neglect the fact that engineeringstudents need to demonstrate an acceptable level of understanding of the basic topicstraditionally covered in such courses. A preliminary report of our successes and failureswas published a couple of years ago,2 and since then we have continued to modify andimprove the course by listening to student feedback and using more efficient coursestructure and management, as well as through cross-college collaborations. Briefly, thesechanges have resulted in a course that better addresses the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) criteria and gets students to take a more active rolein their own learning.There are many well documented methodologies for improving student learning ofclassical physics, 3-6
Session 2530 A Survey of Authentic Teaching in Secondary Math and Science Classrooms Tamy L. Fry1 , Teri Reed Rhoads 1 , Mark Nanny 2 and Mary John O’Hair3 The University of Oklahoma School of Industrial Engineering 1 School of Civil Engineering and Enviro nmental Science 2 Center for Educational and Community Renewal3Abstract The Authentic Teaching Alliance (ATA) is a project funded through the National ScienceFoundation GK-12 program in which University of Oklahoma Fellows from engineering andeducation
self-evaluate [13]. Assessment of these skills mustgo beyond reproduction of knowledge measured in exams, but must be measured as a developingskill over time. One way to capture the affective domain is through reflection or journaling [14].Journaling can encourage self-evaluation, but even experts to struggle to capture accurate self-assessments [15]. In addition to the task of self-assessment, peer-assessment tools are effectivebecause learners have had a chance to observe others throughout the learning process andtherefore, can be more fair and accurate with judgements compared to teachers or experts [13].In addition, learners have the perception that peer-assessment processes are fairer than instructorassessment alone [13]. When self and
of EYHconferences to date, including a national survey initiated in 2002 by the EYH Network office.The EYH Network in 2002 conducted the most recent of the three longitudinal studies. TheEYH Network partnered with the Center for History and Media Echo Project at George MasonUniversity to collect national data on EYH alumnae 20. As of January 2006, 54 participants hadbeen solicited through announcements and networking via professional organizations. Alongwith demographic and contact information, the survey solicited data on a combination of sevenclosed and open-ended questions regarding participation in EYH, education and careerexperiences.Most (81%) had positive or very positive reactions to EYH. Most (87%) had math or sciencerelated majors
linked, as space itself can impose a limit on thetools it can house. Certain aspects, such as funding, can include multiple approaches, such aslooking at the overall revenue for space (quantitative) while also considering the restrictions onusage that funding may have (qualitative). For example, makerspace funded through State fundsor Govt. sources cannot be utilized to benefit a specific for-profit private company ororganization directly. Hence, the ability of tangible assets to impact a specific community alsodepends on elements that govern the continuity of the space.When looking at a makerspace without its physical assets, all that remains are the people makingthe space function. Access is always a huge element of a makerspace, as what
teaching conceptions and methods and graduate level engineering education.Dr. Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh Linda DeAngelo is Associate Professor of Higher Education, Center for Urban Education Faculty Fel- low, and affiliated faculty in the Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Program at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. DeAngelo studies social stratification, investigating how social inequities are produced, maintained, and interrupted. Currently her scholarship focuses on access to and engagement in faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Narrative Analysis of
Marjorie Letitia Hubbard, PhD North Carolina School of Science and Math, Durham, NCAbstractEarly exposure to engineering coursework can increase the persistence of students, particularlywomen and minorities, in STEM fields in college and beyond. Secondary school instructorshave a golden opportunity to approach engineering curriculum design with a student-centeredperspective that fosters engagement since many curricular resources for high school studentsmust be uniquely tailored for students with different levels of exposure to engineering.This paper describes the development of a biomedical engineering curriculum for high schoolstudents that integrates design thinking using the framework of student-centered
most software development now takes place. These stereotypes are especially harmful toyoung students, who may feel disinclined to pursue a career that carries such a negativeconnotation. We investigate a current and successful program –the Software Factory approachwith existing undergraduates, and apply it to K-12 students. The goals of this exploratory casestudy were to counteract negative stereotypes by 1. Having K-12 students work in a team that resembled a small professional software development group, and 2. Having students work in the Software Factory –an especially designed physical space created to promote a realistic open and modern work environment. This case study aimed to address both goals through a summer
Paper ID #32918A Sojourn of Engineering Identity Conflict: Exploring IdentityInterference Through a Performative LensDr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational success strate- gies, and b) understanding how
, “Engineering leadership: grounding leadership theory in engineers’ professional identities,” Leadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351-373, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1742715014543581.[9] D. T. Willingham, Cognition: The Thinking Animal, 3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007.[10] D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1982.[11] R. Bolton and D. G. Bolton, People Styles at Work… And Beyond: Making Bad Relationships Good and Good Relationships Better, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Amacom, 2009.[12] K. G. Wolfinbarger, “Team leadership in engineering education,” in New Directions for Student Leadership: No
is the creation of formal programs that empowerstudents and faculty to take an active role in commercializing their inventions through newcompany formation. Such a program requires more than information and education; it requiresdirect, hands-on assistance with most facets of business formation, planning, networking,financing and team building. United States colleges and universities have a tremendous untappedentrepreneurial resource in their students and faculty. Page 12.1520.2Recently, the University of Maryland’s Clark School of Engineering, through itsVentureAccelerator Program, has pioneered the provision of specific and dedicated
through research experiences for engineering students, student pathways to engineering degree completion, and documenting the influence of co-op experiences on academic performance.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for
Paper ID #37134Training Construction Management Students about Sustainable andEquitable Infrastructure through Leveraging an Envision-Rating System ina Hispanic-Serving InstitutionMiss Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University Rubaya Rahat grew up in Bangladesh, where she pursued her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure projects. Rubaya now is a Ph.D. student at Department of Civil and Environ
improve university diversity through exemplary mentoring, merging students who transition between UTEP and EPCC to improve the graduation rate of students in STEM fields. She also encourages students with disabilities (or as one calls it ”special abilities”) to pursue degrees in STEM as well as break barriers for women in engineering to create a broad spectrum of opportunities and meet the 21st century STEM demands. Although having a passion of helping beyond students learning, Carolina also had advocated and helped students who major in Mechanical Engineering as an exemplary Teachers Assistant in the Mechanical Engineering department laboratory ”Lockheed Martin” to have a reflection of a real-world engineering
Paper ID #23590Investigating Why Students Choose to Become Involved in a University Mak-erspace through a Mixed-methods StudyMr. Ethan Hilton, Georgia Institute of Technology Ethan is a PhD student in Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology working with Dr. Julie Linsey as a part of the IDREEM Lab. He graduated with honors from Louisiana Tech University with his Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering. Ethan’s research area is design cognition and methods with a focus on prototyping and its utilization during the design process. In particular, Ethan has focused on hand-drawn sketches and how
Paper ID #19667Engaging Engineers in Inclusive Cultural Change Through a New Method,Articulating a Succinct DescriptionEmily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. She is involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of Engineering ranging from student support programs, faculty bias awareness trainings, and inclusive cultural change. She is a recent Industrial and Systems Engineering graduate from Ohio State University, where she was also very involved with
Engineering Course Through a Critical Review over its Offerings Orner, K. , Prouty, C. , Naughton, C. , Manser, N. , Verbyla, M. , Trotz, M. and Mihelcic, J.R. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 University of South Florida Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 1AbstractThe Sustainable Development Engineering course has evolved over its seven offerings at aresearch university in which interdisciplinary groups of graduate students engage in criticalthinking, problem solving, and collaborate with community partners. Students provide on-siteskilled labor, multi-media presentations, and project proposals for the community; in
experiences at U.S. and Canadian institutes. Additionally, ASCE’s most recent Body ofKnowledge identifies (5) BOK “Outcomes” associated directly with capstone experiences andthe survey results identify the adaptability of current senior design courses to capturedemonstrated abilities in these outcomes. Through capturing the standards of practice for a goodnumber of programs and mapping those programs to the ASCE BOK outcomes, a baseline fordefining a successful program should become evident.IntroductionThe Capstone or Senior Design experience is a culminating project opportunity for students toshowcase the engineering skillset obtained throughout their academic training experience, yet auniversal understanding of the standard of practice has not been
Paper ID #9136Research Institutions’ Teaching Imperative: Rising to the Commitment ofService-Learning in Engineering EducationDr. Bowa George Tucker, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Bowa George Tucker, Ed.D. is a Senior Research Associate for the National Science Foundation funded Engineering Faculty Engagement in Learning through Service, and Engineering for the Common Good in the College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell. His received his doctorate from the University of Massachusetts, Boston in Higher Education Administration in 2010. His dis- sertation research produced a rigorous
havecreated for our students.2. Schumacher’s Intermediate Technology as the Precursor to Appropriate Technology Appropriate technology is widely credited as an outgrowth of the ideas expressed by the“radical economist”1 Ernst Friedrich “Fritz” Schumacher in his book Small is Beautiful: A Studyof Economics as if People Mattered2, which is a compilation and synthesis of his writings andwork from the 1940s through 1960s in which he developed the concept of “IntermediateTechnology”. The origins of Intermediate Technology reside in Schumacher’s criticism ofconventional development practices, which assumed that the problems of the developing worldcould be solved by the transfer of capital-intensive, large-scale technologies from theindustrialized
, metal, glass, rubber, wood, food and clothing products. All werelocated in or near the city of Phnom Penh, the farthest away being approximately 50 km from thecity. Before traveling to Cambodia numerous contacts with government and NGO operationswere made to set up visits before arriving in country. However, these contacts, in the end werenot utilized, as these organizations seemed more interested in directing our work beyond thescope of our original plans and in limiting our visits to their own contacts. Therefore, wedecided to wait until we arrived in-country to make our own contacts and found great success infinding a variety of companies that were happy to speak with us. Within one week of arriving,more contacts and referrals were available
and explore allaspects of the kit, however, since some facets of the kit are beyond the scope of the course, studentsin the course are only required to familiarize themselves with the basics of MATLAB and Simulinkimplementations of a SISO (single input single output) system using a single heater and atemperature sensor. Students are also instructed to download appropriate components for TCLabfrom MATLAB central file exchange [10]. Figure 8: Portion of Matlab Script for test_Heaters.m (right) and the corresponding display (left)The campus license for MATLAB allows all students to download the basic software and itstoolboxes on their laptops/desktops alleviating the logistics issues. Once all the Arduino andTCLab-related add-ons are also
the subject at the 2014Convocation of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi [32]. Hementioned that the aura which was barely 5 – 6 cm beyond his thumb, had expanded to asize larger than the washing machine-sized Kirlian Camera pursuant to the yoga program.He suggested that with continuing progress, aura science could become a significantinput to medical science. It is clear that the program was working for him many yearslater going by the following information on Mr. Modi’s maiden visit to the US as PrimeMinister in 2014: “While the first lady has been instrumental in introducing yoga insidethe White House, Obama appeared to be very impressed by the energy and vigor shownby Modi when he hosted the latter over a private
AC 2007-2180: THE TEAMS PROGRAM: A STUDY OF A GRADES 3-12ENGINEERING CONTINUUMMalinda Zarske, University of Colorado at Boulder MALINDA SCHAEFER ZARSKE is a K-12 Engineering Coordinator for the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Her research interests include how K-12 students learn engineering. She is the curricula coordinator for the TEAMS program, a content editor for the TeachEngineering.org digital library, and has helped develop and teach engineering electives for high school and undergraduate students. A former middle and high school math and science teacher, she received her M.A.T. in secondary science from the Johns Hopkins University
Paper ID #14909Improving the Impact of Experiential Learning Activities through the Assess-ment of Student Learning StylesDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr
relevance is influential inattracting and retaining students (in particular underrepresented minorities) in STEMdisciplines.2,3,8 Thus, inquiry-based activities were emphasized in the course modules. Theformat is aligned with research-based GCS and state standards for instructional planning anddelivery. The major components include (1) goals that are aligned with the North Carolina K-12Curriculum, (2) activator activities that test students’ prior knowledge, (3) teacher input activitiesin which the instructor teaches new knowledge through demonstrations, (4) an inquiry-basedsmall group activity facilitated by students, and (5) a concluding activity that requires students toreflect on what they learned and share their findings with others. A rubric
are typicallyinsufficient to facilitate and gauge students’ learning. Through these assignments, students mightdevelop problem-solving skills, partially through pattern-based recognition, but are often unableto gain a strong grasp over concepts or apply them to contexts beyond the class. A lack ofcomplete understanding of fundamental undergraduate concepts can adversely affect students’learning in the long term, their knowledge retention, and ability to succeed in their engineeringcareers. In this study, assignments on several topics in a large undergraduate fluid mechanicscourse, including homework, in-class activities, and quizzes, were revised to inclusively coverproblems at five different Bloom’s Taxonomy cognitive levels: remember
mechanics, and ocean hydrodynamics. Benitz is a Hassenfeld Community Engagement Fellow and a Diversity and Inclusion Fellow at RWU. Her research focuses on offshore wind energy, oyster growth, community engagement, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Strengthening Undergraduates’ Appreciation of Engineering Ethics through a Simulated Stakeholder Meeting on Offshore Wind Energy DevelopmentAbstractThe need for deepening students’ appreciation for the importance of engineering ethics remainsever present. However, accomplishing this learning outcome can be challenging, as theprinciples often come across as abstract and distant to many
betweenepoxy-glass composites and southern yellow pine. During the six-week program, the teachers learned to conduct literature research in thelibrary, to design experiments, to fabricate composite material overlays on wood beams, to testthe beams to determine strength and stiffness improvements and to test the bond strength aftervarious environmental exposures. Through these experiences, the teachers gained increasedcontent knowledge, design of experiments skills, and useful instructional materials.IntroductionThis project was made possible by a Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Supplement1 tothe University of South Carolina’s Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) grantfrom the National Science Foundation. The objective of
, pp. 862–873, Sep. 2003.[13] S. Reynolds, “Seeing Structures: Interactive CAD Models in Mechanics of Materials,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual: American Society for Engineering Education, Jul. 2021.[14] J. Wood, D. Jensen, and K. Wood, “Enhancing Machine Design Courses Through Use of a Multimedia-Based Review of Mechanics of Materials,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR: American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2005.[15] S. C. Cooper and G. R. Miller, “Suite of computer-based tools for teaching mechanics of materials,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 1996.[16] L. Dobrzański, A. Jagiello, and R. Honysz