BehaviorSub-goals 3 and 4: Identify missing pieces and new opportunities and imagine next stepsTo address sub-goals 3 and 4, two sessions specifically devoted to “research opportunityrecognition” and “imagining next steps” were interspersed with the panel sessions. The firstsuch session, at the end of Day 1, was designed and hosted by a group of students who arepart of Epicenter’s UIF program. In this session, UIFs led small clusters of attendees in aninteractive brainstorming exercise about ways to collaborate with students as research partnersand participants. These clusters used white boards to capture their ideas.The second such session was held towards the end of Day 2; this session was known as theRe3 session (Re-cap, Re-flect, Re-search). This
university students. Instructors mustdemonstrate didactic characteristics, motivate, and integrate the course material in order to achieveeffective undergraduate teaching. Costa [3] observed that undergraduate students prefer interactivediscussion sessions to traditional lectures which facilitates better knowledge retention. Asindicated by Patrick [4], graduate students desire more active learning involved in the classroomto promote problem-solving.Both groups of students have some similarities as well. Dunn [5] found that for both graduate andundergraduate students, creating virtual social networks and building a high-quality relationshipcan facilitate a greater sense of community in the classroom and promote students’ learning.According to a
x [m]Fig. 3. Graphical output from MATLAB code for Example Problem 3 in Table I, for anadopted position of charges.Fig. 3, also shows various vector visualization questions and MATLAB programming tasksgiven to the students.In “Creativity” class sessions, students are given MATLAB tutorials, with ample discussions ofapproaches, programming strategies, MATLAB syntax and formalities, and alternatives. This isfollowed by comprehensive and rather challenging multi-week homework assignments ofMATLAB problems and projects in electromagnetics. In addition, students are specifically askedto redo some of their conventional “by hand” computational problems they had for homeworknow using MATLAB and to thus experience firsthand the power and utility of
. 1). External and base pieces These built the internal structure and external part of the suit. 2). Backdoor system The backdoor system enables the user to put on the entire suit from back easily. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Conference 3). Other functional components Central Control Unit The suit is controlled by the central control unit which is composed of a microcomputerRaspberry Pi 3 assisted with microprocessor Arduino MEGA. A Raspberry Pi 3 is a Single-Board-Computer (SBC) equipped with an ARM v8 CPU running on 12.GHz. An Arduino MEGAis a microcontroller board with enriched I/O pins/ports. User Interface
. The experience,student engagement, and feedback on the behavioral energy automation system are discussed.Project based learning (PBL) incorporating students into full-scale design build projects such asthe 2016 Tiny House competition requires significant contributions of time and interdisciplinarycollaboration to accomplish at the college level [2], [3]. A competition with real deadlines,budget constraints and the tangible deliverable of a net zero tiny house made keeping the projecton track a necessity for faculty and students to accomplish the milestones along the projecttimeline [4]. The pedagogical approach involved integrating a real project into engineering andmanagement curriculum to provide context to student’s theoretical work. The
design. The site will recruit and train nine undergraduate students each summer andengage them in research endeavors on the design of sensors including student training inmathematical methods for extracting information from sensor systems. The program waslaunched in 2017, and nine undergraduate research projects advised by a team of faculty advisorsstarted in the summer. The projects embedded REU students in tasks whose focus was to designsensors and interpret their data by studying and programming appropriate machine learningalgorithms. The paper describes the technical details of the research activities and summarizesan independent assessment of the projects and learning experiences.1. IntroductionUndergraduate research projects, assessments
, more suited to developing a “personal computing” – getting results that are of interest and immediately useful for an individual's work. Pedagogically, it allows students to get at least simple results immediately, with incremental growth from that point. 2. Maple has a large library of STEM procedures, permitting use of sophisticated technical computing without extensive user programming. Typical small-scale software development consists of writing the scripting connecting invocations of library procedures, and providing the user interface programming that allows facile comprehension of computed results through tabular listing, plots and animations, etc. 3. Maple's standard user interface
). Developing Problem Solving Leadership: A Cognitive Approach. International Journalof Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 936-954.8. Silk, Eli M. "The Design Problem Framework: Using Adaption-Innovation Theory to Construct Design ProblemStatements." 24 (2014): 1.9. Jablokow, Kathryn, et al. "Ideation Variety in Mechanical Design: Examining the Effects of Cognitive Style andDesign Heuristics." ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers andInformation in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015.10. Wright, Ms Samuelina M. "Exploring the Effects of Problem Framing on Solution Shifts: A CaseStudy." age 26: 1.11. Silk, Eli M., et al. "Interventions for Ideation."12. Vogt, W. Paul
them the upper hand with industry recruiters.Competitions sanctioned by SAE International (formerly the Society of Automotive Engineers)generally occur at the end of the school year (May/June), thereby making the summer months acritical time for student teams to reflect on their previous designs and to start proposinginnovations for the subsequent season. The Formula SAE (FSAE) team at The Cooper Union inNew York City has used this time to immerse high school students in this real-world activity intheir college’s summer STEM program.This 6-week intensive summer program is separated into two main modules. The first modulefocuses on teaching students the fundamentals of engineering experimentation that culminate inoral presentations detailing
first-year engineering students’learning experience [1-3]. Engineering education saw the birth of the many faces of integrationlike multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity. Most studies agree that ifarranged according to the increasing level of complexity of integration, multidisciplinarityshould come first as having the lowest level and transdisciplinarity on the top with the highestlevel of integration [4]. In this study, we employed the lens of transdisciplinarity by combiningmetacognition, systems thinking, and empathy in an introductory engineering course. Theeducation literature on transdisciplinarity [5-7] acknowledges that generally, current highereducation practice does not yet effectively train students as
National Research Council postdoctoral researcher at the Air Force Research Laboratory, he joined the faculty of the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 2006. He was a TMS Young Leader International Scholar in 2008, received the NSF/CAREER award in 2009, the Xerox Award for Faculty Research at Illinois in 2011, the AIME Robert Lansing Hardy Award in 2014, co-chaired the 2011 Physical Metallurgy Gordon Research conference, and became a Willett Faculty Scholar at Illinois in 2015. His research focuses on defects in materials using density-functional theory, and novel techniques to understand problems in mechanical behavior and transport.Prof. Andrew Ferguson, University of
Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994, 2000) describes therelationship between person, environment, and behavior relative to career choices. SCCTidentifies processes and resulting pathways through which students form academic and careerchoice goals and make decisions regarding necessary actions to attain their goals. Specifically,SCCT posits that students will base their career choice on having 1) the skills and knowledge forthe career, 2) the expectations of the reward for the career, 3) an interest to do the work related tothe career, and 4) a supportive climate for pursuing the career. In particular, the supportiveclimate is based on environmental influences which can be proximal (i.e. direct and immediate)to the
Design andDevelopments Launch Pilot award (14-44500). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations are those of only the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNSF.ReferencesAlvarado, C., Mirza, D., Gray, A., & Tjoa, M. (2021, March 13–20). The role of mentoring in a dual-mentored scalable CS research program [Conference session]. SIGCSE ’21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Virtual. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432364Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020). “Looking at myself in the future”: How mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented
hardgood, a process, or an event—many artifacts exhibit a common internal organization ofreadily identifiable subcomponents, a “boxes-in-boxes” or hierarchical organization as aninterconnected system. He posits that one reason for this is that the “shape” of anartifact’s organization reflects the nature of the human thought processes behind thedesign process. In short, human problem solving typically involves breaking complexproblems down into simpler ones, and the artifacts that we design bear the imprint of thisproblem solving approach. As an example, Figure 3 shows a concept map5 illustratingthe organization of subsystems and subcomponents in an automobile
disciplines, as well as to teach themhow to use particular tools, employ some data techniques, and write technically.8 Content that iscommon between the two tracks include engineering graphics (both by hand and with a softwarepackage), MATLAB, design, and engineering ethics. They also address an array of professionalskills, including teamwork and oral reporting. The major additional content area for the honorsstudents is computer programming in C and C++. Further, with the additional contact time, thehonors students are able to engage in a more challenging and substantial design project.9 The honorsprogram reserves ten weeks at the end of the program almost exclusively for this project, while thestandard track integrates their design project with
Paper ID #11265Why girls with an interest in IT in high-school do not choose IT career – anextended studyDr. Tanya Stanko P.E., Innopolis University Tanya Stanko is a Vice-Provost for Education at Innopolis University. She specializes in launching new Universities from scratch, including setting up curricula and polices, recruiting faculty and students. She holds PhD in Computational Aeroacoustics from the University of Leeds and worked as researcher at Technical University of Munich. Her current research interests include investigation of the professional competencies, foreign learning environment, gender diversity in
performance, technical risk management, high speed dynamics, program management and organizational leadership.Ms. Wendy Otoupal-Hylton, IUPUI Page 24.1156.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Teaching Applied Engineering Through Practicum CoursesAbstractThe industry advisory committee that helped design the Motorsports Engineering Bachelor ofScience degree curriculum for a large American university was insistent that the students had tobe engaged in real-world, hands-on, experiential learning opportunities. This was viewed asnecessary in order to produce the type of engineering
the other faculty who administered surveys in their course sections.References1. McCaulley, M.H. et al. 1983. Applications of psychological type in engineering education. Engineering Education, 394-400.2. Felder, R.M. et al. 1993. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention I. Success and failure in the introductory course. Journal of Engineering Education, 15-21.3. McCaulley, M.H. et al. 1987. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and retention in engineering. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, 3(2), 99-109.4. Rosati, P. 1997. Psychological types of Canadian engineering students. Journal of Psychological Type, 41, 33-37.5. Scott, T.H. & Scott, J.C. 1996. Utilization of the Myers-Briggs Type
of Texas Rio Grande Valley Expertise in water quality and algal physiology and culture. Interest in use of algae as biofuel. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engaging Minority Students in Sustainable Bioenergy and Water Quality through an Education and Research Network Krystel K. Castillo-Villar1, Mauricio Cabrera-Rios2, Michael Persans3, Hudson Deyoe3 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 2 Department of Industrial Engineering, The University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, PO BOX 9000, Mayaguez, PR 00681 3 Department of Biology, The University of Texas
presentation speech. Recently, students were given an anonymous survey about their experience and how they feel about their improvements. The survey questions are listed as follows: 1. The program has taught me about robotics and the different designs and applications available. 2. I know how to build the drivetrain, lifts, and end manipulators taught in class confidently on my own. 3. I have learned to program the robot for autonomous and driver control in a competition. 4. I understand the different sensors available in VEX robotics and how to use them effectively. 5. The program has taught me how to write technical papers and presentation speeches. 6. I can confidently give a presentation and my public speaking has truly improved. 7. I feel
engineering,even if not explicitly so.References[1] J. J. Park, M. Handley, D. Lang, and M. A. Erdman, “Engineering Leadership Development:Contribution of Professional Skills to Engineering Undergraduate Students’ LeadershipSelf-efficacy,” International Journal of Educational Methodology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–80, Feb.2022, doi: 10.12973/ijem.8.1.69.[2] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, “Curricular and Co-curricular Influences onUndergraduate Engineering Student Leadership,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106,no. 1, pp. 44–70, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20153.[3] M. R. Kendall and C. Rottmann, “Student leadership development in engineering,” NewDirections for Student Leadership, vol. 2022, no. 173, pp. 7–12, Mar. 2022, doi:10.1002/yd.20474.[4] Y
Wisconsin Milwaukee. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1662/.[3] “The Chancellor’s Senior Survey.” (2019)https://secure.dmi.illinois.edu/SeniorSurvey/Home/Dashboard.[4] Rose, D. H., Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Designfor Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1703 N. BeauregardSt., Alexandria, VA 22311-1714. Web site: http://www.ascd.org[5] EDUCAUSE Center for analysis and research. (2020), ECAR Study of the TechnologyNeeds of Students with Disabilities.[6] Dewantoro, D. A. , Yasin, H.. H. M. , Irvan, M. (2020) Measurement of E-LearningReadiness for Students with and without Disabilities. The 6th International Conference onEducation and Technology (ICET).[7] Green, K., Chewning, H. (2020
-Learning," Proceedings American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2007.Coyle, E.J., Jamieson, L., & Sommers, L. (1997). EPICS: A model for integrating service learning intothe engineering curriculum. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 81–89.Coyle, E., Jamieson, L., and Oakes, W. (2005). EPICS: Engineering projects in communityservice.International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE) Vol. 21, No.1.Duffy, J. (2008). Village Empowerment: Service-learning with continuity. International Journal ofService Learning in Engineering. Vol. 3, No. 2, September.Duffy, J., “Village Empowerment: Service-Learning with Continuity,” International Journal for ServiceLearning in Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2008, pp. 1-17Eyler
outreach activities. Grant-sponsored research oftenrequires project activities leading to national or international recognition and influence, whereasthe service-centered outreach activities discussed here are most often local or regional-sponsoredactivities. Many public scholars—perhaps most of them—organize their scholarship, creative practice, and teaching around projects. A project is carried out by a purpose-built team organized for a finite period of time in order to bring about specific results or to create particular events or resources. One way of making promotion review more coherent for administrators and individual faculty members is to review projects in a holistic fashion. Tenure and
Technology and Kiambu Institute of Science and Technology, as well as Head of Subject, Physics at Kenyatta High School. The combination of my teaching and data analysis skills earned me a position at a child and women rights community-based organization, Champions of Peace-Kisumu (CoP-K), as a capacity building coordinator, a precursor to my new action-research interest. With work experience spanning engineering industry and teaching in technical and vocational education and training institutions, my research centers on underrepresented (URM) groups with a focus on efforts to advance solutions on broadening participation in engineering spaces, both in college and the workplace.Dr. Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati
cost and scale, largemanufacturers were the primary users of this technology [2]. However, with plunging technology costs andrising need for increased productivity, adoption of factory automation by small and medium-sizedmanufacturers (SMEs) is on the rise [3]. This influx of advanced technologies and automation into thetraditional manufacturing industry has led to significant workforce skill shortages. The recent trend ofskilled worker retirements in industrialized economies further exacerbates the need for technically savvyemployees in the modern factory [4]. In fact, about 2.4 million manufacturing jobs are estimated to be leftunfilled by 2028 in the United States [5]. The top skills required by the manufacturing workforce includecomputing
/act/unsecured/documents/06-24-16-Subcon-Hispanic-Report.pdf 2. Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., Boyd, H. H., and Lents, N. H. (2013). Development and Implementation of Targeted STEM Retention Strategies at a Hispanic-Serving Institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12(3), 280-299. 3. Clark, M. A., Ponjuan, L., Orrock, J., Wilson, T., and Flores, G. (2013). Support and Barriers for Latino Male Students' Educational Pursuits: Perceptions of Counselors and Administrators. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91, 458-466. 4. Concepción, D., Holtzman, M., and Ranieri, P. (2009). Sustaining student and faculty success: A model for student learning and faculty development. International Journal
, “Cooperative beamforming for wireless ad hoc networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pp. 2957-2961, Washington, DC, Nov. 2007.16. F. Quitin, M. M. U. Rahman, R. Mudumbai and U. Madhow, “A scalable architecture for distributed transmit beamforming with commodity radios: design and proof of concept,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1418-1428, March, 2013.17. R. Mudumbai, J. Hespanha and U. Madhow, “Scalable feedback control for distributed beamforming in sensor networks,” in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2005), pp. 137-141, Adelaide, SA, Sept. 2005.18. USRP products, http://www.ettus.com.19. GNU Radio, http://www.gnuradio.org.20. F. Quitin
manufacturing jobs” as a main reason for the problem.Relatedly, [3] has set forth the goal of attracting and growing tomorrow’s manufacturingworkforce through STEM-focused education programs and industry-education partnerships.The related educational programs are often connected to learning environments that havebeen created to engage students in making, tinkering, programming, and honing other skillsrelevant to tomorrow’s workforce while exploring related career pathways [4]. These learningenvironments are typically referred to as STEM labs (laboratories) and/or makerspaces [5].However, programs like these often focus on upper-secondary students, and can fail toaddress career misperceptions, especially early on when career interests are
advanced manufacturing; silicon micro-fabrication; micro- electromechanical Systems (MEMS); and electronic and MEMS Packaging. He has authored over 85 technical publications, book chapter, and is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Engineering Education, and Phi Kappa Phi. Dr. Mian is a recipient of MSU Presi- dent’s Pure Gold Award (2012), ASEE Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Best Paper Award (ASEE Conference 2011), IMAPS Conference Best Paper Award (1999), and Graduate Research Forum Award (1998). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017