Multidisciplinary Engineering design," ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 83, No. 2, 1995, pp. 311-316.5. Lamancusa, J., Jorgenson, Jens E., and Zayas-Castro Jose L., “The Learning Factory – A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 2, April, 1997, pp. 103-112.6. Mahajan, A., McDonald, D. and Walworth, M., “An Innovative Integrated Learning Laboratory Environment,” ASEE NCS Spring Conference Proceedings, Sinclair Community College, Dayton, Ohio, Vol 2, April, 1997, pp. 324-329.7. Mahajan, A., McDonald, D. and Walworth, M., “An Innovative Integrated Learning Laboratory Environment – An Update,” ASEE NCS Spring Conference Proceedings
courses.Conceptual Framework The technology literacy curriculum needs to be firmly founded in the context ofthe student. Every student is alive, and has an interest in sustaining life. This notion iseloquently stated in John Dewey's famous pedagogical declaration. It was published inThe School Journal, Volume LIV, Number 3 (January 16, 1897), pages 77-80. He states: I believe that all education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race. This process begins unconsciously almost at birth, and is continually shaping the individual's powers, saturating his consciousness, forming his habits, training his ideas, and arousing his feelings and emotions. Through this
. and B.S. in manufacturing engineering and electrical engineering, respectively, from the Missouri University of Science and Technology. Dr. Nagel’s long-term goal is to drive engineering innovation by applying her multidisciplinary engineering expertise to instrumentation and manufacturing challenges.Prof. Christopher Stewart Rose, James Madison University I do research on the anatomy, development and evolution of amphibians and I teach courses on the com- parative anatomy of vertebrate animals, animal development, human development and evolution, scientific writing, and biology in the movies.Dr. Ramana Pidaparti, University of Georgia Ramana Pidaparti, is currently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at VCU. Dr
strategies to measure performance against expected outcomes but not necessarilytowards applications to life‟s uses or individuals‟ preferences. In their book “Creative ProblemSolving” Edward and Monika Lumsdaine11 present many stimulating contrasts between ourinformation-based edu-system and creative learning. Education is a system that defines what andhow-much one should learn and from what sources; teaching focused, not learning focused. In aparallel sense, one historical perspective delving into the dichotomy of the engineeringpractitioner as contrasted with the educators‟ predilections that teach engineering was offered in1993 by Hazen and Ladesic.12 They tracked the changes of the aero-engineering curriculum fromthe 1920‟s forward to 1995
engineers are responsible. Educating engineers for their career responsibilities hasalways been a priority of teaching institutions, but ethics education in engineering has not alwaysbeen a significant part of the curriculum. The importance of ethics training for students in otherfields such as medicine and psychology is more prevalent than that in the field of science andengineering. While the need for making ethical decisions for professionals in medicine andpsychology is apparent, it may not be so for engineers. Engineers make countless decisions thataffect the welfare of their corporations, their communities, and their professions. For instance, achemical engineer may have to choose between safety of those living near a plant and cost
carryout thespecific tasks. To examine one step in the design process; as cost becomes the driving issue in the area ofdesign, experimental analysis is giving way to numerical analysis. Thus, the mechanical engineer musthave knowledge of both experimental procedures and numerical analysis methods. It is at this pointwhere the well rounded engineer comes is beneficial to the company.Creating a mechanical engineer who is capable of satisfying many roles is left to the mechanicalengineering curriculum. We, as educators, must provide a mechanical engineering curriculum which isdiverse and yet integrates the key knowledge bases in the traditional ME concentrations. It is important tohave courses which integrate this basic knowledge into a design
certain university (ies)only. Therefore, it might be worthwhile to indulge in a further in-depth analysis of those coursesand domains with the intention of implementing courses of similar nature as a part of the Stevensgraduate EM programs. Page 15.16.7ConclusionReviewing Table 1 in reference to the Stevens EM Program shows that all domain areas arecovered except for Quality, Research Methods and Techniques, and a few courses listed in the“other” category. To address this lack of domain in the Stevens curriculum, Quality is high onthe list of topics that will be added. In terms of the domain of Research Methods andTechniques, those courses are
incorporating sustainability concepts into engineering curricula,suggesting approaches like a micro-curriculum and stand-alone courses4. Moreover, tools such asthe Sustainability in Higher Education Assessment Rubric (SHEAR) and SustainabilityAssessment Survey (SAS) have been empirically validated and proposed for assessingsustainability competencies in higher education.Dancz et al.5 developed a new instrument to assess senior design projects in engineering,addressing the shortcomings of previous tools in capturing multi-disciplinary knowledgetransfer, particularly in sustainability. While their study was limited to Civil Engineeringdepartments, exposing a gap in a broader application, this study extends the use of theirinstrument to various
curriculum development is largelyshaped by four dimensions: a) Education leadership (i.e., the engagement of theuniversity/college’s leadership to support veteran friendly campus and program), the environmentvariables (i.e., the lab-based engineering learning contexts), graduate competencies (i.e., keylearning outcomes and competencies for learners), and pedagogical strategies (i.e., utilization ofvarious teaching strategies such as lecture, lab experiments, and guest speakers). Figure 1 belowillustrates the systematic approach for curriculum development starting with a careful andthorough scanning of environmental factors and determination of specific competencies andlearning outcomes for students. Knowledge gained from the previous two stages
sessions was wanting to becomebetter educators. Comments on becoming better educators related to a faculty memberacknowledging they could use professional development for improving their teaching, but therewas also an emphasis on this professional development helping them as the educator, becomebetter for the sake of the students. We had participants say, “I want to learn how to help them [students]. I want to be effective, help and guide them, to succeed.”With a similar sentiment, we had another participant say, “I see my colleagues say, ‘we learned this way, so my students have to learn this way,’ but I say no, I want them to NOT be underwater, and I don’t want my students to experience it.”Overall, NTT faculty
theirexperiences. Project Based Learning is a teaching method in which students gain knowledge andskills by working for an extended period of time to investigate and respond to an authentic,engaging, and complex question, problem, or challenge” (Buck Institute for Education, 2018,para. 3).Methods Participants. Student participants include 140 rural, seventh grade students participatingin the Solenoid Invention Kit Unit Sequence during an in-school, science class. A school withsimilar demographics served as the control group. The unit was taught over a six-week periodduring spring semester 2017. Solenoid Invention Kit Unit Sequence. The Solenoid Invention Kit curriculum containsfive lab activities, two make activities, and one invent
, prototyping, program development, crafting interactive curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 9 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabrication technologies. He has taught lectures and workshops on advanced subjects to more than 1000 undergraduate engineering students and 150 graduate students, while advising on over 500 student and faculty research projects. His academic credentials include an M.B.A in Organizing Innovation and Product Management from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and
manufacturing. The educational programs are aimed at furthering education in engineering and engineering technology by promoting global excellence in engineering and engineering technology, developing future generations of entrepreneurially-minded engineers. This is achieved by partnering and investing in educational initiatives and programs between industry and institu- tions of higher learning. Michael has served on various advisory groups including, the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Education, Boeing Higher Education Integration Board, American Society for Engineering Education Project Board and the National Science Foundation I-UCRC Industry University Collaborative Research Center Advisory Board. Michael
Paper ID #37931Work in Progress: Supporting Engineering LaboratoryReport Writing with Modules Targeted for InstructorsCharles Riley (Professor) Professor and Graduate Program Director Civil Engineering Department Oregon Institute of Technology I conduct research in diverse areas of engineering education from professional skills, to writing, to gender and ethics. I also maintain a structures laboratory to conduct full-scale structural component testing and field investigations of highway bridges.Dave Kim Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineering and
Paper ID #36714Leveraging Entrepreneurial Minded Learning andMakerspace Prototyping to an Advance Embedded SystemsSystem-on-Chip CourseChristopher Martinez (Associate Professor) Associate Professor in Electrical & Computer Engineering Interested in improving digital circuits and embedded system education Have been working on the addition of DEI material into the curriculum Looking for ways to improve hispanic student participationMaria-isabel Carnasciali (Associate Professor) Maria-Isabel is currently an Assistant Provost and professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of New Haven. She teaches
structured class. Findings from thestudy illustrated how students were able to develop core competencies such as in CAD-CAMwhile characterizing the kinds of mistakes that students make in developing said competencies.We conclude on the illustration of a future iteration of an M3 curriculum, one where thechallenges students typically face in CAD-CAM are purposefully woven into the assignmentsthemselves, serving as a way to provoke awareness and improvement in skill development.Introduction‘Making through Micro-Manufacturing’ (M3 ) [1, 2] provides a model of how to couple theflexibility of ‘Making’ with the concerns of production engineering. Such an approach inproduction emphasizes customizability and personalization in product design. Because of
to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational Scholarship presented by
,calculus, and physics, we only thought about the problems that we needed to solve. When wetook this course, I feel like I am now more open to the environment around me. I feel like all thisshould be fixed, that, like, this would be a great idea to apply. I started to have more ideas.”This concept of starting to have more ideas is one of the main goals for introducingentrepreneurship education into the curriculum – to create a generation of young people who seethe world as a place of opportunity, a chance to innovate and contribute. That this is happeningwas expressed by several students through statements such as, “Now when we see a problem orsomething, we look for solutions and think of a plan.” For Mouza and others like her, it changedtheir
first examination towardsearning a Professional Engineer license.However, unlike other basic courses like statics and dynamics, a variety of academicdepartments teach their own "version" of Engineering Economy. This is based on results of asurvey of teachers of Engineering Economy7. These include chemical, civil, computer, computerscience, electrical, engineering management, environmental, general, industrial, mechanical andmaterials science, engineering and technology. Depending on the learning environments,different students from different disciplines may or may not learn the same material. Theenvironments vary for a number of reasons, including (1) curriculum setting; (2) coursedefinition; (3) educator background; and definition of the (4
describes our BSE program and pro-vides data on students currently enrolled in it.IntroductionEngineering programs typically have very little room in the curriculum for students to makechoices for interests they might have outside of their disciplines. This lack of flexibility likely actsas a deterrent for some students who might otherwise choose engineering. This inflexibility alsooften acts as a deterrent in the development of new, cutting-edge engineering programs.Prior to EC2000, accreditation standards were focused on extensive quantitative requirements.Engineering programs were required to have a certain number of hours in several topics in orderto obtain accreditation. Now, however, ABET has embraced outcomes-based education and
Chancellor and Board of Trustees in 2007. The Chancellor’s Award is a prestigious award within the SUNY system and is awarded only to those candidates who have a record of consistently superior performance and a long commitment to the SUNY system. . She has also been a recipient of Rene Chasmen Affirmative action Award in 1994. She is a motivational speaker for women in Science and Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Collaborated Efforts in TI ARM M4/32BIT Microcontroller Curricula Development and AssessmentIntroduction These collaborative efforts in curriculum development were an extension of several NSFfunded projects that focused on the
. and B.S. all in industrial engineering from the University of Arkansas. She has a variety of research interests including quality & reliability, engineering education, and community-based OR. She is a member of ASEE and IIE.Dr. Leanne Petry, Central State University Dr. Leanne Petry is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering, Science, Technology, and Agriculture at Central State University. Her expertise is in analytical and materials characterization tech- niques, including microscopy, spectroscopy, chromatography, and electrochemistry. Her research interests include oxidation-reduction reactions at the surface of electrodes for sensor applications, corrosion mech- anisms of materials, as well as
, City of Escanaba, Alger Delta Electric,Marquette Board of Light and Power, We Energies, U.P. Power Company, Champion Inc., NorthElectric Inc. City of Gladstone and City of Negaunee.Program CurriculumThe curriculum developed is shown below with the courses developed specifically for the powertechnician program in italics. The rest of the course already existed and are used in otherelectrical associate programs and the ABET accredited baccalaureate degree in ElectronicsEngineering Technology offered by NMU. Fall Semester I EN 111 College Composition 4 CIS 110 Principles of Computer Information Systems 4 ET 112 DC Circuit Analysis
an M.L.I.S. from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. His professional interests include teachers’ perceptions of school library programs and school librarians as a resource and assisting educators with integrating emerging technologies into the classroom.Dr. Ranjeet Agarwala, East Carolina University Dr. Ranjeet Agarwala serves as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at East Carolina University. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the North Carolina State University. Since 2001 he has taught courses in Engineering Design, Digital Manufacturing, and 3D printing, GD&T, Electro-Mechanical Systems, Statics and Dynamics. His research interests are in the areas on Advance
. Table 3. Course classification codes Category Sub-category Remarks I. General Education A. Languages Korean, English, Japanese, etc. B. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences History, Literature, Management, etc. C. Natural Sciences Mathematics, Physics, etc. D. Physical Education, Services II. Computer A. Computer in General B. CAD/CAM III. Basic Courses A. Design and Drafting Graduation works included B. Manufacturing
was a Co-PI for the NSF sponsored GatewayUndergraduate Engineering Education Coalition and Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering andDean of Newark College of Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology.HAN P. BAODr. Bao joined is the Mitsubishi Kasei Chaired Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Old Dominion University.His teaching and research interests include manufacturing, integrated process and product design and concurrentengineering. Page 6.797.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society
engineering laboratory through remote web-based experiments.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Washington, DC. June 28- July1, 1998.[3] Li, Francis, James A. Landay, Anthony D, Joseph. “Supporting Collaborative Teams in Engineering Education.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM. June 24- 27, 2001.[4] Baxter, Douglas H. “Examining the Benefits of a Self-Taught Solid Modeling Course.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM. June 24- 27, 2001.[5] Ronald E. Musiak, Eric W. Haffner, Steven Schreiner, Alan K. Karplus, Mary B. Vollaro, and Richard A. Grabiec. “Forging New Links: Integrating the Freshman Engineering Curriculum.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual
being unable to practice in industry because of theheavy undergraduate emphasis on theoretical engineering aspects rather than hands-onapplications.11 Additionally, a prominent consensus report from the National Academy ofEngineering highlights a “disconnect between engineers in practice and engineers in academe”and points out that ”[i]ndustry representatives point to this disconnect as the reason thatengineering students are not adequately prepared, in their view, to enter today’s workforce.”12Actual observations of professional engineering work are critical resources for rethinking Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for
traitsincludes not only “a good understanding of engineering science fundamentals” but also suchhighly desired traits as: “a good understanding of design and manufacturing processes”, “amulti-disciplinary, systems perspective”, “a basic understanding of the context in whichengineering is practiced” (i.e. concurrent engineering), “good communication skills; written,oral, graphic and listening”, “high ethical standards”, “a profound understanding of theimportance of teamwork”, “curiosity and a desire for lifelong learning”, “flexibility and anability to think critically and creatively”. Many of these attributes require training beyond thatwhich has been historically provided in the classical engineering curriculum. In addition,Boeing adds a note to this
program success. The authors presenta set of eight categories of design competencies to be used as a basis for structuring effectiveengineering design projects. During project development, the eight categories of competenceare checked against anticipated steps in the project to assess the structure of the project and todirect modifications that will more fully achieve desired design education outcomes. Anexample is included to assist faculty in adoption of a competency-based approach to projectdevelopment. This approach provides a basis for outcomes-based design education, even whenstudents transfer from one program or institution to another.KEYWORDSEngineering design education, learning outcomes, curriculum design, collaborative