REFERENCES Fig. 7 Fig. 8. Fig. 9recycled aggregates or recycled styrofoam as an Styrofoam, one control, one with De Brito, J., et al. “Structural, Material, Mechanical and Durability Properties and Behaviour of Recycled Aggregates Concrete.” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 6, June 2016, pp. 1–16.alternative is an endeavor beneficial to the environment. 50% RCA, one with 100% RCA). Duan, Zhen Hua
. Page 4.211.1Course DescriptionThe topics in this course include soil and aggregates as engineering materials; concrete mixdesign and mechanical behavior of concrete; reinforcing and admixtures for concrete; timberand wood systems; mechanical behavior, microstructure, and manufacturing of metals;manufacturing and mechanical behavior of plastics; applications of geosynthetics; asphaltcements; and composite materials. The course was recently changed from 2 credits to 3 creditsto allow for expanding the laboratory component of the course. The total laboratory hours inthe course were not changed (one 2-hour session each week). However, with the additionalclass time, better preparation is possible making the laboratory sessions more efficient
Session 1464 Materials Characterization by Digital Microscopy G. J. Filatovs, S. N. Yarmolenko, D. M. Pai and J. Sankar Department of Mechanical Engineering and NSF Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411AbstractMaterials characterization and analysis is the central theme of materials science. While computer-based methods greatly extend the scope of characterization techniques, these methods areassociated with their own set of implementation issues in terms of image processing, statistical,and mathematical problems. Classical metallography does not
Attachment 2 EXPANDED LIST OF POSSIBLE PROJECT TOPICS1. Energy absorbtion characteristics of wood for applications such as space craft landing pads or automobile bumpers.2. Cellulosic flywheels for energy storage.3. Honeycomb structures from wood and fibrous materials - current and future applications.4. Use of wood for cryogenic applications.5. Earth quake performance of wood.6. Biomass conversion of wood - myth or reality.7. Fracture behavior of wood - how applicable is conventional fracture mechanics?8. Appropriate technology - undeveloped countries a) Most efficient means of extracting heat from wood b) Most efficient utilization of wood in shelter construction c
could catch a ball. Even thoughcameras and computers could direct the robot towards a ball, robot's move in an Page 10.817.1awkward, lumbering fashion because conventional hydraulic valves cannot keep pacewith the commands of the computerized controllers. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAdaptive materials, such as magneto-rheological fluid, can “cycle” at a rate of 200 timesper second. As a result, this technology will allow devices that can operate instantly andwithout mechanical valves. Increased
Session 2464 Materials Science Experiments and Engineering Statistics Surendra K. Gupta and Carol E. Marchetti Rochester Institute of TechnologyAbstractThis paper describes three of the five engineering modules being developed for use in threestatistics courses: 314 – Engineering Statistics, 351 – Probability & Statistics I, and 352 –Probability & Statistics II. 314 is a mandatory course for all mechanical engineering (BSME)students; 351 & 352 are mandatory for all industrial & systems (BSIE) engineering students. Toanswer a student’s (often unasked) question “why
circuits, comprise many layers of variousmaterial types. The polymer, ceramic, and metallic materials used to construct andpackage electronic devices are chosen and combined carefully to take advantage of thedistinctive physical and mechanical properties of each material category. During the labsession students dissect and examine devices and electronic packaging systems tounderstand more about the ways materials can be used together to create complexstructures. The lab was designed for lower division students who are not materialsscience majors. Emphasis is placed on understanding the physical and mechanicalproperties involved in material selection, and on understanding how combinations ofmaterial types can be used to satisfy design
. In the class lectures, the basic concept ofasphalt specification, mechanical properties and test methods are discussed. The sustainabilityconcept of the materials is also integrated in lectures. Homework is assigned to students so thatthey have the chance to bridge the concepts and practical problems. The most important parts ofthe class are the hands-on experiments in laboratory, and the sustainable material concepts inlectures. The relationship between students’ homework, exams, labs, and total grade are compared.Three semesters’ results are analyzed to improve the curriculum.IntroductionThe Civil Engineering Materials class (CE 3101) is designed for junior and senior undergraduatestudents. This class covers different materials such as
Paper ID #37251Student performance, engagement, and satisfaction in aflipped Statics and Mechanics of Materials classroom: A CaseStudyRachel H Sangree (Associate Teaching Professor) Rachel Sangree is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, serving as the department’s Director of Undergraduate Studies and the Program Chair for Johns Hopkins' Engineering for Professionals (EP) program in Civil Engineering. Sangree earned her BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University, her PhD in Civil Engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and she worked as a design
Session 2793 You can't do a thing if you can't build the swing: Modeling and Reality in Mechanics of Materials Paul Palazolo, Anna Phillips Civil Engineering Department - The University of MemphisAbstractThis paper presents the results from the integration of lab experiences and classroom materials ina junior level Mechanics of Materials class at the University of Memphis. Previously, the classcontent and laboratory content were disjointed and offered no sense of continuity between topicsand potential applications. This produced students who might have passed
Paper ID #44849Enhancing Student Learning and Engagement through Interactive Learningin the Engineering Materials Course of the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology ProgramDr. PS Dhanasekaran, State University of New York, Canton Dr PS (Puttagounder Dhanasekaran Swaminathan) has PhD degree in mechanical engineering from Wi- chita State University, Wichita, KS. He is currently working as an Associate professor, at SUNY Canton, NY. He has taught, CAD/CAM, FEA, Machine design, Statics, Strength of Materials, and various courses on materials and materials selection, for both undergraduate and graduate programs. He also authored and
A New Approach for an Undergraduate Mechanics of Materials Course that Integrates Theory, Analysis, Verification and Design Joseph J. Rencis, Hartley T. Grandin, Jr. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Arkansas/Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstract This paper presents a description of a first undergraduate course in mechanics ofmaterials. Although many of the features of this course have been used by other faculty andpresented formally in textbooks, the authors believe they have united them in a way thatproduces a course that is unique and innovative. The title of the paper includes Theory,Analysis, Verification and Design to
A look at an active learning strategies for deeper understanding: a case study in Mechanics of Materials Nicolas Ali Libre a*, Jeffrey W. Jennings b, S. Amy Skyles b a Civil, Architectural and Environmental Eng. Dep., Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO b Educational Technology, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MOAbstractActive learning encompasses anything students might be called on to do in class besideswatching and listening to an instructor and taking notes (Felder & Brent, 2016). The purpose ofthis study was to incorporate active learning strategies into Mechanics of Materials, a
Session 3464 Student Response to a General Education Course on Materials M. Grant Norton, David F. Bahr School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University Pullman WA 99164-2920AbstractThis paper describes the response that students have had to our general education course onmaterials. The course is now in its fourth year and we have been able to collect data from studentsurveys distributed at the end of each semester. Also included are details of some of theresources that we have found particularly useful in teaching this course.IntroductionTo
Session 2164 An Innovative Materials Laboratory Collaboration James P. Bandstra, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown Richard J. Henry, Concurrent Technologies CorporationAbstractThe University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown offers a Materials and Manufacturing Laboratorycourse in collaboration with Concurrent Technologies Corporation. This paper describes thecollaboration, the benefits of the collaboration, and the materials laboratory experiences that thecollaboration provides for the Mechanical Engineering Technology students.ObjectiveThe objective of this paper is to provide a description of how
Session 1364 WWW Support for Materials Engineering Education Paul D. Johnson Grand Valley State UniversityI. IntroductionStudents have become very familiar with the use of the Internet for communication and recrea-tion. As a result, they are also becoming comfortable with the use of the Internet to carry outclass-related assignments and research. With numerous Internet terminals scattered across mostcampuses, it is very easy for the students to get access to web resources – often much easier thanit is for them to access conventional library resources. Students in
I Session 2364 DESIGN IN MATERIALS COURSES? NATURALLY! C. O. Smith, G. Kardos Engineering Consultant/Mechanical Engineerirw 1920 C;llege A v e . / C a r l e t o n Unive~sity “ Terre Haute, IN 47803/ Ottawa, ONT. KIS 5B6 A difficult in, both ABET and CEAB accreditation procedures is ~roviding sufficient“design” content in
Manufacturing in an Introductory Materials Course Sarah E. Leach Purdue UniversityAbstractThe mechanical engineering technology curriculum includes formal courses in manufacturingprocesses, but manufacturing considerations should also be incorporated into courses intended toteach fundamental theoretical principles. Adding materials processing exposure in parallel withtheory has a number of benefits for students. These benefits include: helping students tounderstand how fundamental principles relate to processes and controls, giving them anappreciation for the scale and pace of manufacturing environments, increasing their awareness ofthe
MUSICAL I STRUME T DESIG USI G COMPOSITE MATERIALS Josh DeRosa jxd1068@rit.edu 1139 Altamont Ave. Schenectady NY, 12303 Abstract: This paper discusses the investigation of composite materials in instrument building. Applications of epoxidized soybean oil in the context of instruments have been explored. A resin transfer molding setup has been constructed and provided preliminary samples for acoustic testing. Results are inconclusive for the effect of pre-tensioning and ESO use. Carbon fiber music strings have also been made
Paper ID #35277Sustainability in Food Services and MaterialsMr. Aatish Gupta, Rowan University I am a Mechanical Engineering student at Rowan University.Ms. Lauren MulvihillMr. Emmet Scott Sedar, Rowan University I am an accomplished honors student, and aspiring Mechanical Engineer and Physicist, passionate about astronautics and the private military contracting industry. Currently serving as the President of the SAME student chapter at Rowan University.Jenna Nicole Sperduto American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
and Napper.2II. The Current Materials Course and Companion LabsThe new materials lecture course (MEMT 201 -- Engineering Materials) replaced two lecture coursestaught separately by the Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Civil Engineering (CE) programs. This two-hour lecture course maintained the flavor of the former Mechanical Engineering materials course, with asubstantial amount of time being spent on a material’s crystalline and atomic structures and how heattreatment affects its mechanical properties. A two-lecture sequence on portland cement concrete wasadded to expose all engineering students to this very important engineering material. Electricalproperties of materials were covered in some detail to give students basic knowledge in
and accessibility of LCVA softwares such as EIOLCA and ECO-itmake it possible to utilize these as tools for teaching and learning the concepts of lifecycle value analysis. Government and product marketing (ECO-Labeling) are the drivingforces for corporations and organizations engaging in life cycle value assessment of theirproducts and systems.It is this paper’s position that the costs/performance-importance of materials in product,process and system’ design and development dictate that material selection be accordedpriority and more attention in engineering technology and SMET curricula and education.Bibliography1. Ashby, Michael. F., “Materials in Mechanical Design”, Journal of Materials Education, Vol. 15, Page 143 –166, 1993.2. Jacobs
Paper ID #33880Stimulating Student Preparation in Introductory Engineering MechanicsMajor Brad Gregory Davis, United States Military Academy Major Brad Davis is an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his BS in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy, MS in Engineering Management from the Missouri University of Science and Tech- nology, and MS in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research interests include the impact response of structural materials, design of protective structures
Engineering Education1. Altiero, Nicholas, “Grip and Win,” ASEE Prism, vol. 10, no. 7, 2001, p. 39-40.2. Callister, William D., “Materials Science and Engineering – An Introduction,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.3. Johnston, Stephen F. et al, “Engineering and Society,” Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999.4. Popper, Stephen W. et al, “New Forces at Work, ” Rand, Santa Monica, California, 1998.5. Randolph, Gary B., “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, no. 2, 2000, pp. 199-125.Biographical InformationPATRICA M SHAMAMY, P.E. is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at LawrenceTechnological University in Southfield, Michigan
AC 2012-3221: INVESTIGATION OF PROPORTIONAL AND NON-PROPORTIONALLOADINGS USING MOHR’S CIRCLEProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, Georgia Southern University Somnath Chattopadhyay is in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Southern University in Statesboro, Ga. He teaches mechanics, design, and materials, and his current research emphasis is on fatigue crack intiation in metallic materials. He has authored a text on pressure vessel design and serves as an Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology Page 25.859.1 c American Society for Engineering
, is an assistant teaching professor of Civil Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received his BS (2001), MS (2003) and PhD (2009) in civil engineer- ing with emphasis in structural engineering, from University of Tehran, Iran. His research interests and experiences are in the field of computational mechanics, cement-based composite materials as well as in- novative teaching techniques. Dr. Libre is the manager of Materials Testing lab at Missouri S&T, teaches mechanics of materials and develops digital educational resources for the engineering students. He had the opportunity of leading several scientific and industrial research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate
textbook (or videolectures) on their own outside of class, and then during the class meetings they solve problemsand/or perform activities with support from the instructor and/or teaching assistants. The benefitscan include increased student engagement and more attention paid to individual students’ needs.Potential downsides of flipped classrooms include the difficulty some students have in learningnew material on their own. Flipped classrooms have been applied successfully to statics courses[1-3]. This approach was also used in a mechanics of materials course [4] and in a machinedesign course [5]. Analysis of the general applicability and outcomes of flipped classrooms havebeen treated in [6-8]. Flipped classrooms offer the opportunity for
. Number of students Code Pre-class survey Post-class survey (N=83) (N=81) Material properties 15 61 Geometry 0 20 Boundary conditions 0 18 Accelerometers 4 9 Assumptions 4 21ConclusionsIn this study, the lab portion of a Mechanical Vibrations course was evaluated for itseffectiveness in improving students’ experiences in experimental vibrations and
research interest include, Deformation & Failure Mecha- nisms, Materials Science, Fracture Mechanics, Process-Structure-Property Relationships, Finite Element Stress Analysis Modeling, Failure Analysis, ASME BPV Code Sec VIII Div. 1 &2, API 579/ASME FFS- 1 Code, Materials Testing and Engineering Education. Professionally registered engineer in the State of Texas (PE).Dr. Matilda (Tillie) Wilson McVay, Texas A&M University Associate Professor of Instruction, J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University from 2006 - present (2020) Undergraduate Program Director, Department of Mechanical Engineering, from January 2017 - 2019 Lecturer, Department of Aerospace Engineering
traditionally analytical courses in the Engineering Mechanics sequence. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Using FEA as a Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Machine Component DesignAbstractOver the last 50 years, Machine Design textbooks have been continually updated to includeinstruction on current technology and to include the latest standards. However, currenttechnology has not been incorporated in the teaching of the material. Specifically, there is achapter in most texts that addresses basic finite element analysis (FEA) theory. However, FEA isnot used to teach the concepts of machine design. Conversely, the content of machine design isnot used to enhance