retention rates, suggesting a fallout of female engineering students throughout theiryears studying engineering. The current percentage of women in the United States with bachelordegrees in engineering is 19.2% 2, 3. This percentage is a slight 0.8% increase from 2010, whenthe percentage of women with bachelor degrees in engineering was 18.4% 3.An area of research that has received attention over the years to help contribute to ourunderstanding of why we lose women in engineering is identity. Identity is thought to be a set ofmeanings that are applied to the self in different social roles or situations that serve as adefining reference of one’s self 4. Further, strong identification with a group has been linked toreduced likelihood of group
(note that the number in parenthesis is the number of times thisanswer was given): Technical sessions (8) o Comments were: Need more active learning/hands on component to these technical sessions. Too complicated for some Would rather see implementation rather than theory Too long Nothing (4) Logistics (3) More networking (2) Organization (2) More focus on research (2) More lab work (1) More autonomy (1) Reduce amount of activities per day (1) More hands on technical sessions (1) More
of interpreting shifts in beliefs over time. Additionally, Douglas et al. [53] highlighted that manyoriginal CLASS items exhibited weak psychometric properties. Through exploratory and confirmatory factoranalyses of data from 3,844 introductory physics students, they proposed a revised 15-item CLASS instrumentwith three distinct factors: (1) Personal Application, measuring how students relate physics to real-worldcontexts; (2) Problem Solving and Learning, assessing attitudes toward problem-solving approaches in physics;and (3) Effort and Sense Making, capturing students' dedication to understanding physics concepts. They arguedthat the revised model showed improved internal consistency and structural fit, though further work
understanding of engineering and technology –sometimes referred to as engineering and technological literacy [28]–[30]. Connecting to above,popular media, including videogames, may be one means to support greater engineering andtechnological literacy. There are many ways technological literacy has been defined [3], [29]–[31]. For example, the International Technology and Engineering Education Association (ITEEA)identified five aspects of technological literacy [29]: • Understanding the Nature of Technology, • Understanding of Technology and Society, • Understanding of Design, • Abilities for a Technological World, and • Understanding of the Designed World.Additionally, the National Academies of Engineering [30] released a report
experiences to their long term goals, and (3)minimize gaps between courses intended to build on each other. Hands-on experiences now existin all but one quarter of our four-year curriculum. The experiences incorporate open endeddesign problems as well as thoughtfully constructed laboratory experiences. Flexibility has beenadded by allowing students to select three to four courses from pre-approved math and sciencecourses, by opening up the timing of these courses as well as general educational requirementswithin the four year curriculum, by doubling the number of mechanical engineering technicalelectives available, and by allowing students to take technical electives from any of our threeengineering programs (Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer
Business Analysis, Projectapproach. Currently, a tool using a decision tree approach is Management Institute., 2017.being developed. [2] Sciforma., "New Product Innovation: The Case for Collaboration," 2023. [3] K. Krippendorff, Driving Innovation from Within : VII. IMPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION A Guide for Internal Entrepreneurs, New York, The research described above provides valuable insights for NY: Columbia University Press,, 2019, p. 1
student voices.Keywords: mindset, classroom strategies, research methods, qualitative methods, mathematicalmodeling, sustained collaborative autoethnographyIntroductionMindset is an important element of learning. For instance, metacognition—thinking aboutthinking—is an important aspect of mindset that promotes deeper and more transferable learning[1]. A review of teaching approaches found that metacognitive approaches are very effective,second only to classroom management techniques [2]. Another metaanalysis found thatmetacognitive strategies have a high effect size, relative to other teaching interventions (ranked46 out of 195 factors) [3].There are specific approaches to promote student metacognition. Journaling involves keepingand reviewing
audiences”; therefore, offering educationrelated to effective communication with a range of audiences is essential in engineeringprograms. However, we do not have enough knowledge about how engineering students performtheir writing practices during lower-division education.In engineering education, multiple efforts have been made to analyze or characterize engineeringstudents’ writing. Conrad and her team published multiple articles [1, 2, 3, 4] to investigate thecharacteristics of effective writing in civil engineering practice. They analyzed the organization,sentence structure, and grammatical errors of the technical memos written by students in civilengineering classes and compared them to the same genre written by civil engineeringpractitioners
course. Theresults suggest that instructors can start a CS1 class with Coral to enable a smooth start and toteach using an educational simulator, without loss in learning outcomes or programmingcapability. We indicate ideas of how Coral's introduction can be improved, which may yieldfurther improvements.1. IntroductionCS1 courses are difficult and commonly have high rates of Ds, Fs, and withdrawals [1], [2], [3],[4], [5], [6]. One contributing factor is the set of technical challenges in the first several weeks,including nuances of commercial languages like Python, Java, and C++ [7]. Those languageswere designed for professionals, not for learners. For example, Figure 1 shows an earlyinput/output program in a popular Python textbook
currently a senior-year Engineering Physics student at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Though I’ve enjoyed the technical work I’ve done, and devote myself now to my senior design project, I feel that education research has much to offer me, and that I have much to offer it. I think the combination of science or engineering with education provides an opportunity for me to apply my scientific curiosity towards understanding and helping people, a better opportunity than I could have predicted before doing this research. Page 26.241.1 c American Society for Engineering Education
these escalating threats, straining the resources and capabilitiesof their existing cybersecurity teams and further underscoring the need for a skilled workforce.Yet, the cybersecurity industry is currently facing a significant skills gap; in 2024 there wasfound to be an estimated global shortage of 4.8 million cybersecurity professionals. Workforcegrowth has plateaued at around 5.5 million globally, while the skill gap widened by 19%compared to the previous year [1]. In the United States alone, the supply of cybersecurityprofessionals met only 83% of employer demand, leaving over 225,000 positions unfilled as ofJune 2024 [2, 3, 4].According to recent industry reports, professionals with the following technical and professionalskills are needed
“constituent part” of many activities and decisions; • How to present the discussion of technological and engineering literacy in a “publicly accessible” context?This paper considers these questions vis-à-vis moving technological and engineering literacy /philosophy of engineering into mainstream conversation.TELPhE is needed …The 2002 publication of Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More AboutTechnology [2] and the April 18-19, 2005, National Science Foundation (NSF) workshop [3](reported at IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE) conference in 2005 as The Technological Literacyof Undergraduates: Identifying the Research Issues [4]) led to recognition of the need for anorganization to serve as the focal point for
11.2Electrical Engineering 2 8.7 17 12.1 27 12.6Engineering Mechanics 2 8.7 1 0.7 2 0.9Environmental Engineering 3 13.0 3 2.1 3 1.4Acoustics 3 2.1 9 4.2Architectural Engineering 29 20.6 9 4.2Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering 9 6.4 14 6.5Engineering Design 4 2.8 0 0.0Engineering Science and Mechanics
behalf. He is a steering committee member for the International Conference on Wear of Materials and an executive committee member of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He serves as their delegate on the ASEE diversity committee. Prof. Sundararajan has been recognized for his accomplishments with the Young Engineering Faculty Research Award and Early Achievement in Teaching Award at Iowa State University. He received his B.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from The Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India) followed by M.S. and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. c
Figure 3. Path generated using MasterCamd) Session 22. The next step in this project is to generate a G-code of the plastic mold for acomputer numerical controlled (CNC) mill using computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)software. The commercial software MasterCam will be used to generate a G-code and tovisualize the manufacturing of the mold from a raw aluminum block as shown in Figure 3.e) Activity outside the lecture schedule. Manufacture of the mold with a CNC machine. There isonly one CNC milling machine available in the machine shop of this shop, other than twosmaller routers. Thus groups will have to show up at the workshop at different times. The CNCmachine shown (HAAS VF1 Vertical Milling Machine) in Figure 4 will be used to manufacturethe
and by the end of one semester, undergraduates will write at a level comparable toentry-level graduate students.Background Bioengineering Mechanics I is a junior level course for biomedical engineering majors (BME),and Orthopaedic Biomechanics is a cross-listed course for both senior level mechanicalengineering majors (ME) and graduate students from a variety of backgrounds including BME andME. Both courses take place over a 14-week semester (Fall 2012-2015). In both courses, studentscomplete four lab exercises. Each lab explores concepts in statics, mechanics of materials, andorthopaedic biomechanics. Because the focus in the lab is primarily technical, little formal writinginstruction (i.e., lecture) is presented to the students; instead
Wireless Communication, Internet of Things (IoT), Optimization using Game Theory, and Engineering Education Research. She is a member of the IEEE and ASEE, a technical pro- gram committee member for IEEE Globecom, ICC, ICCCN and VTC conferences, and a reviewer for several international journals and conferences.Dr. Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University Dr. Sacharia Albin joined Norfolk State University in July 2011 as the Chair of the Engineering Depart- ment. He received his BS and MS degrees from the University of Kerala, and Ph.D. from the University of Poona, India. He was a design engineer in microelectronics at Hindustan Aeronautics, India for three years. He was awarded a Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship by
arriving for classes in the fall.Due to its low maintenance design, administration of the EBC program is inexpensive. Theprogram was administered in 2015 for just under $8,000, approximately $18.50 per participant.The program was funded through an internal grant from UNC Charlotte’s Division ofAcademic Affairs. A majority of the funds were used for student workers who helped designand update the content, guided students through EBC registration during orientation, monitoredstudent progress, and hosted the forums. A small portion of the funding was used to purchasemarketing materials for the program. The fee for ALEKS® was paid by the student directly toMcGraw-Hill.ResultsThe Math program will be removed from the EBC starting in 2016 and offered as
is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia. Before moving into academia, Matt worked in land development planning and design, contributing to projects in stormwater management, airport design, floodplain modeling, site development, and construction document preparation. In his teaching, Matt supports a project-based learning approach to help students develop professional and technical skills relevant to engineering practice. He has contributed to scholarship of teaching and learning through research interests that include first-year engineering education, service learning, and international engagement. In addition to teaching and research, he serves as the faculty advisor to several student
the multiple‐choice test with partial credit," International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 799-812, 1993.[3] M. C. Lovett, "Make exams worth more than the grade," Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy, pp. 18-52, 2013.[4] T. Passmore, L. Brookshaw, and H. Butler, "A flexible, extensible online testing system for mathematics," Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 27, no. 6, 2011.[5] M. Craig, D. Horton, D. Zingaro, and D. Heap, "Introducing and evaluating exam wrappers in CS2," in Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, 2016
content and the approaches they use ininstruction. As a part of this greater movement, the University of New Haven has developed 18e-learning modules on a variety of entrepreneurial topics that collectively address the learningoutcomes in the KEEN Framework [2]. With modest support from a mini-grant program, severalof the modules were deployed by 77 faculty at 55 institutions over a 3-year period. As part of thedeployment, feedback was solicited from both faculty and students regarding their perceptions ofand interactions with the modules. This paper summarizes the feedback.Overview of the E-Learning ModulesThe 18 e-learning modules consist of text, case studies, short videos, interactive exercises and afinal quiz. The modules are designed to be
BME’s shows that around 50%pursue BME master and doctoral levels; 25% went to BME industry; 17% went to medical school;5.6% MS in health-care related programs and the remaining 2.8% follow other paths. The studentbody, as the discipline itself, has diverse motivations and professional pathways. Therefore, thereis a need to deliver the course content in a way that promotes intrinsic motivation for this diversepopulation. The problem based methodology motivates the pre-medical students [1] becausethey see the usefulness of the theory in realistic medical problems while the students aiming togo to industry appreciate the technical aspects and the explicit connections with the regulatoryworld.Industry Expectations: In addition to the technical
on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and Boeing. Zalewski served as a chairman of the International Federation for Information Processing Working Group 5.4 on Industrial Software Quality, and of an International Federation of Automatic Control Technical Committee on Safety of Computer Control Systems. His major research interests include safety related, real-time embedded and cyberphysical computer systems, and computing education. Page 26.769.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
, often conflated with engineeringjudgment, serves only as a contributing factor or may occasionally be used to justify judgmentsafter the fact. The engineers in Gainsburg’s study identified engineering judgment with tasks likedetermining sufficient precision for calculations, making modeling assumptions, and sometimesoverriding mathematical results. Petroski’s [3] analysis of engineering failures similarlyemphasizes judgment’s role throughout the design process, noting that “the first and mostindispensable design tool is judgment” that both initiates projects and monitors their execution.However, engineering education typically emphasizes technical competencies over judgment-based skills, with the Grinter Report noting that “the ability to deal
. degrees. He is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Illinois. He taught civil engineering for over 35 years, including six years at Washington University in St. Louis and 29 years at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, where he was the chair of the Civil Engineering Department for ten years. His areas of expertise are in civil engineering and mechanics. He has consulted for various organizations, including government agencies and an international offshore drilling company. He has published many journal articles and technical reports.Mr. Daniel M Woehl, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Daniel Woehl is currently enrolled as a master’s of Civil/Structural Engineering student at Southern Illi
. Thus capabilities can bethought of as the potential for functionings; alternatively capabilities are opportunities and functioningsare outcomes. This paper compares ABET’s accreditation criteria with a published set of capabilities ineducation. The comparison shows there are some areas where criteria overlap with capabilities, but alsoseveral areas where the overlap is low. The capabilities that aligned most with ABET criteria overlapwith engineering epistemologies and a view of students as the ‘product’ of engineering education.IntroductionMost engineering programs in the United States, and many globally, are accredited by the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET). ABET is a national, not-for-profit 501(c)(3)organization a
in a distance learning environment.MethodsThe studies in this paper were conducted in a lower-division Statics and Dynamics engineeringcourse of 111 with primarily sophomores, and an upper division hands-on programming courseof 24 students, primarily juniors and seniors. Each course implemented video assignments tofacilitate students studying for their oral examination midterm exam or quiz.Video Assignment FormatIn the lower-division Statics and Dynamics engineering course, video assignments were assignedas part of the written homework for extra credits. To receive credit, groups of 3 students wouldturn in a video recording of their brainstorming or group discussion session. Provided to thestudents are multiple guiding questions in the
proceedings articles. He is a commissioner of the ABET and also serves on the Board of Engineering Technology Division iunder American Society for Engineering Education. He is a fellow of the Academic Leadership Program under the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) of 10 Universities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Building and Sustaining a Successful Graduate Degree Program in TechnologyAbstractA Master’s degree program in technology that includes leadership and management componentallows students to enhance their technical skills and knowledge, as well as help them developnew leadership and management skills. The Master of Science in
. This team represents leaders from both the mobile and stationary energy intensive sectors of the economy. It makes decisions concerning the rate of improvement in energy efficiency over the coming decades. (3) Carbon Pricing. The carbon pricing team represents the governments for the world’s largest economies (and leading emitters). Although there is no current international body that could enforce an international price on carbon, implementation of carbon pricing policies are growing internationally. Many economists agree that carbon pricing is the most effective and economically efficient way to reduce carbon emissions.8 This team sets a future carbon price for the global economy. (4) Energy
Wisconsin-Madison has a longhistory of offering a variety of introductory multi-disciplinary freshman engineering courses.Our most popular course, Intro 160, was a 3 credit course with a hands-on client-based designlab and a seminar style lecture. Recently, our college has decided to end all centrally fundedmulti-disciplinary freshman engineering courses, primarily due to budget cuts, and chargeddepartments with the task of developing and funding their own freshman engineering courses.We developed a new freshman multi-disciplinary hands-on design course to take the place of themost popular freshman engineering course, Intro 160.Approximately half (about 525 engineering freshmen) of our engineering college departments(Biomedical Engineering (35