enrolled in required engineering classes, such asEngineering Economy, a course required by multiple disciplines. Students who have completedthe program have been the most effective advocates for the program. This “word of mouth”marketing has resulted in 60 students in pursuit of the certificate and another 20 who areparticipating in some part of the program. The director’s work has been centered on signing upand guiding the students successfully through the program. The students then recommend theprogram to others. There have been 27 certificate graduates to date.The Components of The MSU Engineering Entrepreneurship ProgramThe CourseworkAs a joint effort with the school of business, a considerable portion of the program’s courseworkis taught
. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her
N Mean SD N Mean SDI can discuss with my class how business and 37 5.24 0.72 22 5.41 0.67entrepreneurship affects my daily life.I can help my students understand how different 37 5.38 0.64 22 5.59 0.50products appeal to different audiences.I can spend the time necessary to plan 36 4.78 0.96 22 5.00 0.82entrepreneurship lessons for my class.I can employ entrepreneurship activities in my 35 4.89 0.90 22 5.23
programs focusing on developing a concept, creating a solution ofvalue, and then developing commercialization plans. These efforts include: (1) facilities such asthe 60,000 sq. ft. Maker Space, (2) extracurricular programs, such as Intensive DesignExperiences (IDE), Pop-Up Classes, Business Management Certificate, and Lean StartupProgram, and (3) courses with focus on entrepreneurship both at the college level and withindepartments. Engineering Entrepreneurship program provides engineering students well-definedpathways to develop entrepreneurial mindsets through immersive experiences in curricular andextracurricular programs. This will prepare students for successful careers as leaders oftechnological innovation within large corporations or
appearance as students translate design ideas into physical models.The Engineering Design ClassroomsSurvey data was obtained from undergraduate students who had recently completed rapid prototyping aspart of the engineering design class. Rapid prototyping occurs in all years of the engineering curriculumand data was collected in each cohort. The engineering design prompts were different for each classroom.First Year Data Acquisition and Processing (ENGR 110) – Smart Project: This module involves thecreation of a “smart product” invention in a team environment [7]. Student teams consist of bothengineering and business students in groups of 3-5. The “smart” part of the project indicates that thestudents develop a product that incorporates the use of
AC 2012-3699: ENCOURAGING DIVERGENT THINKINGDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University Daniel Raviv is a professor of computer and electrical engineering and computer science at Florida At- lantic University. He also served as Assistant Provost for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. With more than 25 years of combined experience in the high-tech industry, government, and academia, Raviv devel- oped fundamentally different approaches to ”out-of-the-box” thinking and a breakthrough methodology known as ”Eight Keys to Innovation.” He has been sharing his contributions with professionals in busi- nesses, academia, and institutes nationally and internationally. Most recently, he was a visiting professor at the
Paper ID #9947The Innovation Competencies - Implications for Educating the Engineer ofthe FutureProf. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Dean of Innovation and Engagement and Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman. He joined Rose-Hulman in 2001 and his teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, design, quality, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, his industry experience includes roles as cofounder and Chief Operating Officer at Montronix and development manager at Kennametal. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois
sensing skills altogether and included activities like manual testing anduse of various tools towards that. The focus, however, considering the profile of the class, wason developing creativity competency. More detailed description of different activities of thecourse is provided in the following sub-sections.WikiEducation in general, and engineering education in particular, has steadily adopted newerparadigms of student-centered learning as opposed to traditional lecture-oriented learning 42-43.The new paradigms are well supported by Web 2.0 technologies that allow development ofstudent-centered personalized learning environments 44 around blogs, wikis, and discussionforums. A special and perhaps the most popular instance of wiki is the online
Paper ID #15994Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Innovation for Engineering and Busi-ness Student TeamsDavid G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
of decades. Industries offeringhigh volume products with low levels of innovation lost their competitive edge while embracinginnovativeness gained importance as a driver of economic success. On the other hand adiscussion about the educational system started. Already in 1964 Georg Picht published “DieDeutsche Bildungskatastrophe”5 (The German Educational Catastrophe). It describes andcriticizes (1) the relative low share of state budget spent for general and academic education, (2)the low number of high school graduates and (3) the inferior chances of children from rural orworking class families to get access to higher education. The discussions led to a number ofreforms in the German educational system. Especially a practical and industry
Paper ID #25235Expanding and Evolving an Innovation ConcentrationDr. Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas Dr. Karl D. Schubert is a Research Professor and Director of Research for Innovation and Data Science Initiatives for the College of Engineering and the Sam M. Walton College of Business in the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His academic research focuses on providing Innovation programs for STEM education; and, student, faculty and industry innovation engagement. Schubert also serves as a consultant specializing in innovation, entrepreneurship, technology and organizational opti
the analysts. The facultyand staff are the senior partners who act as advisors. The client is the sponsoring company; withone to two mentors from the company assigned to each project. Student teams own the problem,the project, and the deliverables for the client.Student teams are sourced exclusively from the University of Maryland’s Hinman CEOsProgram. Hinman CEOs is the nation’s first living-learning entrepreneurship program, placingapproximately 90 entrepreneurially-minded junior and senior students from all disciplines into aunique community in which students live together, learn about entrepreneurship, and launch newventures. In the 2011 class, the major distribution is 48 percent engineering, 38 percent business,and 14% arts, humanities
program at Montana Tech has been led by an individualprofessor, which appears to be the case in many entrepreneurship programs7. Looking into thefuture, Solomon, et al. described a changing pedagogy based on the broadening market interestin entrepreneurial education, which partially explains this current interdisciplinary course offeredby the petroleum engineering and BIT departments8. This class appears to have the potential forgrowth as the engineering programs at Montana Tech are currently making changes based on therecommendations of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) for Page 11.453.4additional management and
NSF I-Corp (McKenna, et. al2015) and many university entrepreneurship programs and classes (Selig, 2014). As a first steptoward more rigorous evaluation, creation, and usage, a unifying framework will be necessary.Canvases as Representations of SystemsOur top-level analysis recognizes that a canvas is a visual tool for decomposing a system. Weobserved large variation in content, purpose, usage and format in our survey of popular canvases.For example, some canvases are a collection of related boxes, while others are clearlyalgorithmic flowcharts arranged in box form. While some canvases aimed to provide a holisticview of a complex domain, such as the Business Model Canvas, others focused very narrowlyand deeply on some specific domain. The
. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in
year, the authors used a sample of convenienceto pilot utilization of the instruments. For the pilot, both the EP10 and EMP were given to 70undergraduate students majoring in math, science, or engineering. Forty-two participants werefirst-year students enrolled in an Introduction to Entrepreneurship course (EMGT100), with theremainder enrolled in an Introduction to Engineering Management course (EMGT330), whichconsisted primarily of seniors and graduate students. Students in the EMGT100 course wereprovided in-class time to complete the survey as an element of the entrepreneurial lectures.Alternatively, students in EMGT330 completed the surveys as a homework assignment related tocuriosity and self-awareness. Students in EMGT100 have proactively
joined the Designing Edu- cation Lab to learn more about the drivers of entrepreneurial career goals of students and entrepreneurship in general. Since 2016 he is working full-time for Celonis, an innovative Process Mining software com- pany based in Munich.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading
Paper ID #20041Impact of Makerspaces on Cultivating Students’ Communities of PracticeAbstractMr. Mohamed Ahmed Abdalwhab Galaleldin, University of Ottawa Mohamed a doctoral student at the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Ottawa. His research inter- ests include Makerspaces, engineering education, business incubators, and entrepreneurship. He holds a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering, and M.Eng. in Engineering Managment, and currently completing his Ph.D. at the University of Ottawa.Dr. Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa Hanan Anis holds an NSERC Chair in Entrepreneurial Engineering Design and is a professor in
Benchmarking ActivitiesLawrence Tech has a rich history of incorporating innovative teaching strategies into theengineering curriculum with an emphasis on problem-based learning, active/collaborativelearning, and entrepreneurial minded learning. However, in order to achieve the desiredoutcomes of the new course, innovative teaching strategies needed to be implemented within thecontext of a more “real world” experience. In addition, a pedagogy that enhances theentrepreneurial mindset and is designed for maximum student engagement and retention wasdesired. Upon consideration, the format of a studio course was chosen for the second yearengineering design class. Studio courses are a unique format that typically integrate contentdelivery, hands on activity
Graduate and Professional Studies,and Dr. Skipper assumed the program leadership responsibilities of marketing, recruiting, coursedevelopment, and operations. In Academic Year 2011-2012, the program continued to grow,reaching 180 course enrollments across the fall, spring and summer semesters. A secondgraduating class of 16 students completed their studies in May 2012. Students and employerscontinued to find great value in this program resulting in 285 enrollments in AY 2012-2013 and27 MSPM graduates in May 2013.At this time, The Citadel’s Master of Science in Project Management (MSPM) is the only suchprogram in the State of South Carolina. In recognition of the continued growth of this uniqueprogram, and to provide a clear path for future
, according to both of ourInnovators. Topics introduced in the workshop included: Page 15.241.7 ≠ Engineering in Change ≠ Spelling Test ≠ Biomimicry ≠ Bisociation ≠ Trimming Technique ≠ Technology E-ship Case Studies ≠ Breakout: What can we do at Baylor University?Preliminary OutcomesOne of the major classes where a KEEN Innovator has incorporated entrepreneurship principlesis our senior design course. This is also a key course that is regularly assessed to support three ofour ABET program outcomes:(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs;(d) an ability to function on multi
Technology. He holds an M.S. and B.S. in Industrial Technology with a minor in chemistry from Illinois State University. He is a co-PI on NSF grant #0501885. Page 11.73.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Multi-Disciplinary Entrepreneurial Project for Teaching ReengineeringAn entrepreneurial project at Illinois Valley Community College immerses engineeringdesign and electronics students in reengineering and entrepreneurship over the course of theirtwo-year technical programs. The project also teams the technical students with businessstudents, simulating an industrial
. The researchers coded a discovery whenever the text used a word or phrase thatdescribed an action related to the skill (See Table 2). For example, the text on page 90 of TheInnovator’s DNA, “He noticed a lower-middle class man riding a scooter with an older childstanding in front, behind the handle bars,” was coded as observation.Table 2. Coding ProtocolSkills Examples Book ExamplesAssociation Connecting, Creativity, Cross- Marc Benioff came up with the idea for pollinate, Combining salesforce.com “It’s basically enterprise software meets Amazon.”1. (pg. 42)Experimenting Making
in the classroom. Dr. Perez has been teaching the Basic Engineering (BE) – BE c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18234 1301 course for over 9 years. Lead the design for the development of the new Basic Engineering course (now UNIV 1301) for engineering at UTEP for the Engineering, Science and University Colleges. Devel- oped over 5 new courses, including UTEP technology & society core curriculum classes specifically for incoming freshman with a STEM background. Dr. Perez was awarded the 2014 ”University of Texas at El Paso award for Outstanding Teaching”. Dr. Perez
the pangineer must begin with the current education of engineers.Traditional engineering education has typically presented content knowledge acrossmultiple disciplines; however, to prepare students for modern challenges, the moderneducation system must now focus on delivering the context across and between the thesecontent areas.Knowledge how, or know-how, has always existed in engineering learning and practice.A common example recalled fondly by today’s practicing engineers are project-based Page 7.1101.1classes, such as capstone design courses for Mechanical Design engineers. Such classes Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
and Industrial Distribution Department in 1989 and has served as the Program Director of the Electronics and Telecommunications Programs and as the Associate Department Head for Operations. He received his BS degree in electrical engineering (1975) from California State University, Sacramento, and his MS (1980) and DE (1983) degrees in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. His education and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development.Richard Scruggs, Texas A&M University Richard M. Scruggs is the director of Mays Business School's Center for New Ventures and Entrepreneurship at Texas A&M
faculty and students; partners with leaders in academia and government to build a national entrepreneurship agenda in engineering; conducts research on higher education models; hosts online classes and resources; and forms communities around entrepreneurship in engineering education. (http://epicenter.stanford.edu/page/about) 2. I-‐Corps™ L is designed specifically for STEM educators with innovative teaching strategies, technologies, or set of curriculum materials. The principal goal of the program is to foster an entrepreneurial mindset within the education community and to impact the way innovations are designed and implemented. It provides real world
the curriculum for theprograms to be truly successful.Over the past tens years, Rose-Hulman has made great strides in introducing entrepreneurship tothe student body. In addition to Engenius Solutions, Rose-Hulman has developed a Masters inEngineering Management, which offers classes to both graduate and undergraduate students inentrepreneurship and management, established Rose-Hulman Ventures, another LillyEndowment funded program, many departments have encouraged and supported student teams indeveloping entrepreneurial based proposals for external funding from organizations such asNCIIA. All of these programs provide entrepreneurship development opportunities for the Rose-Hulman student body.While the current programs and opportunities are
business and entrepreneurship area. While use of the modular approachprovides increased flexibility for students, it also tends to compress curricular contentwhich significantly increases the challenge of incorporating engaged pedagogies withinthe classroom. To provide a balance between active learning and increased flexibility,courses were divided into skills oriented classes and courses with a significant activelearning component. Skills classes make extensive use of a multi-media approach andindependent study options. For courses requiring extensive use of active learningcomponents, an inverted classroom approach is used to provide more extensive deliveryof content outside of the regular class time. This paper discusses some of the pros andcons
entrepreneurial interventionsthat we incorporate into the freshmen engineering experience. These interventions occurthroughout the first year of study in engineering.In the engineering students‟ first quarter, a one class introduction to the definitions and conceptsof entrepreneurship is conducted. A particular emphasis is placed on the excitement and risksassociated with starting something new and the need to overcome the fear of failure,demonstrated in „Failure: The Secret to Success‟, a film produced by Honda. A discussion of thesocietal role of entrepreneurs underscored by playing The Acton Institute video, „The Call of theEntrepreneur’ (ref: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pem0ZSsMQVA ).27 An inspirationalcall to consider entrepreneurial ventures