University (ASU) has integrated these skills intothe various courses within the engineering curriculum. However, recent assessments of theCapstone Design Course indicate that seniors need even more opportunities to gain these skills.In addition, the Dean of the Engineering School directed departments to have a course primarilyfocused on engineering business practices such as ethics, finance, and entrepreneurship. As aresult, MAE has created a new senior-level course called “The Engineering Profession”.This paper (1) discusses course development, (2) summarizes the course content, (3) describesinitial implementation results, and (4) makes recommendations for course improvement.Initial Course PlanningPrevious and current department vice-chairs began
need to be equipped with more than just specializationskills [20], but be ready to be a productive member of a company without extensive training.In the literature, Warnick [21] identifies eight categories of global competence for engineers: exhibit aglobal mindset; appreciate and understand different cultures; demonstrate world and local knowledge;communicate cross-culturally; understand international business, law, and technical elements; live andwork in a transnational engineering environment; and work in international teams.The development of competencies to support engineering is a spiral, with students building on somecompetencies and adding new ones as they progress through the curriculum. In this paper we focus on thedevelopment of
AC 2010-209: POSTER: THE SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL ENGINEERING PROJECTHenry Harms, Stevens Insititue of TechnologyMercedes McKay, Stevens Institute of TechnologyElisabeth McGrath, Stevens Institute of Technology Page 15.963.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Poster: The Systems and Global Engineering ProjectAbstractSystems engineering is a rapidly growing field that addresses the need for multiple entities tocollaborate on the development and operation of complex products and systems. StevensInstitute of Technology and the New Jersey Technology Education Association have partnered todevelop, pilot and disseminate systems and global engineering
Paper ID #16204Trash Sliders: The Latest UVA Engineering Teaching Kit (P12 Resource Ex-change)Dr. Larry G. Richards, University of Virginia Larry G Richards is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia. He leads the Virginia Middle School Engineering Education Initiative, and is active in K 12 outreach and professional development activities locally and nationally. Larry’s research interests include creativity, entrepreneurship, engineering design, innovation, and K-12 engineering education. He is a founding member of the K-12 Division and is a Fellow of ASEE
Associate professor at KTH.Prof. Anette Kolmos, Aalborg University Anette Kolmos is Professor in Engineering Education and PBL and Chairholder for UNESCO in Prob- lem Based Learning in Engineering Education, Aalborg University, Denmark. Guest professor at KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Guest Professor at UTM University Technology Malaysia 2011-2013. President of SEFI 2009–2011 (European Society for Engineering Education). Founding Chair of the SEFI-working group on Engineering Education Research. During the last 20 years, Dr. Kolmos has re- searched the following areas, primarily within Engineering Education: development and evaluation of project based and problem based curriculum, change from traditional to
re-configured for BME. This provided thestudents with a basic understanding of EE concepts, enabling the students to apply circuitconcepts to bioinstrumentation. Conversely, some BME departments cover bioinstrumentationthrough a measurements principles course, neglecting the underlying circuit principles. Thisapproach teaches students how to use measurement devices, but misses an opportunity to exposestudents to the operating principles of these measurement devices and engineering analysistechniques such as system modeling and time and frequency domain analysis. To incorporate EE principles into a BME curriculum, the Weldon School of BiomedicalEngineering has developed a novel, one semester bioinstrumentation laboratory course
in lecture and recognize that these concepts are notsolely academic and can be used in their daily lives. Feedback from the students indicated that in Page 22.1551.14addition to learning the course curriculum, they developed their abilities in teamwork, timemanagement and communication skills, skills crucial to a professional engineer, but oftenunderemphasized in academic settings.References1. Aronson, M.T., R.W. Deitcher, Y. Xi, and R.J. Davis, “New Laboratory Course for Senior-Level ChemicalEngineering Students, Chem. Eng. Educ., 43, 104 (2009)2. Cussler, E.L. “A Different Chemical Industry”, Chem. Eng. Educ., 40, 114 (2006)3. Varma, A
the project's funding period – a crucial concern notedin the literature [1], [19]. When instructors directly embed data science into disciplinary contentrather than treating it as an add-on to an already full curriculum, the integration is more likely topersist as a permanent course component. While emphasizing instructor autonomy, we found that certain structural elementsremained essential for successful integration. These included establishing common definitionsfor learning objectives and outcomes through consensus agreement, developing accurateassessments, and maintaining a shared framework for module development ([10], [11]). We alsoacknowledge that embedding data science content into disciplinary contexts requires varyinglevels of
and professional elements, instructors wereconcerned that students would not register for the course, as it was not a “required” course withintheir curriculum and could possibly serve as an avenue to show internship-like or industryexperience. In addition, project topics were not finalized when the course was first advertisedthrough email. However, this did not seem to affect registration as students were minimallysolicited to sign-up for the pilot course experience. Once students were registered, they did notdrop the course during drop add or during any other period for the semester.Projects and Developing PartnersThe initial idea of the course was to have industry partners that were willing to work with studentsand mentor them throughout
college. This paper will describe these efforts(specifically, intensive training incubator, continuous engagement, microcredentials) and present thereach of the program as well as the impact on faculty understanding and confidence in applying EMconcepts.MethodsWe developed our effort under an umbrella program we call the NC State Wolfpack EngineeringUnleashed (WEU) network. WEU encompasses our activities as well as branding the focus on 1)the fundamental principles of EM called the 3 Cs: curiosity, connections, and creating value and 2)3 additional principles: collaboration, communication, and character. All of our activities underWEU emphasize the “6 Cs” and their incorporation into the curriculum, and promote using aconsistent terminology. We
national levels such as curricular reforms related to engineering education in the Indian states of Gujarat, Maharashtra and Goa. He has authored a book on ’Competency-Based Curriculum Development’, published 2 modules in engineering education related areas along with other colleagues of NITTTR Bhopal. He has also published several international papers related to engineering education over the past several years. He has also authored 2 popular books on wind power technology - one focused for the industry and the other for the university system. He was the first professor in India to offer online training programs for inservice engineering teachers in the areas wind power and renewable energy since 2005.Prof. shashi kant
remain in the U.S. marketplace. Theresults from student-reported survey data showed the module had a positive impact on perceivedEML skill development. Additionally, analysis of technical questions showed the moduleimproved student understanding of the underlying physiology and clinical relevance, which weretopics retained from the original course content prior to the implementation of this intervention.IntroductionBiomedical engineering (BME) is a demanding field of study since students must develop notonly technical skills in engineering, but also a solid understanding of human physiology. Thishas often been addressed in the BME curriculum by the inclusion of stand-alone courses inanatomy and physiology, which attempt to provide students with
physics/pre-engineeringcurriculum.NASA-Threads integrates fundamental science and mathematics courses taught with engineeringapplications and the appropriate use of technology into a physics/pre-engineering curriculumtargeting the junior/senior year of high school. The threads of this curriculum includeFundamentals, Technology, Communication, and NASA Applications. The fundamentals, whichare grouped into blocks of similar topics, provide the backbone of the educational experience.NASA applications are strategically introduced to provide timely, hands-on reinforcement offundamentals, and the progressive development of technical knowledge and skills.The rigorous curriculum is designed to guide students through a systems-level understanding ofreal
-based learning. She believes project- based learning holds significant potential for increasing the diversity of students who succeed in college and who persist in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, and she views her work with the Center as contributing to education reform from the inside out. She holds an M.A. in Developmental Psychology from Clark University and a B.A. in Psychology from Case Western Reserve University. Her background includes working in the field of education evaluation, where she focused primarily on the areas of project-based learning; STEM; pre-literacy and literacy; student life; learning communities; and professional development. She has worked on projects whose funding
ofthe development, usually lasting between 2 months and 6 months, but which has taken more thana year for complex projects (see [12] for one example). Once a prototype solution has beencompleted, instructors and Ideas Clinic staff will design the learning materials for the course, andit will transition into an implementation phase. For projects with significant hardwarecomponents, the implementation phase often includes significant work to scale the hardware foruse by an entire class of students.McRae et al. [13] specify that quality work-integrated learning (WIL) programs have fourcommon characteristics: 1. Pedagogy – WIL needs to be integrated into the overall curriculum 2. Experience – The learning environment must be supportive of the
Engineering Course for Fundamental Automobile Body Design American Society for Engineering Education Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA June 26-29, 2016IntroductionThe structure of the vehicle that you drove to work today protected your life. This simple“skeleton” of the car or truck is actually a highly complex multi-material, multi-degree of freedomstructure that can fail in millions of different ways. As the automotive industry drives designs forlight-weighting, the vehicle body is becoming even more of a complex structure that must operaterobustly for 20 or more years.For the development of this new course, a major US university teamed together with a major
development cycles of the feasibility of their implementation into our curriculum. A sophomore entry course in thek called Sprints, iterationsLogic program curriculum, of work which and Digital are Design, typically is chosen for the1-4 weeks inThe implementation. length. course The Sprints a xed duration – theywere instructors end on
Paper ID #30098Using the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Master Kinematics and Human BodyMotion in a Biomechanics CourseDr. Andrea T Kwaczala, Western New England University Andrea Kwaczala is an assistant professor at Western New England University in the biomedical engi- neering department. She teaches Biomechanics, Product Development and Innovation, Senior Capstone Design and Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices. She focuses on hands-on labs centered on student engage- ment and project-based learning. She works in affiliation with Shriners Hospitals for Children where her research focuses in the design of assistive technologies to
there, requirements wereelicited from the stakeholders. This approach has been documented in several publications [17][18] [19].While this approach provided to be highly successful at first, problems began to develop as thecourse was taught multiple times. There were timing issues with the course, as the BE studentshad already made many of their fundamental design decisions prior to determining therequirements, which made an appropriate elicitation process impossible. Scheduling proved tobe very difficult, as teams had conflicting goals and there was little chance for interaction.Ultimately, a significant change in the Biomedical engineering curriculum made this approachimpossible.New ApproachIn developing a new approach to teaching
learning outcomes from first-year in their Capstonedesign projects? With more research and data, future results aim to answer (4) How could thecurriculum help support more robust engineering design outcomes based on our findings?IntroductionThis research was done at Northeastern University that has a common first year engineering programthat covers engineering design and problem-solving in two Cornerstone courses. These first-yearCornerstone courses were developed as part of a curriculum redesign that focused on incorporatingengineering design with computational problem solving, data analysis and visualization tools. Thisresearch compares the design and teamwork learning outcomes of students who have gone through thewhole undergraduate curriculum
AC 2011-1915: ALTERNATIVE LAB REPORTS - ENGINEERING EFFEC-TIVE COMMUNICATIONDaniel Lepek, The Cooper Union Daniel Lepek is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at The Cooper Union for the Advance- ment of Science and Art. He received his Ph.D. from New Jersey Institute of Technology and B.E. from The Cooper Union. Since joining The Cooper Union in 2009, he has taught more than half the courses in the chemical engineering curriculum. Currently, he teaches the undergraduate laboratory course se- quence and the graduate transport phenomena sequence. Recently, he has developed and introduced new elective courses on particle technology and pharmaceutical engineering. His research interests include particle
this course incorporated the seniors as mentors to help guide the less experienced juniorsthrough what the seniors considered “familiar territory”.The course objectives for Principles of Biomedical design include the following: 1. Assessment of client needs to establish problem-specific constraints 2. Identification of relevant constraints (e.g. regulatory, manufacturing, economic, environmental, societal, etc.) 3. Formulation of problem statements that incorporate client input and relevant constraints. 4. Generation of multiple, creative solutions for a problem and development of criteria by which to rank the merit of feasible solutions. 5. Critical reviewing the performance of a solution to evaluate the achievement of
incorporating basic engineering fundamentals and thedesign process in high school curriculum, the INSPIRES modules target ITEEA Standards forTechnological Literacy, which outline the need for students to be able to understand engineeringdesign and apply the engineering design process. The most recently developed module is “Engineering in Healthcare: A Heart Lung CaseStudy”, is the second INSPIRES module focusing on healthcare. Heart disease, in recent years,has become the number one cause of death in the United States3. With increasing rates of heartdisease, more people are undergoing open heart surgery to reduce the risk of complications.Developing new solutions to this critical healthcare epidemic will fall to students currently in
solving in an engaging and cost-effective way? It is clear that other programshave invested a prohibitive amount of capital. Space is another limited resource. Without lab benches andstorage, we would need to be creative in developing a hands-on equipment-based module. The finalresource to be considered is time. This precious commodity would also make it challenging to start fromsquare one to develop a curriculum to teach hardware-driven program development. These conditionsinspired a search to determine how to make programming come alive for our students given thelimitations described.Challenge #3: Experience. While there is a core of instructors responsible for the majority of the 20+course sections from year to year, there are also some who
detailing plans, listingspecifications and preparing project bids. Environmental engineers may have greater need for Page 15.702.6producing analytical reports and for writing memos communicating recommendations. Softwareengineers’ most important needs in the area of written communications might be for writing userinstructions and manuals, and software test procedures and results. Because of these varyingneeds, the Lead Faculty for each program (i.e., the faculty member responsible for thatprogram’s curriculum) was asked to determine the types of written communications mostimportant to emphasize during the major curriculum. Using the list developed
used by seniors and graduate students inengineering at the university level. The objective of this study is to explore the use of the VirtualCVD Laboratory as a learning platform at the high school level. While the simulation can betransferred intact, level-appropriate curriculum and assignments were developed for 9th and 10thgrade high school students. In 2007-08, the Virtual CVD Laboratory was used by 263 students inIntroduction to Engineering and in seven sections of Chemistry at Crescent Valley High School(CVHS). The most prevalent theme in examining student work was the wide variety of responseselicited by this ill-structured project and the clever ways in which statistical methods weresynthesized and integrated into student understanding
instructor workload. • it is difficult to provide continuity in individual student writing development in a laboratory-intensive, team environment. • anecdotal feedback from graduates indicates that strong writing and presentation skills differentiate them in the workplace.Project Management Skills Development Page 22.431.12Figure 3 portrays that students must move from perspective of being reactive to assignments tobeing proactive with projects as they enter the workforce. The project managementfundamentals curriculum is scaffolded to enable that transition and it begins in earnest once thestudents have established their writing
Paper ID #48300WIP: A Novel real-time circuit simulation tool – JSIMJohn Francis Simonis, The Ohio State University at MarionDr. Qudsia Tahmina, The Ohio State University at Marion Dr. Qudsia Tahmina, The Ohio State University at Marion Dr. Qudsia Tahmina is an Associate Professor of Practice at The Ohio State University at Marion and teaches engineering and engineering technology courses. She is involved in curriculum development, assessment of learning outcomes and ABET accreditation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Novel real-time circuit simulation tool
is now an urgent need to train work forcefor this field. There have been recent efforts to address the problem at the community collegelevel, with some of them now offering courses on renewable energy and even boot camps orcertifications to prepare students to work with renewable systems. At the 4-year institution levelthe offerings related to renewable energy majors at undergraduate level are limited, and they areeven more so at the graduate level.At the international level, there is literature presenting different efforts to integrate renewableenergy curriculum in various universities and programs. Guttierez et. al. presents the studentfeedback from a program developed in Germany which involved over 400 students from 79countries [8]. A
Maghiar, Georgia Southern University Marcel Maghiar, Ph.D., Assistant Professor at Georgia Southern University teaches Construction Man- agement courses at junior and senior level in the Civil Engineering and Construction Management de- partment. His research experience includes development of computer syntaxes to unequivocally describe construction activities and development of a consistent methodology to explicitly classify and quantify construction methods (emerging taxonomy of construction methods). Marcel’s main expertise is in com- puter modeling of construction processes. His doctoral work allows the profiling of each journeyman’s affinity for productivity, quality and safety. By analyzing the behavior of