Paper ID #27188Capturing the Experiences of ESL Graduate Students in Engineering Educa-tionMs. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in differently
, sustainability, and community engagement. She is also a licensed professional engineer in Colorado. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Students in a First-Year Engineering Design Course: Identity, Self-Efficacy, and ExperiencesAbstractThis Complete Research paper explores the attitudes and experiences of neurodivergent (ND)and neurotypical (NT) students in the context of a first-year engineering design (FYED) coursewhere students work in teams on open-ended projects. The data set includes post-survey datafrom Spring 2023 and pre- and post-survey data from Fall 2023. The end of the survey asked ifstudents self
Tech’s campus-based business accelerator), the Alumni Entrepreneur Alliance and otherlocal organizations have seen increasing attendance and have become an increasingly importantnetworking and discussion forum for local entrepreneurs, inventors, business service providers,investors, students and faculty.Two NCIIA (National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance) grants, totaling about $40Kfor Florida Tech have been central to the rapid increase in entrepreneurial participation byundergraduates and graduate students. One of the grants funded entrepreneurial multi-universitywireless senior design projects, while the other supports a series of Electrical and ComputerEngineering Department senior design teams with entrepreneurial commitment
California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons at the University of Cali- fornia, San Diego. She earned a PhD in Adult Education-Human Resource Development. Her research interests include adult learning and development, faculty deProf. Curt Schurgers, University of California San Diego Curt Schurgers is a Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project-based learning. He also co-directs a hands-on undergraduate research program called Engineers for Exploration, in which students apply their engineering knowledge to problems in exploration and
Paper ID #25794PANEL: After #MeToo: What’s next for Women in the Engineering Work-place?Dr. Jennifer J VanAntwerp, Calvin College Jennifer J. VanAntwerp is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan. She earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, with research in protein engineering. Her current research interests include retention, diversity, and career pathways among engineering students and professionals.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington
conceptual work related to ethical followershipand making a case for follower development programs.Ethical Leadership Researchers of ethical leadership frequently cite the Brown et al. (2005) construct, whichis grounded in social learning theory. It proposes that “leaders influence the ethical conduct offollowers via modeling… by virtue of their assigned role, their status and success in theorganization, and their power to effect the behavior and outcomes of others” (p. 119). Brown etal. (2005) suggest that followers identify and emulate ethical leaders who act in a manner that is“normatively appropriate and motivated by altruism” (p. 120) and who communicate explicitlyabout ethics and reinforce ethical behavior. According to Brown et
Mechatronics Engineering from Kocaeli University, Turkey.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Cornell University Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University.Andrew Whitehead, Andrew Whitehead received his Master’s of Science from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education in Fall 2022. His research interests include diversity, equity, and inclusion and empathy within the engineering pedagogy.Sri Sowmya Panuganti, Purdue Engineering Education ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Promoting Research Quality to Study Mental Models of Ethics and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in
manufacturing in a production context for an audience of both undergraduate engineering students and current manufacturing workforce members. Through investigation of the mock production platform and associated data concepts and applications of modern data-driven tools are explored in the topic areas of data collection and the industrial internet of things, data analytics and predictive modeling for production data, simulation and digital twinning, and process and manufacturing systems optimization" [17]• Project and product delivery o "Phase (4) was having trained and untrained groups work together in a Joint Architecture Design
StructureThe Partnership to Improve Student Achievement (PISA) project is a New Jersey Department ofEducation-sponsored Math-Science Partnership (MSP) grant that provides elementary teachers inNew Jersey with professional development in innovative, research-based, science andengineering curricula; classroom-based technical and pedagogical support; and ongoing coachingand mentoring. Two universities, a science center, and a teacher education institution arecollaborating in delivering these services to 56 Grade 3-5 teachers from six urban districts inNorthern New Jersey.The Center for Innovation in Engineering (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology is the leadpartner in the program. The two-week summer institutes are held on the Stevens Campus
the U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Currall was a member of the Nanotechnology Technical Advisory Group. He has been a grantee on $21,533,893 in external funding of which over 78% came from refereed research grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health. Currall was lead author of a book on university- business-government collaboration entitled, Organized Innovation: A Blueprint for Renewing America’s Prosperity (Oxford University Press, 2014). Based on a study funded by the NSF, the book is the cul- mination of a 10-year research project on interdisciplinary research involving science, engineering, and medicine. He has served as a member of
the papers in the four periods of high activity.Specifically, we looked for how the papers understood and portrayed STS, and what argumentsthey made about its application to engineering education. We compared the trends found in therelevant and not-relevant papers, as well as in the papers across the four time periods andanalyzed the authorship trends in the papers.Quantitative ResultsThe quantitative results informed our research in several ways. First, the frequency analysis byyear allowed us to identify four time periods on which to focus our qualitative analysis. Figure 1below summarizes the frequency analysis and highlights the periods in which STS is most visiblein the discourse of ASEE. 1996
grapples with the recent emergence of these approaches, they continue to engage indiscussions about how to establish rigor and quality in qualitative work (Kellam & Cirell, 2018;Walther et al., 2017). Despite the epistemological and methodological diversity in qualitativeengineering education research, many scholars (e.g., Authors, 2018; Koro-Ljungberg & Douglas,2008; Walther, Sochacka, & Kellam, 2013) agree that multiple procedures are needed toestablish quality throughout the qualitative research process, from the initial conceptualization ofa study through its publication.We affirm that multiple methods can and should be used to establish quality and rigor inqualitative research. In this paper, however, we focus exclusively on one
AC 2009-1783: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ONLINE MATHEMATICSPLACEMENT EXAM AND ITS EFFECTS ON STUDENT SUCCESS INPRECALCULUS AND CALCULUSDoug Bullock, Boise State University Doug Bullock is Chair of Mathematics at Boise State University. His research interests include math education, quantum topology, quantum algebra and representation theory, with particular emphasis on applications to knot theory and the topology of 3-manifolds.Janet Callahan, Boise State University Janet M. Callahan is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at the College of Engineering at Boise State University and Professor of Materials Science and Engineering Department. She received her Ph.D. in Materials Science, her M.S. in
non-engineering students offered through the Honors College at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. The course was a general course about energy, and covered issues involving energyassociated with transportation, electricity generation, and building systems. The paper discussesfinding the appropriate level of coverage of the subject material, the challenges and opportunitieswith teaching in a seminar-style format, and setting appropriate expectations for upper-levelstudents from a variety of non-engineering disciplines. The paper also includes lessons learnedfrom the course so as to improve the course in future offerings.IntroductionIn recent years, there has been recognition that increasing the technological literacy of thegeneral populace
Paper ID #29795Developing an Instrument to Measure Engineering Education ResearchSelf-EfficacyJaveed Kittur, Arizona State University Javeed Kittur is currently a doctoral student (Engineering Education Systems and Design) at Arizona State University, USA. He received Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014 respectively. He has worked with Tata Con- sultancy Services as Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011-2012, India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014 to 2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE
Engineers, Students [28] (2001) Engineering for The American Society of Professional Engineers, Change [29] Mechanical Engineers, the Institute Academic Engineers, Students, of Electrical and Electronics Global Development Engineers, and Engineers Without Practitioner Borders USA (2009) Engineers Without Academic Engineers at: Professional Engineers, Borders [30] École des Ponts et Chaussées Academic Engineers, Students (France, 1982); University of Waterloo (Canada, 2000
scientists are related but different, engineeringin the classroom demands a different style of instruction than may be effective in the science ormath classroom. Style of instruction aside, high school science and math courses rest on afoundation of relatively well-defined content; contrast this with Koen’s definition of theengineering method as “the strategy for causing the best change in a poorly understood situationwithin the available resources”1. Even retreating from this abstract definition and focusing onmore familiar territory such as electrical or mechanical engineering does not necessarilyilluminate the fundamental engineering content these disciplines share. An extensive NationalAcademies survey on the present state and future of K-12
able to talkabout in job interviews, and I think this has really given me an edge, as well as made me moreconfident in my technical knowledge and qualifications overall.” Lastly, a number of learnerscommented that the module(s) were much more hands-on, and application focused compared totheir other BME courses. Learner’s appreciated the project-based and experiential learningexperience as indicated in their responses. One learner mentioned “We focused much more onthe "big picture" in the BME-in-Practice modules, rather than the details of specific math orphysical calculations. I like that the BME-in-Practice modules were very hands-on, discussion-based, and were in a small classroom setting, rather than a big lecture room.” Another
toundergraduate students from the various STEM (aerospace engineering, electrical engineering,mathematics, mechanical engineering, chemistry, biology, computer science, sociology, andpsychology), and non-STEM majors (political science, and English). The questionnaireadministration was repeated in Spring 2019 to students from the STEM and non-STEM majorswho had not responded in Fall 2018. The questionnaire included few additional items (gender.academic standing, GPA, design/project experience). These demographic items preceded theAT-20 items. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The studentswere invited to respond to the survey through their instructors who were provided copies of theinformed consent forms. The survey
holding a hammer everything looks like anail.However when doing design research that has underlying it the quest for generalizability (a wellrecognized tension between academic rigor versus professional applicability), we often want toeither go across contexts or generalize findings from one context to another. If beneficial resultsare been found that improve design practice in one context, how can these be meaningfullyapplied to other contexts and disciplines. How do design researchers go about applying generalfindings to a context that itself is rich and usually fixed in the way it operates.How then can research be conducted across design contexts without loosing the sense of contextunderpinning the research results? Conversely how can
Paper ID #15369Engineering Deans’ Support For LGBTQ InclusionDr. Erin A. Cech, Rice University Erin Cech is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at Rice University. Before coming to Rice in 2012, Cech was a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford’s Clayman Institute for Gender Research. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of California, San Diego and B.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State University. Cech’s research seeks to uncover cultural mechanisms of inequality reproduction–particularly gender, sexual identity and racial/ethnic inequality within science
creativeactivities. This is due in part to the need to share regardless of an institution’s CarnegieClassification. Moreover, with the aid of technology, the number of invitations to present,publish, or to otherwise share their findings and results has grown. These opportunities rangefrom international conferences, proceedings, and journals, as examples, to those that have a moreregional focus. Some conferences and journals are quite broad and provide opportunities forpresenters and authors to be included among a potpourri of persuasions. Others are quitespecialized.Some of the invitations originate from well-established and enduring entities, such as theAmerican Society for Engineering Education or the Institute of Electrical and ElectronicsEngineers
through the cohort.An important aspect of peer mentoring is the safety and comfort that may be felt when askinghigh-risk questions (such as questions that show how much trouble a new teacher is having witha particular course, topic or group of students). The fact that senior mentors may one day be in aposition to judge junior faculty members (e.g. by voting on their tenure application) can make itdifficult for the junior to confide in a mentor about difficulties they are having with teaching oradvising research students. Peer mentors can share information received through experience orfrom other mentors without it feeling like an unsafe situation.V. Interdisciplinary GroupsThe primary benefit from forming interdisciplinary groups is that there is
with supplemental material. This statistic is notsurprising—educators want to design a learning experience to fit within the context of theireducational and local communities. For example, an entire course designed at Stanford withresources focused on Silicon Valley might find little applicability at Arkansas Tech University inRusselville, Arkansas (one author’s former hometown). However, certain curricular elementsused to develop the Stanford course could be combined with elements from other courses tocreate a new course, targeted at students in Russelville. According to respondents, “blocks” ofcurriculum, or learning objects [4], are more useful than predefined courses. There is also a needfor material to help bootstrap student understanding
energy is widely accepted as an alternative energy. Solar energy is captured byphotovoltaic or solar cells, which is then converted into electricity. Most solar cells installationsare attached to an immovable base, such as a roof top or ground base. The cells are generallypointed to the midday Sun position in the sky to yield maximum energy output from the cells.The problem with this arrangement is that a reduced amount of energy is produced during theearly morning hours and late afternoon hours because the solar cells are not aligned to the Sun’sposition to receive the maximum amount of energy output. In order to receive the maximumpotential of Sun energy, the solar cells must be constantly aligned to point directly at the Sun.The Solar
engineering” student population that hasoccurred, the traditional “Soil and Water engineering” area should be replaced with “NaturalResources engineering”. This change of demographics requires that we re-evaluate how we asinstructors relate to students that are not from the farm. Further, we must evaluate how weprepare students for employment in future job opportunities.An underlying assumption in this presentation is that unique expertise of the classicalagricultural engineer can and should be applicable to problems common at the rural-urbaninterface. This demands that air as a resource needs to be considered along with soil and water.Further, one should broaden the classical view of soil and water area to be more inviting tostudents from a non-farm
a moreinterpersonal communication skill set in students. Indeed, as Trevelyan pointed out in his studyof communication practices of engineers in Australia, “assessment of communication inengineering education is misaligned with practice requirements”5. To better align educationalassessment of communication practices in the first place, educators need to know more abouthow this skill set is defined and practiced in engineering workplaces. This paper intends to helpshed light on that question through reporting on the ways that practicing engineers valued,defined, and practiced “communication skills”.Study Description and MethodsThis study is part of a larger project sponsored by the National Science Foundation whichexamines the alignment of
activities pursued by students in Fall 2010 included: • Participation in activities of Mini Baja, Electric Car Club, or the Rocketry Club. • Technical training provided by their workplace (3 students). Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 7 • Technical research toward a specific hobby application or personal project (3 students). • General technical readingNot only is the percent of Reading/Research-type activities down, but those that in the previousyear had been largely article readings of general interest, while the 2010 reading-and-researchactivities were
Paper ID #6950Unlocking Student Motivation: Development of an Engineering MotivationSurveyMr. Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech Philip Brown is a Ph.D. candidate in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. He has a B.S. from Union College and a M.S. from Duke University, both in Electrical Engineering. His research interests include informed career decisions, mixed methods research, motivation and learning theories and intervention development.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Page 23.1284.1
Paper ID #9357Integrating Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Computational Methods at aPolytechnic Institution: Experiences of Interdisciplinary Course Designs forCritical ThinkingDr. Mehmet Vurkac¸, Oregon Institute of Technology Mehmet Vurkac¸ is an assistant professor of Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy (EERE) at Oregon Institute of Technology, where he has also taught courses in decision-making, samba percussion, math, and machine learning. Vurkac¸ earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering in December 2011 at Portland State University, with research at the confluence of machine learning