much moreoften than women. Figure 5 shows that 61.1% of men visit a makerspace once or twice per week,compared with only 41.4% of women who do the same. Men are generally more comfortable 3Dprinting on campus than women, as shown in Figure 6.Figure 1: Pre-college 3D Printing Experience for Men and Women Figure 2: How Students Learn to 3D Print in CollegeThe average comfort level with 3D printing reported by men is 8.4/10.0 while on average, womenreport 7.5/10.0. The most uncomfortable man rates themselves at a 4.0/10.0 while the most un-comfortable woman rates themselves at a 2.0/10.0. Interestingly, when looking at comfort levelversus student year, as shown in Figure 8, the average comfort level is high for all class years andis over 8.0
. Disseminating: The historic contribution of women in general and to the STEM disciplines, particularly, which they deemed exciting and motivating. The idea was to spread the importance of women participating in STEM to the community. 4. Sharing: With their peers organizing the event as workshop collaborators. Also, sharing knowledge and experience acquired in each of their training areas to a younger community.Concerning the above, Danny, a university collaborating student, commented, "Thanks to theposter session of the meeting, I learned about a paleontology pioneer, Mary Anning, which mademe connect and extrapolate the biological sciences with the study of creatures that have been onearth for millions of
: Gender and identity formation of engineering students,” in Proceedings of 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2008, pp. 1–3.[33] X.-Y. Du, “Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 35–42, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1080/03043790500430185.[34] A. Godwin and G. Potvin, “Pushing and pulling Sara: A case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 439–462, 2017, doi: 10.1002/tea.21372.[35] J. Jorgenson, “Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technical work,” Manag
, the precision of our investigationwill improve. For example, written responses from trainees attribute the inclusive nature of theNRT program to the small size of cohort groups, the leadership style, and the opportunity toconnect with peers and professionals from diverse academic and ethnic backgrounds. Next year’ssurvey could ask in more detail about these factors. Sampling from subsequent generations ofNRT cohorts will also help us develop a larger database, allowing us to produce more solidevidence to support conclusions.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT)program (NSF grant # 1828571).References[1] “Digest of Education Statistics, 2019,” nces.ed.gov.https://nces.ed.gov
to obtain a job. Many faced personal/discriminatory interviewquestions, biases, and assumptions about what they could or could not do, in addition to beingsubjected to explicit discouragement and gender discrimination. The paper offersrecommendations for addressing these issues as well as further areas of research to pursue. Bybringing to light the issues surrounding females entering engineering professions in Qatar, thisstudy offers a contribution to women’s role and empowerment in the region.IntroductionWhile attracting women to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fieldshas been a steady concern in Western countries, female students across the Arab world aredominating most STEM educational programs [1-2]. Engineering
to help students contextualize Ada Lovelace in time [34]. Do not spend more than 15 minutes orienting students regarding historical events as this subject could take up endless time. 2. (1 hour) Have students watch (as homework or during a dedicated session) the BBC’s 2015 documentary, “Calculating Ada: The Countess of Computing” (59 minutes) [35- 36]. a. During the documentary, have students take notes on what they find strange / interesting / revealing about Ada Lovelace and her contributions to the history of computer science. 3. (50 minutes) During the next class session, or immediately after screening the documentary if there is time during
13,289 39.2% 20.2% Karolinska Institutet 17,484 75.2% 16.0% University of California, Berkeley 21,991 59.5% 8.7%1 “Collab” is the abbreviation of collaborations, similarly hereinafter.UIC intensity is measured by the percentage of UIC publications in the total number ofpublications of a university indexed in the WoS (%UIC), and a different list of universitiesemerges (Table 3). The use of the UIC intensity generated different results from those basedon UIC publications. Most of the Chinese universities leading in UIC productivity disappearfrom the top 10 list in terms of UIC intensity, except China University of Petroleum Beijing.This implies that this university performs relatively
knowledge was broughtinto and out of a hackathon and did not address the process in which students worked on projects(La Place et al., 2017).MethodsTo extend the previous knowledge transfer work and software development work, we offer thefollowing research questions: 1. What technical knowledge do students use in capstones and hackathons? 2. Where do students learn the knowledge used in capstones and hackathons? 3. How does the software development process used by students differ between capstone and hackathon projects?This is a qualitative pilot study meant to fuel future research on knowledge transfer betweenhackathons and academic experiences. The nature of hackathons often results in participantsdesigning and developing a project
to complete and understand the necessary courseworkthis is required in engineering, whereas if a male student fails a course he views it as he needs towork harder for next time. This lack of confidence in female students causes them to leave themajor17.In keeping with the above considerations, a study was undertaken at this university with thefollowing goals (1) to find the factors that help recruit women engineering students, (2) toidentify the challenges and barriers being faced by female students working in multidisciplinarynon-female dominated teams engaged in project-based learning activity18, (3) to find acorrelation between their experiences and their underrepresentation and/or retention in theengineering field. The overarching goal
Support from the Theories of Liberatory Pedagogy and IntersectionalityI. IntroductionWithin conversations on broadening participation in engineering, there is a longstandingrecognition of the need for and importance of institutional support for students fromunderrepresented demographic groups [1]. This support comes from many sources, such asinstitutional offices, programmatic initiatives, and informal mentoring by faculty and peers. Keyinstitutional programmatic interventions include bridge programs, recruitment incentives,scholarship support, and safe space communities for marginalized and underrepresented identitygroups. These initiatives act as a front line for addressing diversity and equity in engineering.Their importance has been
University of Michigan-Dearborn Advancement ofTeaching and Learning Fund and the NSF Award #1245036 Collaborative Education: Building aSkilled V&VF Community. We would like to thank Ms. Raminderdeep Randhawa who workedas Research Assistant on this project and Ms. Navin Tama who worked as a Graduate StudentInstructor for the fall 2016 offering of CIS 375. They gave generously of their time and energy tothis project.Bibliography1. Branch R. (2010): Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, Springer, 2010.2. Ardis, M., Chenoweth, S. and Young, F. (2008): “The ‘Soft’ Topics in Software Engineering Education”, Proceedings of 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (Vol. 1, Oct 2008), IEEE Press, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2008, pp. F3H1
Ohio Northern University, where he teaches courses in general engineering and in the thermal sciences. He received a B.S.M.E. degree from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees, both in mechanical engineering, from the University of Notre Dame. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Incorporating Microprocessors across the Mechanical Engineering CurriculumAbstractEngineering has been and continues to be a highly cross-disciplinary field. The growth ofmechatronics and robotics has served to increase the demand for students with skillsets frommultiple traditional fields (joining electrical, computer, and mechanical engineering
described as the inclination towards entrepreneurial activities,learning to deal with uncertainties and changes, and the drive towards pursuing innovation. Anexample of entrepreneurial mindset in a company would be the following indicators:1) Seeking opportunities to solve problems for customers in a company,2) Focusing on creating value for customers3) Engaging the marketplace by being in contact with customers, and suppliers.A study [4] into how the KEEN framework helps build interest in developing entrepreneurialmindset in engineering classroom, and its impact on student learning outcomes, revealed thatKEEN-focused online discussions helped build technical interest in the topic, encouragedstudents to formulate questions, explore alternatives
in an Introductory Circuits CourseIntroductionThere are increasingly frequent calls to incorporate reflection into engineering education. Muchof the focus has been on the use of reflection in teaching design.1, 2 However, there have alsobeen efforts to incorporate reflective practices into courses which are not specifically focused ondesign. If we are able to incorporate reflection into what “the students learn engineering tobe”3—meaning, the engineering science courses which make up the vast majority of mostundergraduate curricula—reflection is expected to contribute to learning outcomes and students’development of metacognitive and social skills.4Because exams are generally used for formative assessment, they are rarely also leveraged as
if it’s for the better than okay • It is relatively easy to follow the homework structure. The most difficult part is the estimation. We do not have the same experiences to give a general answer before the solution • Just time consuming • The given and find portions are easy but the plan and estimation seem tedious and don’t provide understanding of the topics.2. What do you think about the structure of handwritten problems overall? (Circle all that apply. Add comments to back up your answers.) 1 responded to: That is my approach on every problem 8 responded to: It forces me to be more organized 3 responded to: I make fewer mistakes since all
curriculum [4, p. 151], [5] by integrating makingactivities into the curriculum to expose students to design activities and experiential learningtechnology [3]. The term “making” today covers a broad set of activities from differentdisciplines, highlighting the innumerable opportunities for interdisciplinary work [1]. Sheridan etal. [6] defined making activities as creative production in art, science and engineering, wherepeople of all ages blend digital and physical technologies to explore ideas, learn technical skillsand create new products.Integrating making activities in engineering schools’ curriculum engages students inexperimental learning opportunities through the creation of physical or digital objects and byproviding access to
educators andstudents are frequently challenged by various dominant images of global engineering educationthat originated in the United States (e.g., student-centered, active learning, problem-solvingskills). When they are improving their curriculum and instruction in engineering, it is nearlyimpossible that they can escape from responding to these global forms of engineering education.In general, this paper should be of particular interest to comparative education scholars,international engineering educators, and education policymakers with a global focus. Dominant Images and Global Engineering EducationEngineering studies scholars Gary Downey and Juan Lucena have challenged the traditionalview of culture that defines culture as
spent time in industry holding technical and operations-based roles and has experience with outreach projects focused on STEM education and mentoring.Tina L. Fletcher, University of Pennsylvania Tina L. Fletcher holds a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science and African American Studies from the University of Arkansas and a Master’s degree in Secondary Teacher Education from Harvard University. She served as a U.S. Government teacher at Anacostia Senior High School in Washington, D.C. where she was named the 2010 Teacher of the Year. She then served as a fundraiser and successfully raised over $20 million for President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign in addition to raising over $300 thousand for St. Jude
. The CFA resulted in three goodness of fit statistics, which tell us how well the proposedmodel captures the covariance between the factors in the study. The Root Mean Square Error ofApproximation (RMSEA) is an absolute fit index based on chi-squared, degrees of freedom andthe sample size. A RMSEA of 0 indicates a perfect fit. It is generally accepted to use <= 0.08 asthe cutoff for a moderate fit. The Comparative Fit Index (CFI) is a comparative fit index basedon chi-squared and degrees of freedom. A CFI of 1 indicates a perfect fit. A CFI of >= 0.95indicates a good fit. The Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) is also a comparative fit index based on chi-squared. TLI is similar to CFI in that a TLI of 1 indicates a perfect fit, and a TLI of >
-Wildwood-retests-site-/article_b00aa7fa-9b24-5e0b-991d-6b6437289763.html[52] J. H. Wolf, “Waste pit world’s only source of rare toxic pollutant,” United Press International. Jan. 27, 1983.[Online]. Available: https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/01/27/Waste-pit-worlds-only-source-of-rare-toxic -pollutant/2882412491600/[53] A. Hurley, “Floods, rats and toxic waste: Allocating environmental hazards since World War II,” in Commonfields: An environmental history of St. Louis. St. Louis: Missouri Historical Society Press, 1997, pp. 241-262.[54] Ecology and Environment, “Technical study and remedial action for Denny Farm site 1, Aurora, Missouri:Final report,” Sept. 15, 1980. [Online]. Available: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/9101Q6WZ.PDF?Dockey
meet desired needs within realistic constraints suchas economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” (Software Engineering Self-Study Report, p. 34). As such, this demands that theprogram provide “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context” as well as “a knowledge ofcontemporary issues” (Software Engineering Self-Study Report, p.34). However, neither of themajors provide students the space within their majors for coursework in elective areas that mightbetter support knowledge in these outside areas beyond the 15 hours of general educationrequirements. The approved technical electives
of Kinetic Energy munitions during initiallaunch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer workingfor DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution tothe M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 yearappointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Followingthese accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in thesecond gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both airand ground. His team deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and thenagain in 2006
stated as a reason for leaving engineering; the difficultyof the material was often compounded by attitudes and quality of instruction. Tyson [7]considers “Academic Integration” as a key factor in degree attainment, with academicintegration reflected in a sequence of classes- Physics I and II and Calculus I, II, and III.Zhang, et al. [8] considered the relative importance of 20 core science and math coursestaken by engineering majors, finding that grades in only 6 of them were significantpredictors of retention. It is interesting that the course that they found to have the highestpredictive value was General Chemistry 1 Lab, which is not a subject strongly associatedwith advanced topics in mechanical engineering. Indeed, one of the major
impact of thethree-semester sequence on development of an entrepreneurial mindset in the CDS capstonedesign experience.Three Semester Course SequenceA brief description of the three course sequence is provided below. Details on the learningobjectives, session-by-session class schedule, and assessment of technical dimensions of thelearning objectives were previously described in [5] and are not repeated here except asnecessary to describe those features associated with an entrepreneurial mindset.The capstone design sequence for CDS students consists of three courses: Introduction toProjects, Competition Projects 1, and Competition Projects 2, as shown on the BSME flowchartin Figure 1. Introduction to Projects runs during the Spring semester and
University (WSU) faculty for 36 years and for the past 27 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research and technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. He was also the recent recipient of the inaugural 2016 Innovation in Teaching Award given to one WSU faculty member per year.Dr. Olusola Olalekan Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Professor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology
classrooms. Flipped and alternative classroom models have gainedin popularity in recent years and while the engineering classrooms in higher education havelagged behind their non-STEM colleagues in this process, the trend has continued to gaintraction over the last decade [1]. Adoption of alternative course models is due in part to thepromise that the flipped classroom design holds for engineering faculty to find a compromisebetween the long-venerated lecture format and the research-based instructional practices ofactive learning. In its idealized form, the flipped design allows instructors to maintain delivery ofcritical theoretical and background information by presenting this material to the students outsideof the formal classroom setting, thus
test.Didactics and Team BuildingThe descriptions provided on the three pages above are lengthy, but they were needed to pointout the enormous scope of this real-world shop-floor problem. In most semesters, students metfor a 1-hr noon planning session on one day, and a 3 or 4 hr work session on another afternoon.All student teams visited a recycling center at least 3 times — the early groups to observe prac-tices in place and plan how to better the flow — and the latter groups to check table installationand throughput and staff and employee acceptance.Their professor, a Registered Professional Engineer, would demonstrate how he followed aschematic to wire in a particular component. He emphasized neatness and double checking. Thenhe would leave and let
humans’enjoyment of scientific discovery. We provide here a process to invigorate the interest ofAmerica’s talented students in science degrees via a community outreach program with one’slocal science museum.We address this critical need to recruit students into STEM programs by (1) building robustaffect-informed support for their knowledge construction during immersion experiences with alocal science museum and (2) engaging them in teams in the development of smart phoneapplications relevant to science exhibits, in a formal course at a university.We have recruited 66 above-average high school students over the past two years, thanks to agrant to our local science museum (MODS, or the Museum of Discovery and Science, Ft.Lauderdale, FL) by a major
their teachers for a night of fun STEM workshops and activities. CPP students’ reflectionsand students’ engagement in the activities for more than a single term suggested thatundergraduate students were positively affected in their involvement with the program. K-12parents and teachers were enthusiastic about the program and were excited to meet with CPPengineering students. The results will be used to expand the program to reach more K-12students, and it will be the basis for a sustainable outreach program that will allow CPPengineering students to apply their technical knowledge while servicing the community. Thispaper describes the details of the service learning outreach-retention program designed for CPPengineering students.Background on
Engineering and MS in Environmental Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She previously served as a project manager at a water resources center, but returned to the University of Arkansas to teach general introduction to engineering and to coordinate the Freshman Honors Innovation Experience.Mr. Clint E Johnson, University of Arkansas Clint Johnson is the Director of the Supply Chain Management Research Center and the Director of the McMillon Innovation Studio as well as an instructor at the University of Arkansas. Clint’s back ground focuses mainly on developing strategies for innovating and implementing large scale retail focused initiatives, specifically as it relates to the blending of the online and brick and