researchstreams may be used by the research group to write journal articles or used as preliminaryexploratory data to write research grants.AssessmentThe University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB) gave approval to work withhuman subjects in all aspects of the assessment (IRB # HUM 00094780). Surveys were given atthe beginning (pre) and end (post) of the semester to both the research (intervention) and non-research (control) sections. Additionally, we conducted interviews of students in both theresearch sections and the non-research sections. Longer-term studies will also incorporatestudent grades, majors, and eventual graduation in STEM.Survey InstrumentThe survey focused on student attitudes, interests, and self-efficacy in STEM in
AC 2009-924: THE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING FEATURES FORNON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING GRADUATE STUDENTSAnatoliy Protasov, National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI” Dr. Anatoliy Protasov is a Head of Nondestructive Testing Department of National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”. He graduated from the National Technical University of Ukraine “Kiev Polytechnical Institute”, Electric Engineering Department, MS, Ph.D. He has research experience in Nondestructive Testing Methods. Page 14.1245.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 The Professional Training Features for Non-Destructive Testing
following purposes: ● To engage undergraduate students in the research process ● To demonstrate how what they are studying, and learning can be put to practical use ● To teach the students the value of their chosen field and how it benefits society ● To evaluate the structural integrity of Maybeck Chapel, an historically significant structure that has been a campus focal point for 85 yearsThe work was performed by four undergraduate students representing each of the majorengineering disciplines. One was a sophomore majoring in chemical engineering, and the otherthree were juniors: one in civil engineering, one in mechanical, and one in combinedarchitectural and industrial, but leaning toward industrial. The project team was
areas.Michael Chan, China Travel Ship Management LimitedDru Wilson, Central Michigan University Page 12.913.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Integrating CAD/CAM/CAE and Composite Molding Technologies in a Research ExperienceAbstractThis paper discusses the research experience of a student who integrated design andmanufacturing functions to improve a brake shoe used on a band saw. The CAD/CAM andcomposite tooling technologies selected for this project were primarily based on student’sundergraduate and graduate course work. The scanning/digitizing and rapid prototypingtechnologies were also studied. This
sponsors both REU sites and REU Supplement for NSF-funded research projects. REU is getting more and more attention from educators. One of themain benefits of REU that has been extensively discussed in literature is its impact on a students’decision to pursue a graduate degree and a career in the science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) workforce3,4,6,8,11,32. Other benefits include student retention15, researchskills learned by students8, and learning other skills such as teamwork, communication, andpresentation7. Hackett7 studied several impacts of undergraduate research and compared it withcooperative educational experiences for engineering students. Boylan3 provided an informativesurvey on undergraduate research. While there is
Paper ID #19133Career Certainty: Differences Between Career Certain and Uncertain Engi-neering StudentsMr. Bernhard Schadl, Stanford University Bernhard Schadl is a visiting student researcher at the Designing Education Lab of Dr. Sheri Sheppard. Bernhard completed a MSc. in Management and Technology from the Technical University of Munich.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering
School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Katherine L. ReindersDr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI
Engineering Students: Enhancing Active Cooperative LearningAbstractInvolving students in research projects can be seen as a form of inductive teaching. However, thefew studies the authors could find regarding the benefits of incorporating research inundergraduate classes show mixed results and opinions. This paper discusses preliminary resultsof introducing faculty on-going research to undergraduate students, in a form ofmultidisciplinary projects and team environments, focusing on student-centered approaches, suchas active cooperative learning.In the summer of 2011, a small informal team of students was assembled and presented themwith an open-ended multidisciplinary problem. The students were from the Electronics
,and resulted in great success, was due to the fact that the participants already had an establishedrelationship. The representatives from the three host universities are also the representativesfrom their respective institutions to the MDSGC Program Committee, which meets regularly toconsider proposals to MDSGC, programmatic issues, and strategic planning. The participantsand the MDSGC management at JHU are well known to each other, know the unique facilitiesand research expertise at each other’s institutions, and are accustomed to working together. Forexample, UMES has strong efforts in remote sensing for agricultural applications andautonomous platforms for studying the Chesapeake Bay; MSU has a strong program in systemsengineering and
Evans (2016) have developed this activity aspart of a course for undergraduate and graduate students. (The second author has participated inthese class as a section facilitator.) The Odyssey Plan activity is adapted from this course.Research DesignThis study was guided by the research question: § How do undergraduate engineering students project their conceptions of what personal and professional success may look like?To guide the research design, Crotty’s four elements of a research study was used. Detailed inTable 1, the rationale explains how the theories and methodologies come together to build themethods in which the study was conducted.Table 1: Elements of a Research Study (Crotty 2012) Definition
. Page 22.1714.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Writing Challenges for Graduate Students In Engineering and TechnologyAbstractGraduate education for most students is the move to deeper exploration of knowledge throughpersonal involvement, primarily through research and writing. By thesis or directed project,many graduate programs in engineering and technology incorporate substantial written research-based projects into the master’s level curriculum to prepare graduates for professional careers orfor further study at the doctoral level. Students in the engineering and technology fields faceseveral challenges in moving to written projects of
Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using
. Students arementored by professionals in ethics and communication, participate in special study groups, andcomplete a report and presentation based on their research. Preliminary evaluation of thisenriched summer experience points to its success and suggests that the REU program is a goodsetting for preparing undergraduates to be more capable members of their profession.IntroductionSince bioengineering programs throughout the nation have outpaced the development ofappropriate teaching materials, a consortium of schools with strong bioengineering departments—Vanderbilt, Northwestern, the University of Texas at Austin, and the Harvard-MIT Divisionof Health Sciences and Technology (VaNTH)—is developing new educational technologies forthe field. VaNTH
Professional Engineers, and the United States Society on Dams. Rick’s research focuses on laboratory and field testing of soils and remote sensing applications within geotechnical engineering.Micah Hale, University of Arkansas Page 22.707.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Faculty and Student Involvement in a Graduate Level Civil Engineering Seminar SeriesAbstract: In an effort to establish a “community of learning” within the Civil EngineeringDepartment at the University of Arkansas, a new graduate student seminar series was created
ProgramAbstract Research experiences for undergraduates have increased in availability at universities andgovernment laboratories throughout the nation. Government agencies, universities and privatedonors support these activities with a variety of expectations, including providing a more skilledworkforce, creating a greater emphasis on graduate education and increased retention of studentsin highly technical fields. While the value of these programs has been well-established, there is apaucity of empirically-based research on the various models and practices of these experiencesthat have the greatest impact on the students. The focus of this study was a National ScienceFoundation funded Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) program at a 4
); research (why it is important, how tostart); portfolios; what industry looks for (industry representatives with advanced degrees addressthe students); how to choose a company; and how to network. Assignments compel the student tostart research and a paper is required on their career plans for the first 10 years after theirBachelor’s degree (minimum 5 pages).3, 4 Another popular topic is 101 Finance (how to handlemoney as a new engineering graduate). A primary purpose of the class is to encourage and tomotivate the students. The 4.0 Plan helps prevent the new transfer students from suffering“transfer shock” which can be devastating to students since their GPA starts all over at 0.0 aftertransfer. It is helpful for them to learn about the imposter
for the undergraduate students taking specialproblems courses in PHEV topics, which would be under the guidance of one of the authors, anElectrical Power Engineering Technology faculty member. In addition the CenterPoint Energywould provide the PHEV to study, the necessary data gathering equipment, and advertise theinvolvement of the College of Technology and CenterPoint in the project. The CenterPointRepresentative wanted the product from undergraduate student projects to be a presentation bythe students on their research projects to a group of employees of the Power Company. Thegraduate research activity is being supported by funding a graduate research assistant position forone of the authors who is involved in smart-grid research. The
graduate engineering programsattracted by a variety of engineering majors and courses. This study bringsthese developments together to answer the following research question:How do student veterans and curriculum variety impact the performance ofonline master’s degree engineering programs?To answer this question, we develop a research model from hypothesesdrawing from the literature. The model is then tested using secondary datafrom 65 online engineering master’s degree granting programs throughout theUnited States. The statistical analysis technique used is linear regression. Theindependent variables represent veteran enrollment and curriculum variety,and the dependent variable represents online graduate engineering programperformance. In sum
Paper ID #32158A Community of Practice Approach to Integrating Professional SkillsTraining with Graduate Thesis ResearchProf. Shan Jiang, Iowa State University Dr. Shan Jiang is an Assistant Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering department at Iowa State University. He obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, working with Professor Steve Granick on Janus particles. After graduation, he studied drug delivery at MIT Langer lab as a postdoc. He then worked at the Dow Chemical Company Coating Materials as a research scien- tist. He was the Dow Certified Green Belt Project Leader and
institutions which have used DEM in the study of asphalt mixtures.Many researchers have used DEM in this area as well. The author has introduced theapplication of the DEM in graduate student projects at Texas A&M University –Kingsville (TAMUK) and Michigan Technological University (MTU) (You and Dai2006a). In Texas, five graduate students completed their master degree research projectsusing the DEM and finite element modeling simulation. In addition, several studentpapers have been prepared for publication. Two Ph.D. students and two postdoctoralresearchers at MTU are currently conducting further research to develop the DEM inasphalt mixtures so that a friendly user interface and functional predictive tool can beavailable.As part of the learning
students, and bolster thequality of research conducted in the lab group. Involving undergraduate students in literaturecritiques is not a new concept and has been found to be beneficial [1]. The involvement ofundergraduates in a literature review seminar has the added benefit of encouraging these studentsto pursue graduate studies in engineering [2]. Advice on conducting graduate seminars isavailable in “The New Professor’s Handbook” where the authors assert that, “a seminar programcan go a long way in helping graduate students acquire the knowledge and skills to becomeindependent researchers” [3]. More specifically, research skills that can be obtained via aseminar program include: • “identify important research questions and specific
Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe Summer Undergraduate Research in Engineering/Science (SURE) program, initiated in1992, is a ten-week summer program for junior and senior level undergraduates from U.S.institutions. In 2013, the program instituted a new initiative to provide opportunities to studentsfocused on robotics research, and as a direct consequence, interest them in opportunitiesavailable through graduate study. Robotics, as a discipline, is inherently interdisciplinary,combining all aspects of engineering and computer science necessary for designing anddeploying integrated systems and solutions. Every year, eight students with diverse backgroundsare selected and paired with faculty advisors and graduate student mentors who are members
attainment ofengineering students has been shown to vary significantly between ethnic groups [1]. Whilstit is recognized that the participation rates of minoritized students varies across individualdisciplines within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) [2], thereexists a general underrepresentation of those referred to as ‘BME’ [* see Notes] [3].Participation rates also vary between level of study, with 32.3 % of those accepted onto UKbased engineering undergraduate courses in 2017 classed as ‘BME’, compared to only 22.2%at graduate research level [3]. Such issues with persistence (which here refers to the transitionfrom one career stage to another, for example, progressing from an undergraduate program toa graduate program
in research, and a development andpresentation of a research poster. The second TAMUS LSAMP-supported international researchexperience seeks to inspire more URM students to pursue graduate study or research-focusedcareers by engaging third- and fourth-year URM undergraduates in a rich, interdisciplinary,team-based international research experience in Belize. Both the ELCIR and Belize experiencesare open to participating students from all alliance campuses.ELCIR Program DescriptionBy 2012, TAMUS LSAMP was considered a senior-level alliance with over 20 years of NSFfunding. At the time, “senior alliances with 20 years of funding [were] required to documentestablished practices that have been successful in the recruitment, education and
AC 2012-5308: USING WIKIS TO FACILITATE WRITING RESEARCHABSTRACTS IN A CIVIL ENGINEERING GRADUATE COURSEDr. Monique H. Head, Morgan State University Monique Head is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Morgan State University located in Baltimore, Md. She also holds a joint appointment as an Assistant Research Professor at Texas A&M University. Head conducts reduced- and full-scale experiments that are com- plemented by structural analysis using state-of-the-art software to study the response of bridges subjected to lateral, dynamic, and impact loads. She has vast experience modeling bridges to characterize their system response, particularly capturing the effects of highly
internalization of certain valuesover others.IntroductionGraduate students engaging in research education are vying for admission to a community ofscholars, learning to operate within specific requirements, regulations, and expectations in eachfield of study [1]. Shifts in how doctoral students view themselves and their peers, their mentors,the field, and generated knowledge occur throughout the research education process.Simultaneously, students proceed through the process of taking on or rejecting values and valuesystems (axiology) that are proliferated and perpetuated in their professional field of study. Inaddition to messages conveyed from graduate development within engineering environments,graduate students also bring their beliefs about knowledge
four case studies of graduate students in HumanitarianEngineering and Science (HES) at Colorado School of Mines (HES @ Mines) who have used RTto connect their research with undergraduate engineering education and with the communitiesthey want to serve. The first case study will show how research on gold processing plants inASGM has been translated to teach engineering students how engineering is ultimately asociotechnical practice and how it can be disseminated so ASGM communities understand thepower dimensions affecting their work. A second case-study will describe how RT can be usedto teach engineering students community-based research methods and to empower communitiesat the intersection of ASGM and agriculture to evaluate environmental
Paper ID: 2002-1262 Session number: 3615 Division: Civil Engineering Graduate Study in Public Works Engineering and Management at the University of Florida Ravi S. Srinivasan¹, Dr. Fazil T. Najafi², Dr. Dennis Y. Fukai³ ¹ Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida ² Professor, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida ³ Asst. Professor, Dept. of Design, Construction & Planning, University of FloridaAbstractPublic Works and Infrastructure is a pervasive part of every aspect of urbanized life, andincreasingly impacts the human and nature. The scale of infrastructure systems in the UnitedStates continues to
reform to impact graduate education: a case studyAbstractFor more than a decade, American industries have complained that the skills of engineersentering the workforce are not sufficient to meet the challenges of a high-performance workplace[1]. In addition, ABET has recently changed the student outcomes required for engineeringgraduates to reflect many of the skills lacking in undergraduate training [2]. Additionally,national studies suggest the preparation of US graduate students is too narrowly focused onacademic research skills, at the expense of professional skills such as communication, teamwork,mentoring, and leadership [3]. In response to these studies, many departments are trying toradically change their
: A Case StudyAbstractThis case study focuses on the mandatory and credited information literacy training sessionsoffered by a team of librarians since 2002 to more than 5000 graduate students enrolled in aresearch program at a francophone engineering university. Their creation was justified in part bya survey in which many professors mentioned they would like their students to develop betterinformation research skills. This paper describes how these sessions have evolved since theirimplementation and discusses the factors that contributed to their continuation over time.Initially, these training sessions were mandatory for all PhD students. In 2008, they also becamemandatory for all research master’s students. Due to the significant increase