Engineering and Technology (ABET) outcomes: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data 3. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs 4. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 5. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 6. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 7. An ability to communicate effectively 8. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context 9. A recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, life-long learning
. Padmanabhan , North Dakota State University G. Padmanabhan, Ph. D., P. E., M. ASEE, F. ASEE is a professor of civil engineering at North Dakota State University (NDSU), Fargo, North Dakota. He has been on the NDSU faculty for more than 30 years teaching and engaging in research. His expertise is in water resources systems and modeling. He served as the Director of North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute for the last 12 years. He is a long standing member of ASEE. He has been active in STEM education outreach activities to North Dakota Native American students at the college, high and middle school levels for the last 15 years. He has received funding from the Office of Naval research, National Science Foundation
, effective introductorycourses are important for students’ future success in their program of study, and therefore,careers [1], [3], [8]–[11]. As summarized by Temple et al. [3]: “[F]irst year courses can improve academic performance, stimulate interest and improve retention, and better prepare students for future coursework. It is important that students acquire the qualities that prepare them to be successful engineers in the changing workplace, including the ability to work on and communicate with members of a multidisciplinary and professional team.”Research on high-impact educational practices has shown that in-class active or collaborativelearning in introductory science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM
emotional statesnecessary to be successful in engineering research. Attention to detail and perseverance are essential skills to succeed as an engineer. It is ok to ask questions constantly. It’s also ok to ask the same questions repeatedly until you understand. It’s always better to keep asking than to settle for misunderstanding.These physical and emotional states were important to note because many engineering programsdo not focus on intentional reflection about these experiences that foster research self-efficacy.Additionally, students increased self-efficacy beliefs that may impact their future behaviors,based on self-efficacy and social cognitive theory. The following are examples of thesebehaviors:Goal-setting. Students set
EXPERIENCES IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS: STUDENT OUTCOMES, FACULTY PERCEPTIONS, AND LESSONS LEARNEDAbstractA Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on the Internet of Things (IoT),funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), was established at a large publicuniversity to engage undergraduate students in a 10-week, immersive research experience.REU students conducted research in fields spanning security, privacy, hardware design, dataanalytics, healthcare simulations, and social computing. A common survey available toPrincipal Investigators (PIs) of REU sites in Computer and Information Science andEngineering (CISE) was deployed to the 2016 summer cohort students at this REU IoT site.Results of the student pre
examination,”by which we mean examination of the status of practice in a profession against the ethicalstandards enacted in its particular code, and vice versa. For example, Clause 8, which wasrecently added to the IEEE Code of Ethics, requires all members “to treat fairly all persons andto not engage in acts of discrimination based on race, religion, gender, disability, age, nationalorigin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.”57 This clause provides richopportunities for students to discuss the necessary structural changes to the engineeringprofession—in areas such as employment policies, workplace culture, college admissions,facility design, etc.—so as to live up to the code. Similarly, instructors could also
ways to help incorporate a CT curriculum, is to look at those that havealready been implemented and have proven to be successful in the classroom.Agbo et. al review the impacts and effects that computational thinking (CT) has had on theprogramming and critical thinking skills of higher education students [10]. Students that areinterested in improving their programming skills and technological expertise often find thatthrough the use of a CT regiment, they become increasingly more proficient in their field. CT isso important in today’s society due to the nature of the skills and knowledge that it encompassesto a student. CT builds not only a better communication outlet for a student, but also theapplication of problem-solving skills to real
fluidity and fuller engagement of humandimensions for maximum effectiveness, and 2) Management to provide needed consistency,structure, and synchronization. A variety of leadership and management topics can beintroduced to engineering students by using experiential learning activities during the course ofstudy. Engineering students can explore various areas such as leadership, communication,negotiation process, global awareness, and workforce diversity. “Experiential learning occurs asa person engages in an activity, looks back at the activity critically, abstracts some useful insightfrom the analysis, and puts the result to work in another situation. It is an inductive process,proceeding from observation rather than from a priori “truth”. The
industrialsoftware to collaborate on the design; practice inventive thinking and problem-solving to developdesigns; collaborate in class-based and worldwide teams; and develop and present a finalproduct. Students are introduced to a systems-thinking approach that encourages them to seetheir design effort in a larger context. They have to reflect on the problem they are trying tosolve, the resources that are available, and assess the desirable as well as potentially undesirableimpacts their design will have in its intended environment. Local as well as worldwidecollaboration fosters teamwork, innovation and invention, effective communication, and other21st century workforce skills.Over the course of three years, this project will develop, pilot, and
. While we understand that facultyschedules are not always flexible, there was a noted lack of communication with the menteesand/or the mentoring program coordinator when a mentor would be missing from these events.Lessons LearnedMuch of what we have learned to date in this program is not surprising, particularly in hindsight.Looking back over the last three semesters, it is clear that changing models for awarding andtracking competencies partway through a program is difficult for students. Many of the studentsare still playing catch-up with the new model of competencies and badge submissions. In certainsituations, the accountability to agreements made between faculty fellows on how and how oftento engage in certain activities, such as mentoring
summer bridge program is50 students per year. The program includes a rigorous set of math tutorials and focused worksessions - all done in the social context of a learning community. Most of the summer bridge Page 24.737.4students who matriculate to MSU in engineering will flow directly into the DPO ScholarsProgram (DPO-SP) program.7In the following sections we will describe the structure of the DPO-SP program and discuss theprogram evaluation results focusing on two main aspects, academic and social. We will presentthe short and long-term impacts that the program and its components have on participants, anddiscuss our efforts to extend the program
and academically working at the group.” “It has been the opportunity of a lifetime and something I am extremely grateful for.” “I’ve made great connections with all the research groups so far. I’ve learned a great deal from conducting research and conversing with my coworkers and team leaders, and will continue to do so.” “Very positive and fun experience.”These comments reveal that faculty members play a pivotal role in engaging, motivating, andsupporting the growth and development of underrepresented students.V. CONCLUSIONA strong STEM workforce highly depends on creating policies, programs, and initiatives thatprovide equitable access and opportunities for all students, especially those from underrepresentedand underserved communities. As
otherhand, the primary disadvantage of traditional in-person learning is the lack of flexibility. Studentsmust attend classes at specific times and locations, which can be difficult for those with busyschedules or who live far away from the school. Additionally, in-person learning can be disruptive,as their peers or the environment may distract students. However, the traditional in-person learningexperience can have a positive impact on student learning and engagement. Previous studies haveshown that students who participate in in-person learning are more likely to retain information anddevelop a deeper understanding of the material [4].The COVID-19 pandemic has affected education in various aspects. Several studies reported thechallenges with
helpfulness; (4) Ethical Considerations & AcademicIntegrity, which addressed concerns such as misinformation and policy clarity; and (5) Open-Ended Questions, which invited detailed comments about the impact of GenAI and its integrationinto the curriculum. The survey included multiple-choice questions, Likert-scale ratings, and free-response questions. All responses were collected anonymously, as an email login was required tolimit one response per student, though identities were not linked to the analysis.Participants: Following ethics board approval of protocol code STUDY00025344 at theUniversity of Minnesota – Twin Cities, the survey was distributed to students enrolled in theRobotics Master’s program at the Minnesota Robotics Institute
disabilities.The program and specific workshop have been offered every summer since 1994. The overallgoal of the computer science workshop is to build confidence in the students as they create andbuild successful programs to solve specific problems. We evaluate the program by answering thequestions: Can high school students with disabilities, and with little or no programmingexperience, be successful innovators and implementers of a week-long programming project?and How does workshop participation impact students’ futures and confidence? We demonstratesuccess of the computer science workshop by providing examples of students’ projects, a reportfrom one workshop participant who is currently enrolled in college and a co-author of this paper,and data
engineering often focuses on skills andmotivation—individual-level characteristics—our qualitative case study indicates the importanceof students’ identities and supports as factors shaping their pathways through undergraduateresearch experiences and onward towards careers in engineering fields. Notably, we observed thatSTEM and engineering identity development were distinct among some of our students, who foundtheir engineering identity take shape later, including during their engagement in engineering peernetworks, mentoring relationships, and research activities. Moreover, we found that studentscurrently involved within campus organizations with an emphasis on STEM identity developmentmay be particularly poised to be successful in STEM majors
construction of structures, or portable music players and the “Walkman effect” on socialinteractions; team dynamics and communication skills; methods and uses of prototyping; usingCAD to represent designs; and using systems modeling and MATLAB to analyze them. The Page 24.807.9classroom was also an interactive design studio, in which students actively engaged with thedesign process, including: performing design thinking exercises to develop devices andprocesses; identifying relevant stakeholders and appropriate questions for the design of a publicpark; and reverse engineering a common device.Through these activities, students developed an
science degrees in theirrespective nations. This stark contrast between the United States and these other countries hasprompted an exploration into the factors that contribute to women’s participation in computerscience.This study focuses on understanding how cultural environment can affect the participation ofwomen in CS, specifically with respect to individual, household, community, country, and globalinfluences on occupational pursuit. The research question guiding this study is: what culturalfactors influence Muslim women’s occupational pursuit of computer science? This qualitativestudy explores, through semi-structured interviews, the experiences and influences of Muslimfemale students currently pursuing graduate degrees in CS. Leveraging
students hands on training in a STEM related field. Mr. Haefner has 13 years’ experience teaching college STEM courses. He has taught construction management at Westwood College in Chicago; mathematics at Mid-Michigan Community College and Cornerstone University in Grand Rapids, MI. Mr. Haefner has taught algebra, engineering statics, several HVAC courses, several CMT classes, as well as AutoCAD and Advanced Manufacturing using SolidWorks. Mr. Haefner also has over 15 years; experience in the fields of civil, geo-technical and environmental engineering at companies including: Testing Service Corporation in Carol Stream, IL; Singh & Associates in Chicago, IL, Weaver, Boos and Gordon in Chicago, IL; STS Ltd. In Grand
mitigate academic integrityissues include making sure questions are not identifiable in common web search engines,including special symbols in questions to make them untraceable by web search engines, anduploading questions as images so they cannot be readily copied and pasted [4]. Theserecommendations highlight that teaching in an on-line environment should be done in a differentmanner than teaching in-person. Therefore, instructor experience and training in on-lineinstruction could impact student learning and perception.While it is difficult to directly measure teaching effectiveness and student learning, grades andstudent perceptions are common indicators of both. While controversial, studies have shownstudents to be reliable evaluators of
also be informed by the differing ways in which these students engage with their academic life. Survey results showed that students from underrepresented groups attempt to engage more with their academic programs as a community than their peers do. Their responses indicate that, frequently, the issues that they run into are systemic issues with the university’s culture. Many student responses highlighted the lack of intentionality on the part of those creating a hostile academic environment; these students from underrepresented and marginalized groups see other faculty, staff, and students not putting the same attention into being part of an academic community as they themselves do. These students’ negative experiences are, frequently, not a
be both a learner and a teacher. Mentors report improved skills in public speaking ability,communication skills, basic teaching skills and report the experience as more rewarding thananticipated [7]–[10]. Mentors in medical courses often report greater understanding and insightof the course material due to reviewing, reorganizing, and explaining the students' information[5]. Mentoring is so beneficial that in one study, those who mentored near-peers achieved highercourse grades than their peers who were not mentoring [25].Although there are many studies about the topic, there seems to be little knowledge of the near-peer model outside the medical and health postsecondary spaces. Few papers examine near-peermentoring relationships outside the
thinking, and identities as engineers than as unique innovators [1]– [3].Students who do not conform to this mold of “being an engineer” are often alienated fromengineering, do not develop engineering identities, and leave engineering, which reduces themuch-needed human potential for innovation [4], [5].Most diversity literature focuses on the intent to increase access and provide equitableexperiences to students who are often marginalized in engineering (i.e., women, students ofcolor, students with visible and non-visible disabilities, and students in the LGBTQ+community). However, our work begins to address a gap in the literature about students’underlying attitudes, mindsets, and beliefs (what we call latent diversity in this work) that
scalable.”Theme 4: Students learn entrepreneurial skills through the Ventureprise engagement. Studentsneed to learn how to think entrepreneurially, beyond making technical products. They need to findout if their product idea is feasible and needed in the larger business community, which is part ofthe learning process. As a faculty advisor noted: “My experience working with students on this track, [the program] is learning about entrepreneurship, not about if you should license this technology, but interviewing scientists and engineers, they might not need our technology- it might be cool but not useful……, So when we go to the patent committee we say it can do this and we talked to company x, y, z …and they need
- Psychological Concept,” Self Identity, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 339–354, 2004, doi: 10.1080/13576500444000119.[11] N. K. Schlossberg, “Marginality and mattering: Key issues in building community,” New Dir. Student Serv., vol. 1989, no. 48, pp. 5–15, 1989, doi: 10.1002/ss.37119894803.[12] E. Tovar, “A Conceptual Model on the Impact of Mattering, Sense of Belonging, Engagement/Involvement, and Socio-Academic Integrative Experiences on Community College Students’ Intent to Persist,” CGU Theses Diss., no. 1–336, 2013, doi: 10.5642/cguetd/81.[13] M. K. France and S. J. Finney, “What matters in the measurement of mattering? A construct validity study,” Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 104–120, 2009.[14] L. R
connection betweenunderrepresented students’ strong sense of “classroom belonging,” their engineering identity,and their academic performance [20]. Strayhorn [10] compared white and Latinx students’sense of belonging drawing on data from a large survey of students in four-year institutions. Hefound that “academic and social experiences influence Latino college students’ sense ofbelonging. For instance, it was found that grades and time spent studying positively influenceLatino students’ sense of belonging; time spent studying had a more powerful impact thangrades. Taken together, findings may suggest that Latino students who excel academically (e.g.,high achievers) feel more connected to campus than those who perform less well” (p. 313).Moreover
perceptions, motivations, and expectations of students inconstruction management programs. The findings highlight several key areas for improvement inrecruitment strategies, program development, and industry representation. The importance of rolemodels, the influence of gender perceptions, and the impact of career expectations on studentchoices are all significant factors that need to be addressed. The research underscores the needfor better information dissemination, particularly during high school, to combat misconceptionsabout the construction industry. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing concerns aboutwork-life balance and providing accurate salary information. By focusing on the positive aspectsof construction careers, such as
backgrounds, andwere pursuing distinct academic trajectories. It is clear that each researcher has not foundthemselves on the same exact page, as our unique experiences continue to shape ourinterpretations and applicability of each code. Contrary to the famous statement “Great mindsthink alike,” our experience in qualitative coding suggests a new perspective. Student researcherKassy, highlights that “In our classes, we were paired with classmates, and collaborated in anattempt to come to a consensus of codes. Collaboration was essential, as it was evident that weall think differently when it comes to coding, even with the guidance of the codebook.” In ourcase, great minds think differently, but are collaboratively engaged and are receptive
engineers equipped to tackle complex 21st-century challenges.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and a founding co-editor-in-chief of Studies in Engineering Education. She holds a B.S. in chemical engineering and an M.A. in English from Virginia Tech and Ph.D. in English from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is PI or co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, teamwork, design, professional identity, and inclusion in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her research explores examines the ways in which engineering education supports students’ professional
was carefully designed to help first-year students achieve success in the programregardless of the specific engineering major they select in their second year. Therefore, thecourse includes themes centered on several design-and-build projects with the following programobjectives: 1. Provide students with the opportunity to experience engineering as an evolving, creative, and interdisciplinary career that impacts global society and daily life. 2. Provide students with the opportunity to develop process-driven problem-solving skills that recognize multiple alternatives and apply critical thinking to identify an effective solution. 3. Provide students with the opportunity to integrate math & science in an engineering context. 4