(accessed 2/20/2022).[6] K. Kricorian, M. Seu, D. Lopez, E. Ureta, and O. Equils, "Factors influencing participation of underrepresentedstudents in STEM fields: Matched mentors and mindsets," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, no. 16,2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00219-2.[7] G. Ladson-Billings, "From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S.schools," Educational Researcher, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 3-12, 2006.[8] G. Ladson-Billings, "Pushing past the achievement gap: An essay on the language of deficit," The Journal ofNegro Education, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 316-323, 2007.[9] G. Ladson-Billings, "Lack of achievement or lack of opportunity? ," in Closing the opportunity gap: WhatAmerica must do
Paper ID #22830Progress on the Pathway to Instigating a Revolution of Additive InnovationDr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU she served as a program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was on the faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Segal Design Institute at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from
) but indirect current Page 26.600.6measurement using a split-core transformer current sensor. The module puts in contextvarious aspects students may have covered in class, such voltage and current division,internal resistance requirements for voltmeters and ammeters, transformer functionality,and power factor correction. In many Circuits course offerings, AC circuits,transformers, and power are covered near the end of the semester. As such, the particularmodule is one that might be best offered near the end of the semester.In the experiential component, students build their own simple current sensor that theycan use to estimate the power draw of a
. 95, Shell Development Company, Exploration and Production Research Division, Houston, Texas, June 1956, 40 pp. Page 25.681.13(16) R. W. Bentley, “Oil Forecasts, Past and Present,” International Workshop on Oil Depletion, Uppsala, Sweden, 2002.(17) G. Boyle, B. Everett, and J. Ramage, Energy Systems and Sustainability – Power for a Sustainable Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, p.289.(18) G. Boyle, B. Everett, and J. Ramage, Energy Systems and Sustainability – Power for a Sustainable Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, p.289.(19) A. Feltrin and A. Freundlich, “Material Challenges for Terawatt Level
protect the ecological system. His primary research interests lie in machine learning and data visualization using AR/VR devices. Dr. Wu has actively contributed to several NSF and NIH funded projects, serving as both a Principal Investigator (PI) and Co-PI.Dr. Sergiu Dascalu, University of Nevada, RenoDr. Zhen Zhu, East Carolina University Zhen Zhu is an assistant professor at East Carolina University. From 2010 to 2013 he was a senior research engineer and a principal investigator with the Navigation Systems Division and the Advanced Concepts and Technologies Division in Northrop Grumman EDr. David Feil-Seifer David Feil-Seifer is an Associate Professor in Computer Science & Engineering at the University of
for Body Struc- tures Design Group at General Motor Corporation in the Warren Technical Center from 1984 to 1989. Dr, Brown was also an engineering principal engineer for a number of engine, and structural design groups at Ford Motor Company from 1977 to 1984. He was a research engineer at Eastman Kodak Corporation from 1974 to 1977. Dr. Brown received both his M.S. and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Connecticut at Storrs, CT in 1970 and 1974 respectively. He earned his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University at West Lafayette, Ind. in 1966. He is currently the PI at the Univer- sity of the Pacific for the four-year collaborative National Science Foundation TUES DUE grant
inclusion in the ASSESS database.1 Thestrategy incorporated three components: (1) search of peer-reviewed journal articles, such as theJournal of Engineering Education (JEE) and the International Journal of Engineering Education(IJEE), (2) use of branching techniques from reference sections of papers and reports, and (3)identification of innovative projects that may have developed and employed evaluationinstruments, particularly by searching the NSF database as well as Frontiers in Education (FIE)and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conference proceedings.While comprehensive, the strategy in year one proved to be somewhat challenging for locatinginstruments. To address the issue, the project team decided to contact engineering
for each user group; and (4)communicate the reasoning and technical information of high level system modeling throughconnection among assumptions, units, graphical views of the model, and numerical results.4.1.3 In-Class ActivitiesThe EFFECT was implemented in six class sessions of 50 minutes each during the Fall 2017semester. This course was scheduled in a computer lab, which was not the ideal setting for theactive learning exercises that were developed. Most of the activities did not require computeraccess, and the physical environment somewhat hindered effective teamwork (which can beobserved in Figure 2).In the first session, students completed a decision worksheet to estimate the total empty spotsearch time in hours per person per
Redesign Process for an IndustrialEngineering Program Seeking ABET Accreditation,” International Journal of EngineeringPedagogy, vol. 5, issue 3, 2015, International Society of Engineering Education.[7] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design, Alexadria, VA: ASCD, 2005.[8] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET Standard, ABET, Baltimore, MD:2021.[9]Lattuca, Lisa, Terenzini, Patrick, and Volkwein, Fredricks, Engineering Change: A Study ofthe Impact of EC2000, Executive Summary, ABET: Baltimore, MD, 2006.Appendix A: Background and TerminologyTerminology used by the Curriculum Renewal CommitteeProgram Goals: Together, program goals make up a broad description of what our students willbe able to do, know, and care about after
since 1999. His research interests are in modeling and analysis of complex systems and processes, simulation and visualization, and their applications in manufacturing, healthcare, energy, and information systems. He teaches a number of courses in these areas at the under- graduate and graduate levels, and has developed several of these courses. He is currently leading the effort in designing a new undergraduate program in Data Engineering. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Indus- trial and Systems Engineers (IISE). He served in the Board of the Computer and Information Systems Division of IISE, serves as an Associate Editor of IISE Transactions on Healthcare System Engineering, and is an ABET Program Evaluator for
engineering courses for over twenty years in thermodynamics, solar engineering, graphics, dynamics, machine design, and finite elements methods at the University of the Pacific. He has over fifty referred technical research publications, and conference papers with twelve in the areas of finite element learning modules with two recently accepted referred engineering journal papers covering the results of this NSF research on finite element active learning modules.Dr. Joseph J. Rencis P.E., Tennessee Technological University Dr. Joseph J. Rencis is the dean of engineering by the Clay N. Hixson Chair for Engineering Leadership, and professor of mechanical engineering at Tennessee Technological University. From 2004 to 2011, he
Emerging Opportunities and Pro- fessor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical commu- nication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among others. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Learning to Make Change by Revolutionizing Departments: Initial Team ExperiencesAbstractThe launch of NSF’s program “Revolutionizing Engineering and
, and P. Dario, “On the development of a novel adaptive prosthetic hand with compliant joints: experimental platform and EMG control,” 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1271-1276, IEEE, 2005. 11. R. Fourie, and R. Stopforth, “The mechanical design of a biologically inspired prosthetic hand, the touch hand 3,” pp. 38-43, IEEE, 2017. 12. Q. Luo, M. Bai, S. Chen, K. Gao, L. Yin, and R. Du, “Enhancing force control of prosthetic controller for hand prosthesis by mimicking biological properties,” IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 2023. 13. E. C. Prinsen, M. J. Nederhand, J. Olsman, and J. S. Rietman, “Influence of a user
on their preconceptions about engineering and about engineering ethics.While many students initially perceive ethics as tangential to their larger education, engagingtheir emotions about this assumption allows for the possibility to reframe ethics as a core part oftheir curriculum.IntroductionEngineering students have identified ethics as central to engineering1 but it often remains at theperiphery of a curriculum that is focused on technical knowledge.2 The challenge is to makeethics explicit and central, especially to advanced students who are in the process of definingtheir societal roles.3 To do this, our approach embraces the interdependency of emotions, values,and ethics and builds on recent research that shows emotions are
involved in engineering education research and Page 23.46.1 practice for over forty years and has worked with thousands of faculty all over the world on pedagogies of engagement, especially cooperative learning, problem-based learning, and constructive controversy. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and past chair of the Educational Research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Paper ID #7043and Methods Division. He served on the Committee on the Status
Mathematical/Computational Methods. He is the recipient of numer- ous teaching and pedagogical research awards, including the NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, NCSU Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor Award, ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Raymond W. Fahien Award, and the 2013 and 2017 ASEE Joseph J. Martin Awards for Best Conference Paper. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, and integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests
' to Develop and Test the Thermal and TransportScience Concept Inventory (TTCI)”, International Journal of Engineering Education 27(5), 968-984, 2011.14. Kaw, A., and Yalcin, A., “Measuring Student Learning Using Initial and Final Concept Test in a STEMCourse”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(4), 435-448, 2012.15. Miller, R., Streveler, R., Yang, D., and Santiago-Román, A., “Identifying and Repairing Student Misconceptionsin Thermal and Transport Science: Concept Inventories and Schema Training Studies”, Chemical EngineeringEducation, 45(3), 203-210, 2011.16. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., and Glaser, R., Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design ofEducational Assessment, National Academy
development of course materials that may be usedin the engineering classroom.II. MethodsParticipants Three participants were selected from a larger dataset as part of an ongoing researchproject. Since the goal was to examine the similarities and differences between students, faculty,and practicing engineers, one participant from each group was randomly chosen to document howthey formulated a solution to an ill-structured engineering problem and what each participant didduring each of the steps of problem solving. The student participant was a female junior student incivil engineering studying at a small university located in the Midwest. The student participated ina co-op or intern in a technical position across multiple semesters. The faculty
information science. Her research interests include engineering education and educational assessment and evaluation. Her K-12 outreach activities involve organizing a local science fair and a hands-on workshop in nanotechnology. Her other research interests include higher education administration and comparative and international education. Page 25.290.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 CCLI: Model Eliciting Activities: Experiments and Mixed Methods to Assess Student Learning IIIAbstractAs part of a seven university CCLI Type 3 collaborative
ventures, covering key business structures like idea generation, intellectual property, teamwork, business planning, patents and basic legal issues, physics applications (developed by Loyola University Maryland). ● Introductory physics modules incorporating technical feasibility, human desirability, and economic viability based on the Elon Musk Hyperloop concept and the human-powered irrigation pump created by KickStart International (developed at Loyola University Maryland) [24]. ● A capstone course consisting of weekly sessions that teach students written and verbal communication skills, with an emphasis on accessibility of writing to an educated lay person with or without a STEM background (developed by George
on-line professional development effort involving 20 facultymembers at 10 different colleges or universities. The effort included weekly conversations onreadings selected by rotating facilitators, and had participants also develop and present a project.They had 100 % retention with high participation at the weekly sessions and found the deliverymode convenient, efficient, and free of technical difficulties.Although the number of actual VCP implementations is small, a number of reports havediscussed the advantages and characteristics of them for faculty and teacher development.10, 36, 57Early reports had more of a passive portal focus that managed vast amounts of information and
andArchitecture programs at our institution. Participants included students who engaged in variousroles during the competition:• Direct Participants: Students who worked on competition projects and served as team members responsible for design, technical analysis, and presentations.• Presenters: A subset of direct participants who represented their teams during the formal presentation phase of the competition.• Support Roles: Students who assisted with logistical or preparatory aspects of the competition, such as research, drafting, or documentation.• Attendees: Students who traveled to the International Builders' Show (IBS) in Las Vegas to observe and support their peers. 4. SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSISThe NAHB Student Competition
to teach engineering to U.S. school children. He oversaw the NSF-funded project that resulted in the 2013 publication of Messaging for Engineering: From Research to Action and the 2008 publication of Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improv- ing Public Understanding of Engineering and was co-editor of the reports Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy (2006) and Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology (2002). In the late 1990s, Greg oversaw NAE and National Research Council reviews of technology education content standards developed by the International Technology Education Association. c American Society for Engineering
-Champaign and a research assistant professor with the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer En- gineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, conceptual change and development in engi- neering students, and change in faculty beliefs about teaching and learning. He serves as the webmaster for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division
Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University. He was previously an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering programs and Tooker Professor for Effective STEM Education at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University.Dr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU she served as a program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of
Engineers,” 2010. [Online]. Available:https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/Divisions/VictoriaDivision/Groups/Senior EngineersGroup/seg_march2010.pdf. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2013].[3] Suresh, R., “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering,” Journal of CollegeStudent Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. Theory, Vol. 8 (2), 2006, pp. 215-239.[4] Relder, R.M., Forrest, K.D., Baker-Ward, L., Dietz, E.J., and Mohr, P.H., “A longitudinal study ofengineering student performance and retention: I. Success and failure in the introductory course,” JournalEngineering Education, Vol. 82 (1), 1993, pp. 15-21.[5] Pearson, W., and Miller, J. D.,“Pathways to an Engineering Career,” Peabody Journal of
foundation that guides the continual transformation of Technical and Engineering Education. Additionally, Dr. May is actively involved in shaping instructional concepts tailored to immerse students in international study contexts. This approach fosters intercultural collaboration, empowering students to cultivate essential competencies that transcend cultural boundaries. Beyond his academic role, Dr. May assumes the position of President at the ”International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE),” a nonprofit organization with a global mandate to advocate for the broader advancement, distribution, and practical application of Online Engineering (OE) technologies. His leadership underscores his commitment to leveraging
- ceived funding from NSF and industry. Hosseini is an internationally known figure; he has served on the editorial board of a journal and on the program committee of several international conferences. He regularly reviews research papers for various journals and conference proceedings and textbooks for book publishers. Hosseini has played a leading role in the development of electrical engineering and computer science programs, including the development of the new B.S. degree program in computer engineering, the initiation of the computer science program accreditation by ABET, and the growth and expansion of curricula in computer architecture and computer networks, where he has developed several undergraduate and
Paper ID #7940Teaching Linear Circuit Analysis Techniques with ComputersDr. Brian J Skromme, Arizona State University Dr. Brian Skromme is a professor of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering and assistant dean of the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was a Member of Technical Staff at Bellcore from 1985 to 1989.Mr. Qiao Wang, Arizona State UniversityPaul Rayes, Arizona State University Paul Rayes is an undergraduate student studying towards a B.S. in Electrical Engineering at Arizona
development and engineering education in theupcoming year. The future development effort includes revision of the game design based on thecollected feedback and computer-based game development. Also, we plan to expand itsimplementation to enhance community resilience and decision-making communication ingeneral. Our future implementation plan will be through 1) recurrent summer camp sessions, 2)undergraduate introductory risk management course, 3) community engagement events, and 4)workshop sessions for practicing engineers. As part of the implementation efforts, the game’seffectiveness in achieving intended learning outcomes will be assessed as well.References[1] ASCE, “Achieving the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025: A Roadmap for the