. She has incorporated problem-based learning into her lectures, lab- oratories, and outreach activities to engage students and the community in the STEM education process.Dr. Augustus Morris, Central State University Dr. Augustus Morris is the Chair of the Manufacturing Engineering department at Central State Univer- sity, Wilberforce, OH. He is also the Program Director of the NSF funded grant, Implementing Pathways for STEM Retention and Graduation (IPSRG). His research interests include robotic applications in agri- culture, haptic devices, high altitude balloon payload design, and cellulose-based composite materials.Dr. Cadance Lowell, Central State University Dr. Cadance Lowell is a Professor of Agriculture at
Paper ID #44115(Board 50/Work in Progress) A Systematic Review of Embedding Large LanguageModels in Engineering and Computing EducationDr. David Reeping, University of Cincinnati Dr. David Reeping is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and was a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. His main research interests include transfer student information asymmetries, threshold
Paper ID #37968Application of Artificial Intelligence and the CynefinFramework to establish a Statistical System Prediction andControl (SSPC) in Engineering Education.James Jay Jaurez (Professor) Dr. Jaurez is a dedicated Academic Program Director and Associate Professor in Information Technology Management at National University where he has served since 2004. Dr. Jaurez is also a FIRST Robotics Head Coach since 2014 and leads outreach in robotics to the community through partnerships with Makerplace, Steam MakerFest, UCSD Create, Learning for Life, and many others over his over 19 years as an educator. Dr. Jaurez
Paper ID #47533Critically Examining Constructive Alignment for Marginalization: An Analysisof Foundational Works and Modern Applications in Engineering EducationMr. Mackinley Love MSc, University of Calgary Mackinley O.H.K. Love is a doctoral candidate at the University of Calgary in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering; he previously completed his BSc and MSc at the same department in 2021 and 2023, respectively. He researches engineering education and how to improve materials science education in mechanical engineering courses. He is the president of the Engineering Education Students’ Society, which
Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, 2005. [4] Scott Danielson, Mark Henderson, Chen-Yaun Kuo, Chell Roberts, Darryl Morrell, Robert Grondin, Robert Hinks, and Thomas Sugar. A clean slate: Designing a mechanical systems concentration within a new engineering program. In 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, November 2005. [5] Georgine Loacker, editor. Self Assessment at Alverno College. Alverno College Institute, 2000. [6] Marcia Mentkowski and Associates. Learning That Lasts: Integrating Learning, Development, and Performance in College and Beyond. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2000. [7] Student Assessment-as-Learning at
; Shane, J. S. (2011, April). Exploration of Strategies for Attracting and Retaining Female Construction Management Students. In 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings.7. Genetin, B., Chen, J., Kogan, V., & Kalish, A. (2022). Mitigating Implicit Bias in Student Evaluations: A Randomized Intervention. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44(1).8. Ghazzawi, I. & Jagannathan, C. (2011). Bridging the Gap: The Role of Outreach Programs in Granting College Access to First Generation Students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(1).9. Hartman, H. & Hartman, M. (2005). Undergraduate Women's Participation in Professional Organizations. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 11(2).10
Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.11. S. J. Lee, E. L. Allen, and L. He, “A Bottom-up Approach to Interdisciplinary Engineering Education in Nanotechnology,” Materials Research Society 2006 Spring Meeting, Symposium KK, San Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.12. V. Mitin, X. Liu, D. Vo, H. Van, and A. Verevkin, Presentation: “Undergraduate AFM/STM Laboratory,” The 3rd International Seminar on Teaching Nanoscience with Scanning Probe Microscopy, Chicago, IL, March 28, 2007.13. N. Jaksic, “Nanoscience, Nanoengineering and Nanotechnology Education at Colorado State University – Pueblo,” Materials Research Society 2006 Spring Meeting, Symposium KK, San Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.14. N. Jaksic, “A Design
ordisregard these items. The second is that writing skills are not typically perceived as part of anengineers’ toolkit, which instead focuses on skills in building, designing, and inventing [29], andso male participants (who traditionally identify more with the stereotypical scientist or engineer[30]) considered the item irrelevant and decided to skip it.Similar hypotheses can be generated to explain the patterns in missingness for the third item,'When I write peer-reviewed papers, I feel like a scientist', which was skipped more often by menand international students. International students were not more likely to skip the two previouslylisted items, but their results could be considered as trending significant (p = .079) or indicativeof an
Paper ID #25708Women’s Experiences in the Transition from Capstone Design Courses to En-gineering WorkplacesDr. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is invested in building the capstone design community; she is a leader in the biannual Capstone Design Conferences and the Capstone Design Hub initiative. She is also involved with efforts to
”Transport Phenomena I and II” courses in Chemical Engineering.Dr. Mehdi Shadaram P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Mehdi Shadaram is the Briscoe Distinguished Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Associate Dean of Engineering and the founding Director of the Center for Excellence in Engineering Education at the University of Texas atProf. Eric M. Brey, The University of Texas at San Antonio Professor Eric Brey is Peter Flawn Distinguished Professor and Chair of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Texas at San Antonio. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025S-STEM: Increasing the success of talented engineering students with unmet
Paper ID #37622Introducing Prototyping to First Year Chemical EngineersThrough Hands on ActivitiesJulianne Vernon (Associate Dean for Academic Success) Associate Dean for Academic SuccessAmy PangSamuel Christopher LevilleAllison A Cannatti © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Introducing Prototyping to First Year Chemical Engineers Through Hands-on ActivitiesAbstract – One section of the introduction to chemical engineering module at our institution hasgone under development the past few years. The style
findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 1, 1-19.19. Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D. & Hackett, G. (1994) Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.20. Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H. & Treistman, D. (2003) Relation of Contextual Supports and Barriers to Choice Behavior in Engineering Majors: Test of Alternative Social Cognitive Models. Journal of Counseling, 50, 4, 458–465.21. Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., Sheu, H.-B., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B.R., Gloster, C.S., Wilkins, G., Schmidt, L.C., Lyons, H. &
. (2011). Engineering Education Discourses on Underrepresentation: Why Problematization Matters. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(5), 1117. 4. Lewis, B. F. (2003). A critique of literature on the underrepresentation of African Americans in science: Directions for future research. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(3&4). 5. Moore, J. L. (2006). A qualitative investigation of African American males' career trajectory in engineering: Implications for teachers, school counselors, and parents. Teachers College Record, 108(2), 246. 6. May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority
Session 3255 Issues in Reshaping Innovative Professionally Oriented Graduate Education to Meet the Needs of Engineering Leaders in Industry in the 21st Century D. A. Keating1 T. G. Stanford1 R. J. Bennett2 R. Jacoby3 M. I. Mendelson4 University of South Carolina,1 University of St. Thomas,2 Cooper Union,3 Loyola Marymount University,4 1. Introduction and Context1.1 Framing the IssuesAs we enter the 21st century, the further education of the nation’s graduate engineers in industry
Paper ID #13613Engineering students teaching hands on engineering design challenges to un-derserved community familiesDr. Amy Hee Kim, Iridescent Amy Kim is the Sr. Director of Content Development at Iridescent, a science and engineering education nonprofit. She is trained in physical chemistry (Ph.D. University of Chicago) with a strong passion for improving STEM education in informal settings. In graduate school, she chose to pursue a career path where scientists can give back to their communities. She was a science policy fellow at the National Academy of Sciences where she learned how to effectively communicate
connections in a low-stress, open-ended, creative environment. One student responded: “The journal forced me to sit backand conceptualize relations so that I can better picture them applied to everyday life andthus understand them better…I think this is very important for my future, not only forapplying concepts in the field, but also for communicating with people.”21 Certainly, aswitnessed by many noted inventors and thinkers, a notebook of one’s own creative ideascan be an unparalleled source of inspiration. “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
2002-2003 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 a b c d e f g h i j k Outcomes Page 9.702.3 Figure 2: Indirect measurements of program outcomes through exit survey Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationAnother indirect measurement is through an alumni survey, which is
recently authored Fundamentals of Electromagnetics with Engineering Applications, by John Wiley & Sons, 2005, and Applied Electromagnetics: Early Transmission Line Approach, by John Wiley & Sons, 2007. and is Associate Editor of the International Journal of Radio Frequency Identification Technology and Applications. He has won several teaching-related awards and is a member of the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers and the American Society for Engineering Education. Page 14.171.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 AM Radio Construction – A Junior
Paper ID #28353Incorporating Feminist Theory and Community Centered Methods in a Studyon Gender in Engineering Education: Protocol Design and PreliminaryThemesAndrea Haverkamp, Oregon State University Andrea Haverkamp is a PhD candidate in Environmental Engineering with a Queer Studies PhD minor at Oregon State University. Her dissertation research explores the support systems and community re- siliency of transgender and gender nonconforming undergraduate students in undergraduate engineering education. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Kansas and an M.Eng in Environmental Engineering from
Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 138(2), 131-138.[7] Moon, S. K. (2010). “Design-oriented structural engineering education.” Presented at the 19th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference, 387-395.[8] Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., & Radcliffe, D. (2011). “Engineering competence? An interpretive investigation of engineering students’ professional formation.” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 703-740.[9] Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). “Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day.” Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.[10] Strayer, J. F. (2012). “How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task
. The potential impact ofMars on engineering ethics education is noteworthy, particularly in the context of situatedcognition. By immersing students in the role of engineers on a Mars mission, the game providesa contextual, interactive platform for exploring ethical issues. This approach aligns with theprinciples of situated cognition, emphasizing learning in context and through experience. Thegame's realistic scenarios and the requirement for immediate decision-making foster a deeperunderstanding and internalization of ethical principles compared to traditional, more abstractmethods of ethics education.Looking ahead, future research directions will focus on further refining Mars to enhance itseducational impact. This includes the integration
independent. 7 Designing learningenvironments that foster students’ growth as autonomous, self-motivated managers of their ownlearning, however, is not a simple task. With its introduction of program outcome (i) “a recognition Page 22.1334.2of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning,” as a requirement for all engineeringgraduates, ABET essentially challenged engineering educators to teach not only engineering contentbut a way of sustaining professional development after students no longer have the benefit of formaleducational opportunities on a regular basis. To effectively foster a propensity toward lifelonglearning, faculty
worked as an Assistant Pro- fessor (2014 to 2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He is awarded with the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University She teaches courses in the engineering and manufacturing engineering programs as well as programs in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program. Her research interests include topics related to student persistence, STEM doctoral student experiences, faculty mentorship and development, modeling and analysis of complex manufacturing systems, and the development of new discrete event simulation
integrative profession education concurrent with engineering practice Define a framework of integrative professional graduate engineering education that combines advanced studies, experiential learning, self-directed learning, and innovation- based learning in a manner concurrent with on-going engineering practice in industry Early career development ─ Define framework for Level I ─ IV Engineer Leading to the professional Master of Engineering Level IV Engineer ─ Project Level Responsibility Mid career development ─ Define framework for Level IV ─ VI Engineer Leading to the professional Doctor of
Paper ID #46238Engineering U.S. Responsible AI Policy, A Survey, 2020-2025Daniene Byrne Ph.D., Stony Brook University I study policymaking for emergent technologies as a design process with social justice impacts. As a SUNY PRODiG+ Fellow in Stony Brook’s College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, in the Department of Technology, AI and Society, I am interested in the controversies, consequences and ongoing development of Responsible AI policies for youth-related technologies in media and education. My social science research, connects policy, STS, science communication, and media studies - all relevant to understanding
instrument’s items functiontogether to yield a test score22. High internal consistency reliability estimates (e.g., above .90) aredesired38. As shown in Table 1, overall scale reliabilities are acceptable. With the exception of Page 10.593.7the Composition subscale and Written Expression, subscale reliabilities were acceptable. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Table 1. Number of Items, Reliabilities, and Descriptive Statistics of EPICS Scales. Scale Subscale No
.2014.991099Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2).Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2012). The role of classroom artifacts in developmental engineering. Presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio. TX.Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1, 123–145.Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and
AC 2005-39: EVALUATION OF A LIVING-LEARNING COMMUNITY FORENGINEERING FRESHMENJennifer Light, Lewis-Clark State College Page 10.595.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005 Evaluation of a Living-Learning Community For Freshmen Engineering Students Jennifer Light, Jennifer Beller, Greg Crouch, Denny C. Davis Washington State UniversityAbstractThe idea of learning communities is not new or novel, however, its role in retaining, engaging,and intellectual development for engineering students has yet to be fully explored. There arenumerous learning community studies that
. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals
College, M. Phil. from University of Cambridge (U.K.), and her Ph.D. from Cornell Uni- versity, all in physics.Lt. Col. Christopher I. Allen, Air Force Research Laboratory Christopher I. Allen is the Deputy Chief of the Battlespace Environment Division, Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. He received his B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Houston in 1993, his M.S. in electrical engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) in 2010, and his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from AFIT in 2015. His research interests include microelectronics, the energy value of information, and effects of radiation on electronic devices.Michael