AC 2012-3083: MOTIVATING STUDENTS TO LEARN PROGRAMMINGUSING GAME ASSIGNMENTSDr. Rajeev K. Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University Rajeev Agrawal is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Electronics, Computer, and Information Technology at North Carolina A&T State University.Dr. Zachary Kurmas, Grand Valley State University Zachary Kurmas is an Associate Professor at Grand Valley State University. He teaches primarily CS 1, CS 2, and computer architecture.Dr. Venkat N. Gudivada, Marshall University Venkat N. Gudivada is a professor of computer science at Marshall University, Huntington, W.V. He re- ceived his Ph.D. degree in computer science from the University of Louisiana, Lafayette. His current
Paper ID #8993Execution of Remote laboratory with Learning Management SystemDr. Abul K. M. Azad, Northern Illinois University Abul K. M. Azad is a Professor with the Technology Department of Northern Illinois University. He has a Ph.D. in Control and Systems Engineering and M.Sc. and B.Sc. in Electronics Engineering. He has been in academics for 15+ years, and his research interests include remote laboratories, mechatronic systems, mobile robotics, and educational research. In these areas, Dr. Azad has over 100 refereed journal and conference papers, edited books, and book chapters. So far, he has attracted around $1.7M of
as apart of a curriculum. The first part of the paper will address these issues and will suggest acoordinated approach so that there will be a viable remote laboratory infrastructure with ahigh degree of acceptance.The author has a number of federal research and institutional grants and has developedInternet accessible remote laboratory facilities. These facilities have features like use ofsingle computer for accessing multiple experiments, manipulating experimental setup fromremote locations, integrated assessment, and real-time learning management features. Thedeveloped facilities have used for delivering a number of laboratory courses, while gatheringdata in terms of achieving learning outcomes and assessing the effectiveness of the
Engineering and Computer Science at Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz.. His areas of interest are systems and control, global learning, and engineering pedagogy.Dr. Sheryl L. Howard, Northern Arizona University Page 25.486.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 ECE Curriculum Improvement to Incorporate Global LearningI. introductionTraditional Electrical Engineering curricula include courses in the fundamentals of electrical engi-neering, senior elective courses in specialized topics, and a capstone senior project. Labs providestudents with experience in hardware and software
AC 2012-3187: SERVICE LEARNING: ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY UN-DERGRADUATE DESIGN PROJECTSDr. Steven F. Barrett, University of Wyoming Steven F. Barrett, Ph.D., P.E., received a B.S. in electronic engineering technology from the University of Nebraska, Omaha, in 1979, a M.E.E.E. from the University of Idaho at Moscow in 1986, and a Ph.D. from the University of Texas, Austin, in 1993. He was formally an active duty faculty member at the U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado, and is now professor of electrical and computer engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Programs, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wyoming. He is a member of IEEE (senior) and Tau Beta Pi (Chief Faculty Advisor). His research
AC 2012-4057: TEACHING CIRCUIT THEORY COURSES USING TEAM-BASED LEARNINGDr. Robert O’Connell, University of Missouri, Columbia Robert O’Connell received a B.E. degree in electrical engineering from Manhattan College, N.Y., and a M.S. and Ph.D degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana. He is currently professor and Associate Department Head of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Missouri, Columbia. He recently completed a Fulbright Fellowship, which he used to study modern teaching and learning methods in higher education. He won the College of Engineering Faculty Teaching Excellence Award in 2006 and 2010. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE, a Professional Member of
engineering program. He has served as an ABET Program Evaluator for software engineer- ing, computer engineering, and computer science, and is currently a member of the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. Page 25.1257.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Teaching Software Engineering: An Active Learning ApproachAbstractSoftware Engineering is a core component of many computer engineering programs. Insoftware engineering courses, students are taught to apply their programming anddevelopment skills to solve a larger scale problem. The resolution of this problem involvesthe
part-timeappointments) are increasingly recruited to staff critical courses. However, conflicting class andpersonnel schedules are a real barrier to maintaining high quality instruction. Blended learningstructures offer a solution to this problem.At our university the course Chemical Materials Science is usually taught as a traditional lecturecourse which meets 4 days per week. During the Fall 2008 quarter, the course was taught in ablended lecture/distance learning format. This format, formed to accommodate the schedule ofthe available adjunct instructor, met once per week for a lecture/discussion session. Theremainder of the course information was presented via recorded online lectures and other onlinefeatures via the Blackboard™ website
AC 2010-484: PROBLEM-BASE LEARNING OF MULTI-CORE PROGRAMMINGWei Zhang, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale Page 15.983.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Problem-Base Learning of Multicore Programming Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Southern Illinois University Carbondale Carbondale, IL 629011. Introduction The computer industry is rapidly moving towards the multicore processors.Manycore processors have been widely used in all computing domains, including desktop,server and embedded computing systems. A multicore processor combines two or
issue with using Maple for the platform for the worksheets. In fact, onestudent commented, “This was my first experience using maple and I found it easy to use andunderstand. It was extremely helpful.”. The only real issue with using Maple was that it wasonly available on-campus, so many students who work from home did not have access to it.Student computer labs are open 24/7, so this would not be seen as a limiting factor in the future.In the next implementation of the worksheets, timing will be critical to assess. Comments, suchas the following, reiterate this importance. “I feel that these tutorials were very helpful in refreshing the concepts that we have previously learned. I think that they would be very beneficial when
improve the effectiveness of teaching as well asstudents’ performance 2-3. The illustrations, such as would be found in a textbook become activewhen the user manipulates the controls provided. This new level of engagement moves thelearner from a passive to an active role, with the potential for more enthusiastic involvement inthe learning process, as well as independent integration of concepts to be learned in the course4-10 .There are a number of visualization tools already available for AC systems and electricalmachines. These cover a broad range of subject material where the depth of coverage varies andis usually specialized. Many of the computer applications available are rather advanced forintroductory courses or are narrowly specialized
, “Learning and understanding key concepts of electricity,” in Connecting research in physics education with teacher education, A. Tiberghien, L. Jossem, and J. Barojas, Eds. 1998.[2] A. H. Johnstone, “Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 7, pp. 75–83, 1991.[3] P. Licht, “Teaching electrical energy, voltage and current: An alternative approach,” Phys. Educ., vol. 26, pp. 272–277, Sep. 1991.[4] G. Biswas, D. Schwartz, B. Bhuva, S. Brophy, T. Balac, and T. Katzlberger, “Analysis of student understanding of basic AC concepts,” 1998.[5] G. Biswas, D. L. Schwartz, B. Bhuva, J. Bransford, D. Holton, A. Verma, and J. Pfaffman, “Assessing problem
Paper ID #37932Towards Goal-Oriented Experiential Learning forCybersecurity ProgramsEman Hammad (Assistant Professor) Dr. Eman Hammad is a cybersecurity professional & interdisciplinary professional focusing on trustworthy & resilient complex systems and emerging technologies. She obtained her PhD in Electrical & Computer Engineering from the University of Toronto. Dr. Hammad is an is an assistant professor with Texas A&M University - Commerce. She combines practical experience and theoretical research to shape her vision for resilient-by-design solutions in the connected world. She is the
AC 2007-1550: VISUAL LEARNING IN A MATERIAL/ENERGY BALANCE CLASSRichard Zollars, Washington State University Dr. Zollars is a professor in, and director of, the School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado. He has been teaching engineering for 28 years. His interests are colloidal/interfacial phenomena, reactor design and engineering education.Christopher Hundhausen, Washington State University Dr. Hundhausen is an assistant professor of computer science in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University. Director of the Visualization and End User
AC 2008-1407: LEARNING ANALOG ELECTRONICS THROUGHPROJECT-BASED INVESTIGATION OF FM COMMUNICATION CIRCUITSOscar Ortiz, LeTourneau University Oscar Ortiz, MS, Oscar Ortiz is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 2002. He received his B.S.E.E. from the state university of West Virginia at Morgantown and his M.S. degree from Northeastern University at Boston, Ma. Prior to joining the faculty at LeTourneau he was involve in several voice and data communication companies. His professional interests include digital signal processing, analog and digital communications. Email: oscarortiz@letu.eduPaul Leiffer
privately held company located in Tampa, Florida. In 2006, Thomas Richter moved to the Multimedia Center for "New Media in Education and Research" of the TU-Berlin, extending the development and integration work on virtual laboratories. Since 2007, he holds a position at the Computing Center RUS of the Stuttgart University. Page 13.1322.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 User Adaptive Interactive Courses in SCORM Compliant Learning Management SystemsAbstractTraditional on-line courses are static: Unaware of the learner, they present the same content toevery
(11) as documented in theresults section.ResultsFifteen students of Transportation Engineering classes of 2003 learned and used the computerprogram for not only analyzing the existing conditions of the highways but also for optimizingthe design. A confidential survey was conducted using the questionnaire shown in Table 1.Questions 5 through 10 were evaluated by students. These evaluations were checked against theircombined scores in the mid and final examinations with and without the use of the computerprogram. The differences were not statistically significant as shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows 5Performance Indices (PI) of the computer program. Table 4 shows the improved scores on thefive performance indices due to the usage of the computer
, programmer, and the software development platform in oneplace, this allows the students to develop microcontroller-based systems without using additionaltools. CodeWarrior is a powerful tool for program development and debugging. The basicfeatures of it can be learned in a short time. The microcontroller module is a complete singleboard computer that the students can use directly in their projects. The form factor for the moduleis smaller enough that the projects become truly embedded systems. The project board comeswith a programmer that can flash the microcontroller (9S12C32), in addition to its prototyping Page 13.58.8capabilities. This kit is an
2006-1411: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANINTERNETWORKING REMOTE ACCESS LABORATORYShelton Houston, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Houston is a professor in the School of Computing at the University of Southern Mississippi teaching in the Information Technology program. He is in his 26th year at the university and has 10 years of consulting experience in personal computer systems. His current research interest is in cryogenic-instrumentation.Christopher Herrod, University of Southern Mississippi Mr. Herrod is an Instructor in the School of Computing at the University of Southern Mississippi. He has a M.S. from the University of Southern Mississippi and has 10 years of
2006-2158: PROMOTING ACTIVE LEARNING IN TEACHING THEORGANIZATION OF PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES COURSEJun Luo, Ohio Northern University Jun Luo is currently an assistant professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department at Ohio Northern University. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Computer Science from Beijing University of Technology, Tsinghua University, and University of Florida in 1994, 1997, and 2002, respectively. His teaching interests are in data structures and algorithms, databases, compilers, and organization of programming languages.Robert Hovis, Ohio Northern University Robert A. Hovis has a Ph.D. in mathematics from Ohio State University and
Paper ID #7142An Associative Based Approach to Analyzing an Online Learning Environ-mentMs. Bahareh Azarnoush, Arizona State University BAHAREH AZARNOUSH is a PhD student at the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Sys- tems Engineering, Arizona State University, PO Box 878809, Tempe, AZ 85287-8809, bazarnou@asu.edu. Her research interest is statistical learning.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State UniversityDr. Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State UniversityDr. George C Runger, Arizona State University Page 23.154.1
Session 1532 Analysis of a Learning Model Applied to an Engineering Course Cordelia M. Brown, Arthur J. Brodersen Vanderbilt University School of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Nashville, Tennessee 37325AbstractA three phase learning model was applied to an Introduction to Digital Logic course atVanderbilt University in the Spring of 2004. The three phases included administering pre-assessment inventories, facilitating collaborative exercises, and evaluating the learningexperiences of the students. The first
been funding for more than a decade 7 Engineering Coalitions(Academy, ECSEL, Foundation, Gateway, Greenfield, SUCCEED, Synthesis) for researchingand disseminating better methodologies for engineering education(http://www.foundationcoalition.org/home/foundationcoalition/engineering_coalitions.html).Recently, we also have Project Catalyst from Bucknell University to train engineering faculty forproblem-based learning (http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/projectcatalyst/). DiSessa5 andShneiderman6 described innovative computing concepts and technologies better suited for humanneeds, especially in science and engineering education. Interestingly, Shneiderman's activelearning approach goes beyond the academic realm to extend to the corporate
Session 1532 EC2000 AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: RETHINKING THE FACULTY AND INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT CRITERIA P. David Fisher, James S. Fairweather, and Marilyn J. Amey Michigan State UniversityAbstractThis paper examines the current and potential affects of the new EC2000 engineering-accreditation criteria on the roles of faculty and administrators in engineering education.Typically, Criterion 5 (Faculty) rates the quality of an academic program's faculty by assessingthe qualifications of individuals and their achievements. Criterion 7 (Institutional Support andFinancial Resources) rates
AC 2011-1047: WORK-IN-PROGRESS: COLLABORATIVE AND REFLEC-TIVE LEARNING IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSNeelam Soundarajan, Ohio State University Dr. Soundarajan is a faculty member in the Computer Sc. & Eng. Dept. at Ohio State. His interests include topics in Software Engineering and Engineering Education. Page 22.1700.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Work-in-Progress: Collaborative and Reflective Learning in Engineering ProgramsAbstractThe importance of well developed team-working skills as well as reflective or metacognitive skillsamong engineering
Session 1520 Facilitating Active Learning Engineering Courses with Tablet PC Note Taking Technology Craig Scott, Pamela Leigh-Mack, Solomon Alao, Alicia Davis, Yacob Astatke, and Schinnel Small Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Morgan State University, Baltimore, MarylandAbstract This paper describes an investigation of a means to use technology to help studentsconstruct meaning through the use of the dimensions of Learning (DOL) pedagogical framework. We use the tablet PC and specialized note taking
Session 1917 Simulation and Animation of Mechanical Systems to Enhance Student Learning M. Hoorfar, H. Najjaran, W. L. Cleghorn Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department University of TorontoIntroductionThere are many applications in mechanical engineering whose analysis or design procedures notonly require tedious computations but also are prone to error so that neither instructors norstudents are keen to focus on the details of the subjects. They are not enthusiastic to pursue thelengthy process of the old fashioned designs
22nd International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE'00), IEEE Computer Society Press.[9] The Meaning of Requirements, M. Jackson, Annals of Software Engineering, Baltzer Science Publishers, Vol. 3, pp. 5 – 21, 1997.[10] A First Step Toward Improved Teaching, James E. Stice, Engineering Education, Vol. 66, Number 5, pp. 394 – 398, 1976.[11] Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning, James E. Stice, Engineering Education, Vol. 77, Number 5, pp. 291 – 296, 1987.DEEPTI SURIDeepti Suri is Assistant Professor of Computer Science in the Department of Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). She primarily teaches Software Engineering courses inthe areas of Software
Paper ID #19098Investigating Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in aCAD-enabled Learning EnvironmentDr. Chandan Dasgupta, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, WestLafayette Dr. Dasgupta is a Postdoctoral research fellow at Purdue University. He has a PhD in Learning Sci- ences from the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and MS in Human-Computer Interaction from Georgia Tech. His dissertation work focused on scaffolding students’ productive disciplinary engage- ment in engineering design activities using suboptimal models. His research interests include the use of
. In response, thesecond set of videos will contain more live action video clips, animations, and “pen tableting,”which allows us to sketch images and graphics digitally, as if using a pencil and paper. In thesecond set of videos, all mathematical computations and simple drawings will be done using apen tablet. Students commented they really appreciate the pen tablet videos, especially whendealing with mathematical content. Page 23.1347.11In the first 24 videos, we tried to adhere to Mayer’s Redundancy Principle—written text shouldnot duplicate narration, however, we did not always succeed. For example, the intended learning outcomes and