initial collaborationAbstractThe economic, social, environmental, and scientific interrelatedness of our ecological survivaldepend on shifts in how we educate the next generation of educators, engineers, scientists, andsocial activists. Education, both formal and informal, as well as social activism, have to findways to cross borders, collaborating to find solutions to the pressing problems of our time. Onthe South Texas Gulf Coast, one of these pressing issues is stormwater management and policy,but it has been challenging to effectively engage local leaders, water professionals, researchers,and community stakeholders in the solution-seeking process. To overcome this challenge, theresearch team adopted a transdisciplinary methodology to pilot a
Paper ID #6195Use of Sustainable and Systematic Plan to Assess Student Learning Outcomesfor Non-Traditional IT StudentsDr. Lifang Shih, Excelsior College Li-Fang Shih received her Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction with specialization in online instruction from the State University of New York at Albany. Dr. Shih is current the Associate Dean for the School of Business and Technology at Excelsior College. Her researches have focused on issues related to quality online instruction, outcome assessments, online communication, and the development of online commu- nity, etc. Her papers have been presented in national
“What are some of the strengths of your approach to teaching/coordinatingcapstone design?” separated into a dozen categories, as shown in Table 2. Note that the content themesin Table 2 (and all similar tables for subsequent questions) are listed in descending order of frequency.Over a quarter of respondents (n=98) referred to their relationships as one of their teaching/coordinatingstrengths. A majority of these responses (n=58) were regarding industry involvement, participation, andnetworking: Networking. As I tell the students, ‘It is not what you know, but who you know.’ Communications, both written and oral. Interaction with local engineers, and city, county, and state agencies. (R310) Incorporation of
communication between students. Practitioner A asked ateaching assistant to monitor the chats and participants interactions, whereas Practitioner Bmonitored the chat himself. Practitioner A shared the following: “The TA (teaching assistant) helped a lot by monitoring students’ use of the chat and reaction functions. The TA also ensured that students had cameras on during instruction. Additionally, the TA was instrumental in determining if students were logged on, fully engaged, and completing tasks and assignments.”.”Practitioners C and D were more structured when addressing virtual etiquette expectations. Bothpractitioners instructed students to mute their mics unless speaking, operate with cameras on, andto use the chat only
relationshipinvolving research and faculty exchange.Several Specific recommendations in the context of this program are listed below to build uponthe current start and develop a long-term sustainable program. The first recommendation is tosend a follow-on delegation of UA Engineering Faculty and the Director of the Study AbroadProgram to develop robust plans to control program costs and attract more students in the secondcourse offering in the summer of 2018. As stated earlier, personal relationships are the key tothe long-term sustainability of this program, and given communications challenges, these arebest done face to face and in Cuba.Secondly we must continue to broaden the participation of research-focused faculty on bothcampuses in this program. The
wererefurbished along with students at the three high schools and used for making bike-poweredblenders (smoothie bikes).Figure 5: (L) Tex Kang, a member of the Smoothie Bike Team, with a member of the Penn Policedepartment in the background (R) Some of the many abandoned bikes that Penn Police collectevery year off of racks on campus.Progress and Impact to DateBetween the two classes described above, 184 students across 23 unique majors were exposed tosustainability topics through EOP framework learning objectives (Table 1). Additionally, the 22students in MEAM 2300 completed 25 hours of community service each, for a total of 550 hoursof service.Table 1: Students exposed to sustainability topics over the course of the ASEE EOP MGP Class
iterativeprocess approach to the MEA, first generating a model, testing the model and revising themodel to develop a suitable solution38. The students’ solutions to the MEA typically takethe form of a comprehensive report outlining the process used to generate their solutionto the problem.There have been several studies investigating the impact of MEA instruction on studentlearning outcomes and general skill development. These studies have shown that MEAs: 1) Encourage a different perspective regarding the use of engineering concepts, with students applying concepts to achieve a broad, high-level solution rather than a low-level formulaic, rote approach10. 2) Encourage students to work collaboratively and cooperatively as a group, honing
Page 24.902.8Future WorkSo, how do students learn and re-learn design thinking? The authors hypothesize that studentslearn and re-learn design thinking and the design process by doing authentic activities in project-based learning courses similar to the course Group 2 participants were engaged in. Students learnand re-learn design thinking through the act of repeatedly experiencing a design process coachedby the teaching team, with each iteration improving on their procedural skills and syntheticknowledge to create anew. The design process serves as a cognitive apprenticeship17; eachconstructive design activity and design experience, through interaction with teammates orcoaches, gives students opportunities to refine their model of design and
do know that theseprograms can encourage students to enroll in engineering, the lasting impact of these programson engineering students is less clear. With this research, we provide some clarity by examiningbackground factors of retained aerospace engineering students.The goal of this mixed-methods investigation is to identify the factors that increase studentsuccess in engineering in order to inform future programs and curricula. Research questionsguiding this study include: 1) How do retained aerospace engineers describe the impact ofparticipation in a pre-engineering program on university major choice? and 2) Whichbackground factors affect student retention and success in Aerospace Engineering students? Wesurveyed sophomore and senior
Rosati law firm, where she prepared and worked on patent applications in different fields of technology.Oscar Rios (Engineering Content Developer)Nikitha Sambamurthy (Engineering Content Lead) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Analyzing the Use of Embedded MATLAB® Laboratory Problems in an Online Interactive TextbookAbstractMany first-year engineering problem-solving courses have a goal of encouraging students tolearn software skills as one of a myriad of tools in solving engineering problems. In thesecourses, MATLAB® is the programming language often taught, as multiple subsequentengineering courses
the issue. Since it was a ABET Skill 3g – Ability to 18 3.77 2.0 5.0 practice session 30 minutes was allotted. communicate effectively 5. Several students wrote about the process and exercise in ABET Skill 3h – Broad 13 3.95 3.0 5.0 their course journals. Overall those who discussed it understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in … were very positive about the experience. contexts ABET Skill 3i – Recognition of 12 3.62 2.0 5.0Instructor Questions [on
-leddiscussions focusing on three primary areas: (1) the impact of AI on the workplace, specificallyaddressing concerns such as “Will I have a job?” (2) future developments in AI and what’s next,and (3) the convergence of AI with other emerging technologies. After introductions, panelistsshared their personal journeys with AI, leading into in-depth discussions of these key themes,followed by an engaging Q&A session with students and faculty.This paper presents faculty observations, insights from student surveys, and reflections on theoverall experience. It underscores the significance of the forum for our college community andexplains why such discussions are both timely and essential. Testimonials and survey responsesprovide further context
forengineering and computer science graduates, began focusing heavily on student successinitiatives in 2004 with support from the Engineering Schools of the West Initiative, through theWilliam and Flora Hewlett Foundation. This first wave of initiatives was critically assessed, andengineering student success became a focal point for the CoE. Internal research conducted underthis grant exposed numerous roadblocks that impeded students' academic success. In 2010,another large grant, funded through the National Science Foundation Science Talent ExpansionProgram (STEP), was awarded to increase the numbers of students graduating with STEMdegrees. This grant engaged an interdisciplinary, cross-college team of STEM educatorspassionate about continuous
experience or Co-op/Internshipexperience.On the other side, the high school students involved in this research program were all 10thgraders and most of them did not take physics and calculus when they faced the designchallenge. During the “Mind Your Brain” challenge, most high schoolers revealed that they hadno idea of the designing procedures, even though they didn’t know the differences between themost commonly used unit systems, the international unit system, and the U.S. Customized unitsystem. They frequently misused the two separate unit systems in one single calculation, whichbarely happened in their rival group.Most high schoolers could not fully understand the impact and momentum of a movingobjective, which is critical to the design of the
campustransfer policy, processes, and practices. The Spider tracked down agreements, policies, data, andpractices. She interviewed stakeholders internally and externally and also supported statewideevents to uncover barriers and propose solutions. This work meant she worked closely with theAdvisor in the engineering college and also frequently collaborated with the community collegeDean to identify, address, and uncover problems which negatively impacted transfer.Among the most important attributes of the Spider is tenacity; she met with resistance frommany quarters, but her focus on student success, recognition of the ecosystem in which studentsnavigated, and unrelenting attention to detail ensured that change occurred in key contexts.The Engineering
pedagogy. In practice, there is a dearth in theliterature, but the few papers focusing on design in K-12 engineering seem to show itseffectiveness. Cunningham and Lachapelle20 summarize the results from six years ofEngineering is Elementary, an engineering design curriculum for elementary schools, and findthat it has improved interest, engagement, and performance in both students and teachers. Sadleret al.21 show that after engaging in design challenges, middle school students’ science skillsincreased, though they evaluated solely the ability to design science experiments. Kolodner22finds that students participating in Learning By Design engaged in collaboration,communication, decision-making, and design of investigations much more like experts
Paper ID #37078A Pathway to Initiate Engineering Education Research: A First-YearReflection on Faculty DevelopmentDr. James W. Giancaspro, University of Miami James Giancaspro, Ph.D., P.E. is an associate professor of civil engineering with an emphasis on struc- tures and mechanics. He has two years of industry experience and 17 years of teaching and research experience at the University of Miami, where he is also currently a graduate program director. His current engineering education research interests include instructional technology in mechanics, undergraduate student retention, and graduate student support.Dr. Diana
expecting to see higher levels of student and agency motivation and engagement. With thismonetary award at stake, we also anticipate an improvement in the quality of this year’s projectproposals.References[1] R. G. Bringle and J. A. Hatcher, “A service-learning curriculum for faculty,” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, pp. 112-122, 1995.[2] S. J. Peterson and M. J. Schaffer, “Service learning: A strategy to develop group collaboration and research skills,” Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 208-214, 1999.[3] C. I. Celio, J. Durlak, and A. Dymnicki, “A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students,” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 164-181, 2011.[4] M. J. Gray, E. H
ofperspectives, awareness, and experiences engaging with ethical issues, faculty have theopportunity to address these differences by adapting curricula and tailoring instruction to addressthese concerns. Reforming how we discuss macroethics in the classroom allows educators tohave the ability to positively impact student motivation, critical thinking abilities, and effectivecommunication within engineering spaces. This research paper highlights the need formacroethics education integration into engineering curricula. By encouraging students andfaculty alike to challenge the status quo of the aerospace community, we can reevaluate andreform the discipline's ethical foundations. Furthermore, through the investigation of students'perceptions of
, construction speed, ease ofmaintenance and deconstruction, and the impact on the environment.At the end of the semester, the hard-copy survey questionnaires were distributed in class for bothcourses to gather students’ feedback. They were asked an open-ended question to definesustainability in their own words, and indicate how their understanding of sustainability changedsince the beginning of the semester on a five-point scale ranging from “significantly decreased”to “significantly improved.” They also indicated their level of agreement or disagreementrelating to their understanding of how engineers can contribute to a sustainable world as a resultof the course. Finally, they were asked about their levels of engagement with differentsustainability
professionals?Study data included survey responses to validated scales measuring: critical consciousness,system justification beliefs, social empathy, and sociopolitical control beliefs. Newinstrumentation was also piloted assessing equity-related perceptions and beliefs about civilengineering and infrastructure systems. Participants were junior and senior undergraduate civilengineering students (n = 21) enrolled in a professional development, community, and strategicchange course, with data collected throughout the Fall 2020 semester. Results suggest thatstudents did have awareness of infrastructure inequities and, on average, did not have strongsystem justification beliefs. However, there was not an association between students’ awarenessof
initiative is to engage the students in peer-centered support structuressuch as ambassador programs. Ambassador programs help students develop professional skills,especially in the areas of communication and interpersonal relations2. Ambassador programs alsofacilitate student engagement. Student engagement is now highly relevant to most universities,given the new Carnegie Classification emphasis on the constructs reflecting student engagementin higher education3. However, activities to engage students are often discussed by non-students.Likewise, the roles and effectiveness of ambassadors are often discussed and evaluated from anexternal perspective, namely that of faculty and administrators. More explorations are needed tocapture a student-centered
participants with the program? 2. What was the impact of the program on theparticipants’ teaching knowledge, skills, attitudes, and practices? (To those measures might beadded their evaluations by students and peers.) and 3. What was the impact of the program on theparticipants’ students’ learning (knowledge, skills, and attitudes)?11The remainder of this paper presents the shadowing experiences of each of the five new full-timefaculty members including: ● personal background ● prior expectations, including motivation ● preparation for the program (clear expectations/requirements?) ● what happened - in program and out ● post-analysisComputer Engineering New Faculty CaseI spent three years working as a software consultant before
and Psychology – those who had developed thefine system in existence in the U.S. high school system and made it what is today. The promiseof this system when it was sold to engineering faculty was that it was to have three components: a) Student evaluation of teaching b) Peer evaluation of course materials and classroom performance Page 13.587.6 c) Community recognition of contributions to advancing learning.However, only the first of these came with easily quantified metrics. One question asked studentsto rate the statement “The Instructor Was an Effective Teacher” on a scale of 1 to 5. The meanvalue of the score on this question
providers, to systematically improve the repository impact and to prepare for itseventual scale-up. The vision of RECET to enable more effective collaboration between ECEprograms for educational delivery has been socialized throughout the communities served byECEDHA and IEC. There have been articles in online newsletters and presentations at onlineand in-person meetings, with a particular emphasis on regional meetings of department heads.Unfortunately, interest in a repository like RECET has waned since COVID-19 restrictions onECE educational delivery have been eliminated. Many programs have gone to a new normal, butthey have done so by almost entirely addressing their remote delivery issues locally. ECEdepartmental leadership largely considers the
for long-term care through her research. Emily has also been an advocate for minorities in STEM at Purdue as the founder and graduate ad- visor of the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) graduate chapter on campus, graduate student recruiter for the Industrial Engineering department, and as a panelist for the Early Discovery Mini-Conference and Minority for Engineering Program. She also continues to be active in service for the Purdue community as the incoming graduate advisor for Tau Beta Pi Indiana Alpha chapter.Suzanne SwaineStephen McBride, Purdue University Stephen McBride is the Assistant Director of Graduate Student Success for the College of Engineering. With a strong background in leadership
present their names and pronouns, beingmore mindful of dynamics at play in group work, and being flexible and accommodating with deadlines. Many of these conversations and community-voiced concerns have informed the work of the DEIAmbassadors in developing their Theater-Based Workshops to build a more inclusive and safe community.F. Theater-Based Workshops In our previous work, we have observed that it is challenging to engage undergraduate students inDEI themed workshops and other activities if they are offered as an extracurricular activity. On the otherhand, faculty are frequently reluctant to cover DEI topics in classes, either because they view them as notrelated to the course material, because they feel uncomfortable or unqualified to
Paper ID #6955Student Attitudes toward STEM: The Development of Upper ElementarySchool and Middle/High School Student SurveysMalinda Faber, The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University Malinda Faber is a Research Associate on the Evaluation Team at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University. Malinda works on multiple research teams, including evaluations of The Golden LEAF Foundations’ STEM Initiative, North Carolina’s Race to the Top STEM Initiative, and the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction’s IMPACT-V Model for capacity
, generally experience these issueswhen they enter the workforce, having to complete on the job training in order to becomecomfortable with power quality matters.A new power quality course was created at the University of Pittsburgh, in the Spring 2018semester. This course uses a novel approach to teaching students power quality concepts byusing an electric power laboratory designed specifically for undergraduate education. Studentswork with real electric motors, transformers, variable frequency drives, and DC powerelectronics to understand the impacts of these loads on a 208Vac, 75kVA rated system. Acustom, 5kW rated work bench featuring compact fluorescent loads, as well as traditional single-phase or three-phase linear resistive, capacitive, and
conflate sociotechnical engineering education with ethics education.Others have challenged the nature of sociotechnical learning activities, such as service-learningand community-based design projects, for their tendency to fail to engage with the ways powerdynamics shape interactions between faculty, students, and community members [8-12]. Thesecritiques elevate the need for clarity around defining sociotechnical design education.Other criticisms have come from local, state, and national legislative actors who have advancedefforts to curtail or ban the teaching of the “divisive issues” in primary, secondary, andpostsecondary education [13-14]. However, the form and function of these legislative attacksdiffers across sociopolitical contexts in the