havedeveloped a new approach for engaging engineering undergraduates in projectsassociated with grand challenges in engineering as outlined by National Academy ofEngineering, World Health, and others. The program was created to developknowledge and skills for engineering design, lifelong learning, multidisciplinaryteamwork, effective communication, applying engineering fundamentals to problemsolving, and appreciating influences of engineering on people.Program DescriptionThe goal of the program is to provide undergraduate students opportunities to addresssignificant interdisciplinary challenges that incorporate elements of some of the mostimportant engineering challenges. They should learn and apply engineering concepts,principles, and approaches in
and Simulation Home Energy Management Scenarios (HEMS) and Assisting in Graphical Interface Design for HEMS • Introduction to Analog-to-Digital Converters • Evaluating Performance and Economics of Wind Farm Siting • Hybrid and Electric vehicles and the charging infrastructureProgram Schedule The Young Scholars are engaged in activities throughout the day that include lectures,research at the library and online resources, projects, industry tours, collaboration with faculty,staff and students. Additionally, YS are coached later in the program on learning how to delivera Perfect Pitch (90 seconds explaining the problem being addressed, how the problem is beingaddressed, and impacts), and how to write and present a research
increased cognitive loadlimits people’s engagement [12], i.e., their attentional and emotional involvement with thetask [13]. This type of engagement is vital for students to innovate [14], [15] and to thinkcreatively [16].Muldner and Burleson [17] showed that students’ engagement differs between low and highcreative students. Likewise, Koch et al., [18] and Eldor and Harpaz [19] reported that workersemploy higher cognitive flexibility, which leads to creative performance when they areengaged. Reid and Solomonides [20] found that engagement and creativity support each otherfor student learning in design. Taken together, stereotype threat might then pose a challengeto creativity performance through distraction and disengagement on the critical task
survey might show improved reliability and/or validity.IntroductionEngineers’ work has wide ranging impacts on communities and individuals, making it imperativethat engineers. Broadly, ethics can be divided into two main foci; micro-ethics, which focuseson an individual’s behavior, and macro-ethics, which focuses more on the social responsibilitiesof the profession as a whole. Creating learning environments in engineering programs is acritical step in developing engineers that practice in ethical ways. There are many challenges forengineering faculty, however, regarding the ethics education of engineering students. Previouswork has highlighted barriers to effective ethics education including a lack of studentengagement, working ethics into
that rests with EWH. The Duke-EWH summer institute is run bythe Director and Assistant Director with 2-3 part-time staff being brought in as needed during thespring and fall. During the summer, an additional 4 US staff and 2 local staff are engaged to live Page 13.531.2and work with the students in their host countries.The Summer ProgramAdequate delivery of medical care often depends on sophisticated technology; technology thatmany underdeveloped countries cannot maintain in good working order. About 60% of donatedequipment in the developing world is not being used. In many hospitals, their problem is notgetting more donated equipment; it is
AC 1998-543: Sustainability in Environmental Engineering EducationM. Wayne Hall,Marilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community College Page 3.524.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 1998 Session 3551 Sustainability in Environmental Engineering Education Marilyn Barger, M. Wayne Hall Civil and Environmental Engineering FAMU-FSU College of EngineeringABSTRACT More than a decade has passed since the Brundtland Commission report, Our CommonFuture, and six years since Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration on Environment andDevelopment
Engineering and Business Administration Raritan Valley Community College, Branchburg, NJAbstractRaritan Valley Community College (RVCC) launched an innovative Engineering-Businessinterdisciplinary project to manufacture a real product for a real customer. The product, a no-battery, “green energy” customizable shake-light, was manufactured by student-workers with theobjective to expose students to a real manufacturing business environment and to fosterinterdisciplinary collaboration and communication. The profits of the business were donated to alocal Food Bank to demonstrate how business can positively impact the community. A furtherobjective of the project was to provide students a genuine hands-on experience to relate
to transmit additional data within communication packets,leveraging the increased bandwidth provided by modern communication infrastructure. Thisincreased dependability provides advantages for IBR dominated systems [6].This context underscores the importance of teaching protection students about the challenges andsolutions when protecting lines fed by IBRs. Engineering students and professionals needhands-on experience with real-world scenarios to understand the impact of IBRs on transmissionprotection and to develop effective solutions. By incorporating realistic laboratory exercises intothe curriculum, students can bridge the gap between theoretical concepts and practical
. The program will limit enrollment to 40 cadets (two sections) for the inaugural class, but it must meet the minimum requirements for the curriculum. • Facility Availability: Extended delays in the construction of the CEAC or the wind tunnels could impact instruction of the first class and impact ABET accreditation. Because ABET evaluation and accreditation require students to have graduated from the program, the initial four student year groups enrolled (2028, 2029, 2030, 2030) will commit to the major on the assumption that the program will be accredited in 2029. The SWOT analysis identified a path forward: the new aerospace program nests withinand leverages existing
Experiences for Students and Teachers project, Learning through Engineering Design and Practice (2007-2011), a National Science Foundation Award# 0737616 from the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings. This project is aimed at designing, implementing, and systematically studying the impact of a middle-school engineering education program. Page 22.208.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Analyzing Subject-Produced Drawings: The use of the Draw-an-Engineer Assessment in ContextIntroductionIn this paper, an example of
which dialogue is exchanged.Since the current elements under investigation take place within an LMS arena, it should beexpected that a virtual community is created. To identify as a virtual community, the group’ssocial interaction with peers, such as the interaction that takes place during a peer review event,takes place virtually. At times, people tend to gravitate to others with similar interests, but that isnot a requirement of a peer event. Hence, elements of a course should be designed in such a wayas to “provoke the kinds of thoughtful engagement that helps students develop effective thinkingskills and attitudes that contribute to effective problem solving and critical thinking,”(2) (p. 889).Therefore, using a social constructivist
significant changes, particularly in the wayengineering schools are adopting problem-based instruction to meet the changing demands ofpractice. Increasingly, engineering schools are requiring students to work on team projects that areopen-ended with loosely specified requirements, produce professional-quality reports andpresentations, consider ethics and the impact of their field on society, and develop lifelonglearning practices. While there exist numerous implementations of courses adopting these methodsto purportedly improve student learning, measuring the impact of problem-based instructionremains challenging. The existing evidence generally suffers from methodological shortcomingssuch as reliance on students’ self-reported perceptions of
Paper ID #30781Integrating Asset-based Practices, Engineering, and NGSS: Lessons fromWorking with Teachers through a Community-focused ApproachDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frame- works and Chicano Cultural Studies to investigate and analyze existing deficit models in engineering education. Dr. Mejia’s work also examines how asset-based models impact the validation and recognition of students and
, described in detail in this paper, was first piloted in an Engineering Design course atNortheastern University (NU) in 2004. Informal feedback was obtained on its effectiveness as asupplemental teaching and classroom engagement method; the students’ responses wereencouraging and enlightening. Following collaboration on the details, procedures, and protocol,the OME was adopted in a first-year Introduction to Engineering Design course at ThePennsylvania State University (Penn State, PSU), during Spring 2005, where more formal datawas collected. The student feedback from Penn State was both positive and informative. PennState outcomes show that 93% of the students agreed that they felt more aware of engineeringissues because of OME and over 82% found
studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing an Instrument to Measure Engineering Education Research Self-EfficacyAbstractThis research paper focuses on the design and development of a survey instrument to measureengineering education research self-efficacy (EERSE), or the self-perceived ability to conductresearch in the area of engineering education. A total of 28 items were initially written to measurethis construct along three dimensions: general research tasks such as synthesizing literature andpresenting research findings at a conference (12 items
of the EOP framework is to help guide the curricularchanges needed to ensure that every engineer has the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed forsustainable engineering practice. The framework consists of 43 core outcomes centered aroundthe concept of systems thinking. The framework is grouped into nine subcategories of systemsthinking, communication and teamwork, environmental literacy, responsible business andeconomy, social responsibility, environmental impact measurement, materials choice, design,and critical thinking.The ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria (CEPC) requires that students be able to “includeprinciples of sustainability in design.” Furthermore, ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomesincludes several outcomes related to
the subject is to choose the twowhich are the same as the model. The MRT is a timed test where speed and accuracy are bothimportant.Intervention vectorsSorby, et al did a significant amount of work evaluating the types of activities pre-collegestudents should be engaging in to improve their baseline spatial abilities by the time they reachundergraduate level. Most of the activities involved hand-eye coordination. Specifically, theyfound that the freshmen that were arriving on campus with higher spatial skills benefitted from: (1) Playing with construction toys as a young child; (2) Participating in classes such as shop, drafting, or mechanics as a middle school or secondary student; (3) Playing 3-D computer games; (4
Candidate and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fel- low in the Purdue University Engineering Education Program. As an undergraduate student at the Univer- sity of Nevada, Reno (UNR), Justin completed Bachelor’s degrees in both Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education with an informal emphasis in engineering education. Through his in- volvement in the UNR PRiDE Research Lab and engagement with the UNR and Northern Nevada STEM Education communities, he studied student motivation, active learning, and diversity; developed K-12 engineering education curriculum; and advocated for socioeconomically just access to STEM education. As a Ph.D. Candidate with the STRiDE Research Lab at Purdue
Student Learning, in The Impact of Pen-based Technology on Edcuation: Vignettes, Evaluations, and Future Directions, D.A. Berque, J.C. Prey, and R.H. Reed, Editors. 2006, Purdue University Press: West Lafayette, IN.10. Mock, K., Teaching with Tablet PCS. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2004. 20(1): p. 17-27.11. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. 2003, New York, NY: The Free Press.12. Rogers, J.W. and Cox, J.R., Integrating a Single Tablet PC in Chemistry, Engineering, and Physics Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 2008. 37(3): p. 34-39.13. Sneller, J., The Tablet PC Classroom: Erasing Borders, Stimulating Activity, Enhancing Communication, in 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in
next steps. These adjustments are driven by our reflection ofwhat, precisely, is our revolution, and how our project team is adapting to accelerate progress onthe pathway to reach the revolution.Where Have We Been?—Background on ASU RED projectOur focus is to empower faculty and students to become risk-takers and innovation leaders. Byencouraging risk-taking, we create an environment that rewards experimentation and enablesfaculty and students to become passionate about their work. The project leverages an additiveinnovation mindset [1] by using a mode of collaboration where participants in a community are:1) inspired by shared artifacts/ideas, 2) openly share (and learn about) the technology andprocess used to create these artifacts/ideas, 3
cognitive theoryspeaks to the role of academic self-efficacy in persistence in that students with low self-efficacyare more likely to withdraw or disengage from their domain (major)3. On the other hand, thosewho have high self-efficacy are much more likely to remain engaged and exert effort in order tobe successful at completing a task or tasks associated with the course of study3. In thisinvestigation, we use a self-efficacy scale that has been designed to measure efficacy in theacademic environment. The academic self-efficacy (ASE) scale is part of the MotivatedStrategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) developed, extensively refined, and heavily usedby Pintrich et al.4 to assess motivational orientations and learning strategies used by
developed and teaches CEVE/GLHT 314: Sustainable Water Purification for the Developing World, a project-based course on sustainable strategies for safe water supply in low-income and developing regions of the world. He col- laborates in other project-based courses at Rice, such as Introduction to Engineering Design, advising undergraduate students in the development of water-related projects. He also works with Rice’s Center for Civic Leadership in the development of activities to promote student community engagement, such as Alternative Spring Breaks and summer experiences with water-related NGOs in Mexico. Jorge’s previous research and teaching experience as a postdoctoral scholar and professor fall within the areas of
Sustainability. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Comprehensive Study on The Effectiveness of Active Learning Techniques in Remote Learning ClassesAbstractSince COVID-19 was declared as a pandemic in March 2020, the world as we know it has changed.Most academic institutions in the U.S. have switch to fully online or remote classes. This abruptchange has left both the instructors and students with a lot of challenges to face, with the mostconcerning of them all is being able to fully focus and actively engage in a remote classroom. Oneof the ways to help students in a remote online classroom is incorporating
studies in engineering.The belonging questions are modeled after the Sense of Belonging questions asked on theNational Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). NSSE is a national survey administeredannually to first-year and graduating seniors enrolled at four-year colleges and universities acrossthe country. The instrument measures how undergraduate students spend their time and asksthem to rate the quality of their experiences. The Sense of Belonging questions were initiallyadded to the instrument in 2020 and have since been tested successfully for strong reliability andvalidity [41].As part of the survey, students will be asked demographic questions including race/ethnicity andsex. To mirror institutional data in the analysis phase, we utilized
educational technology innovations that enable Java-DSP (J-DSP) [1] to beused in 4 courses at 5 different universities. The project tasks consist of the following:a) educational innovation that upgrades the J-DSP GUI,b) a software development task to extend the mathematical and signal processing functionality of J-DSP,c) a comprehensive on-line laboratory exercise development task engaging all the Co-PIs at the different universities,d) a dissemination and assessment plan that involves five universities which committed to testing and providing feedback on the new J-DSP GUI and all exercises and content,e) a comprehensive pilot test of a new multi-site laboratory concept that allows students in the five universities to run real time
and facultyperspectives from the 2007-08 course projects. These surveys were designed to establish abaseline for the project and used selected questions from the UW-Madison campus’ NationalSurvey of Student Engagement, Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey(APPLES), and Educational Benchmarking, Inc (EBI). While these assessment data have notbeen significant in determining impact on the desired outcomes, it has identified those courses, inand outside of the initiative that are contributing to the goals of the EB2. For example, surveyresults indicate that students found a number of courses outside of specific EB2 funded projectsalso contributed to their development of the EB2 specific project course goals.At regular intervals
AC 2010-1333: A PRACTICE LEARNING OF ON-BOARD DIAGNOSIS (OBD)IMPLEMENTATIONS WITH EMBEDDED SYSTEMSYu-Wei Huang, National Changhua University of EducationJieh-Shian Young, National Changhua University of EducationChih-Hung Wu, Chienkuo Technology UniversityHsing-Jung Li, National Chung Cheng University Page 15.75.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Practice Learning of On-Board Diagnosis (OBD) Implementations with Embedded SystemsABSTRACTThis study presents the impact of embedded system on the development of on-boarddiagnostics (OBD) implemented by engineering students. The engineering students needprofessional skills in
developing their skills from day one. Instructors communicated that the questions in the oral assessment would be linked to the content of the in-class activities. They tried to dispel the notion that authentic assessment equates to random questions, reassuring students that they would not ask questions that were completely out of the blue. Similarly, they communicated that there would be high, but achievable expectations for students so there was motivation for students to engage in the process of building their skills. tudents were also given several opportunities to practice with instructors. During office hours,Sstudents had the option to come in for a “mock” oral
purpose of integrating theory with practice, students derivedmany other advantages3, 4, 12, 14, 15, 18, 25, 33, 37 from participating in cooperative educationprograms, which may be optional in some of the academic institutions where they are offered.Some of these advantages include the development of social skills, engagement in teamwork,improvement of communication skills, enhancement and greater clarity of future career goals,salary advantage, and the development of practical skills.An Interpretation of Work Based Learning in the Context of InterdisciplinarityA curriculum inclusive of a cooperative education strategy could be interpreted as aninterdisciplinary program5, 26, 31 where the work place learning experience is conceptually viewedas
cihub.orgas well as an initial online attitudinal survey including items related to community andbelonging, engineering identity scales, emotional affect ratings, professional role confidencesurvey items, selected Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES)categories, and selected measures of student engagement borrowed from the National Survey ofStudent Engagement (NSSE)11, 17–24. The intermediate qualitative stage included observationalfieldnotes of lectures as well as recitation sections throughout the semester, and one-on-one Page 23.856.9interviews with eleven focal students conducted during weeks 11 and 12 of the 16