prioritizes the invaluable input and expertise of participants. Adiverse group of participants renowned for their teaching excellence was selected from fivedepartments. A total of ten participants were chosen, and data was collected using a variety ofmethods, including classroom observations, analysis of course materials, surveys, and focusgroup discussions.Our observations across various courses have revealed common practices employed byinstructors to foster effective learning environments. These practices encompass dynamic anddiverse class introductions that utilize strategies like revisiting prior content, storytelling, andaddressing student well-being to establish a strong foundation for the session. Throughout theclass, instructors consistently
," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 585-601, 2021.[3] M. Prensky, "Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1," On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1-6, 2001.[4] D.H. Smith IV, Q. Hao, C. D. Hundhausen, F. Jagodzinski, J. Myers-Dean, and K. Jaeger, "Towards modeling student engagement with interactive computing textbooks: An empirical study," in Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2021, pp. 914-920.[5] A. T. Bates, G. Poole, and T. Bates, Effective teaching with technology in higher education: Foundations for success. Jossey-Bass, 2017.[6] J. L. Jensen, T. A. Kummer, and P. D. d. M. Godoy, "Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of
optimization algorithm known as the hybrid cellular automaton (HCA) method. This method has since been applied to the design of crashworthy structures for Honda R&D Americas, as well as blast mitigating structures and materials for the U.S. Army and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Currently, Dr. Tovar is the founding director of the IUPUI Engineering Design Research Laboratory and the author of more than100 technical publications, including 27 journal papers and one book chap- ter. His research on engineering design addresses fundamental aspects on synthesis and optimization of high-impact energy absorbing materials and structures, particularly for applications in the automotive and aerospace industries. He
SIIPWhile the COE faculty are generally pleased with the technical content of our courses, the depthof student learning and level of student engagement vary substantially from course to course oreven from semester to semester within a course. This variability is particularly concerning in thelarge undergraduate gateway courses that are pivotal to students’ persistence and subsequentacademic success. Target courses for the program were defined as those that 1) enroll largenumbers of students, 2) enroll students from multiple departments, 3) are regarded as challengingteaching assignments, and/or 4) provide a foundation for subsequent courses. Accordingly, SIIPinitially adopted three goals for improving these courses with the explicit expectation
case study.Using the model of intercultural communication competence, suggestions and strategies areprovided in order to offer ideas for STEM faculty to build a healthy relationship with a newChinese graduate student. 1. Introduction:International students are a critical part of enrollments of graduate education at US universities,especially in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. TheInstitute of International Education's 2021 Open Doors report reveals that, in the academic year2020-2021, the US hosted a total of 914,095 international students [1]. This data emphasizesthe significant role played by international students in the graduate education landscape of theUS. The report further highlights that a
, who can use this information totailor the next class towards what students struggled most on [9, 11]. When it comes to comparing student achievement between traditional teaching methodsand the Flipped Classroom method, there are some discrepancies. Some have found no statisticallysignificant differences between the two methods; however, it has been found that with a FCmethodology, there are fewer students with lower grades, and generally students obtain bettergrades when frequently attending laboratory sessions [8]. The success of FC tends to heavily rely on the course type. Courses that are more content-based, as opposed to design-based, have been found to perform better [11]. For example, when aFC method was applied to a high
experience in remote learning, most faculty and students still prefer traditional face-to-face teaching [1], but the experience of the remote classroom has undoubtedly changed the waywe engage in traditional face-to-face courses today and moving forward. Various studies havebeen conducted regarding the issues and outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic [2-9]. The impacton university students [2, 4], university centers for teaching and learning (CTLs) [6, 7], and publicK-12 school systems [5, 8] have been initially documented, but further studies regarding the lastingimpacts of the pandemic are sure to come. A question that remains is: in what ways have we seenpositive change to our higher-educational courses as a result of the pandemic? This study aims
Lab [DEL] at Stanford University. The participant group had a diverse set of educational and professional backgrounds and included undergraduates (N=3), graduate students and postdoctoral scholars (N=4), visiting student researchers (N=5), academic staff (N=1), and experienced faculty members (N=3). As a part of the session, the participants were asked to reflect and respond to two questions: 1) As an instructor, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you use to create a more inclusive and equitable classroom (i.e., to help students feel like they belong and are supported)? 2) As a student, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you wish your instructors used to create a better
launched thefollowing new programs that were outlined in the Student Success Initiative:Engineering Learning Communities (ELCs): The study space managed by the IDEA Centermorphed into ELCs in 2016, which are cohort-based collaborative study groups for engineeringstudents in “gateway” math, science, and engineering courses that are led by peer educators.Students reinforce learning and study skills through problem solving sessions and office hoursthroughout the quarter, while learning the value of collaborative study in engineering. Earlyassessment of the program found that participants 1) discovered new ideas and procedures forsolving problems, 2) learned how to self-reflect on their study skills and habits, 3) gained selfconfidence in academic and
” stories withus and to reunite with other campus e-Girls alumni. The questions closely mirrored the open-ended questions in the survey. Our rationale for including the focus group was two-fold (1) tocreate an opportunity for former e-Girls to reconnect with others who had shared experiences,and (2) to provide an opportunity to probe narratives for complexities not easily surfaced througha survey. While 15 replied indicating they could attend, inclement weather forced one session’scancellation and restricted travel for all but three participants for another scheduled session. Twoparticipants attended a “make up” focus group a week later. The focus group facilitator (authorx) was joined by author y and a note taker for the first focus group. The
Paper ID #26061The Industry Scholars Mentorship Program: a Professional Industry Con-nection Experience for Engineering UndergraduatesDr. Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego Bre Przestrzelski, PhD, is a post-doctoral research associate in the General Engineering department in the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, where she innovatively integrates social justice, humanitarian advancement, and peace into the traditional engineering canon. Before joining USD in August 2017, Bre spent 9 years at Clemson University, where she was a three-time graduate of the bioengineering program (BS, MS, and PhD), founder of
potential impact of this study in light of existing ethics education research within STEM.Keywords: Philosophical Ethics; Community-Engaged Learning; Faculty Development1. Introduction To support the development of an exemplary generation of STEM professionals, currentundergraduate STEM instruction must draw on students’ dispositions towards ethical thoughtand action. Yet, there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate or effective model forSTEM ethics instruction [1, 2]. This project seeks to increase the role that community-basedlearning, faculty engagement, and institutional intentionality play in the formation of ethicalSTEM undergraduates. The primary goal of this project is to develop interdisciplinarypartnerships to build and
distinct types of discourse: Talking Across Differences in moments of operationalplanning and Intentionally Breaching the Professional and the Personal, whereby theethnographers developed mechanisms to transgress this false binary into the very design of theethnographic research.LATTICE includes two professional development cohorts of women in academic engineeringand computer science and an anthropological investigation of the values, practices, relationshipsand philosophies of the organizers. LATTICE refers both to the programmatic interventionsaimed at advancing women leaders in academic engineering and also the team organizing them.The interventions have six characteristics that include: (1) establishing a national network andprofessional
: (1) a transparent map of thestudent learning processes; (2) evidence of changing perceptions about the flipped classroomacross the course; (3) confirmation of the value of faculty student centered approaches; and (4)the revelation of lessons learned by reflecting students. Recommendations from students willalso be discussed. It should be noted that this paper focuses on the student experience in whatwas generally their first flipped class, and (because they were freshmen) also one of their firstcollege classes.I. IntroductionChanging student demographics and an emerging assessment and accountability in highereducation have resulted in change in the teaching and learning literature about how people learn[5-7]. In 1995, one of the most
the “upward” shift in the scores from week 4 through week 15 isreal (i.e., some of the averages trend “upward” across the five questions in Table 4). Also, it isinteresting to note that the question related to the course (i.e., question 1) and the question relatedto reputation (i.e., question 5) show a few low scores after the fourth week while the otherquestions – related more to the instructor – are generally positive after the fourth week.Although a limited sample size, the results of student assessment from Spring 2017 indicate thata majority of students weresatisfied with the course and the instructor. This may further be supported by the number of “A”grades earned in Spring 2017 (Table 2, above).As shown in Figure 3, for Spring 2018 the
Distinguished Professor and Endowed Chair andDirector of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Currently she is working onPurdue NSF ADVANCE institutional change, global & local EPICS design teams, and individual engi-neering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics indesign through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: pmbuzzanell@usf.edu & buzzanel@purdue.edu] c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Understanding Ethical Reasoning in Design Through the Lens of Reflexive PrinciplismIntroductionDespite increasing emphasis on understanding and developing ethical competence amongengineering students [1], [2
skills required for an ML/AI career: computerprogramming, mathematics and statistics [1, 31, 32]. Hypotheses 3a and 3b follow the same logicas hypotheses 1a through 2c that asserts that measures of confidence related to skills acquired ina post-secondary education positively predict Intentional Persistence. Studies of women in therelated fields of computer science have found that men report higher levels of confidence intechnical skills than women [33, 34]. This finding still requires confirmation within the new fieldof ML/AI engineering.Hypothesis 3a: Technical Confidence is a positive predictor of Intentional Persistence in ML/AIand engineering.Hypothesis 3b: Women have less Technical Confidence than men in ML/AI. 3. Discrimination in
physics education has matured and grown. A reasonablycomprehensive description of the state of the field can be found elsewhere 1. The process ofidentifying misconceptions, creating curricula to address those misconceptions and then evaluatingthe efficacy of instruction has been applied to many areas of physics 2, perhaps nowhere moresuccessfully than mechanics. In that arena, many well-validated and established instruments exist,including the Mechanics Baseline Test 3, Test of Understanding Graphics in Kinematics (TUG-K)4 Page 24.34.2and the Force Concept Inventory5 to name but a few. Physics educators have created a wide varietyof research
computer games: a capstone course for undergraduate computer science education. In Proceedings of 31st SIGCSE Technical Symposium (Austin, TX, March 2000), ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000, 260-264.[3] G. Pleva, “Game programming and the myth of child’s play,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 20 2 (December 2004), 125-136.[4] L. Samavedham, and K. Ragupathi, “Facilitating 21st century skills in engineering students,” The Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. XXVI No. 1, 2012, pp.38-49.[5] B.R. Maxim, S. Acharya, S. Brunvand, and M. Kessentini, “WIP: Introducing active learning in a software engineering course,” Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, OH, June
activation ofconceptual resources leading to canonical understanding. Utilizing a qualitative think-alouddesign, four students completed the CALM while being recorded and prompted to explain theirthinking. Sessions lasted two to three hours per participant. Audio recordings of studentsthinking aloud were supplemented by video recordings of their screens as they completed themodule. We also collected and analyzed the notes they wrote as they completed the CALM.Comparing across the four cases, the activation and coordination of resources was moreidiosyncratic than we previously envisioned. For example, part of the CALM contains three two-part multiple-choice questions used for formative assessment with the initial question asking aconceptually
Italian architect StefanoMarzano once said “"every time we design a product we are making a statement about thedirection the world will move in" [1]. As engineering instructors, we must strive to create well-rounded engineers, who are technically sound, creative designers, with strong ethicalconvictions. Engineering education in the United States has traditionally emphasized theacquisition of technical knowledge [2]. Traditional engineering courses can often lack the hands-on training that bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application, limiting engineeringstudents' ability to grasp the real-world implications of their studies [2]. To address this gap, weneed to configure engineering courses to include, in addition to technical and
academic integrity arediscussed. It is important for institutions to be welcoming, agile and accommodating inproviding a quality student experience for a sustainable enrollment pipeline.1. Introduction 1.1. The Enrollment CliffConsistent enrollment or strategized growth is crucial for continuity of higher educationinstitutions. Enrollment defines their academic programs, their student experiences, and thefuture direction of the institution, specifically financial sustainability. Over the course of 2023,14 nonprofit four-year colleges announced closures and a handful of others announced mergersor acquisitions [1]. These are mostly small, private, tuition-dependent institutions with meagerendowments that have seen enrollment slipping for years
the basic requirements needed. In the second week, the students were asked to designtheir own bioreactor on paper, present it to the class, and then make a technical drawing of theirdesign. The third week was to prototype the design using LEGOs® and order the materials neededto build it within the given budget. The fourth week was dedicated to building their designs, andthe fifth week was dedicated to testing them to the desired specifications given. Based on thefeedback we recommend the instructors consider adding an additional two weeks to allow studentsto build and test the final prototype.Design Project In the first week, students were introduced to their problem through a case study exampledetailed in Appendix 1. Briefly, student
working as a Research Assistant for an NSF-funded project at UTEP dedicated to broadening the participation of Latinx students in higher edu- cation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Identity Capital and Persistence among Latinx Engineering/CS Undergraduates on the US-Mexico BorderAbout 10% of engineering and computer science degrees in the U.S. were awarded to Hispanicsfrom 2004 to 2014 [1], while only 8% of the engineering workforce and 7% of the computingworkforce, respectively, was comprised of Hispanics, as of 2018 [2]. In spite of concertedefforts over the last several decades at expanding their enrollment and
sequences and assessment resultsfrom industry sponsors, technical advisors, student self-assessment, and feedback through an“after-action-review” form. The results show high satisfaction with our capstone coursestructure, content, and approaches.IntroductionThe capstone design course is an essential milestone of engineering education and has been usedto help fulfill ABET Criteria for Accreditation. While engineering curricula must include aculminating major engineering design experience [1], engineering technology programs mustincorporate an experience that develops student competencies in applying both technical andnon-technical skills [2]. In addition, educational programs have used the capstone course forvarious purposes, including equipping
, technology can be used to improve how educators teach [1] as well asenable new modalities of pedagogical techniques [2]. The successful implementation oftechnologies relies heavily on an instructor’s knowledge of the technology and ability tointegrate it into their class [3]. Researchers have studied the barriers and dynamics of technologyadoption by faculty members. Some of these barriers include perceived usefulness (or lackthereof), structural constraints (such as technical support), lack of time to learn new technologies,and varying levels of faculty proficiency with technology, among others [4].With such a wide variety of technological tools and approaches designed to improve the learningexperience available on the market today, it is
, how to dress, eat and hold a professional conversation at a formal meal during aninterview; and how to network and follow-up after meeting people professionally. The guestspeakers, veterans themselves, were excited to present to these highly motivated student veteransand to share their stories, and in the process, they inspired this next generation of engineers andengineering technologists.Keywords: adult learners, engineering, learning communities, STEM workforce preparationIntroductionThe goal of the National Science Foundation S-STEM project, A Pathway to Completion forVeterans Pursuing Engineering and Engineering Technology Degrees, is to provide professionaldevelopment and scholarships to student veterans who are attending Old Dominion
“learning by doing” in a team activity within a semi-structured format.Structure is provided in the form of regular progress sessions with the instructor, assigned design activities,and adherence to implementing the features of the project as defined by the student with the instructor'soverview. Independent activity is encouraged in the form of open laboratories and the keeping of records asself-directed entries in a technical journal.Through the design, building and testing process, the student should learn: Strategies for the creation and development of ideas for projects Importance of recognizing problems and problem definition Writing of project descriptions and specifications Maintaining a technical journal
linear modeling, we investigate therelationships among interdisciplinary teaching system on graduates’ interdisciplinarycompetence and explore the mediating effects of interdisciplinary identity.Results This study finds that: (1) Student-centered instructional practices, as well ascomprehensive curriculum emphasis, have a significant role in promoting theinterdisciplinarity of engineering graduate students. And Student-centered teaching methodshave a more significant effect on improving students' interdisciplinary ability thancomprehensive curriculum emphasis. (2) The recognition of interdisciplinary identity plays apartially mediating role between the interdisciplinary teaching system and interdisciplinarycompetence, and the performance
, culminating in a senior capstoneproject for industry partners. This interdisciplinary approach enables students to developprofessional skills in project management, ethics, design, teamwork, and more through hands-onprojects. With diverse team compositions, students focus on various technical aspects, such asComputer-Aided Design (CAD), 3D printing, assembly, testing, electrical, and softwarecomponents.This paper highlights the incorporation of an Internet of Things (IoT) platform into the second-year PBL course. Students were introduced to a low-cost ($6) microcontroller with wirelessinternet access and provided with prototype Python programs. These programs enabled studentsto create their own wireless access points and simple web servers