, entrepreneurship, technology and organizational opti- mization for new and ongoing companies. Karl earned his bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the U of A, his master’s in Chemical Engineering from the University of Kentucky, and his Ph.D. in Engineering from the U of A. Karl has been awarded 9 US and International patents and is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (FIET). He also has 35 years of industry experience including serving as a CIO, CTO and COO for start-ups, mid-size, and enterprise companies such as IBM, Dell and Lifetouch.Kristie Neff Moergen, University of Arkansas Kristie Moeren is a PhD student in Management in the Walton College of Business (University of Arkansas). She
structure must have something called“closure,” which is where multiple actors exert external effects on another [66]. In order fornorms to be effective, they must be enforced by sanctions from multiple others. Closure comesfrom those who interact more frequently and who are closer in age [66]. With closure also comestrustworthiness of a group, and from that a reputation can arise and with it the desire to maintainit [66]. A group focusing on entrepreneurship with no closure is ineffective at enforcing thesenorms against negative external influences against it.Potential SolutionIt has been suggested that instead of a shotgun approach to entrepreneurial educational foranyone willing to sign up for a class, the university should focus on providing
. Specifically, if the ESEMA outcomes are aligned withpromoting the development of future entrepreneurs, are we taking the right actions to developthis mindset?IntroductionFor decades leaders in academia, industry, and government have recognized the need forengineering education to develop engineers who are more than simply technical experts [e.g. 1,2, 3]. The responses of the engineering education community to meet those needs are widespreadand varied in their approaches. Results have also been varied [4, 5]. In recent years, a notableworkstream has grown around development of engineering entrepreneurship. One specific areathat is receiving increased attention from engineering educators and engineering educationresearchers is the development of an
, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom Mason is Professor Emeritus of economics and engineering management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where he has been teaching since 1972. He was founding Head of the Engineering Man- agement Department and its M.S. degree program and founding Vice President for Entrepreneurship & Business Planning of Rose-Hulman Ventures and has also served Rose-Hulman as Head of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vice-President for Administration and Finance, Head of Engineering Management, and Interim Vice President for Development. While on a three-year leave from Rose-Hulman, Mason served as CFO and CEO of a 140-person network management systems business. In 2007-08, he used
withindustrial clients previews future career activities [5]. However, Jorgensen et al asserted thatphysical prototypes are the desirable endpoint of this type of collaboration, and it is “impossible”for students to embrace a design problem, generate concepts, and carry one to a prototype stagein the time frame of a single semester class.While collaborative university/industry engineering product development has been successfullydemonstrated on short timescales in extracurricular engineering club projects [6], we found noexamples in the engineering education literature where one-semester-long class-based designprojects produced prototypes for industry partners without raising work quality concerns. Forexample, a Swedish Computer Science program reported
21st Centuryengineer. Thus the work presented is an attempt to take a closer look at the intersection ofleadership and entrepreneurship through a collaborative approach of two disciplines, engineeringand psychology, and to utilize the intersections of the fields to understand the role of theentrepreneurial leader in survival.The author’s original intention in the fall of 2006 was to conduct hypothesis driven research. Todo this she created, modified and revised a research design that featured ‘survival’ as thedependent variable. Multiple discussions with professors at engineering institutions thatincluded business or entrepreneurship programs were conducted with two goals: First, shewanted to investigate a central question, “If the
Ph.D. in Finance at the University of Arkansas in 1986. He has 30 years experience in banking, investments and small business. He is the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and Information Technology where he works to foster collaboration between multidisciplinary groups of faculty, students and commercial interests in Louisiana to encourage new business creation. He teaches the university’s innovative entrepreneurship courses emphasizing technology commercialization.James Nelson, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Jim Nelson is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies for the College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University. He is also the Robert Howson Professor
26.1565.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Product Archaeology Canvas Joe Tranquillo jvt002@bucknell.edu Biomedical Engineering Bucknell University1 IntroductionEngineering as a profession strives to benefit society through the applications of technology andscience. Meaningful contributions from engineers are therefore achieved by balancing technicalproficiency with a wider understanding of society 1,2 . More recently, entrepreneurship has arisen asa method for weaving an understanding of society 3,4,5,6,7 , and in
Paper ID #16258Innovation Sandbox: Examining the Impact of Interdisciplinary InnovationSpaces on Diverse DisciplinesDr. Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo Thomas Katona is an Assistant Professor of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). He works in the BioMedical Engineering Department and has a joint appointment in the Orfalea College of Business. Before joining Cal Poly, he worked in startup companies in the LED and LED lighting industry. His roles in industry included leading product development teams, business
Paper ID #8741The Framework on Innovative EngineeringDr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of three NSF awards supporting research in engineering education and a Research Associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University and Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering innovativeness, entrepreneurial engineering, teamwork, mindset changes and learning strategies of
at different schools teach classes over the internet to get a different perspective on entrepreneurship; • record guest speakers and make them available to other KEEN schools or do it live over the internet; • summer exchange program between schools; • program that allows students to shadow entrepreneurs; and • podcast every two weeks in which an entrepreneur sends in a problem and students can present their solutions.The KEEN Second Regional Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education washosted and held at Mercer University Campus, Macon, GA during March 15-17, 2012. Theobjective of this meeting is to bring together administrators, faculty, students, and staff fromKEEN Schools on a common platform to
admit it, I sometimes would rather do well in a class than learn a lot. c) It’s much more important for me to learn things in my classes than it is to get the best grades. d) If I had to choose between getting a good grade and being challenged in class, I would choose ... (Circle one: “good grade” or “being challenged”).The first three items were scored on a 6-point scale with responses ranging from 1 (stronglyagree), 2 (agree), 3 (mostly agree), to 6 (strongly disagree); a high score indicated therespondent’s preference for learning goals. The last item converts to a dichotomous variable thatindicated the respondent’s goal choice.ProcedureThe study was administered in three engineering design courses at different levels of
be infused into a course of their choosing. 2. Examine the connections between math, the sciences, technology, and engineering, so faculty will be able to help their students make those connections in all their classes. This paper provides a brief overview of KEEN, the rationale for the project, and adetailed summary of the Teaching Institute. Additionally, the paper also includes a summary offeedback data generated from pre- and post-surveys given to the participants and an overview ofthe Program Transformation Grants initiative. Lastly, the paper includes some lessons learnedand provides some insight on how the project will move forward in the future.Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network The Kern Entrepreneurial
Entrepreneurship 2) Technical Marketing / High Tech Product Strategy 3) Technology Commercialization StrategiesA highly successful pilot program in Engineering Entrepreneurship consisting of these threecourses was developed and taught by one of the co-authors at KSC in 2002. This widelyacclaimed prototype program has been featured by the National Collegiate Inventors andInnovators Alliance as a Curricular Model for entrepreneurship education.30,31 These courses arecontinually enhanced for effectiveness using feedback from students, their organizations and thecommunity. Integrating class project teams into extended entrepreneurial “E-Teams” for thecommercialization of innovative ideas and utilizing off-the shelf NASA-developed technologiesis
Paper ID #11693Development of Entrepreneurial Attitudes Assessment Instrument for Fresh-man StudentsMr. Todd Mathew Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd is a PhD Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on en- trepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering educa- tion efforts.Prof. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Purdue University, West Lafayette Genisson Silva Coutinho is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is a CAPES grantee and also professor in the Department of Mechanical and
Movva, SAFM - College des Ingenieurs Italia Academic background in Nanotechnology from multiple universities - EPFL (CH), INPG (FR), Politec- nico di Torino (IT) & UC Berkeley (US). After a brief stint in strategic consulting, co-founded three start-ups - Smart-park, MTCS & Brava Italia. Later after obtaining, an MBA from Coll`ege des Ing´enieurs (CDI), currently heading the Innovation department in CDI ITalia which includes projects like Innovation for Change (Impact Innovation project - joint collaboration by CERN, Politecnico di Torino & CDI Italia), CDILabs (An open-innovation project that helps build sales relationships between MNCs and Startups) and School for Entrepreneurship. Passionate about
Paper ID #28962Creating a Master ”Entrepreneurial Mindset” Concept MapDr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to
entrepreneurship education.30,31 These courses arecontinually enhanced for effectiveness using feedback from students, their organizations and thecommunity. Integrating class project teams into extended entrepreneurial “E-Teams” for thecommercialization of innovative ideas and utilizing off-the shelf NASA-developed technologiesis another strong facet of this partnership.32 The SCION Partnership also has plans to developand deploy a series of intense, innovative 2-day workshops in Technology Commercialization,to generate awareness of the opportunities in this field and create a critical mass of TechnologyCommercialization Specialists from varied backgrounds (engineers, marketers, lawyers,financiers, investors, retired persons, etc) in the Space Coast area
, it is not surprising that educatorsneed to consider that each of these contexts will have a different effect on and importance tostudents. These differences in effects result from students own emotions (Shephard, 2004) andthe level of self-identity that the students place on the failure. As an example, it’s not surprisingthat students’ self-identity in a 30-minute entrepreneurially oriented in-class activity will be quitedifferent than students’ self-identity in a business that they start through a universityentrepreneurship center. Huerta (2018) begins to show how students self-identify with variousentrepreneurial activities by profiling several students and their journey through curricular andco-curricular university entrepreneurship
Paper ID #22908Curious About Student Curiosity: Implications of Pedagogical Approach forStudents’ MindsetDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based
Page 25.1259.7included in the analysis. Innovation-related courses required to earn these academic credentialsranged from 3 to 12 classes. In many cases, they consisted of a majority of required “core”courses, coupled with elective options. Among institutions in the sample, five out of the eightalso offered an entrepreneurship program, four of which were multidisciplinary. Table 1. Innovation Education Programs, Originating Department, and Target Audience Type of Credential Originating College, Department Target Audience or Center Bachelor of Innovation College of Engineering and Applied Business, Computer Science, Computer Science and
AC 2010-589: ENGINEERING ENTREPRENEURIAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS:PLANNING, OPERATING AND GROWINGDonald Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald Reimer is a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering and Associate Director of the Lear Entrepreneurial Program at Lawrence Technological University. He teaches Corporate Entrepreneurship for Engineers and Structured Approaches to Innovation in the Lear Entrepreneurial Program. Don is the faculty advisor for the Lawrence Tech Chapter of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organization. He serves as a Kern Fellow in the Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network. Don also serves as the Program Director for the Coleman Foundation Faculty
supports Innovation and Start-Up Projects. While at Un- ternehmerTUM, Florian was involved in a marketing project for a tourism startup (Social Tourist) and consulting for another startup that monitors super lightweight structures (fos4x). He joined the Designing Education Lab to learn more about entrepreneurial decision making for profit or non-profit organizations and social entrepreneurship in general.Dr. Qu Jin, Stanford University Qu Jin is a postdoctoral scholar in the Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. She earned her Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2013, M.S. degree in Biomedical En- gineering from Purdue University in 2009, and B.S. degree in Material Science and
Operating Officer of Deka Medical, Inc. Nelson was selected as Director of the Engineering Entrepreneurship program through professional association with Dr. Wayne Bennett, Dean of the College of Engineering. The program is funded through an endowment given by MSU Alumnus and Entrepreneur Jack Hatcher of Pinehurst, NC. The Entrepreneurship Program is designed for engineering students who plan to pursue a career combining technical and business skills. It features a Certificate Program that includes completion of 15 hours of selected business and engineering classes, the Engineering Seminar Series, and completion of a Team Project with commercial aspects
) law. He is the Director of the Entrepreneurship Clinic at IU-McKinney where he also teaches Patent Law and Patent Prosecution. Additionally, he teaches a three-course sequence in engineering where students learn about IP law as it applies to engineering design and engineering careers.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering Education, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
engineering graduates. Currently, he works for the solar electric vehicle start-up Sono Motors in Munich.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI
specialty is water resources engineering. He authored or co-authored six books and many engineering and education publications and presenta- tions. A recent book is Engineering Your Future: The Professional Practice of Engineering and his book Introduction to Creativity and Innovation for Engineers was published by Pearson Prentice Hall in early 2016. Walesh facilitated and/or made presentations at several hundred workshops, seminars, classes, webinars, and meetings throughout the U.S. and internationally. For the past 15 years he has been active in the effort to reform the education and early experience of engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
, working in small businesses, initiating jobs in largercompanies, or starting their own companies. A recent survey of Lawrence Tech industryadvisory members verified the view that business skills were as important to success as anengineer as technical expertise.Engineering students at Lawrence Tech. now have two options: the traditional engineering pathand Entrepreneurial path. The second option includes a greater emphasis on communications,leadership, and business aspects of the engineering profession. Both paths require 131 creditsand lead to a B.Sc. in engineering, however, students who successfully complete theEntrepreneurial Program also obtain an Entrepreneurship Certificate. A unique feature ofLawrence Tech’s Entrepreneurial program is the
engineering and technology students.For example, the following constitute a sample of effective practice furthering our students’propensity for, and capability with, technological innovation:Phase 1 Ideation: In an introductory freshman class using creative brainstorming of howtechnological problems are addressed differently in various regions of the world.Phase 2 Development: Implementing a vertically integrated capstone project that teams studentsfrom each year of the baccalaureate program on an industry-based problem. Senior studentsmentor junior ones to develop advanced skills.Phase 3 Realization: Students work with entrepreneurs, for example in the university’stechnology park or incubator, in implementing an innovationInteraction with Context
Portion of the Student’s Design Analysis, Conducted for the Purpose ofRefining the Initial Design Concept Shown in Figure 16.Figure 19. Revised Product Architecture Resulting from the Student’s Design AnalysisShown in Figure 18.Figure 20. The Student’s Final Design that Evolved from the Initial Concept Shown inFigure 16 and the Revised Architecture Shown in Figure 19, after Design Analysis andRefinement Activities Were CompletedFinally, the following examples illustrate the application of TRIZ for the specific purpose ofovercoming technical contradictions via innovative design solutions. Students were providedwith mentoring in the form of a collaborative class activity, to facilitate understanding of theprocess. The instructor helped students to