presentations that have featured experiential learning and engineering education topics as well as her engineering research in vehicle structural durability and the use of neural networks to model non-linear material behaviour.Schantal Hector, University of Windsor Ms. Hector is currently pursuing her Bachelor's Degree in International Relations and Economics at the University of Windsor. She is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Career Education and has applied her knowledge and skills as part of the project to develop learning outcomes for the cooperative education program over the past two years. She has been instrumental in the collection and statistical analysis of the learning outcomes
Practices and Scalable Scholarship.” Engineering Studies 1: 55-76.21. Little, P. and Cardenas, M. (2001). “Use of ‘Studio’ Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Conference & Exposition.22. Weinstein, R. D., O’Brien, J., Char, E., Yost, J. R., Muske, K. R., Fulmer, H., Wolf, J., and Koffke, W. (2006). “A Multidisciplinary, Hands-on, Freshman Engineering Team Design Project and Competition,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 22:1023 – 1030.23. Downey, G. (2005). “Keynote Lecture: Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology?: From ‘Problem Solving’ to ‘Problem Definition and Solution’,” Engineering Education. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 83(A8): 1-12.24
. ofEducation, 1997.16 Larson, D. et al, “A Holistic Assessment of Writing in Design,” Proceedings - Frontiers inEducation Conference, v 1, Section T2H, 1998, p 231-235.17 Olds, B. M. and Miller, R. L., “Assessing a Course or Project,” How Do You Measure Success, ASEE, 1998, p35 Page 6.717.18– 43.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education18 McMartin, F., McKenna, A. and Youssefi, K. “Establishing the Trustworthiness of Scenario Assignments asAssessment Tools for Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Proceedings
collected as part of a larger NSF-funded project thatexplores the link between motivation and conceptual change.The project participants self-selected by responding to an invitation disseminated to instructorsof the identified courses in a partner institution. Requests for participation were also sent to thefollowing ASEE divisions: Biological & Agricultural Engineering, Chemical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Educational Research & Methods, Electrical & Computer Engineering, EngineeringPhysics, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics, Minorities in Engineering, and Women inEngineering. Recruitment sites were purposefully selected to ensure that instructors from avariety of institutions, and, consequently, teaching and learning experiences
Paper ID #45176Reflective Teaching Practices for Equity-Minded Engineering InstructorsDr. Jay Mann, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Jay Mann is Director of the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education (AE3) in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Mann is a twenty-five-year veteran educator with previous experience as a high school classroom teacher, school administrator, and teacher educator. He is a three-time graduate of the University of Illinois (A.B. in History; M.Ed. in Educational Organization and Leadership; Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction).Dr
Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Towards a Philosophy of Engineering Education LaboratoriesAbstractMost engineering educators agree that laboratories are a key part of the engineering curriculum,but there is less agreement about what labs are to accomplish. This ambiguity may be partiallyattributed to changing views in science more broadly about the role of experimentation andparallel changes in emphasis on lab education throughout the twentieth century. Whenlaboratories are seen as practical necessities, their perceived importance decreases. At present,many are returning to the view that laboratories play a key epistemic role. This paper develops arole for philosophy in understanding the purpose of laboratories. Concepts from
outcomes, international students in engineering, and cognitive sciences. She holds a B.S. in Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair of the Engineering Education Research Program at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024WIP: The Role of Classroom Teaching Practices on the Academic Success ofEngineering College Students with ADHDAbstractAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurological
understanding userinteractions. A virtual teaching assistant can enhance interactions, increase learning efficacy, andserve as a continuous improvement tool for student training. Different endeavors to improve VRtraining have been found in the education literature. Callaghan et al. [8] conducted a study wherethey explored integrating virtual reality, IoT, and voice-driven virtual assistants into remotelaboratories for visualizing electrical phenomena, guiding students through experiments, andproviding teaching resources. The researchers delved into the viability and long-term prospectsof utilizing virtual reality and virtual assistants within this framework. In another study, Chheanget al. [9] introduced generative artificial intelligence (AI) and
highschool girls held by the Center for STEM Education for Girls at the Harpeth Hall School inNashville, TN. In 2013, twenty-eight girls participated in the program. Two-thirds of the girlswere from local public, comprehensive high schools, while the other third attended independentschools in the area. The curriculum was based in both service learning and engineering designwithin a global context. The Lwala Community Alliance of Kenya "hired" the participants towork on two projects. The rising 9th and 10th graders designed a fish pond to enable the Lwalaresidents raise fish to use as a commodity. The rising 11th and 12th graders designed an ovenfor the women of Lwala to bake mandazi in large quantities to use as a commodity fortrade. Participants
et al. [11] conducted a study of gendered interests and careeroutcome expectations in engineering. They found that within engineering programs, the gendergap disappeared in biomedical engineering, where female students expressed strongerassociations with “helping others,” while for electrical and computer engineering, femalestudents expressed less interest and associated the disciplines with “inventing/designing things”[11, p.298].Furthermore, students’ networks of support are also highly uneven. Though networks of support,especially those including family members and friends with disciplinary experience, are crucialto student success, students from underrepresented communities are less likely to have thesenetworks. In their research on
with a different county and must scale and customize their ideas forthe community.Evaporative Cooling (Significantly revised)The evaporative cooling design problem began as an unconstrained opportunity for sophomoresto apply thermodynamic principles. When students struggled because of the inaccessibility ofsuch a broad problem, instructors mentioned that evaporative cooling could be used to keepmedicines cool in situations without electricity. This led to a deterministic high-ceilingedproblem as almost all students used this example as their project. The initial grading rubricemphasized technical aspects, and most students did not integrate sociotechnical context intotheir designs. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to keep vaccines cool
among faculty on the actual purpose oflaboratory [7] [8]. At present, most students have access to laboratory equipment only duringscheduled lab times for 2-3 hours per week and laboratory experiments are one-off procedure“cook-book” modules rather than extended projects [8]. Increases in computing power haveenabled new types of remote-control laboratory equipment accessed from home, smallinexpensive kits that can be shipped to students, and advanced simulation software rather thanhardware experimentation [8] [6].Laboratories have been relatively less studied in the literature than other parts of the engineeringcurriculum and what results exist suggest a potentially negative impact of laboratories on studentepistemology. For example, some
Computing Education Research (CER) to advance personalized learning, specifically within the context of online learning and engagement, educational technologies, curriculum design which includes innovative and equitable pedagogical approaches, and support programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments, such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms. She aims to bring EE and CER into practice.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Lilianny Virguez is a Instructional Assistant Professor at the Engineering Education Department at Uni- versity of Florida. She holds a Masters’ degree in Management Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering
evolving technological landscape. By equipping graduates with a morecomprehensive skill set and deeper understanding of the field, it is hypothesized that they will bebetter positioned to secure higher-paying jobs and contribute more effectively to the economy.Moreover, to gain exposure to modern technologies used in the industry, students need to gettrained with the latest tools and techniques. An extension of the degree program allows thestudents to delve deeper into these modern technologies and gain hands-on experience thatdirectly aligns with industry requirements. To achieve this goal, the addition of specializedcourses and internships into the curriculum will ensure that graduates are well-prepared to enterthe workforce and excel in their
University is a comprehensive Roman Catholic institution founded in 1842 by thefriars of the Order of St. Augustine. The University welcomes students of all faiths and is locatedapproximately 10 miles west of Philadelphia. The University offers a wide variety of degreeprograms through four colleges: the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, the School ofBusiness, the College of Engineering, and the College of Nursing. The College of Engineeringoffers BS and MS programs through its four departments: Civil and Environmental, Chemical,Electrical and Computer, and Mechanical. The College also offers a PhD.The university is described as “more selective” by US News and World Report1. In the Collegeof Engineering, the combined Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT
Paper ID #15756Becoming Boundary Spanning Engineers: Research Methods and Prelimi-nary FindingsProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Office of Global Engineering Programs, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
andlikely future workplace. Our students today are rather different animals than those of just afew decades ago. Admittedly, though, good students can survive our existing prescriptivecurricula and become excellent contributors; but it is reasonable to postulate alternativeapproaches that may increase our STEM population.SummarizingIt is worth reflecting on the ideas of Confucius/Xun Xi in 450 B.C. and striving to placegreater reliance on Project-Based (or ‘experiential’) Learning (PBL):"Tell me, and I will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I will understand."Senior Design projects seem satisfactory for students that survive to become seniors.However, if the whole curriculum could be inverted to offer major ambiguous
Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her research interests include the professional formation of engineers, diversity, inclusion, and equity in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, and leadership. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Statistical Analysis and
Technological Future.23 Making the abstraction of the fundamental ideas in thiscourse more comprehensible to students has the potential for greatly increasing the quantity andquality of students in STEM fields.A curriculum writing team (CWT) of three Algebra I teachers was recruited to develop a set ofLearning Modules (LMs) during the Summer of 2011. These LMs include activities thatscaffold core concepts and provide opportunities to practice skills common to Algebra Icurricula. Each LM contains a sequence of learning and assessment activities, and some of theassessment components are embedded into learning activities. Activities are in the form ofgames or woven into stories and artistic projects in a manner intended to motivate studentengagement and
of Stereotype-Consciousness in Middle Childhood,” Child Dev., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1643–1659, Nov. 2009.[24] A. L. Duckworth, P. D. Quinn, and E. Tsukayama, “What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 439–451, 2012.[25] J. Booher-Jennings, “Learning to label: socialisation, gender, and the hidden curriculum of high-stakes testing,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 2008.[26] A. L. Duckworth, “(Over and) beyond high-stakes testing.,” Am. Psychol., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 279–280, 2009.[27] C. J. Finelli et al., “An Assessment of Engineering Students
Virginia, the TechnologyLeaders Program, provided the case study for this research. This interdisciplinary program consists ofcollaboration between the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Systems Engineering (SIE)departments. It is comprised of a three year curriculum that fosters a learning environment in whichelectrical, computer and systems engineering students collaborate to engage in the designing, prototypingand testing of engineering systems. The value added of a TLP student is grounded in their ability toengage both systems integration and domain-specific engineering work. At the end of the curriculum,graduates should be more able to “design systems requiring the integration of knowledge and skills from”electrical, computer and
engineering work in a global context [20]-[21]. Variousframeworks have attempted to describe such competency demands, often as lists of discreteglobal and technical skills (e.g., [22]-[24]). The framework presented by Jesiek et al. [20] wasdeveloped through a literature search of global engineering case studies, along with interviewsand focus groups with global engineers. The resulting framework describes three dimensions ofglobal engineering competency. Technical coordination refers to the informal management tasksengineers perform in working with others to complete their projects. Understanding andnegotiating engineering cultures describes how engineers must navigate national and culturaldifferences in technical work practices (e.g., taking a more
Paper ID #19530The Philosophical Foundations of Technological and Engineering LiteracyDr. R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University R. Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He
women and minority candidates.4Daempfle found that faculty interaction as well as interactive classroom instruction does have aneffect on retention, though student background and gender influence the extent of these effects.5 Page 12.1277.3Jackson et al. looked at past, present, and future variables of those who persisted and those whodid not persist in engineering majors and found first-year GPA to be the strongest predictor ofpersistence. Other variables (past, present, and future) that also influence persistence, includeSAT scores and self-rating of math ability. Like Daempfle, Jackson et al. also conclude thatpersistence in engineering
Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include graduate education, curriculum development, faculty development, global engineering education, and education policy.Ms. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflective practice. Ms. Soledad has degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, where she continues to be a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering Department. She also served as Department Chair and was a
AC 2009-1142: ASSESSING ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT STUDENTS’PERCEPTION OF ON-LINE LEARNINGErtunga Ozelkan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Ertunga C. Ozelkan, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management and the Associate Director of the Center for Lean Logistics and Engineered Systems (CLLES) at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNC Charlotte). Before joining academia, Dr. Ozelkan worked for i2 Technologies, a leading supply chain software vendor in the capacity of a Customer Service and Curriculum Manager and a Consultant. He also worked as a project manager and a consultant for Tefen Consulting in the area of productivity improvement
positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox also spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Soci- ety of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall
the 16-week course. Responses to threereflective letters (assigned in weeks 2, 9, and 15 of the course) were also collected in whichparticipants were asked specific questions regarding their efforts in establishing learning goals,planning, monitoring, and evaluating their interactions, and setting objectives for the curriculum-building project were also collected. Lastly, the MSLQ was administered online during the Page 10.872.3second week and last week of the course to obtain pre-post measures of self-regulation. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
the objective function coefficients, cj. This will be accomplishedthrough an analysis of surveys received in an earlier phase our project. The results of our data-gathering phase will provide a data point for each educator interviewed that relates a set of inputs(i.e., information about the course, curriculum, educator and student body) to a course syllabus.By aggregating the data, a distribution on the topics in the course syllabus can be derived fromthe given set of inputs. This can then be used to choose a reasonable set of cj values.2.2 Model ExampleConsider the data gathered from the pilot study by Needy, et al.7. In this small study, 27engineering economy educators with varied backgrounds provided information on their coursecontent. A
Undergraduate Programs andAssociate Provost for Academic Services, 2003-06, Associate Provost for UndergraduatePrograms and Academic Services, 1998-2003, TAMU Associate Department Head and GraduateCoordinator, TAMU, 1996-97. TAMU Associate Director of CEMDAS, 1997-98, TAMUDirector of the Program for Automation in Manufacturing, 1991-94, TAMU Associate Director ofNanoFab, 1987-90, Dr. Weichold is currently Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering,his research interest is in Engineering Education in Sustainable Development, Automation inManufacturing, Nano Fabrication. He has revised freshman engineering curriculum to integratetopics in physics, mathematics, and engineering, serve as a Program Evaluator for ElectricalEngineering, and similarly