. A. High. A Pilot Study for Creativity Experiences in a Freshman Introduction to Engineering Course. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.4. K. F. Reardon. A Project-Oriented Introduction to Engineering Course. 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.5. F. J. Rubino. Project Based Freshman Introduction to Engineering Technology Course. 1998 ASEE Annual Conference.6. G. Wight, R. D. Friend, J. Beneat, and W. Barry. Project-Based Introduction to Engineering for Freshmen Students. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.7. H. A. Canistraro, P. Katz, J. Girouard, A. Lankford, and J. Dannenhoffer. A New Approach to the Introduction to Technology Course at a Four Year College of Engineering
newManufacturing Engineering Technology program at Indiana Purdue Fort Wayne drew from pastexperience of offering manufacturing specific courses in the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology program16. Linn et al. presented their efforts in creating a new 4 year degree inprocess and system engineering technology (PSET)15. The creation of the new PSET programwas based on an existing Industrial Engineering Technology program with a different focus.Mullett17 presented a curriculum enhancement effort where the focus of the engineeringtechnology program was shifted from component-based to system-oriented. A similar change offocus and program name was made at Texas A&M University, where the Electronic EngineeringTechnology and Telecommunication Engineering
Paper ID #18757A Microcontroller-based DSP Laboratory CurriculumDr. Ying Lin, Western Washington University Ying Lin has been with the faculty of Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington Uni- versity since September 2010 after she taught for two years at SUNY, New Platz. She received her MS in Applied Statistics and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University, NY, respectively. Her teaching interests include first-year Intro to Electrical Engineering, circuit analysis sequence, and upper-division communication systems and digital Signal Processing courses. Her research areas focus on
Session #3247 A New Approach to the Introduction to Technology Course at a Four Year College of Engineering Technology Howard A. Canistraro, Phylis Katz, Janice Girouard, Ann Lankford, Joan Dannenhoffer The Ward College of Technology The University of HartfordAbstract:As part of a National Science Foundation Institution Wide Curriculum reform grant, several freshmencourses in science, mathematics, engineering and technology (SMET) from across the University ofHartford were completely revised with the specific goals of improving the students
arrive atconsensus 12 and is vital if higher education is to accept the challenge of harnessing the potentialof information communication technology (ICT).Design / MethodAs the study is not testing a hypothesis but is attempting to discover what academics actually dowhen engaged in curriculum design and development, the researcher determined it wasappropriate to follow Charmaz’ 4 constructivist grounded theory methodology and data analysismethod 20, p. 130. Based on the researcher’s view that the development of new curricula and theupdating and innovating of existing curricula is a design 21,22,23 or problem solving activity 12 itwas decided that data should be collected from engineering, computer science and informationsystems academics only
higher education.Asma WasfiMohammad HayajnehBisni Fahad Mon, United Arab Emirates UniversityAmeer Slim, University of New Mexico ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Academic Pathways: A Data-Driven Approach to Reducing Curriculum Complexity and Improving Graduation Rates in Higher Education Ahmad Slim† , Gregory L. Heileman† , Husain Al Yusuf† , Ameer Slim‡ , Yiming Zhang† , Mohammad Hayajneh• , Bisni Fahad Mon• , Asma Wasfi Fayes• {ahslim@arizona.edu, heileman@arizona.edu, halyusuf@arizona.edu, ahs1993@unm.edu, yimingzhang1@arizona.edu, mhayajneh@uaeu.ac.ae
collaborative or team work. Students rarely challenge the integrity ofinstruction by the instructors leading to the lack of interactive relations vital to creativity andinnovation. The curriculum is highly structured and there is little room to take liberal arts orinterdisciplinary courses to broaden their education. Not enough emphasis is placed onprofessional competencies which are important for today’s engineers competing in a globalmarket. Accreditation as a relatively new phenomenon in the developing countries face thechallenge of ensuring quality based on standards while also facilitating innovations in education.There is a lack of resources for upgrading laboratories, shortage of trained teachers to teacheffectively and make the course
products usingnanotechnology concepts.Academic programs in nanotechnology tend to be interdisciplinary in nature and require farlarger resources than what is needed for traditional engineering technology programs. Acurriculum in nanotechnology should be able to cut across the traditional boundaries ofengineering technology education and must include academic disciplines such as biology,chemistry, materials, electronics, manufacturing systems, and mechanics.This manuscript provides detailed information regarding two different nanotechnology curriculawhich effectively train the engineering technicians for nanotechnology implementation inindustry. The manuscript focuses on the two different curriculum development approaches usedby The Pennsylvania
AC 2010-1323: MAKING SERVICE COUNT: ADVICE FOR NEW ENGINEERINGEDUCATORSAndrew Rose, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Andrew T. Rose, Ph.D., P.E. is Associate Professor and Department Head of Civil Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. His teaching interests are in the areas of geotechnical and structural engineering. His research interests are in curriculum development and inovation, engineering education, engineering history, historic structures, and incorporating practical design experience and professional practice issues into the undergraduate civil engineering curriculum. Dr. Rose received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University
create the “screen capture with audio” avi files.Examples demonstrating the delivery and instructional techniques used are given. The first twoexamples illustrate the interactive lecture and homework materials. The final example shows part ofan interactive sample project involving the synthesis/design and subsequent analysis of a planarfour bar linkage.IntroductionThe general demand for fewer hours in the curriculum without sacrificing content, along with thedesire for the development of a working knowledge of math and engineering software, requires"new" delivery approaches. The development of a web-site with various modes/types ofasynchronous tutorial material is the approach taken in this course. More specifically, Worddocuments with
as previousversions14. The previous version of the test has numerous topics that will no longer be coveredduring the FE: Chemistry, Electricity and Magnetism, and Thermodynamics14. Since thesetopics will no longer be tested on the FE exam, programs may opt to drop these courses in favorof offering other content.Other than a change in accreditation requirements by ABET, the new FE content requirementsprovide the greatest opportunity for widespread curriculum reform. This presents a unique Page 24.341.3opportunity for engineering programs to focus on creating not only more effective engineers, butmore well-rounded citizens who can make valuable
to alleviate these issues rely on moreexperience with distance learning and adapting to an online presence on a mass scale.Nevertheless, despite all setbacks and headaches that come with attempting a new approach todelivering material, the mechanical engineering course successfully guided students throughtheir first stage in the engineering program. In many ways, the lack of traditional engagementand teaching tools made delivering material feel less personal and distant than a typical year.However, through online tools and digital software, a new form of community and learningdevelopment was born and there was no discernible gap between the score performance ofdistance students in contrast to in-person students. Even when courses return to a
word problems has revealed thecomplex nature of the processes that lead to the lack of students’ activation of their real-world Page 21.52.2knowledge. Palm8 stressed that in a large number of studies students did not pay much attentionto the realities of the situations described in the word problems. Gerofsky9, in turn, asserted thatword problems were unable to be faithful simulation of real-life tasks. She insightfully predictedthat there would appear new approaches based on new computer technologies.The contemporary computer technologies undoubtedly can provide much better than wordproblems simulations of real world situations in
we do not over-saturate students with co-curricular programming.BackgroundAuthors of “The Engineer of 2020” urge the engineering profession to recognize what engineerscan build for the future through a wide range of leadership roles in industry, government, andacademia not just through technical jobs. Engineering schools should attract the best andbrightest students and be open to new teaching and training approaches.2There is a realization that engineering education needs to shift to address the demands of the newglobally connected workplace.3 Globalization and outsourcing raise serious questions about thefuture of engineering jobs in the USA. Jobs that require the mere application of existingknowledge have been, and will continue to be
Rendezvous Proximity Operations and Capture simulation. Page 12.826.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 IMPACT OF NEW FACILITIES ON ENGINEERING STUDENT OUTCOMESAbstractEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) has established a reputation for providingundergraduate students with a curriculum which has a strong emphasis on application basedlearning. In an effort to improve this learning environment, the campus has recently added a20,000 square foot Aerospace Experimentation and Fabrication (AXFAB) building dedicated toproviding undergraduate students with a premier laboratory
2007new engineering educators mentor and train graduate students to successful project completionand at least one publication. Advice is offered in the form of managing tips to improve writtenand oral communication skills, experiment planning and documentation, and problem solvingskills. Experiences are summarized briefly followed by a discussion of strategies that werefound to be effective.The goal of this paper is to offer practical advice in the form of technique tips that new facultycan easily implement in a research group comprised of young graduate students andundergraduate students. A structured and multifaceted approach has advantages for graduatestudents of all learning styles and can potentially improve a graduate student’s
29 BS, 27 MS and 25 Ph.D. students in the last two years. Many ofthe undergraduates were influenced by the Center not only through their coursecurricula but also through research participation fellowships at A&T, NC StateUniversity and the Center’s partnering and collaborating institutions: Oak RidgeNational Lab, the University of Florida’s Engineering Research Center, and otheruniversities including Kumamoto University of Japan.Fostering Interest in Materials Engineering CareerResearch results are being transported to the curriculum through: • incorporation of new lab experiences into related undergraduate lab courses • development and modification of both existing and new curricula based upon an integrated approach of advanced
. Page 23.1003.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 PROSPECTIVE PROFESSORS IN TRAINING: A TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR Ph.D. CANDIDATES IN ENGINEERINGAbstractFor the past six years, the University of Toronto has been offering a training program for senior-year Ph.D. Candidates in Engineering as they prepare for life after graduation. Specifically, theProspective Professors in Training (PPIT) Program offers a year-long curriculum that includesseminars, activities and a theoretical course aimed to promote teaching and research excellencefor individuals seeking to become engineering educators. For the seminar component of PPIT,students interact with current professors
itsgoal the development of innovative curriculum and instructional practices that will allow fortransfer of new knowledge into the classroom. Although the major focus is on content related tothe ERC, methods that apply to all STEM areas are under consideration in practices related todesign, implementation, and assessment of student learning. Two primary goals of the SmartLighting ERC’s Education and Outreach components are to: 1) investigate the viability ofalternative approaches to instruction that will build on the constructionist/constructivist approachto STEM education1-4 and, 2) help students learn to work in professional teams that, when givena task or problem, can collaborate to provide a solution. To meet these goals, the
AC 2007-959: A MULTI-PRONGED APPROACH TO ADDRESS THE IT GENDERGAPJulie Mariga, Purdue University Professor Mariga teaches in the Department of Computer and Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University, in West Lafayette, IN. Her areas of interest include virtual technologies and increasing the number of women students within CIT. CIT offers degrees in both information systems development and network engineering technology. She has co-authored a textbook, edited a second textbook, and written five chapters for other texts. She has published over fifteen referred articles and has written or co-authored numerous grants aimed at increasing the number of women students in CIT. She has
the field ofBME where advancements are often made at the interface of materials, electrical, mechanical,and medical knowledge. Moreover, today’s biomedical engineers must be capable problem-solvers who are comfortable working in multidisciplinary teams within the design process.Traditional educational approaches, which leverage standard lecture-style dissemination of siloedinformation with limited hands-on project and design experience, are not sufficiently preparingour graduates for success in the interdisciplinary, project-focused world [1]. At UVM,foundational technical content is currently taught across the departments of MechanicalEngineering, Civil Engineering, and Electrical Engineering. In the new curriculum, these topicswill be
integration of mobile technology with BIM. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Pedagogy to teach BIM in Construction Management CurriculumAbstractAdvancements in Information and Technology have increased the Building Information Model(BIM) applications in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) domain. One of theConstruction Management department's goals is to continue to improve the curriculum to reflectthe global and national construction industry needs. The Construction Management departmenthas included a BIM applications course in its undergraduate program’s curriculum to accomplishthis goal. The topics covered in the course include extracting the
Electrical Engineering Technology program at the University of Pittsburgh atJohnstown (UPJ).The paper also describes several considerations taken into account during the adaptation ofHardware Description Languages (HDL) and automation based digital design flow to theUPJ curriculum. The demographics of UPJ’s student population and their immediate careerssuggest that most graduates do not pursue graduate studies in computer engineering, nor dothey seek employment related to design and manufacture of integrated circuit components.As a result, a detailed in depth study of modern digital design methodologies is not anecessity.The paper explains the course topics and the related laboratory assignments of the coredigital electronics course for UPJ
2006-1842: DEVELOPMENT AND TREND OF CURRICULUM IN INDUSTRIALDISTRIBUTIONSorraya Khiewnavawongsa, Purdue UniversityEdie Schmidt, Purdue UniversityKathryne Newton, Purdue University Page 11.454.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006DEVELOPMENT AND TREND OF CURRICULUM IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION Page 11.454.2IntroductionIndustrial Distribution has been introduced to the academic field of study for decades. Theopportunity for graduates in industrial distribution is growing. There are a wide variety ofcurricula among the industrial distribution programs across the country. This paper describes anevaluation of the industrial
functioning properly, assisting students with both experiment-based and theory-based questions, and assisting faculty of the development of new experiments to incorporate in the undergraduate labs. In addition to the labs, Chris focuses on safety within the labs as part of the departmental safety committee, managing a safety demonstration lab for training new graduate students, and leading the SAFEChE initiative (safeche.engin.umich.edu) and Visual Encyclopedia of Chemical Engineering Equipment (https://encyclopedia.che.engin.umich.edu/)Amy J KarlssonJanie Brennan (Senior Lecturer) Janie is a Senior Lecturer in Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Her PhD is in chemical
Session 14-2 Baylor’s New Engineering Admissions Plan- Phase I Benjamin S. Kelley, Adam P. Ecklund School of Engineering and Computer Science Aaron Dabney Office of Admission Services Baylor University AbstractBaylor University is best known for academic programs in medicine, liberal arts, business, law, andreligion. Baylor’s School of Engineering and Computer Science (ECS) is a relatively young andsmall component
on Change. Arlington, VA:Author, 1995. $ Florman, Samuel. Teachers at Heart. Technology Review, Vol. 99, No. 5, July 1996, P. 65. % Benenson, G., Neujahr, J., Seignoret, H. & Goldman, E. Encouraging Engineering Students to BecomeTeachers. 1997 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings Washington: ASEE, 1997. Page 3.250.7 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATIONGARY BENENSONGary Benenson teaches Mechanical Engineering at the City College of New York. He is also ProjectDirector of City Technology Curriculum Guides, a NSF-funded project to develop materials for teachingtechnology in
, R., “Innovative Administration Supports Innovative Education,” Proceedings of the 2008 Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, New York, October 2008.2. Benedict, B.A., Napper, S.A. and Guice, L.K., “Restructuring for Strategic Outcomes,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2000, 237-246.3. Hall, D.E., Hegab, H.E. and Nelson, J.D., “Living WITH the Lab - A Freshman Curriculum to Boost Hands-on Learning, Student Confidence and Innovation,” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2008.4. Hegab, H.E. and Hall, D.E., “Microfabrication of a Resistance Temperature Detector,” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2008.5. Swanbom, M.E., Hall, D.E. and Crittenden
Paper ID #21305Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical WritingDr. Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University PhD. in Mechanical Engineering, Wash- ington State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018“Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing”. Hani S Saad Associate Professor of ME/MET Eastern Washington UniversityAbstractTeaching technical writing to engineering students is a challenging task
AC 2008-2543: ENHANCING ENGINEERING EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMESTHROUGH INTEGRATION OF NEW VISION FOR CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURESWITH NANOTECHNOLOGY INTO UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM ANDITS IMPLEMENTATION RESULTSWei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin and has over10-year industrial experience.HuiRu Shih, Jackson State University Dr. HuiRu (H.R.) Shih is a Professor of Technology at Jackson State University (JSU). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering