, and community building. • Split the design-build phases between separate teams [6] to encourage better communication between teams and collective ownership of the final product.AcknowledgmentThe author would like to thank David Moss, the VIU Engineering technician, for creating tools andprocesses that enhanced student engagement under rapidly changing conditions.References[1] B. Dick, Y. Cao, M. Gwyn, J. Kirkey, B. Rudecki, E. Switlishoff, T. Todoruk, “First-year common engineering curriculum for the BC post-secondary sector – Implementation phase”, www.bccat.ca/pubs/Reports/EngCommonCore2018.pdf [Fetched 04.May.2021][2] P.R. Backer, C. Kato, “Effect of Cohorts on Student Retention in Engineering”, 2017 ASEE Annual
. degrees from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China and Ph.D. degree from University of Strathclyde, UK. Prior to joining UBC in 2008, she worked as a research scientist at Ryerson University on various projects in the area of CFD and heat and mass transfer. Dr. Yan has taught a variety of courses including fluid mechanics, fluid machines, mechanics of materials, calculus, and kinematics and dynamic. She has also developed undergraduate fluids laboratories and supervised many capstone projects. Her interest in SoTL is evidence-based teaching strategies, student engagement, faculty development, and teaching and learning communities. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with APEGBC and has served as reviewer for various
in supporting student learning.Instead, strong evidence exists to support the positive impacts of active learning (AL) on bothachievement of learning outcomes and student retention (Davis & Yadav, 2014; Kolmos & DeGraaff, 2014; Lichtenstein et al., 2014). Grabinger and Dunlap (2011) define rich environmentsfor active learning according to the following criteria: ● “evolve from and are consistent with constructivist philosophies and theories; ● promote study and investigation within authentic (i.e. realistic, meaningful, relevant, complex, and information-rich) contexts; ● encourage the growth of student responsibility, initiative, decision-making, and intentional learning; ● cultivate an atmosphere of
Paper ID #37605Exploring engineering students’ reflections of their childhoodexperiences: The intersection of structure and curiosityCollette Patricia Higgins Collette Higgins is an undergraduate student at James Madison University majoring in Engineering and she is currently in the engineering leadership program. As an undergraduate research assistant, her scholarship focuses on K-12 pathways into engineering and STEM disciplines. She is trained to work with individuals diagnosed with special needs including ASD, ADHD, ADD, and ODD and has extensive experience creating scaffolded lessons to engage and interact with
navigating thecomplexities of modern digital life in a healthy way. Digital wellness can be defined as “thepursuit of an intentional and healthy relationship with technology and digital media” [3], or morebroadly as “the impact of digital engagement on human wellbeing” [4]. As a rapidly growingfield of research, digital wellness seeks to foster a more mindful, balanced, and reflective use ofdigital technologies. Burr et al., [4] emphasizes that digital wellness is not a standalone concept,but is one deeply intertwined with overall wellbeing, particularly as the boundaries betweenonline and offline life become increasingly blurred. Themelis [5] explores the idea thatindividuals are not just users of technology but active participants, or digital
data for transfer and non-transfer students inengineering as well as qualitative data collected from interviews and focus groups with studentsand key faculty and staff stakeholders working with engineering transfer students, we expandcurrent work on transfer student capital, articulation agreement efficacy, transfer supportservices, enrollment and guaranteed transfer policies, coursework transfer processes, and co-curricular support programs within the undergraduate engineering context. Our poster willhighlight major findings thus far, including: the impact of integrating community collegestudents into university study abroad programs as a mechanism to preemptively help transferstudents with the institutional transition process; the complexity
.[16] Tannen, D. (1995). The power of talk: Who gets heard and why. Harvard Business Review,73(5), 138-148.[17] Martins, R. K., & McNeil, D. W. (2009). Review of motivational interviewing in promotinghealth behaviors. Clinical psychology review, 29(4), 283-293.[18] Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups intoeffective teams. Journal of student centered learning, 2(1), 9-34.[19] Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano Jr, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006).The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Doescomputer-mediated communication make a difference?. Small Group Research, 37(6), 631-661.[20] Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist
) enablingof transfer credits and experiential credits; b) taking a community-based approach withcomprehensive programs and services for student veterans and their families which includehousing, health care, employment during the college; c) enabling veterans’ voice to be heardthrough roundtables, veteran associations, etc; d) have strong web presence easily accessible to theveterans; e) establish a specific point of contact; e) expand housing options; and f) implementtuition deferment plan to accommodate the GI Bill (Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944)payment schedules; g) provide veteran focused orientations; h) provide faculty training related toveterans (ACE, 2008; Heineman, 2016; Olin Earl & Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 1949).Veterans
Science at Southeastern Louisiana, Dr. Achee also serves as faculty advisor for the student chapter of ACM-W, Women in Computing. She founded the Lion’s Code Coding Camp to provide a summer program for pre-college students and recruit students to the discipline and university. Her research focus is computer science education.Dr. Troy Williams, Southeastern Louisiana University Troy Williams is an Instructor of Physics in the Department of Chemistry and Physics at Southeast- ern Louisiana University. In his capacity at Southeastern, Dr. Williams has designed and led multiple STEM Educator professional development institutes focused on facilitating improving educator content knowledge and communication amongst STEM
educator content knowledge and communication amongst STEM disciplines. His research interests in physics focuses on student-centered collaborative problem solving. Dr. Williams also serves as Co-Lead of the Northshore STEM Coalition, a member of the national STEM Learning Ecosystem network. As part of the Northshore STEM Coalition, Dr. Williams has helped to organize, develop, and deliver STEM programming to un- derserved communities. Troy holds a B.S. and M.S. in Physics and a Ph.D. in Science and Mathematics Education from Southern University and A&M College.Dr. Mohammad Saadeh, Southeastern Louisiana University I am the Industrial and Engineering Technology Department Head at Southeastern Louisiana University. I
programs. However, after admission, the problem ofretention becomes salient for underrepresented minority groups (URMs) in academia 1 . As youngBlack engineers continue to enter advanced graduate studies, it becomes important to examine thefactors that impact how they enter and ultimately decide to leave the institution. In this work, weused the autoethnographic method to share our experiences and illustrate the issues faced by BlackPhD students at elite research institutions. We relate our experiences chronologically starting withthe expectations from peers once arriving on campus, moving into the expectation of solving auniversity’s equity problems, and ending with the mental burdens of coping with an unhealthywork environment. All of these
presenter serving as a bridge. Theworkshop targets the need to improve students’ communication proficiency, and focusessparingly on the hands-on activity component of ambassadorship. Consequently, little is knownabout whether learning to create and facilitate a classroom activity impacts what ambassadorshipmeans to students, and how these perceptions are integrated into existing ambassadorial orprofessional future role components of self-perceptions, goals, beliefs and action possibilities.The present study focused on two questions. 1. For students in an ambassador role during anoutreach visit, what is the purpose of the hands-on activity? 2. How do ambassadors approachthe development of a hands-on activity? The case study with embedded units arose
may (1) support students’ reflection on past experiences, meaning-making of these experiences, and insights that “inform [their] path going forward,”1 and(2) be associated with students’ subsequent behaviors. We first review a broaderliterature on the interventional effects on surveys in political studies and socialpsychology, after which we present the results obtained from including an optionalreflection question at the end of an engineering education survey. We conclude thateducators would benefit from considering the range of potential impacts that respondingto questions may have on students’ thoughts and actions, rather than treating surveys asneutral data collection devices when designing their research.Previous research on the effects
understand undergraduate students’ experiences in a social community within mentorshipprograms [21] and to identify how different manifestations of social capital influence communitycollege students’ intent to transfer to a bachelor’s degree-granting STEM program [22]-[23].Also, prior engineering education studies have utilized social capital to explore underrepresentedundergraduate engineering students’ sources of social capital [24]-[28] and the impact socialcapital has on their decision to pursue an engineering degree [24], [27], [29], persistence in anengineering major [24], [26]-[27], [29]-[30], and experiences as an engineering student[24]-[25], [28]-[30]. Additionally, Corple et al. [31] applied Bourdieu’s definitions of socialcapital and
articles. For each The Undiscovered Mind, and Rational Mysticismstory, six questions on factual matterswere generated* (with the assistance of ChatGPT). The questions were divided into threegroups, each with two questions. A student must answer one question from each group. C. Constructivism and the Structure of the CourseA constructivist view of learning suggests an approach to teaching that gives learners theopportunity for concrete, contextually meaningful experience through which they can search forpatterns, raise their own questions, and construct their own models, concepts, and strategies.The classroom in this model is seen as a mini society, a community of learners engaged inactivity, discourse, and reflection [25]. Based on this
improvementof verbal communication for engineering students. The implementation has not onlyenhanced the students’ soft skills on technical communication but also has increased theinterest in energy topics, including renewable energy and sustainability. The debatesessions require students to conduct research on both their assigned topic they are toadvocate for, and the opponent’s topic that they are to debate against. Such preparationinvolves studying the strengths and weaknesses of competing topics, their theoretical andtechnical limitations, economic analyses, and environmental impacts. The debate sessionshave been conducted in a tournament structure where the qualifying teams haveprogressed to the next level, gradually yielding a final debate
how to make their online content as engaging andeffective as their in-person content.However, the effectiveness of information-seeking behavior instruction delivered online ispoorly understood, particularly when the online transition has occurred quickly. Instructorstraining engineering students in information-seeking will find little guidance about how to adjusttheir pedagogical approaches for effective online learning. The small body of research conductedin this area often relies upon self-report data and tends to be dated [6]. Even less is known aboutthe impact of asynchronous instructional methods on student learning. The limited number ofstudies on this topic tend to use pre- and post-test methodologies that do not directly
showed that the students as a group became more collaborative in their conflict management styles between their junior and senior years.IntroductionMarket forces within the construction industry are demanding more collaborative environments.Construction Management at Risk, Design/Build, Lean Construction, and Integrated ProjectDelivery (IPD), now account for most of all construction contracts.1 In particular, IPD requires asignificant level of collaboration to succeed. However, these increasingly collaborative projectdelivery systems do not ensure collaboration. For example, Lean Construction proponentsfrequently employ the principles of IPD and have positively impacted the construction industry,but success does not occur on every
Page 26.1368.8 of Engineering. (National Academies Press, 2008).3. Moulton, B. in Technological Developments in Education and Automation (eds. Iskander, M., Kapila, V. & Karim, M. A.) 333–337 (Springer Netherlands, 2010). at 4. Bush, M. Corporate Support for Staff Engaging in Volunteer or Pro-Bono Engineering Work. (2011).5. Bielefeldt, A. et al. Spectra of Learning Through Service Programs. in American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition Proceedings (2013).6. EWB-USA. Our History. (2013). at 7. EPICS Purdue. EPICS Overview. (2014). at 8. Bielefeldt, A. R. & Canney, N. Impacts of Service-Learning on the Professional Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students. Int. J. Serv
sustainable programs,creating a more inclusive and dynamic academic environment. The current study assesses asummer research program from 2019 to 2024. The current study evaluates a summer researchprogram that operated from 2019 to 2024, was designed to increase degree retention andattainment for STEM students while promoting their advancement into graduate students. Thisprogram engaged students in high impact practices aimed at fostering professional development,affinity for their STEM discipline, and research skills.Each year, student cohorts participated in an eight-week research project under the supervision ofuniversity or community college faculty members. Depending on institution of origin, previousresearch experience and academic standing
assistance to publiccolleges, polytechnics and the examination council; at international level, MyLinE hasbeen introduced and used by students and staff from foreign universities which includeThailand, Indonesia and Kazakhstan. The online data on the use of MyLinE also shows apositive note as within November 2011 and May 2012, MyLinE has been accessed from122 countries. Such is the impact of MyLinE, it has recently attracted the industries,where through TalentCorp Malaysia, 10 international companies has pledged tocollaborate with MyLinE in sharing their content and training packages to be used byusers of MyLinE.Four years on since its launch, this paper aims to highlight the challenges that MyLinEtaskforce faced over the years in catering to the
role in their decision to persist in or leaveengineering [26-29]. Female-identified students’ sense of belonging and self-confidence have asignificant impact on their persistence [24, 30]. Engineering identity also strongly contributes tostudents’ desires to stay in the field [31-33]. Students who are more interested in and motivatedby the social impact of engineering do not always identify as engineers [25] because of theemphasis on technical engineering work [13]. This is especially concerning in light of recentevidence suggesting that female-identified students place more importance on the sociotechnicaldimensions of engineering than their male-identified peers [23, 34]. Providing students withmore opportunities to engage with socially
renewable resources. The University of Strathclyde hosts one of the largest powerprograms in Europe and, as a prime example of an institution with proven track record in researchand industry collaboration, is our partner in this project. This program, now in its fourth year,prepares and sends a group of 6 students per year to the University of Strathclyde for about 7weeks. The specific objectives of this program areEngage students in high-quality disciplinary research. The student engage in research topics of national and international significance. Specific examples are (i) controls for renewable energy resources and (ii) resiliency of renewables-rich distribution systems utilizing microgrids.Prepare the next generation of workforce
students not enrolled. First-year retention of engineering students was 4.4% higherfor students enrolled in this course compared to students who were not enrolled. This differencewas statistically significant (p≤ 0.05). Other statistics on retention and this survey course are alsodiscussed in this paper.Many students come to engineering college without a clear understanding of an engineeringcareer. The significance of this course in improving the first-year retention strongly supports theneed for similar courses in engineering colleges. The empirical results in this paper aresupportive of current research on first-year engineering retention.IntroductionAs the engineering community further considers the need for more engineers, it is imperativethat
some African American students may be moreactive and outspoken making comments without raising hand, may get up and walk around, ormore social with classmates (Skiba, et al., 2006b). In order to avoid the possibility of confusionor misunderstanding, instructors need to be explicit about their expectations, engage students indiscussions about the class norms, model the expected behavior, and provide opportunities forstudents to practice. III. Communicating with Students in Culturally Responsive WaysDifferences in communication styles can have a direct impact on students’ behavior and it seemsthat culturally responsive instructors have a deep understanding of those differences. It has beennoted that African American students from working
and Emotion, 5, 345e379.(8) Kuhl, Julius, and John William Atkinson. Motivation, thought, and action. Praeger Publishers, 1986.(9) McCormick, Mary, et al. "Assessing students’ motivation to engage in sustainable engineering." International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 16.2 (2015): 136-154.(10) Pekrun, Reinhard. "Progress and open problems in educational emotion research." Learning and Instruction 15.5 (2005): 497-506.(11) Pekrun, Reinhard, et al. "Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research." Educational psychologist 37.2 (2002): 91-105.(12) Pekrun, Reinhard. "The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of
with the BOK outcomes. Each BOK outcome should map to at least one readily identifiable criterion (or portion of a criterion). Each of these criteria should communicate an appropriate direction toward attainment of the associated BOK outcome. Taken as a whole, however, the criteria should stop short of prescribing full BOK attainment, because doing so would be overly prescriptive.This approach is illustrated graphically in Figure 1 below. As indicated in this graphic, the Page 25.1329.5accreditation criteria represent only a small subset of the BOK; yet there is a clear one-to-onemapping from BOK outcomes to criteria
clinical care facilities. The results of the health assessment were then analyzed by thecourse instructors after returning from Guatemala. In order to assess the impact of themultidisciplinary experience on the students, a set of pre- and post-course surveys weredeveloped and administered. The results from the surveys showed increased student-reportedconfidence in their ability to develop solutions to global health issues after completing thecourse. Additionally, student comments reflected the personal and professional growth thatoccurred during the experience, including a desire to apply their respective professional skills tohelp others in need.IntroductionModern engineers must be adept at functioning in a variety of roles in the workplace
’ disposition, so-called meta influencesand various extra-curricular elements. The cluster of learning environment for examplecontained a category for communication and as a subordinate category for the communicationbetween the students and their teachers (Figure 1).Similarly, the work situations were grouped in clusters of categories of accounts where thestudents described ways in which their work impacted on their social life, various practicalitiesof the industrial context, instances of collaboration in the workplace, aspects of planning, typesof technical work, and issues concerned with responsibilities and regulations. Each cluster againcontained categories and subcategories, for example, to classify collaboration with various typesof counterparts
Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ Experience with Collaborative Engineering Design Challenges in a Middle School Engineering Course (Evaluation)IntroductionThe recent emergence of engineering as a curricular priority in K-12 schools has spurred thedevelopment and implementation of new approaches for engaging students of all ages in theengineering design process [1]. With this increased prominence of engineering as a K-12discipline, education researchers have begun to explore the outcomes of engineering educationin the context of K-12 schools. One review of P-12 engineering students from 2000 - 2015documented an increase in engineering education research during this period, highlighting anumber of themes within the literature