Paper ID #26450Creating a Successful Pathway to Graduate Studies: The Student IntegratedIntern Research Experience (SIIRE)Dr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in
models of study abroad including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students. Maria started working at Texas A&M in 2005 as Assistant Director for Latin American Programs and in 2009 she was promoted to Program Manager for South America in the same office. During her time at the Office for Latin America Programs she created, managed and developed projects to enhance the presence of Texas A&M University in Latin American and to support in the internationalization of the education, research, and outreach projects of the university. She was charged with the development and implementation of a strategic plan for Texas A&M
SLCC and the University of Utah (U of U), by an author of this paper, have suggested thatexposing students early on to present-day research topics will instill a similar inclination tocontinue their education beyond the undergraduate level.Technical Discussion and Methods:Normally, graduate-level topics are not included in an undergraduate education. For chemicalengineering students topics related to atmospheric sciences are currently not offered nor exploredat both the freshman and sophomore levels. Through mentorship and independently studying thetopic, it was made clear to the student that the difficulty of VOC vapor removal depends on eachchemical species and she began to research what other current methods were available:Traditional VOC
analysis and discourse analysis methods to study the “IntellectualMerit” and “Broader Impacts” criteria described by 50 engineering graduate students in 11disciplines in their successful applications to the National Science Foundation’s GraduateResearch Fellowship Program. This research analyzes the characterizations of “intellectualmerit” and “broader impacts” within their proposed research across the engineering disciplines asan indicator of disciplinary identity and disciplinary culture. Academic Literacies Theory guidesthe analysis, which posits that graduate students learn the discourse patterns which are embeddedwithin social (disciplinary) structures of the individual disciplines as they establish their owndisciplinary identity. Analysis of
50 students’ with diverse prior experiences. The threecategories of research process sophistication described in this paper will later be used tocharacterize the responses of all returning and direct pathway students in our study and betterunderstand how students’ past education, work, and other experiences relate to their engineeringresearch process. However, the applicability of such a classification scheme would likely extendto evaluating the work of engineering graduate students’ research sophistication or progress overtime more broadly.BackgroundResearch Skills. A major component of doctoral education is preparing students to beindependent researchers. There are a variety of research skills essential for career success inacademia
Education, 2015 Recruitment Efficacy of a Summer Undergraduate Research Program: Impact on Graduate School Intent and SelectionIntroductionSuccessful recruitment of an inclusive student body is essential to enriching the quality ofgraduate programs1, 2. Therefore, universities implement multiple activities to recruit diversestudents for post-baccalaureate studies to their institutions. Some of the recruitment activitiesinclude offering informational meetings, campus tours, career fairs, summer research programs,and assistantships3 to prospective students.Poock3, who surveyed members of the National Association of Graduate AdmissionsProfessionals (NAGAP), found that NAGAP members “perceived only one of the twenty fiverecruitment
scope isinterdisciplinary including design, development and research. The research paper is relevantto Chi Xu’s Ph.D. dissertation. Furthermore, the information is also used in a graduate levelpublic works engineering and management class that is offered each fall semester. Thismakes it relevant to the theme of the ASEE Graduate Studies Division.IntroductionThe solar energy is an ideal energy can gain from the sun, as a type of renewable energy, solarenergy has its advantage: widespread, low contamination and flexibility. High concentratedphotovoltaics is new solar technology which can produce electricity cost-effectively. Byusing a reflection system to concentrate solar radiation can decrease cost and increase theefficiency. HCPV uses cooling
of Desired AM Curriculum ContentWithin these curricular suggestions, we propose that the engineering education researchcommunity begin to employ the context of AM education to consider foundational topics such ascognition, learning, diversity and inclusion, and workforce development. We see several areaswhere engineering education research can be applied, tested, and created. While we see greatopportunity for studying foundational engineering education processes in graduate studentsspecializing in AM, these topics can be extended to specialized undergraduate courses. 1. Opportunities for learning science, online education, and workforce development. While a great deal of research has been accomplished in active learning and best
manifested in NSF’s IGERT program which encourages research at the intersection ofdisciplines. Yet another NSF program, Bridge to the Doctorate, facilitates recruitment ofstudents who would traditionally not pursue graduate studies. Critical to the success of theseprograms is the US academic institutions’ ability to transform themselves and identify the poolof students in order to recruit them. Page 11.802.2This paper presents the University of South Florida's novel and multi-faceted approach tointegrating interdisciplinary graduate research and education with a set of bottom up,administration supported diversity initiatives. After a brief summary
Paper ID #7492Experience with Mentoring and Directing Graduate Student Research at aDistance in a Mechanical Engineering ProgramDr. Vincent Capece, University of Kentucky Vincent R. Capece is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Capece received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Tennessee Technological University in 1980, M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT in 1982, and Ph.D. from Purdue University in 1987.Dr. John R. Baker, University of Kentucky John R. Baker is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Kentucky Ex- tended Campus Program in Paducah, KY. He
inresearch also gain opportunities to meet graduate students and assist with graduate-level researchprojects, which can help students build the necessary academic and research skills to succeed infuture graduate studies.8–10 Perhaps most importantly, engaging in research often helpsundergraduates to clarify their academic interests and career ambitions, and make decisionsabout whether attending graduate school will help them reach their goals.11,12Michigan State University (MSU) offers a variety of summer research programs forundergraduates, including residential and non-residential options in STEM, SBE (Social,Behavioral, and Economic Sciences) and liberal arts disciplines. Most of these programs operateunder a common, 10-week calendar that begins
Catherine G.P. Berdanier is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota and her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University. Her current research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education, innovative and novel graduate education experiences, global learning, and preparation of graduate students for future careers.Paul Andrew Branham, Purdue University, West Lafayette Paul Branham is a graduate student at Purdue University, pursuing a M.S. in nuclear engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering education. He received a B.S. in
AC 2012-3258: GRADUATE STUDENT PEER MENTORING: A MEANSFOR CREATING AN ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH COM-MUNITYMs. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Innovation, Department of Engineering, at Arizona State University. He earned a B.S. in materials science engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University
undergraduate can be a strong predictor of students’ success inEngineering graduate studies.1–3 As an undergraduate research assistant, students are exposed tothe practice and culture of academic research and have opportunities to observe the life and workof graduate students and faculty members first-hand. Graduate school recruiters actively seekundergraduates with research experience, and solicit prospective graduate students through“information booths” at conferences where students present results of their undergraduateresearch experiences.This paper discusses a series of professional development activities designed to help prepareundergraduate researchers for graduate studies in Engineering. Specifically, studentsparticipated in (1) bi-weekly
. Page 15.630.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Graduate Student Qualifying Exam Approach: Course to Guide Students Through Writing a Research ProposalAbstractThis paper describes a new course at Mississippi State University that provides structuredguidance on writing an NSF research proposal. Course development was guided by personalcommunications with David F. Ollis and his 1995 article1 in Chemical Engineering Education on“The Research Proposition.” The endearing premise of this proposal-based qualifying exam isthat writing a research proposal is a learning tool that teaches tangible research skills whichstudents do not gain in their traditional graduate coursework. This course was focused for first
Villanova undergraduate population is of strong quality, andtherefore they are specifically targeted in our efforts. Furthermore, our undergraduate focus onstrong engineering fundamentals tends to steer undergraduates towards attending graduateschool1. This is particularly important as recent studies have suggested that international studentsare increasingly favoring larger research programs2. The Villanova undergraduate student bodyis predominantly U.S.-born, which tends to generally resist attending graduate programs due toeconomic reasons: students graduating with a BSME degree can earn more money immediatelyupon graduation if they enter the workforce, and graduate students often require loans to pay foreducation or to supplement their
Paper ID #8691Applying Research-Based Principles and Theory to Practice: The redesign ofa graduate student instructor seminarMrs. Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon is the Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, at the Pennsylvania State University, USA. She has a Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with
AC 2010-1963: DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONALDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT ARESEARCH EXTENSIVE UNIVERSITYSunni Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni H. Newton is currently in her 4th year of Georgia Tech's PhD program in industrial organizational psychology, with a minor in quantitative psychology. She attended Georgia Tech as an undergraduate, double-majoring in psychology and management. She worked for several years as a graduate research assistant in a psychology lab where she helped conduct studies on adult learning. She currently works as a graduate research assistant in Georgia Tech's Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) where
applications and fellowships ● Careers in Research and DevelopmentBi-weekly meetings held on the NCCU campus support one-on-one advising and mentoring of Bridgestudents. This allows us to focus on the development of students’ identities in science and provide a safespace to ask questions or express concerns. Seminars and workshops have focused on the Bridgestudents’ academic and research preparation for doctoral studies, as well as self-efficacy, study skills,time management, and preparation of graduate school and fellowship applications as mentioned above.NCCU faculty and staff co-facilitate these meetings and inform trainees of resources at their homeinstitution.Integration and socialization in the field is essential to the success of URM
Paper ID #215282018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Campus Climate for Engineering Graduate Students: Examining DifferencesBetween Domestic Minority, Domestic Majority, and International StudentsMr. Thomas M. Bluestein, Virginia Tech Mr. Bluestein is currently a PhD student in Higher Education at Virginia Tech where he is a graduate assistant in the College of Engineering’s Research and Graduate Studies team. He holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of New Hampshire School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction from James
Private Suburban 21%*The percentage of international student enrollment in each university [28] Each program’s chair and graduate advisor were contacted by a member of research team to solicitparticipants. A call for participants containing demographic and background surveys was distributed viavarious internal listservs. Eligible students meeting the criteria for the study were surveyed to selectparticipants with the most divergent form of experiences based on their background and demographicinformation. The intention of this process was to maximize the variation within participants selected toparticipate in this study [27]. A total of 35 eligible participants expressed interest in participating in the study
from 2016 to 2018. His research interests mainly focus on higher education administration, comparative higher education and higher engineering education.Min Zhao, Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University Miss. Min Zhao is a postgraduate student who is majoring in the Curriculum and Instruction at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. Her research interests mainly focus on EFL teaching and learning, and higher engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Research on the Power of Quality Assurance in Engineering Department: Case of Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractWith the advancement
. Dr. Bernstein is Principal Investigator of the CareerWISE research program, supported by the National Science Foundation since 2006. Her over 250 publications and presentations and over $4 M in external support have focused on the application of psychological science to the career advancement of women and underrepresented minorities and the development of effective learning environments for graduate education.She is a fellow of the American Psychological Association and American Association for the Advancement of Science and has won a number of awards for her work on equity, inclusiveness and mentoring of students and faculty. Dr. Bern- stein holds a bachelor’s in psychology from the University of California at
Innovation Lab. https://womensleadership.stanford.edu/mentoring-creating-mutually-empowering- relationships[9] T. Figueroa and S. Hurtado, “Underrepresented Racial and/or Ethnic Minority (URM) Graduate Students in STEM Disciplines: A Critical Approach to Understanding Graduate School Experiences and Obstacles to Degree Progression,” Assn for Study of Higher Education, St. Louis, MO, November 2013. Available online at https://heri.ucla.edu/nih/downloads/ASHE2013-URM-Grad-Students-in-STEM.pdf[10] J. Johnson-Bailey, T. Valentine, R.M. Cervero and T.A. Bowles, “Rooted in the soil: The social experiences of black graduate students at a southern research university,” Journal of Higher
include courses that help in preparing for these exams. This said, the programdoes not mandate a fixed study plan for students preparing for the qualifying exams. Students arealso required to attend a graduate research seminar course and to gradually satisfy the requiredelements of the mandated Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) program, which, at PennState, is referred to as the Scholarship and Research Integrity (SARI) program. Students in the ESM graduate program are not assigned a lab rotation schedule as is thepractice in, say, the biology department. The way in which a student becomes involved inresearch is typically by being recruited by a specific research faculty member (with availableresearch funds) even before the student
influenced by one’s prior experiences5,6,7. While studies have focused on theperceptions of faculty when examining teaching approaches and philosophies6, there is a need tomore closely examine graduate students’ philosophies7,8.When considering different factors which could influence an individual’s philosophy ofeducation, research has indicated that faculty members’ approaches to education withinengineering are influenced by their experiences as students6. Studies have specifically describedfaculty members’ perceptions of teaching and learning as anchored in their undergraduateexperiences, while others have suggested students’ experiences in graduate school do not affecttheir perceptions7. Yet, none of the studies have compared the graduate and
Paper ID #5759Designing a Survey Instrument for a National Study of Direct-pathway andReturning Engineering Graduate StudentsErika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski works for the University of Michigan College of Engineering both as a student affairs professional and as a research associate in engineering education. She holds a Master’s in Higher Edu- cation from the University of Michigan and a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Sociology from Case Western Reserve University.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna R. Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan in
workshop was organized into two sessions focusing on research group organization anddevelopment. Using case studies, select survey results, and their own experiences, participantsfocused on the workshop questions with the aim of developing guidelines for creating andsustaining successful engineering research groups. At the end of the workshop, we collectivelyestablished a set of guidelines and practices to inform development of research groups at theirrespective universities.Workshop StructureParticipantsA call for participants was sent out via engineering professional society listservs and distributedat engineering education conferences. Administrators, faculty members, postdoctoralresearchers, and graduate students interested in faculty careers
American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Pedagogical Techniques to Promote Development of Graduate Engineering Students as Disciplinary WritersAbstractAs demands for research productivity increase, faculty, particularly untenured junior faculty,must efficiently expedite the development of their graduate students’ disciplinary writing skills.In response to this need, a semester-long graduate course was offered within the Department ofCivil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina for the first time in2012. The primary course outcome was for each student to prepare a manuscript ready, or nearready, for submission to a peer reviewed engineering journal at semester’s end. To facilitate
Paper ID #241182018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29The Women in Engineering Graduate Student Steering Committee at theUniversity of DelawareDr. Heather Doty, University of Delaware Heather Doty is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Delaware (UD). Dr. Doty teaches undergraduate courses in thermodynamics, statics, dynamics, and statistics and technical communication, and conducts research on gender in the academic STEM workforce. She is co-PI on UD’s NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant, which aims to