Conference Session

Faculty Track - Technical Session IV

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Autumn Marie Reed, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Nilanjan Banerjee, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Elsa D. Garcin, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Wayne G. Lutters, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Susan McDonough, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Christopher Murphy, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Kevin Erling Omland, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Tagged Topics

Faculty

forth immediate personal reaction to the data, an internal response, sometimes emotions or feelings, hidden images and associations with the facts; 3) The Interpretive Level: questions to draw out meaning, values, significance, and implications; 4) The Decisional Level: questions to elicit resolution, bring the conversation to a close, and enable the group to make a resolve about the future [9]. 6In STRIDE’s operationalization of the Focused Conversation Model in each of our topical eventswe always 1) develop

Conference Session

Track : Collegiate - Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Janice Leshay Hall, Virginia Tech; Dina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Collegiate, Diversity

an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. His research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity. Lee received his Ph.D in engineering education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in industrial & systems engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International

Conference Session

Undergraduate Track - Technical Session II

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Donald Winiecki Ph.D., Boise State University; Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Timothy Andersen, Boise State University; Amit Jain, Boise State University; Dianxiang Xu, Boise State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Undergraduate Education

– [10], [11], [40], [41] followed by an exercise in which all attendees were asked tocomplete the `Gender-Science` version of the Implicit Assumptions Test (IAT). The follow-up discussion was diverted by one faculty memberwho impugned the credibility of the IAT itself3 effectively changing the intended topic of the session to(a) a general movement against social science and (b) the common view that computer science is itself`purely technical` and not affected by issues now associated with bias, lack of inclusion, diversity andsocial justice. Had this same discussion been attempted today, it would be appropriate to point outrecent events including Susan Fowler's experiences at Uber [24], [25], and the situation at Google, ascharacterized in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor P.E., Arizona State University; Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

507). CON252 focuses on the building design and construction process,ranging from excavation to material choice to various building systems. CEE 507 focuses oninfrastructure systems from the technical and environmental perspectives and examines theinterdependences between these infrastructures.III. Motivation and VisionIntroductory courses tend to be required for lower-division students and these courses act asprerequisites for upper-division courses that tend to be more discipline-specific and thus, may bemore engaging for students. Introductory courses provide fundamental information andknowledge needed for upper-division courses. This framework continues throughout anacademic course map, forming a linear advancement. Figure 1 shows this

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Dimitrios Bolkas, Pennsylvania State University, Wilkes-Barre Campus; Jeffrey Chiampi; Carol L. Morman PE, PS, Cincinnati State Technical and Community College

necessary hardware to the participating universities from differentparts of the US, and the feedback received by the students participating in the competition.BackgroundBrief history of surveying educationCivil engineering and surveying education have strong ties that go back to the early history(1800-1900) of surveying education in the U.S. [1]. In these early years surveying was taught inmathematics departments and later in civil engineering departments. The American Society ofCivil Engineering (ASCE) was founded in 1852, and one of its early technical divisions was theSurveying Engineering Division. This was founded in 1926 [2] in order to provide leadership insurveying. For many years surveying grew under the wing of civil engineering. The

Conference Session

ECE Division Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heinz Schmidt-Walter, Hochschule Darmstadt, Germany; Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, College of Technology, West Lafayette; James L. Barnes, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

, Darmstadt. There he started his work in the fuell cell and hydrogen technics area beside power electronics.Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, College of Technology, West Lafayette Michael Dyrenfurth is professor in the Department of Industrial Technology at Purdue University. He is co-PI of the DETECT and Atlantis Concurrent MS degree projects. Active in international aspects of the profession, he teaches and researches in the areas of technological innovation, technological literacy, and international dimensions of technological education.James L. Barnes, James Madison University Dr. Barnes is a professor of Integrated Science and Technology at James Madison University. He has worked in the science and technology

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jinhui Wang, North Dakota State University; Na Gong, North Dakota State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

Microelectronics Journal, and served as the associate editor of Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers. He has also served as the track chair for IEEE International SoC Conference 2014 (SoCC2014), the technical program committees for IEEE international conferences, including IEEE International SoC Conference 2016 (SoCC2016), 2015 (SoCC2015), 2014 (SoCC2014), 2013 (SoCC2013), 2012 (SoCC2012), IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology 2016 (ICSICT2016), 2014 (ICSICT2014), IEEE In- ternational Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip 2016 (MCSoC16), 2015 (MCSoC15), and IEEE 11th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON2015).Dr. Na Gong, North Dakota State University Dr

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James L. Hanson PE, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

based on typical international conferenceproceedings format. The specific format was required to introduce students to the typicalrequirements of publishing.In addition to the written report, an oral presentation to the class was required as part of theproject. Duration of the oral presentations was approximately 8-10-minutes, depending onspecific class size and number of sessions devoted to student presentations (typically 2 classsessions). Additional time was allowed in the schedule after each presentation for questions anddiscussion. The entire project was worth approximately 25% of the course grade. The writtenreport accounted for two-thirds of the grade and the presentation for the remaining one-third. Thegeneral timeline and grading

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Craig Scott, Morgan State University; Mohamed Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University; Pamela Leigh-Mack, Virginia State University; Barry Sullivan; John Kelly, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE); Stephen Goodnick, Arizona State University; Mark Smith, University of Texas at Austin; Michelle Klein, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc. (ECEDHA); Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Ben Oni, Tuskegee University; Esther Ososanya, University of the District of Columbia; Abdelnasser Eldek, Jackson State University; Shujun Yang; Hector Erives, University of Texas at El Paso; Cole Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso; Ivonne Santiago, University of Texas at El Paso; Peter Romine, Navajo Technical University; Shayla Sawyer; Rodrigo Romero, University of Texas at El Paso; Yuanrui Sang; Hassan Salmani; Delia Saenz, Arizona State University; Miguel Velez-Reyes, University of Texas at El Paso

by opportunities and resourcesfor support, with an emphasis on programs focused on MSIs. Breakout session 1 addressed thetech pipeline: what industry needs from future engineers and session 2 addressed retaining andpreparing engineers of color.On day 2, building equitable partnerships and increasing the pipeline to address technical topicsin ECE were reviewed. Participants were divided into 4 technical breakouts, facilitated byestablished leaders from PWIs. Topics addressed were: 1) Semiconductors; 2) Applied AI,Cybersecurity and Cloud Computing; 3) Beyond 5G; and 4) Green Energy. Each of the groupsreported out followed by an open forum.Workshop Session DiscussionsThe information addressed in the sessions came from the presenters, question

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; John Mativo, The University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

requirements, basic engineering courses, major courses, and electives: University Core (41 credits total): o CHEM1210 Chemistry I (3) o CHEM1215 Chemistry I Lab (1) o One from:  COSK1220 Reading and Writing Strategies (3)  COSK2221 Intercultural Communications (3) o COSK1221 Argument and Research (3) o COSK2220 Public Speaking and Persuasion o COSK 2230 Business Professional Communication (3) o ECON1010 Survey of Economics (3) o HUMA1010 Humanities: Art and Music o INFS1010 Introduction to Decision Support Systems o MATH2070 Calculus with Analytical Geometry I (4

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Teamwork, Reflection, and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abdulrahman Alsharif, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Saleh Alatwah

. Therefore, to better understand the distribution ofcomments by raters international status table 1.2 shows the racial breakdown of theinternational status.Table 1.3 Race Proportions of Raters International Status (N = 100,915)Race Yes NoAsian 10,294 (13%) 10,114 (64%)Black 1,337 (1.6%) 423 (3%)Declined 1,785 (2%) 855 (5%)Hispanic 7,775 (9%) 1,716 (11%)Native 64 (0.08%) 33 (0.21%)Other 2,812 (3%) 675 (4%)White 59,662 (71%) 1,944 (13%)Total 83,729 15,760 The total number of comments per- and post-split varies. We believe the

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carole Goodson, University of Houston; Susan Miertschin, University of Houston; Barbara Stewart, University of Houston; Luces Faulkenberry, University of Houston; Curtis Johnson, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

social science with instruction in and experience with technology built in. The othertwo courses presented are technical courses which also present impact and context issues withrespect to culture and society. The faculty involved plan to follow through with more formalstudy of the success of the four courses in meeting the goal of technological literacy.Bibliography1. Pearson, G. P. and Young, A. T., Eds. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More aboutTechnology (2002) National Academy of Sciences.2. Technological Literacy for All: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology 2nd Ed (2006)International Technology Education Association.3. Wendt, A., Martin, J., Russell, J., Graham, M. Farrell, P., Peercy, P., Pfatteicher

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Adithya Jayakumar, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Lucille Sheppard, Ohio State University; Shadia Siliman, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

distributed. 2. A workshop for faculty in the College of Engineering (COE) that was conducted during every departments’ regular faculty meetings. 3. Discussion sessions were conducted with faculty who taught project-based courses. 4. Informal lunch sessions to encourage sharing of effective strategies were proposed.Each component of this approach is described in greater detail below.1. Resource (‘One Pager’)An important part of the initiative was the creation of a detailed resource which containedinformation in the form of organized steps on how to make a traditional classroom moreinclusive. The authors initially planned on creating a one-page resource but quickly realized thedifficulty in this task due to the volume of information that

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 4: Bring Your Own Experiment (BYOE)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eliza Banu, University of Georgia; Dominik May

, and engineering education researchers around technology, instruction, and research. Dr. May has organized several international conferences in the Engineering Education Research field. He is currently program co-chair and international program committee member for the annual International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV) and served as a special session committee member for the Experiment@ International Conference Series (exp.at). © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com BYOE: Energy Loss in Pipe Systems (iRL) Brock Woodson, Eliza Banu, Sheridan Finder

Conference Session

ELOS Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Curtis Brackett, Bradley University; David Zietlow, Bradley University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Optimal Design of a Pump and Piping SystemAbstract The primary objective of this design project is to provide an opportunityfor undergraduate students to integrate engineering measurements and modelingtechniques to accurately predict a priori the optimum pump size, pipe diameters,and wall thicknesses of a pump and pipe system given specified flow rates andlengths of piping. A secondary objective of this design project is to providestudents with an opportunity to improve team and technical skills while groupedinto small teams. The teams are challenged to predict the pipe diameters andpump size used to serve two parallel branches of a piping system. The experimental apparatus is a pre-developed system that includes threedifferent size

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martin Li, Duke University; Brianna Loomis, Duke University; Kevin Caves, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

take the session to any location. The whole purpose of the club is toraise awareness for the types of issues children with disabilities can face, help the parents and childrenenjoy the toys and even, make their own.EvaluationThrough Project Tadpole, we have begun to measure the impact of club involvement of students on theirengineering knowledge and skills as well as disability awareness. We have developed and are piloting asurvey that will be administered at 3 points during the year. As we have started the semester, we haveadministered the first retrospectively, the second two months in, and the third at the end of the year.Results will be used to gauge skills building and enable us to make modifications to our training program.The survey is

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven J. Burian, University of Utah; Douglas Schmucker P.E., University of Utah; Joshua Lenart, University of Utah ; Hessam Tavakoldavani, University of Utah; Pedro Romero, University of Utah; Michael E. Barber, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Island International Engineering Program (IEP).3 The Rhode Island IEPseeks to train engineers to be able to operate in the international workplace by earning onedegree in an engineering discipline and one in a foreign language. In a similar, but more focusedway, the Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering uses aprogram called the Joe S. Mundy Global Learning Endowment4 to provide an internationallearning experience for students that may include international research or a summer-long studyabroad. In addition to the significant resources often needed to promote study abroad, there areother curricula actions that affect the perceived ability of institutions to promote globalization-related learning outcomes

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Hands-on Projects and Spatial Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana Bairaktarova, University of Oklahoma; Matthew Reyes, University of Oklahoma; Nooshin Nassr P.E., University of Oklahoma; Dan Thomas Carlton, University of Oklahoma, College of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

stimulus influences on mental image rotation performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 413–25.[21] Bergvall, V. L., Sorby, S. A., & Worthen, J. B. (1994). Thawing the freezing climate for women in engineeringeducation: Views from both sides of the desk. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 323–46.[22] Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., & Saorín, J. L. (2006). Learning support tools for developing spatial abilities inengineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 470–77.[23] Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–55.[24] Miller, C. L., & Bertoline, G

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

neverthelessimportant. Examples of equity and non-discrimination in design relate to transportation planning(civil engineering) [28], assistive technology [29], universal accessibility for people withphysical limitations [30], and artificial intelligence [31]. These design-related issues could bereadily integrated into a number of technical courses for a wide array of engineering disciplines.Right to Life and Security of Person – Article 3Article 3 of the UDHR states, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” [1].Technology is being used to document human rights abuses via tools including satellite imagery,remote sensing, and machine learning. Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents, and machinelearning can also be applied in numerous

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 4: Fostering Belonging - Identity, Self-Efficacy, and Retention

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter M Ostafichuk P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Carol Jaeger, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Alireza Bagherzadeh, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Jon Nakane, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

university: a longitudinal study of psychological disturbance, absent-mindedness and vulnerability to homesickness,” J Psychol., vol. 78 (pt 4), pp. 425–441, 1987. [3] M.M. Awang, F.M. Kutty, and A.R. Ahmad, “Perceived social support and well being: first-year student experience in university,” International Education Studies, vol 7, no 13, pp. 261–270, 2014. [4] P.M. Ostafichuk, M. Tse, J. Power, C.P. Jaeger, and J. Nakane, “Remote learning impacts on student wellbeing,” in Proc. 2021 CEEA-ACEG, Toronto, ON, 2021. [5] Q.A. Golsteyn and D. Nino, “An analysis on the state of wellness of engineering undergraduate students,” in Proc. Of CEEA-ACEG 2018, Vancouver, BC, 2020. [6] Q.A. Golsteyn and P.M. Ostafichuk

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology; Wade Lee Robison

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

identified resource risks that require ethical decision making. • Risk: “The team experiences any internal conflicts” • Effect: “Tasks may be delayed” • Strategy: “We will refer to the team Norms and Values and Roles and Responsibilities to resolve the conflict”2. Some teams identified safety risks that would affect the team, not just the end user. This is still a consideration of the harms that may occur although it is a risk that could prevent the team from completing the project. • Risk: “Unsafe testing during prototyping” • Risk: “[Team] member is injured while machining prototype”3. Some teams do not take all risks seriously even when considering risks that happen on a fairly regular basis. • Risk: “Team member(s) drop

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Imas, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jeffrey A. Lamack, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Charles S. Tritt, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Larry Fennigkoh P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Icaro Dos Santos, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

standards, user needs Course 2 (1 credit) – Fall Term, Year 3 • Outcome: feasibility analysis • Topics: market research, FDA regulation, codes and standards, intellectual property, IRB, design controls, CAD and solid modeling Course 3 (1 credit) – Winter Term, Year 3 • Outcome: specifications and system design • Topics: interface specifications, system design, funding, biomedical transducers, power budget, technical literature, initial bench design and prototype building Course 4 (1 credit) – Spring Term, Year 3 • Outcome: system design and testing • Topics: bench design and testing, electrical and mechanical safety, design for safety and reliability, electrical noise and interference Course 5 (3 credits) – Fall Term, Year 4 • Outcome

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 11: Shaping Engineers - Competency, Creativity, and Iteration in the First Year

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cooper Vermeulen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

apply theoretical knowledge. Include oral presentations and written documentation to assess communication skills alongside technical proficiency. 9. Integrating Reflection: Require students to reflect on their design decisions, challenges faced, and lessons learned. Reflection helps students internalize key concepts and develop a growth mindset.These recommendations highlight the potential for design challenges to serve as transformativelearning experiences. By incorporating iterative processes, real-world complexity, andcollaborative opportunities, educators can prepare students for the multifaceted demands ofengineering practice. Through the thoughtful integration of 3D printing, students not onlyvisualize but also physically

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 4: Digital Learning Part II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ronald J. Hayne, The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

using timing loops and basicbit shifting, but will be limited to half-duplex (only one direction at a time). A full-duplexhardware implementation requires interfacing with internal processor registers and memory.Software UARTThe standard format for asynchronous serial data transmission is shown in Figure 1 [3]. Thebeginning of a data byte is indicated by a start bit and the end is framed by a stop bit. Data bitsare sent least significant bit (LSB) first and the eighth bit is an optional parity bit. The number ofbits transmitted per second is commonly referred to as the baud rate. This rate establishes thetiming for each bit. Figure 1. Standard Serial Data Format.A software UART was created using delay loops to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 2: Assessing the Entrepreneurial Mindset, Curiosity, and Workplace Preparedness

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Marie Mowat, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Santosh Kumar Pitla, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

finding a gap in a marketand providing innovative solutions to problems [3]. However, for a start-up to succeed, multiplesteps need to take place. A problem needs to be identified, research needs to be done and peopleneed to be talked to, a product concept needs to be developed, the product needs to be tested, andcustomers need to be found [4]. It is during this time, while start-ups are struggling to getfunding and solve the problem they have identified, that they also need technical support. Tocreate viable products, technical expertise is needed, and this is where engineers can help.Engineers are an important part of many start-ups. They provide the technical support and designskills needed to create the product [5]. Engineers are even more

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander E. Dillon, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Jonathan D. Stolk, Southern Methodist University; Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement,” Motivation and Emotion, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 199-223, 2003.[4] P. R. Pintrich, “The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 31, pp. 459-470, 1999.[5] T. Garcia, T. and P. R. Pintrich, “The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 477-486, 1996.[6] J. Stolk and J. Harari, “Student motivations as predictors of higher-level cognitions in project-based classrooms,” Active Learning in Higher Education, in press.[7] T. M. Amabile, “The social psychology of

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 5: Exploring and Re-Examining Ideas in Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alanna Epstein, University of Michigan; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

level at the time of participation, 27indicated "Undergraduate", 22 indicated "Master's degree student", 48 indicated "Ph.D. student",and 22 indicated "Postdoctoral Researcher".Dataset 2, Great Lakes I-Corps Hub Program SurveysThe Hub survey data includes internally developed surveys administered by the Great Lakes I-Corps Hub in the year 2022. Both pre-course and post-course surveys are administered, with thedata from the present analysis drawn from pre-course surveys only. The surveys are administeredwithin Qualtrics, and distributed through the Learning Management System for the Regionalprograms and through email for the Local programs. Instructors are encouraged to allow timeduring the first and last class sessions for survey completion

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Elmore, State University of New York at Binghamton; Koenraad Gieskes, State University of New York at Binghamton; Nicole Alfarano, State University of New York at Binghamton

likely of all the engineering majors to shift to another major. This has also beenobserved at Binghamton University. Other studies have also looked at student confidence in theirchoice of major [5] and [6]. Other factors that go into the choice of major have also beenconsidered in previous studies. Kelly, Maczka, and Grohs found that student identity andmotivation constructs are not significant predictors of changes in major [7]. Griffin and Griffinasked, (1) Which majors were the engineering students originally interested in pursuing? (2) Didthe first-year engineering program provide them with sufficient introductory courses andinformation sessions to assure them of their major choice? (3) What other information sourceshelped them in forming

Conference Session

Construction Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gad M. Ghada, California State Polytechnic University; Jinsung Cho; Yasser Salem

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

program educational 2. Generates and analyzes alternative solutions objectives; 3. Synthesizes all data and chooses the optimal solution based on evaluation of project criteria e. An ability to function effectively as a member or 1. Effectively uses time leader on a technical team; 2. Participates in team work 3. Makes appropriate decisions based on given constraints 4. Demonstrates accountability in a team

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 9: Hands-On Foundations - Building Confidence, Belonging, and Engagement in First-Year Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Mullin, UC San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

-minute-long active-learning lecture sessions. Students then apply these concepts to two projects duringthe quarter-long course (i.e., 10 weeks), beginning with an individual clock project followed by alonger team-based robotics project. While successful completion of a calculus-based science-engineering general physics course is required, it is not expected, nor required, that students whoregister for the course have experience with CAD, engineering design, fabrication or robotics.Indeed, majority of students arrive with little to no hands-on engineering design experience.During the first three weeks of the quarter, students learn basic CAD skills, metal fabricationtechniques and use of the laser cutter in the 3 hour long weekly lab sessions to