, the visualizations notonly illuminated racial disparities but also underscored the need for social change. Furthermore,his visualizations showcased the connection between visualization and the public's response.DuBois's works demonstrate that properly presented data can affect audiences’ opinions, evokeemotions, raise awareness, and prompt action. His work shows that understanding the public'sresponse to data allows for effective visualization techniques and demonstrates the necessity formore creative visualizations in modern fields to inspire change. A selection of DuBois’svisualizations is shown below. W.E.B DuBois Visualizations for the 1900 Paris World’s Fair [4]This project bridges fields of data science, engineering
Paper ID #41079Innovative Mobility Program Series for Asian Students’ Equitable LearningOpportunities Through Interdisciplinary MethodologiesMr. Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Shibaura Institute of Technology Hiroyuki Ishizaki is a Visiting Professor at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), a leading Japanese engineering school. His research interests include multidisciplinary teaching and learning, cross-cultural competence, collaborative online international (COIL), technopreneurship, and project/problem-based learning methods. As a Director of the Malaysia Office, he has been expatriated in Malaysia since 2014 and leading the
Brianna is the Teaching and Learning librarian at the Colorado School of Mines. She collaborates with faculty to design and implement information literacy throughout the curriculum. Prior to her work at the School of Mines, she was the Engineering and Computer Science Librarian at the US Naval Academy and a contract Reference Librarian assigned to the National Defense University. She earned her MLIS at the University of Denver in 2011.Ms. Jamie Marie Regan, Colorado School of Mines Jamie Regan is an undergraduate student in Electrical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Her academic journey is intertwined with a personal and passionate dedication to advancing accessibility within STEM fields. Inspired by her
U.S. are finally heading the many calls to include sociotechnicalthinking–grappling with issues of power, history, and culture–throughout the undergraduateengineering curriculum. While non-purely-technical topics have historically been relegated toseparate courses, universities are now working to integrate sociotechnical content in coursespreviously considered to be purely technical. Researchers have varying motivations for thisfocus, including to better prepare students for engineering practice, which is inherentlysociotechnical [1]; to increase the sense of belonging of historically excluded students, who aremore likely to be interested in the social aspects [2]; and to create better societal outcomes [3-5].Attempts to disrupt the social
. Most students arecompetitively admitted to engineering and computer science majors after their second year. Thesecond population in this study consists of a small private teaching university in the southeastwhich serves approximately 5,000 students with 33% enrolled in one of the followingengineering programs: Aerospace, Civil, Computer, Electrical, Mechanical, Software, and stillexploring. The university is primarily residential undergraduate institution. All engineeringprograms begin with a common first-year experience with typical class sizes throughout theundergraduate curriculum below 40 students.The Large Public University vs. the Small Private University: Several differences are notablewhen comparing large and small universities
withfaculty members on non-course related projects, and others [2].Consistent with these studies, a meta-analysis of eight individual research studies conducted overten years showed that students who interacted with faculty and peers experienced significantgains in critical thinking [4] compared to those who were not as engaged in those interactions. Inthis meta-analysis, Gellin et al. [4] concluded that studies which focus on more specific activities(as opposed to looking at student engagement on campus more broadly) can provideadministrators with opportunities to invest in engagement where it matters most.This study narrows the focus of engagement to more specific activities by studying engagementin the context of specific undergraduate courses in
graduate orprofessional student in good standing at The Ohio State University. The course “CollegeTeaching In Engineering” is one of 12 disciplinary based course within the curriculum andrequired of engineering students.V. Methods and Procedures Development of the assessment process for this study was guided by the six-steprecommendations of Bamberger, et al.28 for impact evaluations. As outlined by Van Note Chismand Szabo29 faculty development programs, and conceptually future faculty development, couldbe evaluated at the three levels of 1) satisfaction of participants, 2) impact of the program on theparticipants’ teaching practices and attitudes, and 3) impact of the program on the participants’students’ learning. In this case, data
-use and stand-by powerreadings for devices that vary), and then try to estimate their own energy use for a month basedon typical amounts of time that each device is used. In the process, one student actually usedhis/her monthly electric bill to verify the calculations.2.3. ProjectThe last significant activity of the course was a class project. For this, the students were requiredto work in teams of 2 – 3 members and were able to select their own topic. Projects could vary intheir amount of research and design, and also could contain an optional build and test componentif desired. Each team submitted a proposal of the project they wanted to pursue, after which theinstructor tried to help better define the scope of each so that the project’s
, commercial relevance36, experimental design37,industrial pracice38, and process dynamics39 and control40. Computers are more available leading to a “virtual unit operations laboratory” as a pre-lab resource41. However, materials and microelectronics are hardly visible, as we find singular mentionof polymer processing 42 and microelectronics43, despite heavy emphasis in research in theseareas. Photonic materials are notable by their absence. Expanding the universe of the undergraduate laboratory The present experiments were introduced in the last several years in order to bring agreater sense of modernity, and relevance to the only hands-on engineering experience in our128 credit hour undergraduate curriculum. The
, and law students. Barbara uses applied psychology and art in her storytelling methods, to help students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a projects - from the early, inspirational stages to reality. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio, she is the author of,”Working Connection: The Relational Art of Leadership;” ”Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Balancing Act in Engineering and Science;” and ”Designing for Social Participation in the Virtual Universe.” With her students in ME 378, she co-authored, ”The Power of First Moments in Entrepreneurial Storytelling.” Barbara makes productive partnerships with industry and creates collaborative teams with members from the areas of engineering, design
AC 2011-535: A COGNITION-BASED CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FORDESIGN TECHNIQUESKathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn W. Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and STS (Science, Tech- nology, and Society) at the Pennsylvania State University. A graduate of The Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineering, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME; she also serves as an ABET Program Evaluator and as Chair of ASME’s Technology & Society Division
in control systems engineering and information systems design and he received his B.S. in Computer Systems En- gineering from The University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He has several years of experience teaching and developing curricula in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech.Ms. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech Michelle Soledad is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Her research interests include faculty motivation and development towards supporting student success. Ms. Soledad has bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Ateneo de Davao
, effectiveness, and pedagogical value ofstudent-generated stories in a fluid mechanics course part of the mechanical engineeringtechnology curriculum. This application, which addressed Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET)’s Criterion 3 and Criterion 5c, was implemented in a four-credit hour(ch) senior-level applied fluid mechanics course, with a 3ch lecture and 1ch laboratorycomponent. The course is the second in fluid mechanics’ sequence and covers topics likepipeline systems design, pump selection, flow of air in ducts, lift and drag, etc. The originalinstructional design used a blend of traditional in-class lectures and problem-based learningfocused on project-based and other laboratory exercises.To further improve the students
organizing the materialso it can be presented by faculty teaching outside their area of expertise. We will presentresults of a one-year pilot program in which we have adopted the interactive format in thepresentation of our introductory course sequence in Chemistry of Materials. We will discusscourse content, student performance, student satisfaction with the course, and the facultyexperience compared to the traditional course. In addition, the in-class demonstrations andteam-oriented student exercises developed will be reviewed.IntroductionChemistry of Materials Background In the School of Engineering at Rensselaer, all students follow a common pre-engineering curriculum for the Freshman and Sophomore years. This curriculum includescourses in
Paper ID #25259A Phased Faculty Development Program to Improve Teaching and LearningProf. Sivakumar Krishnan, Vishnu Educational Development and Innovation Center Prof. Sivakumar Krishnan currently serves as Dean at Vishnu Educational Development and Innova- tion Centre (VEDIC) located in Hyderabad, INDIA, with focus on faculty development and institutional development initiatives in active learning, project-based learning, student learning assessment, industry- relevant curriculum development, lab development and accreditation. He was previously Chief Product Officer with IntelliEd Innovations, an education technology
intoany of the majors. First-year students who intend to or are considering enrolling in the collegeof engineering as sophomores, with few exceptions, complete a standard first-year curriculum,including the two-semester “Introduction to Engineering” course sequence, before declaring thefields of engineering that they plan to pursue. Engineering disciplines at the institution studiedinclude: aerospace, chemical, civil, computer, electrical and mechanical, along with computerscience and environmental geosciences. The students begin to take courses specific to theirchosen disciplines at the start of sophomore year. Historically, 85% of students who leaveengineering do so before the end of the first year, and the majority of the rest who leave do
research Progress 1962-64.J. Heywood and R. Ann Abel. National foundation for projects complted and in progress Educational research summarised in the book. 1964 NCTA discontinued Replaced by a Council for National Academic Awards with similar functions but across the higher education curriculum. 1965 R Liberal Studies and Higher Technology –L. Davies University of Wales Review of theliterature and research and
resources.20 The NASA CiPair Internship Program is a 10-week summer researchinternship program for community college engineering students wherein groups of three to fourstudents work on a research project under the supervision of a university faculty and a graduatestudent mentor. The program has been shown to increase student self-efficacy for success in afour-year institution and interest in pursuing advanced degrees.21 Supplemental instruction (SI) isan academic assistance program that creates a safe environment for students to get theirquestions answered and receive feedback from peers who have been successful in their course.Another academic support program developed to help students develop the study skills necessaryfor college success is the
Session 1353 Module-based Freshman Engineering Course Development Christopher J. Rowe, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Vanderbilt UniversityAbstractThe freshman year of engineering continues to be one of the most critical components ofundergraduate curriculum development for engineering schools. There is an ongoing challenge indeveloping an introductory engineering course that meets the needs of the school/college as wellas the students in an effective manner. A major complaint of students is that there is no formalmechanism that helps students make an informed decision on their choice
industry. On a team is where oralcommunication is so important. Team projects are something we all have in our curriculums. AtBaylor, a survey showed most students approach team projects by dividing the tasks and then Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright © 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 8putting the project together just in time, involving little interaction. In the real world you must workwith other people, usually in person, to get something done. You never know who might be on theteam but, no matter who is on the team, at some
necessary to operate the machines as well as use the software to create their physical parts. Because of the strong link between design software (CAD) and 3D printing, the two were incorporated into a single teaching module. The students learn how to create the parts in a CAD software package (Autodesk Inventor) and then go through the steps necessary to print the parts. The goal of the single module was to help strengthen the link between CAD software and design. To address the need for a CAD/3D printing module, we developed the “3D printed car project.” Each student was required to print a few parts for a small electric car and at the end of the final assignment each team of eight students would have all of the parts needed to fully
-College- Students-Need-Now/248882[2] B. Bayne. “Adjusted Syllabus.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- 6d_W8rdzE9mW2DvPi-dPvRxo4sekKlz3VqEpnu4Dwg/edit (retrieved March 30, 2020).[3] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[4] L. L. Wu et al., “Rapidly Converting a Project-Based Engineering Experience for Remote Learning: Successes and Limitations of Using Experimental Kits and a Multiplayer Online Game,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 4, 2020.[5] S. L. Leung, B. A. Hargrove, E. R. Marsh, A. R. Gregg, and K. A. Thole, “Prompting by COVID-19 to Rethink the
. He received a double major from Los Andes University in Bogota, Colombia in electrical engineering and computer science. He is now finishing his master’s degree in computer science at Texas A&M University. His research interests are in computer-human interaction (CHI), artificial intelligence (AI), computer- assisted instructional (CAI) software, and intelligent tutoring systems (ITS).Prof. Erin M. McTigue, Texas A&M University Erin McTigue is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture in the College of Education and Human Development at TAMU.Dr. Julie S. Linsey, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University
Institute of Technology Simo Pajovic is a graduate student in the MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, where his research focuses on nanoscale transport phenomena. In 2019, he graduated from the University of Toronto with a B.ASc. in Mechanical Engineering. His capstone project was to design and prototype a benchtop universal testing machine for educational use. As an undergraduate research assistant, he worked on micromechanical characterization of lubricants used in aerospace applications and later designing and prototyping medical devices.Mr. Cheuk Yin Larry Kei, University of Toronto Larry Kei obtained his BASc in Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto in 2019. He is currently working in the
proper development of the colleges in their responsibilities forserving the needs of the present students and the projected enrollments in the colleges.”41 Love,in particular, was angered by the University of California officials‟ rebuke, and proposed that theCouncil of State College Presidents, in their capacity as a curriculum committee, simply approvenew master‟s programs proposed by any of the member colleges at its May 1954 meeting. 42The impasse over the master‟s was addressed in the 1955 Restudy of the Needs for California inHigher Education, although here in particular it was the broader, demographic issues that forcedthis study to occur. Finding little evidence of an economy of scale in higher education ininstitutions beyond a certain
teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Dr. Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego Dr. Phan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California San Diego with a specialization in medical devices. He is currently an instructor for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering focusing on hands-on education.Dr. Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego Maziar Ghazinejad is an Associate teaching professor in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at UC San Diego. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from UC Riverside in 2012 and holds M.S. degrees in mechanical and electrical engineerDr. Nathan
assignments; study groups;close relationships among student members; and specialized events, activities, andworkshops.5,6,10 According to Schroeder et al., learning communities substantially enhanceacademic achievement, retention, and educational attainment, especially for freshmen.13Most LLCs are communities in which students pursue their academic curriculum with a blendedco-curriculum involving a theme, concept, or common subject matter while living together in areserved part of a residence hall.14 LLCs range in size but rarely exceed 75 participants.10 Thesmall size of LLCs assists in developing supportive peer relationships.4LLCs are characterized by close working relationships among students and faculty; specializedcourse assignments; study
College became Hollins University, and the Penn State/University of Pennsylvania confusion is still a nightmare. Ohio University and Ohio State University have been in court about who owns the Ohio name. Since the experience is essentially fungible, the brandthe literal wordis crucial.38 Premier schools have to separate their students by generating a story about how special they are. That’s why good schools care little about such hot-button issues as grade infla- tion, teaching quality, student recommendations, or even the curriculum. . . .They’re not stupid. They have to protect the brand for incoming [and future] consumers [who hope- fully become satisfied graduates/customers who later
Paper ID #33739Antiracist Institutional Transformation Matters: How Can CommunityCultural Wealth and Counter-space Processes Illuminate Areas for Change?Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United
photography students, plus students from art history, film, and journalism. In contrast tomany other art/science courses, the artists do not contribute only art to their joint projects, nor do the engineerscontribute only technical assistance. Instead, the engineers are expected to be artists, with aesthetic control overtheir work, while both the art students and the engineers are expected to preserve the scientific utility of theirimages of fluid flow by providing accurate documentation of the flow and imaging process. There are severalother unusual aspects of this course. All assignments are open-ended: students are not given explicitrequirements or instructions to use specific flows or visualization techniques. Instead they are provided with