is essentialfor all students to be literate citizens 2. Design thinking is fundamental in understanding thetechnologically dependent nature of our society because design represents a decision makingprocess for converting resources optimally to meet our needs 3. This study was developed in aneffort to gain a better understanding of how to administer and measure design thinking of highschool students. Using a modified protocol analysis, this study focused on the design thinking ofengineering design teams. As proffered by Roberts et al. 4, “The development of design, problemsolving, and communications skills within a team setting is a crucial component of the educationof a globally competitive engineer” (p. 2). This research will serve to
fields and capacity building (i.e.increasing STEM graduates from amongst US students). “Critical decision points” in college(i.e. points at which a large number of students exit the engineering pipeline) have beenidentified by Johnson and Sheppard, but these junctures have not been characterized nordescribed in the literature between middle school and high school graduation.4 This may bebecause persistence prior to college is difficult to gauge since there are no standardizedengineering classes at the K-12 level.While there is a wealth of research examining students‟ STEM interests in general at the earliereducational levels13-18 with some focusing on longitudinally studying the effects on future STEMpersistence,11, 19 there is a need for
AC 2008-2814: ASSESSMENT OF A BLENDED PRODUCT LIFECYCLEMANAGEMENT COURSE UTILIZING ONLINE AND FACE-TO-FACEDELIVERY MECHANISMSDaniel Wittenborn, Purdue University Daniel Wittenborn is doctoral student in the College of Technology at Purdue University. He received a B.S. in Industrial Technology from Southeast Missouri State University and an M.S. in Computer Graphics Technology from Purdue University. While at Purdue, he has received the Outstanding Graduate Student Teaching Award and Schroff Award. He was also named a recipient of the Bilsland Dissertation Fellowship in 2007. Currently, his research interests include engineering education related to computer-aided design, manufacturing, and
design teams and professional engineering societies, has been shown topromote engineering identity development, graduate school intentions, and plans to pursueengineering careers after graduation.In this work we posit that it is not simply differences in SES that separate highly involved,successful students in engineering from their less involved, less successful counterparts. Insteadwe postulate that such differences inform students’ socialization into engineering and, as a result,their patterns of co-curricular participation. Weidman defines socialization as “the process bywhich individuals acquire the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that make them more or lesseffective members of their society” [5]. In this study, we hypothesize that an
and both his MSE and PhD in Industrial and systems engineering with specialization in Ergonomics and Human Factors. He minor in Auditory Protection and Noise Assessment. His research interests include Human Performance in ex- treme environment, environmental/occupational noise assessment, ergonomics and human factors, lean manufacturing, auditory protection and prevention, human health and safety. Dr. Fasanya has published several articles on noise effects on human ear and human safety. Has presented findings from his studies in several conferences. Dr. Fasanya is a certified hearing conservationist and OSHA Authorized Trainer.Dr. Masoud Fathizadeh P.E., Purdue University Northwest Masoud Fathizadeh – PhD, PE
describe themselves as veterans during the course of the interviews. A summaryof demographic responses can be found in Appendix D.MeasureA demographics survey was used as a measure of behavioral method in an effort to gain furthergeneral information about the participant(s). It included questions pertaining to the participants’employment and marital status, age, gender, and class load information. (Please see appendix Afor demographics questionnaire.)ProcedureParticipants e-mailed the researcher (graduate psychology student), either responding to the masse-mail, flyer, or in-vivo invitation, stating their willingness to participate. Once a date and timewas agreed upon, they were welcomed into a quiet, private room and consented to the study
(PPP) engineering study, the results of which are in the report Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. In addition, she is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design-related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on weld and solder-connect fatigue and impact failures, fracture mechanics, and applied finite element analysis. In 2003 Dr. Sheppard was named co-principal investigator on a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant to form the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), along with faculty at the University of Washington, Colorado School of Mines, and Howard University.Ozgur Eris
their coursework. To provide students with theskills directly relevant to the evolving needs of the biomedical industry, this project will develop and in-tegrate applied biomedical course content and experiments throughout the Rowan Engineering curricu-lum. A plan is presented to introduce hands-on, biomedically-related experiments and course materials intothe engineering curriculum, with a focus on artificial organs. These biomedical modules will be integrat-ed throughout Rowan’s engineering curriculum, into the multidisciplinary freshman engineering course,core engineering courses, and senior electives. Exposure to biomedical topics will provide excellentpreparation for interested students to pursue graduate studies in related disciplines
-oriented approach. The quick sketching and analysiswill aid exploration and deep learning more than the commercially available software. Page 24.683.9Integrated Educational and Technical ResearchThe project represents an integrated research and application effort; technical research, usabilitystudies, educational implementation and educational research efforts are woven together,promoting a model of integrated engineering education research. Research in the form ofusability studies will be conducted to ensure that the IDEA-Pen tool is successful in supportinglearners‟ and instructors‟ education, design and computation needs. It is a foremost concern
STRIDE (Shaping Transformative Research on Identity and Diversity in Engineering) research group at Purdue. Matt’s research interests include engineering student success, both quantita- tively and qualitatively. He is also interested in military veterans success in engineeringMr. Justin Charles Major, Purdue University at West Lafayette Justin C. Major is a fourth-year Ph.D Candidate and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fel- low in the Purdue University Engineering Education Program. As an undergraduate student at the Univer- sity of Nevada, Reno (UNR), Justin completed Bachelor’s degrees in both Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education with an informal emphasis in engineering education
Christina Smith is a graduate student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Utah in chemical engineering and is pursuing her Ph.D. also in chemical engineering with an emphasis on engineering education. Her research focuses on how the beliefs of graduate students around teaching and learning interact with and influence the environments in which they are asked to teach.Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University Ann earned a PhD in mathematics education from Portland State University in 2014. Her dissertation examined the informal ways of reasoning about ratio, rate and proportion that adult returning students bring to an
Alternative Student Assessment in Engineering EducationIn this research study, an alternative approach to assess student performance and academic learningin engineering disciplines is proposed with the intention of shifting a grade driven mentality intoa learning-oriented mindset. The rational for this model of assessment is to disrupt normalizedassessment practices in higher education, reframe student thinking regarding learning andacquisition of knowledge, and encourage students to engage in coursework in meaningful ways.Unfortunately, grades in higher education have become a primary focal point for many students asa means to secure internship opportunities, undergraduate research, post-graduation employment,and graduate school
study to examine how college experiences shape scientific identity development and STEM educational outcomes for women and underrepresented minority students.Dr. Stephanie M. Arnett, New Mexico State University Stephanie M. Arnett earned her Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Notre Dame before work- ing as a Jean Monnet Postdoctoral Fellow at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies of the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Depart- ment of Sociology at New Mexico State University. Her research focuses on the sociology of education, race and ethnicity, and social stratification, with much of her work focusing on international compar- isons
Paper ID #23811WIP: Student and Faculty Experience with Blended Learning in a First-YearChemistry for Engineers CourseDr. Eline Boghaert, University of Waterloo Eline Boghaert is a lecturer in the Chemical Engineering department at the University of Waterloo. Before joining the faculty at the University of Waterloo she taught mathematics at Hopewell Valley Central High School in New Jersey. Her current research interests focus on engineering education and studying how students learn, to improve teaching and learning at the University of Waterloo.Dr. Jason Grove P.E., University of Waterloo Jason Grove is the Graduate
students. In this study interest is operationalized as a differential orientation topersons called Person Orientation (PO), distinguished by an interest in interpersonal interactions,and an orientation to things called Thing Orientation (TO), distinguished by a desire for masteryover objects. This study was conducted in two phases with approximately one thousandengineering students. The first set of data was collected when the students were in their first year,and the second set of data was collected from the same population of students in their fourth (andfor many their graduating) year. Students’ person and thing orientation were measured alongwith their GPA, and their intention to pursue an engineering major (in their first year) and
Paper ID #29336A Review of Agentic Frameworks in Engineering EducationMs. Brianna Shani Benedict, Purdue University Brianna Benedict is a Graduate Research Assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She completed her Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University. Her research interest focuses on interdisci- plinary students’ identity development, belongingness in engineering, and agency.Mrs. Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Kayla is a doctoral
college [5]. However, EESI takes things one step further by incorporatingexperiential learning opportunities coupled with financial support, which changes students’personal income and builds an engineering identity. These factors not only create support inareas that alleviate external barriers, which assist black students' retention in college, but theprogram opens up opportunities to better prepare students once they graduate college to be readyfor the STEM workforce and/or graduate school.Some studies show that experiential learning can positively impact participants, but few focus onblack students and even less on a Historically Black College and University (HBCU).Consequently, this research highlights the impact of a structured community
experiences, the research provides evidence that studentself-reported sources of learning can be associated with a particular type of learning experience.This can serve as an indicator for whether a novel learning experience provides a uniqueopportunity for novel learning outcomes. The general approach to measuring student perceptionsis important in framing our study on students. It was also noted by the authors that NESLOS,“[…] can be useful to other engineering disciplines and learning experiences, such as research,coursework, and service learning experience, as well.”.3Research MethodsSampleWe used a nationwide sample of students participating in various forms of engineering serviceefforts across the United States. Participants were recruited
, the volume of literature in thisarea is limited. Of particular interest is the lack of research in this area that focuses on specificpopulations such as engineers or specific classroom settings; the literature that exists at this pointconsiders the entire population of university students, missing out on the difference that existbetween academic programs, classes, or student sub-populations.Essentially all prior studies connecting non-cognitive factors to academic performance usetraditional academic metrics: first-year GPA, cumulative GPA, retention, or graduation rate.However, we know that classroom setting can have a profound effect on academic performance;for instance, we know that STEM students in particular benefit when classrooms shift
University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recent recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and professional practice.Prof. Josh Boyd, Purdue University Josh Boyd is associate professor and
ProgramsInternships or co-ops abroad International Internships or Co-OpsInternational Extension Campuses International ProjectsExtended Field Trips Abroad Study abroad and academic exchangeMentored Travel Collaborative research projects and global teaming with partners abroadPartner university sub-contract programs Service learning projects abroadProject-based or service learning programs Graduate level international programsConducting Research AbroadIn addition to the various alternatives for achieving engineering global preparedness,programmatic components and factors of these alternatives also have
Page 23.392.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Developing an Instrument to Measure Motivation, Learning Strategies and Conceptual ChangeAbstract Recent studies have shown that some students are graduating from engineering programswhile still holding onto misconceptions in areas such as statics, electricity and magnetism, andthermodynamics. While considerable research has been devoted to promoting conceptualunderstanding, few studies have focused on the intentional ways that students can engage inlearning that can affect conceptual change. Intentional strategies include motivational factors andthe learning strategies students use. In an effort to understand
AC 2010-1240: ENHANCING THE UNDERGRADUATE DESIGN EXPERIENCEWITH SURFACE MOUNT SOLDERING AND PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDTECHNIQUESKip Coonley, Duke University Kip D. Coonley received the B.S. degree in physics from Bates College, Lewiston, ME, in 1997 and the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, in 1999. Following graduation from Dartmouth, he developed electronically controlled dimmers for fluorescent and incandescent lamps at Lutron Electronics, Coopersburg, PA. From 2001 to 2005, he was a Research Engineer at RTI International, where he designed high-efficiency thermoelectrics using epitaxially grown superlattice thin-film structures. Since 2005, he has been
research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. She is interested in the various ways that universities and industry come together and par- ticipate in driving technological innovation at the regional and global level.Ms. Morgan Anderson, University of Washington Morgan Anderson received her bachelor’s degree in Early Childhood and Elementary Education from Hofstra University and her master’s degree in School Psychology from the University of Washington, Seattle. She is interested in the use of digital tools to support school-community partnerships that enhance access to mental wellness assessment and intervention.Ziyan Bai, University of Washington Ziyan Bai has a Ph.D
Paper ID #22574Cultivating the Next Generation: Outcomes from a Learning Assistant Pro-gram in EngineeringDr. Ying Cao, Oregon State University Postdoctoral Scholar in STEM education.Dr. Christina Smith, Brown University Christina Smith is the Assistant Director for Undergraduate Instructional Development at the Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning at Brown University. She received her PhD from Oregon State Uni- versity in chemical engineering. Her research focused on how the beliefs of graduate students around teaching and learning interact with and influence the environments in which they are asked to teach. She
. Russo, and S. Kadel, Constructing educational communities: increasing retention in challenging circumstances. Community College Journal, 1994. 64(4): p. 26-‐30. 36. Tinto, V., Colleges as communities: taking the research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 1998. 21: p. 115-‐138. 37. Tinto, V. and P. Russo, Coordinated studies programs: Their effect on student involvement at a community college. Community college review, 1994. 22(2): p. 16-‐26. 38. Tinto, V., A. Goodsell, and P. Russo, Gaining a voice: the impact of learning on student experience in the first year of college
between academic theory and real world practice. Accordingly, the proposedsenior projects should include elements of both credible analysis and experimental proofing asdiscussed in ABETs criteria6. The senior design project can serve as an excellent culminatingexperience in the program of study when it focuses on research and design projects that have Page 24.632.4practical value to consumers or to industry. For the Drexel’s College of Engineering’s ETprogram at our university, the senior design course is a year-long educational journey (threequarters) that takes an idea generated by a student team or an industrial sponsor and culminatesin a
AC 2008-1351: IMPLEMENTING INQUIRY-BASED EXPERIMENTS IN A FLUIDSCIENCE LABORATORY CLASSCalvin Hsieh, Portland State University Calvin Hsieh is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at Portland State University. He works in the Hydroelectric Design Center Branch of the US Army Corps of Engineers in Portland, Oregon. He is a teacher for the Lego Robotics program at Buckman Elementary School in Portland, Oregon.Gerald Recktenwald, Portland State University Gerald Recktenwald is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department at Portland State University. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, IEEE and SIAM. His research interests are in fluid mechanics, heat
Paper ID #9967Assessing sustainability knowledge: a framework of conceptsDr. Alice L Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education with affiliations with the Women’s Studies Program and Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering (with distinction) from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education
courses'competitive nature.Engagement is one of the main factors that can be used to predict academic success. An engagedstudent is more likely to have short-term goals such as an intention to participate in an internshipprogram or long-term goals such as intentions to pursue graduate studies or move into the technicalworkforce. Tutoring sessions, field trips, and research projects have been introduced to theundergraduate engineering student's curriculum ostensibly to increase engagement. Peerdiscussions in undergraduate courses have helped develop the personal and social skills to thrivein an engineering major. Peer discussions seem to enhance student learning compared with coursesthat do not allow peer discussions [2]. Capstone projects serve as a great