. Finally, the last representative turned thequestion around into a challenge, saying “No, but we are waiting for someone like you to join usand show us whey we should be using them.”At the same time, there is never enough room in a software engineering curriculum for all thetopics the faculty judge to be important. For this reason, the place (or not) of formal methods inan undergraduate program will continue to be debated. Comments and suggestions from othermembers of the software engineering education community are solicited and welcome.References1. J. P. Bowen and M. G. Hinchey, “Ten commandments of formal methods ... ten years later”, IEEE Computer, January 2006.2. L. Burdy et al, "An overview of JML tools and applications", Eighth
submission and presentations with demoWeek 16 Project evaluation and related project grades will be postedFigure 1 outlines the key project parameters including the project objective, intended goals, andboundary conditions. To account for the fact that such a solution can be potentially applied atremote point-of-care locations where electricity may not be readily available/easily accessible, thestudents were asked to make their design fully mechanical and not rely on electrical power/motors.This also helped to reduce the number of interfaces that students must design. The rationale behindreducing the number of critical interfaces was to increase the simplicity and robustness of thedesign, aligning with the frugal engineering principles
and at the Center on Education and Work. He uses experimental and discourse-based research methods to understand the cognitive, social and embodied nature of STEM learning and instruction. He is currently co-principal investigator of the AWAKEN project in engineering education, along with Professors Sandra Shaw Courter and L. Allen Phelps.Benjamin Stein, University of Wisconsin Benjamin Stein is a graduate student in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, where his work is in hyperspectral laser design. Before returning to school, he worked as a math instructor at Stern College for Women of Yeshiva University and an electronics design engineer at ASML. These experiences as an
Paper ID #25394Multi-Learning Techniques for Enhancing Student Engagement in Cyberse-curity EducationDr. Te-Shun Chou, East Carolina University Dr. Te-Shun Chou is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at ECU. He received his Bachelor degree in Electronics Engineering at Feng Chia University and both Master’s de- gree and Doctoral degree in Electrical Engineering at Florida International University. He serves as the program coordinator of the Master program in Network Technology for the Department of Technology Systems and the lead faculty of Digital Communication Systems concentration for the
theoretical courses before they obtain the knowledge and skill setnecessary to complete a meaningful technical project. This long wait time between studentsentering the engineering and technology (ET) program and when they have had the opportunityto apply content knowledge to a meaningful technical project does have a negative impact on thestudent enthusiasm and motivation to stay in the degree2. Identifying this challenge, severalengineering educators have updated their curricula to engage students in hands-on designprojects in the first-year curriculum. While this method potentially keeps students motivated, it isoften difficult to find an engineering project that first-year students can succeed in, due to theirlimited technical knowledge and
; and, 2)promote the engineering’s department support of leadership identity development within theengineering student body. An assessment matrix is shown in Figure 5 for the ECU MechanicalEngineering curriculum. The matrix is augmented with specific evidentiary documentation inthe department’s assessment plan. This is typical for all curricular programs (concentrationswithin a general engineering degree) taught within the engineering department. The evidencewas categorized by type (course outcomes, student work sample, and course/project evaluations)and compared to the cell definitions of the ECU LID framework for applicability in satisfyingboth stage and outcome “requirements”. The results are shown on a course by course basis in
4IET 532 Generation and Transmission of Electrical Power 4IET 555 Engineering Project Management 3IET 582 Plastics and Composites 4IET 583 Ceramics and Composites 4IET 585 Ergonomics 4IET 592 Field Studies 4IET 596 Individual Studies 3IET 599 Seminar 1MET 423
several joint projects with industry. Mr. Rudisill received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from theUniversity of Illinois in 1976 and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in 1984 Page 6.413.8 “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”Appendix A - Survey Results ET 112 (17 Total) ET 210 ( 12 Total) 1. How often do you use your laptop for this class? a. Daily (every
Table 1. Freshman Year Course Sequence. Fall Quarter Winter Quarter Spring Quarter ENGR 120, 2hr, [EJMN], [FL], ENGR 121, 2hr, [EJMN], [Ei], ENGR 122, 2hr, [EJMN], engineering profession, study, [FL], problem solving, technical [Ei], basic mechanics, teaming, problem solving skills reports, design project electricity, energy, design project Elective, 3 or 4hr, typically Math I, 3hr, [St], single Math II, 3hr, [St], single combined precalculus algebra variable differential calculus variable integral
” Session 1606At the University of Hartford’s Ward College AET program:• Design is introduced early in the program and integrated throughout the curriculum. Every semester has a design studio course.• Increased exposure to practice is provided through industry-in-the-classroom activities.• Increased emphasis is placed on communication, both oral and written. Requirements are integrated throughout the curriculum.At the University of Hartford, students are often challenged with "real" projects. Whenpossible proposed sites are accessible for student visits. Students present their solutionsand are critiqued by their peers, faculty, local professionals, and invited guests. Othermembers of the College and University community are present as well
Page 24.729.2of instructors’ written feedback and students’ written reflections on electrical engineeringstudents’ speaking skills. Four design courses—sophomore, junior, and two senior designclasses—provided the project’s framework. The research involved assessing the presentations ofa select group of project students and an equal number of control group students, beginning withthe sophomore design class and continuing through the two senior design courses.The project students received feedback via an analytic rubric. The benefits of using rubrics areshown in Conrad et al 7. The Project students viewed their videotaped presentations and wrote areflective paper on their performances. The control group did not receive feedback, althoughtheir
programs, civil engineering students rarely take courses in electricity orthermodynamics, and electrical engineers focus on electricity to the exclusion of almost all otherengineering sciences. Mechanical engineering is the main discipline in which a background in allof these sciences is expected. Is there a reason—apart from appeal to tradition—to continue toemphasize these six engineering sciences in mechanical engineering? Furthermore, whatelements of ME professional practice are not given their due in ME education?To truly design a mechanical engineering curriculum requires consideration of evidence of whatmechanical engineers do and how to prepare people to do those things. This paper presentsseveral complementary sources of evidence for what
, curriculum, discipline specific content (E) “Include topicsrelated to professional responsibilities, ethical responsibilities, respect for diversity, and qualityand continuous improvement” is addressed in these educational experiences(1). 1. IntroductionEngineering Technology (ET) is one of the six academic departments in the College ofEngineering (COE) at the University of Toledo and it is the largest in terms of number ofundergraduate students enrolled, currently around 1000 students. The ET Department offersABET-accredited Bachelor of Science degrees in five areas of study, namely Computer Scienceand Engineering Technology (CSET), Construction Engineering Technology (CET), ElectricalEngineering Technology (EET), Information Technology (IT), and
curriculum. The authors of this paper are faculty specializing in mechanical orelectrical engineering. Development of a robust and bug-free mobile phone application needscollaboration with people specialized in computer science. Staff and support infrastructure,including information technology capacity and support systems are enhanced through supportingenvironments. As the project moves forward, faculty are suggesting the following inquiry:Should we prepare students to be only users or both users and developers? How to handleappropriately the copyright related issues for the video clips and pictures in the gallery? How tocapture intellectual property related to innovative developments
optics, microfluidics and devices that interface to the biological world. Dr. Dickerson is also interested in enhancing undergraduate engineering education, and investigates new and innovative methods for improving the learning experience for electrical and computer engineering students.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee Clark is Research Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of Assessment for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. She conducts research on education projects that focus on active learning and engineering professional development. Current research includes the propagation of active learning
Paper ID #33538Summer Coding Camp: Curriculum, Experiences, and EvaluationDr. Paea LePendu, University of California, Riverside Paea LePendu is a Professor of Teaching in the Computer Science and Engineering department at the University of California, Riverside.Dr. Cecilia Cheung, University of California, RiversideMariam Salloum, University of California, RiversidePamela Sheffler, University of California, RiversideMs. Kelly Downey, University of California, Riverside I have a masters degree in electrical engineering. After working in industry, I found a passion for educa- tion. I am currently a lecturer at UC, Riverside for
Committee forComputing Education in Community Colleges (CCECC) published their curriculum guidelinesfor two-year associate degree programs in cybersecurity in 2020 [16, 17]. Likewise, the NISTNational Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) proposed the Workforce Framework forCybersecurity Framework [18] as a reference document to share and describe cybersecurity workin cybersecurity education, training, and workforce development. In addition to the educationalframeworks developed by these task forces and institutions, several researchers have activelyworked on cybersecurity education and provided different perspectives. These studies include butnot limited to the comprehensive survey of Švábenský et al. [19], taxonomy of curricula byMouheb
fewer courses/semester to increase depth d. Enhancing lifelong learning skills2) ENHANCE CONTENT - Increased student exposure to: a. New and emerging technologies b. Professional skills (societal impact, ethics, team skills, project management, global issues, economic justification) c. Computer and numerical skills d. Design methodologies and toolsEach of these objectives is described in more detail below.1.a. Integrating theory with practice. Integrate classroom material with related laboratory experiments and other active learning elements to improve in-depth learning. This can be done by structuring the curriculum into four-credit courses: three credits of lecture and one credit practicum. Components of the current
, networking, communication systems, along with digital, analog, and machine-control electronics. He is the recipient of the 2013 Golden Apple Award for Teaching Excellence at Eastern and has been nominated multiple times for the Critical Thinking Teacher of the Year Award. His professional interests include implementing active teaching and learning strategies, metacognition, integrating open-source software/hardware with online control, and deploying electrical and telecom technologies in community-based organizations. He is always seeking opportunities for collaborating on teaching, scholarly, and service projects, especially those aimed at improving students’ critical/creative and communication skills
learning.Instructors are also encouraged to act as cognitive coaches who can nurture an environment thatcan support open inquiry. (Barrows, 2000). It is important that the aims and objectives ofproblem-based learning are reflected in every aspect of the learning environment created.Problem-based curriculum should document accomplishments at the upper levels of Bloom'sTaxonomy Triangle. (Boud & Feletti, 1991). Scholars in the area of cognitive science andeducational psychology have identified four features that clearly separate a problem-basedcurriculum from a traditional, topic-based curriculum. (Nickerson, et. al. 1985). and equally tothe experiences that lead to those outcomes. The important aspect here is to move away from ateaching. Grading is
Planning Dr. David National University7 CS 5247 and Application Hsu Computer Science of Singapore G Electrical Massachusetts CSAIL Robotics: Science Dr. Daniela8 6141 and Systems Rus, et al. Engineering and Institute of G Computer Science
this work. While open-ended questions are not always ideal, the researchers agreed that this method of obtaining datawas best suited to gather the needed data [12].Collection Methods. IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval was sought at both authors’universities once the survey was developed. A link to the survey, along with a letter indicating Engineering Technology and Engineering Program Comparison of Underrepresented Students in the Same InstitutionIRB approval was distributed to engineering technology and engineering students at both of theauthors’ institutions. The students were informed of the intent of the project and a link to thesurvey distributed to minority groups at both study institutions.Data Analysis
academic institutions as well as members from the industryparticipate in the CDIO activities. A number of studies have documented the use of such techniquesin redesigning their curriculum in various fields, from operating like a small company (Säisä,2017) undergraduate design projects (Takemata, 2013), a course in electronics (Svensson, 2012)and systems engineering (Hsu, 2007). The most relevant aspect of the CDIO approach in the context of our course curriculumredesign is that it has been shown to be successful in fostering long term retention of fundamentalengineering concepts taught in the classroom. At our institution (as perhaps with others),constraints on time and resources has resulted in a limited, informal adoption of some aspects
vignette video: “Names and history are almost non-existent inour engineering courses, and numbers and equations are actually what we deal with….” Thus,the participant focuses on using engineering for new innovations and acknowledges that ahistorical lens is not used in the engineering curriculum at the institution he attends. Participant 65 mentions his experiences with HC. He notes that in his senior design class,the “…instructor specified that the senior project leaders could not be White males. . .which wasprobably the biggest show of racism I have seen on campus.” Additionally, the participantdescribes that his “biggest personal obstacle has been being a father during undergraduate andgraduate work,” and “it can sometimes be frustrating
Paper ID #30370Complexity, Right Action, and the Engineering CurriculumDr. R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently
appliedengineering situations (Bordogna, 1993; Springer et al., 1999; Singer & Smith, 2013). This isexemplified with the curriculum redesign at Maastricht University where a traditional lecturemodel was restructured to integrate courses with case studies and projects. This approachintegrated group-work that allowed students additional opportunities to practice and apply theconcepts presented in the course (Perrenet, 2000). In another example of engineering curriculumanalysis, Siller (2001) shared sample course exercises designed to measure critical thinking.Rather than presenting problem-sets or exams, the activities have multiple steps and opportunityfor reflection and articulating decision-making.In addition to the emphasis on critical thinking skills
noveltechnical domain, nuclear engineering developed within a new organizational context [8].Previously, physicists practiced their research within university science departments, but with thedevelopment of wartime research efforts, such as the Manhattan Project, top physicists andengineers found themselves employed by government and military-funded research initiatives.Post-WWII, these government research efforts continued via the establishment of nationallaboratories. The first national laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, cites its establishmentin 1946 as having the goal to perform “cooperative research in nucleonics”, another term used todescribe the field of ‘nuclear engineering’ or ‘atomic energy’ [9]. This time period was markedby specific
Paper ID #18732No Excuses: Use of Simple Active Learning in Electrical and Computer En-gineeringDr. Samuel J Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Samuel Dickerson is an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engi- neering. His general research interests lie in the area of electronics, circuits and cyber-physical systems. He is particularly interested in technologies in those areas that have biomedical applications. He has ex- pertise in the design and simulation of mixed-signal integrated circuits and systems that incorporate the use of both digital and analog electronics, as well as
students expressed their wish of incorporatingthe knowledge of energy market (both local and global), and energy policy into the curriculumand more than half of the respondents reckoned that student should be taught at least to anintermediate level. [31] added a smart-grid-oriented project into the curriculum, whereimportant topics such as the smart grid, electricity market operation, and demand side responseare planted. This practice took an important step forward in bridging the gap between universityeducation and industry content. The second most demanded knowledge is power system analysis (49%). Power systemanalysis has a long history ever since the electrical power system emerged in the late 19thcentury [32], and engineers develop
Electrical Engineering Using a Para Didactic LaboratoryAbstractThe objective of this paper is to report the implementation of a Para didactic Laboratory in aprivate college of engineering in Brazil to improve the training of engineering students so thatthey can become industry-ready graduates.A very important component in the education of an engineer is the professional tacit knowledgewhich is obtained through the interaction with more experienced professionals. This normallytakes place after graduation. In order to expose the students to an element of professional tacitknowledge sooner, in lieu of the traditional approaches such as curriculum change and teachertraining, we founded a Para didactic Laboratory at our college