states that the curriculum being taught now is almost identical to thattaught many decades ago. In general, it is believed that engineering economy instruction putsmore emphasis on routine and trivial calculations and less emphasis on the analysis and decisionmaking processes2,3.According to the literature, while the teaching materials of engineering economy has changedvery little over the years, the actual implementation of the topic in the work force has changeddramatically. Smith9 comments on how risk and risk management is vital to the engineeringenvironment, and yet the curriculum in undergraduate classes only skims the surface of thesetopics. Most textbooks acknowledge the presence and an overview of methods for measuringrisk, but many do
and senior mechanical engineering majors will be Page 11.1272.5 hired as instructional assistants for the laboratory component of the courses. Some additional students will be hired to assist in the development of course materials. Projected pilot program cost: $6,000. Faculty/Staff Training: Some additional training of the faculty and staff comprising the instructional team on the computer tools to be used in the program will be needed. Projected pilot program cost: $1,000. Project Supplies: Supplies will be needed for the hands-on projects and classroom demonstrations used in the program. Projected
belief may stem from theinternal confirmation of understanding that hands-on work provides. Students seem to gainconfidence when they are able to apply class material successfully to real-world systems, rathersolving text book problems on paper. It is not yet clear where the critical learning takes place,whether in the lab or in the associated lecture, but it is obvious from our experience thatlaboratory work catalyzes student understanding and excitement about mechanical engineering.Based on student feedback and our belief in the value of project-based and experiential learning,we have developed a practice-integrated mechanical engineering curriculum that spans the fullfour-year undergraduate experience. Our goal is to ingrain theoretical
AC 2012-3237: AN EXPERIENCE USING REFLECTION IN SOFTWAREENGINEERINGDr. Alexandra Martinez, University of Costa Rica Alexandra Martinez has been working since 2009 as an Invited Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Science at the University of Costa Rica (UCR). She has taught courses in databases, soft- ware testing, and bioinformatics, and done applied research in software testing at UCR’s Research Center on Information and Communication Technologies. Previously, she worked as a Software Design Engi- neer in Test at Microsoft Corporation in Redmond, Wash., and as a Software Engineer at ArtinSoft in San Jose, Costa Rica. She received her Ph.D. in computer engineering from the University of Florida
the race rulesduring a meeting at the beginning of the semester. Decisions regarding team organization anddesign philosophy were to be made by the teams. The AT team employed an open, consensusapproach to the design phase. Three weeks were required for this initial stage, as they evaluatedexisting designs and made predictions for lift and propulsion based on available materials andcomponents. Having settled on a design, they made assembly drawings and prepared to fabricatethe vehicle. The building phase required eleven weeks and the flight-testing two weeks. Thestudents finished the project on time for the race.The mechanical engineering students used a more traditional engineering approach; they dividedthe team into propulsion, airframe
-60], such as the critical goal of enhancing engineeringinterest; thusly augmenting first-year engineering retention.Historically, a main reason that students leave engineering is the lack of engineering relatedexperiences in the first year [61]. Conventional first-year engineering curricula require students tocomplete multiple gateway courses (i.e. basic mathematics and science courses) prior to beginningdisciplinary coursework. These courses oftentimes deal with abstract material with little perceivedengineering context. As a result, students end up believing that all engineering courses will besimilar, and some ultimately leave for other professional arenas where applications can beunderstood much earlier in academic career(s) [62]. One
masstransfer, electricity, and materials. The report noted that, at the time, few curricula requiredstudents to have exposure to all six of these areas. This enumeration of the six engineeringsciences is, itself, unscientific, being made without evidence of what engineers do and whateducators can do to prepare engineers for professional practice. Even so, these six engineeringsciences have come to constitute much of the structure of undergraduate mechanical engineeringcurriculum.The Committee collected evidence from industry on what education they expect of graduates.Industry “indicated no criticism of the technical competence of engineers but raised questionsconcerning (1) the adequacy of their background in basic science, engineering science
hands-on-experience in a wide variety of biological and physical techniques in cancernanomedicine research. Over ten papers have been presented by Rose-Hulman undergraduatestudents at the following conferences: Butler University Undergraduate Research Conference(Indianapolis, IN); Annual Argonne Symposium for Undergraduates in Science, Engineering andMathematics (Chicago, IL); Math, Engineering and Science Conference (Evansville, IN); andAnnual American Society for Engineering Education IL/IN Section Conference.ConclusionsThe proposed curriculum has the potential to have a major influence on undergraduate educationin medical physics because (1) the materials will have been piloted in two institutions with avariety of students, and (2) the
learning styles (our specific choice of techniques being based upon our experienceand the limited time in the course), several of these techniques proved to be valuable to manystudents.The next four sections discuss the set of choices we made and the practices we implemented inthe course. They include background on each of these, as well as our assessments of how wellthey worked, and results from the student feedback we gathered.3. Designing the Course around ReflectionFor students to learn and for their learning to last, they must be engaged in the material. Weexpected some resistance to learning “soft skills” because most engineering students had gonethrough their academic lives largely by working on their own and so had become accustomed tothis
Paper ID #47124Incorporating Industry-Sponsored Technical Writing into Engineering LaboratoriesCaleb Levi Head, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Caleb Head earned a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock in 2022. He is pursuing a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock with a research focus on engineering education. With a passion for teaching engineering courses, he intends to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education after completing his master’s program to contribute to research and pedagogy in the field, to become a
. Ecocentric viewIn this paper we report the results of our research covering over 7 years of teaching a coursedesigned to change the mindset of engineering education from a totally different perspective. Notone anchored to the pedagogically acquired knowledge and skills of the student but one influencedby what the student experiences. Specifically, by what the student has experienced in learning fromnature, also known as Biomimicry. Janine Benyus [4] coined the term “biomimicry,” literallymeaning imitation of life. She introduces it as three major ways to influence engineering solutions,using her words: 1) Nature as a model. Biomimicry is a new science that studies nature’s models and then imitates or takes inspiration from these
[3].A large employer has developed an education program which teaches the concept of short-cyclemanufacturing and how to improve their operation. It helped the company to achieve significantimprovements in reducing work-in-progress inventory, cycle times, and costs [4]. However, themain role in these initiatives belongs to educational institutions, especially the engineeringdepartments of universities. The general trend is to move away from traditional one-subject, in-class instruction to interdisciplinary hands-on engineering programs, which pool resources withother academic institutions, and partner with industry or government institutions [5]. Someuniversities have developed courses, which involve mechanical, industrial, electrical
father is an aerospace and material science engineer. My dad teaches the mathematics as wellas how to throw a baseball. I have additional elective teachers and mentors who help me toexpand my STEAM knowledge. I meet with them on a regular basis who challenge me to deepdive into amazing, fun rabbit holes of learning.The popular television program, Young Sheldon, highlights the struggles and the triumphsassociated with academically accelerated students who tackle more challenging course loads,well before their classmates. I am one of those accelerated students, albeit more socially skilledas I feel collaboration is very important. Despite being in many online friend groups ofaccelerated students across the country, the depiction of Sheldon is
Young Women’s Aviation, Construction, and Engineering Academy OraLynn Manweller, Amy Hoover, William Bender Central Washington UniversityAbstractThe Young Women’s Aviation, Construction and Engineering (ACE) Academy was institutedthis year at Central Washington University. Our goal is to increase the number of young womenwho choose to pursue education and enter the workforce in these technical fields. The Academyis a 3-day, 2-night summer weekend academy that provided hands on learning experiences andactivities to spark career interest in these fields. The academy will be offered in subsequentyears, and the success of the program will be
AC 2012-4154: ENGINEERING IN A FICTIONAL WORLD: EARLY FIND-INGS FROM INTEGRATING ENGINEERING AND LITERACYMs. Mary McCormick, Tufts University Mary McCormick is a graduate student at Tufts University. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in education, focusing on mathematics, science, technology, and engineering education. She received a B.S. from University of Massachusetts, Lowell, in civil engineering, and an M.S. from Tufts University in civil engineering. Her current research involves seeing the engineering thinking and doing in children.Dr. Morgan M. Hynes, Tufts University Morgan Hynes is a Research Assistant Professor in the Tufts University Education Department and Ed- ucation Research Program Director for the
Groupwork. Artworkby Meaghan Veneracion and Kai Zhuang.Pedagogy 2: Virtual and Augmented RealityLearning complex engineering concepts in varying fields, from learning how to prototype a circuiton a breadboard, assembling drones, infrastructure health monitoring, energy consumption,wastewater system, and thermodynamics, all the way to learning about complex geologicalfeatures requires hands-on experience as well as access to sophisticated equipment. For manyeducational institutions, especially those in poorer countries, the affordability of lab equipmentand lab spaces can be challenging, and this presents a materialistic barrier to learning. Yet,without these hands-on experiences, students may become disengaged and unmotivated whenfaced with complex
themessage communicated by the engineering community. They found that high school girls emphasized thefollowing factors: enjoying their work, having a good working environment, making a difference, earninga good income, and having flexibility. The message from the engineering community, on the other hand,indicates that engineering is challenging, is difficult but rewarding, and requires math and science to solveproblems. None of these factors are motivators for the young women surveyed. This idea is echoed byTietjen (2005). She theorizes that women pursue professions in which they see value; if they do not knowwhat engineers do, they cannot assess the value of their work. In addition, the engineering profession issometimes viewed as the cause of
architectural engineer. Before coming to CU, I took Advanced Placement Environmental Science and I enjoyed the class thoroughly. Upon reflection, however, the material I understood and enjoyed the most was urban design and “green” construction. Page 14.1030.8 Entering into EVEN 1000, I knew that I wanted to do something involving the environment, but I only vaguely understood what exactly environmental engineering entails. As the semester wore on, I found I was not interested in the most of the guest lecturers' careers; only [one] position intrigued me, and that was due to her dealings with policy. I like the general idea of helping the
processes (SCP), and outcomes basedassessment (OBA) predicated in AC2K.ABET will still require one year of mathematics and basic science, a half year of humanities,and one and a half years of engineering topics as well as a capstone design experience.Pertaining to the curriculum, ABET program criteria states: Graduates most havedemonstrated:a) knowledge of chemistry and calculus-based physics with depth in at least one;b) ability to apply advanced mathematics through multivariate calculus and differential equations;c) familiarity with statistics and linear algebra;d) ability to work professionally in both thermal and mechanical systems areas including the design and realization of such systems”AC2K has established in Criteria 3, eleven
the multi-tasking capabilities of the expanded system. Hardwareprototyping using an FPGA provides hands-on experience that can’t be obtained by simulationalone.Student feedback was collected from the Student Evaluation of Learning survey, using a five-point Likert scale: 1. Strongly Disagree (SD), 2. Disagree (D), 3. Undecided (U), 4. Agree (A),5. Strongly Agree (SA), Number of Responses (N). The results are very positive and shown inFigure 8. Student Evaluation of Learning SD D U A SA N Mean My ability to identify, formulate, and 0 0 0 0 4 4 5.0 solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics has
educational goal may be achieved by using different methodsand means.The teachers of engineering graphics today tend to use, if not overuse, CAD/CAM software inthe educational process. Sometimes it is assumed that computer graphics software is the primarymeans that will enhance a student’s spatial visualization ability. On the contrary, recent research[8] provides data to prove that the influence of computer graphics on the enhancement of spatialability is not so direct and straightforward. Electronically created tutorials on web pages,instructional movies and CD interactive media are nowadays produced to the advantage ofengineering graphics students. We should probably ask ourselves if the amount of time it takes toproduce these materials is
desired. They also learn to develop function blockdiagrams as a method of illustrating this interconnectivity. They learn how to create simpleexperiments and use a “hands-on” investigation process to gain an understanding of the artifactand to make predictions regarding its behavior. Finally, they learn the necessity of payingattention to detail and that the engineers work is very detailed, even in what may appear to be anuncomplicated artifact.The students also begin to identify the choices the engineer needs to make in creating the productas design details emerged from the conceptual stage of the process. They begin to realize howengineers work on problems and make decisions as they become aware of the open-endednessinherent in the design
Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Indianapolis, IN. https://peer.asee.org/23063International Engineering Alliance (IEA). (2013). Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies. 3(21), June 2013.Jarvinen, M. K., Jarvinen, L. Z., & Sheehan, D. N. (2012). Application of core science concepts using digital video: A “hands-on” laptop approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(6), 16–24.Lichter, J. (2012). Using YouTube as a platform for teaching and learning solubility rules. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(9), 1133–1137.Ludlow, D. K. (2012). Using student-produced videos to enhance learning engagement in a chemical engineering thermodynamics course. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Chemical
, student-led design, and experiential learning, and he is the founding faculty advisor for a vertically integrated research initiative spanning engineering, cognitive neuroscience, and data science. Dr. Gray has published research on interdisciplinary design education and advanced materials applications, and serves as Associate Technical Editor for Research in Nondestructive Evaluation and as Guest Editor for a special issue of Sensors. He has been recognized for his curricular innovations, particularly those that enhance inclusivity, autonomy, and student ownership in engineering learning environments. ´Dr. Juan David Ortega Alvarez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
mind, as defined bythe NAE (2009) and curriculum integration, because Guzey includes integration as well.Guzey (2016) lists twelve elements that apply directly to the needed rubric. They fall into fourlarger categories: lesson content (engaging context, engineering challenge, science integration,mathematics integration, assessment), instructional strategies (student-centered, hands on/mindson, multiple representations), lesson implementation (teamwork, communication) and lessonorganization (learning goals, clear flow). Although the original reference uses a five point scaleto assess a form of quality, for the purposes of this analysis, only presence or absence of theelements is noted.Finally, the NGSS engineering practices include a few
course, areview of student feedback scores, as well as discussion with instructors, reveals studentattitudes towards these courses is often dismissive, and the effort displayed in thesecourses is often lacking. This, in turn, can affect a student’s ability to communicateeffectively in the workplace, resulting in decreased prospects. In order to combat this,many universities have turned to a dedicated communications course, whether taught bythe department of English/Communications or by the Engineering department. Thesecourses, which are more focused on engineering/technical writing, and which engagestudents using examples and forms relevant to engineering, have led to a greaterengagement and dedication to the material by the students, with a
separatebut related laboratory course), Material Science, Thermodynamics, Fluids, Introduction toElectrical Engineering, and Circuits & Electronics. These courses are taken with students fromthe other disciplines, in order that the Biomedical Engineering students are held to the same levelof expertise as those from the traditional majors. In addition, Engineering Design is continuedwith “Engineering by Design”, during which Biomedical Engineers are placed in teams withstudents from the other disciplines to work on projects developed by external mentors. There isalso a strong linkage to ethics via a concurrent course.The middle (or depth) section of the pyramid is formed by the core courses Biomechanics,Biofluids, Bioinstrumentation, and two terms
engineering careers. This project develops a supply-chainof high quality engineering students by 1) supporting the CCs’ HS student outreach activities, 2)supporting the CC engineering courses by providing materials, tutoring, local engineeringspeakers, and tuition scholarships, 3) conducting “Be an Engineer” events on the CC campusesto CC students and local HS students and their parents, 4) following up withclasses/workshops/seminars - exploiting time-tested techniques, assignments, as well as one-on-one and group mentoring - for all participants either via live teleconference or webcast, 5)providing an engaged community of mentors (with extensive experience and commitment) for allstudents, as well as remote tutoring and mentoring via phone, email
Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology at the United International College (UIC) in Zhuhai China. She has trained with ASCE’s Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative, been exploring and applying evidence-based strategies for instruction, and is a proponent of Learning Assistants (LAs). Her scholarship of teaching and learning interests are in motivation and mindset, teamwork and collaboration, and learning through failure and reflection. Her bioengineering research interests and collaborations are in the areas of biomaterials, cellular microenvironments, and tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. She serves on leadership teams for the Whitaker Center of STEM Education and the
diversity were also dealt with inthe class. Topics included studying masculinity in America, how gender is constructed in oursociety and the history of engineering education with regards to gender. Page 9.1426.2 Diversity Course 3 Undergraduate Engineering Diversity Course: Women and Men In The Engineering Workplace The class relied heavily on guest lecturers from the college of liberal arts and sciences at ISU,and from the ISU Women’s Studies Program. The course had to be approved through a lengthycurriculum approval