, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Geoffrey L. Herman is a visiting assistant professor with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in En- gineering Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a research assistant professor with the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer En- gineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, conceptual
been concerned with increasing ourenrollment while retaining program quality. This led to the interest in developing a web-basedcurriculum that could reach prospective students outside our traditional service area. We havehad considerable success in delivering ARET 212 Applied Project Management via our ownCART CMS and wanted to explore the possibility of using it more extensively throughout thecurriculum. This expansion of web-based delivery presents obvious and not so obviouschallenges particular to the delivery of an ARET Online curriculum. We are in the process ofcritically analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of such program delivery.2. ARET Online Admission RequirementsTo enter our program a student must be 21 years of age and
current curriculum?Another question that seems to be pertinent is how do students learn best? There is muchresearch and discussion on the topic, but most educators generally agree that studentslearn best anything that they experience themselves as well as normally do repetitively.Many engineering educators have homework, design projects, and mid-term exams, andmany times topics are tested again on a final exam. This process allows the student tofirst wrestle with the concept at their own pace in a homework assignment where theycan collaborate with others before being asked to test their skills within a timed eventsuch as an exam. Learning by doing is the primary basis behind the growth of project-based learning (PBL) opportunities.4 Some programs
/education/free-software/all, 2014[5] Stratasys, Inc., www.stratasys.com/industries/education, 2014[6] 3D Printing Systems, 3dprintingsystems.com/education/, 2014[7] Next Generation Sicence Standards, www.nextgenscience.org, 2014[8] DeBarger A., et al., Designing NGSS assessments to evaluate the efficacy of curriculum interventions, In Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment, Washington, DC. International Journal of Science Education, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 891-894. 2013.[9] Davis E., and Buxton C., Curriculum Materials., 2013[10] Accelerate Learning, http://www.acceleratelearning.com/ngss.html, 2014[11] Silk E.M., et al., Designing Technology Activities that Teach Mathematics, 2010[12] Bailey F., Moar M., The Veretx Project
equipment suppliers include theacquisition and installation costs only. The operating and maintenance costs are not included.Impact on CurriculumThe impact of the systems engineering approach to small satellite testing and the potentialchanges in the curriculum are discussed below.Students will be guided to follow a basic system engineering approach to the overall project oftesting small satellites. Each satellite to be tested has common and special characteristics andrequirements that need to be identified and addressed in the process of generating the testingprocedures, scheduling and implementation.The approach discussed here follows the engineering practices and basic procedures establishedby INCOSE (International Council of Systems Engineering
mechanical,electrical, or industrial engineering degrees. Upon further explanation, the alumni clarified thatwhat they meant by this statement was that they did not use their disciplinary expertise. Theydid, however, emphasize the ways that the abilities they acquired in their engineering education-- namely technical problem solving, critical thinking, communication, and teamwork -- werewhat allowed them to succeed as engineers. To the surprise of our current students, the panelistsall agreed that one of the most useful classes they took was public speaking. Recognizing theneed for a broad curriculum that reflects the diversity of skills engineers require, including thosewithin the liberal arts, we have started a new major in General Engineering. In
engineering curriculum of the schoolof electrical and electronic engineering at the University of Adelaide. The main goal of this designwas to refresh the technical content of the program and ensure that learning outcomes are alignedto Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competency standards, the evolving needs of employers, andresearch education outcomes. The need to transform from the entrenched content-based approachto a pervasive outcomes-oriented approach has influenced the working group to utilize a structuredtop-down design approach. Moreover, this process has to assure meeting the system flow where thelearning purposes at the degree level (program learning outcomes) are accomplished by theincorporated and aligned interactions of the learning purposes
laboratory.To assess the effectiveness of the laboratory experiment a student survey was administered andresults indicate the new laboratory experiment has been successful in improving studentengagement.IntroductionThis paper describes a set of laboratory modules based on a low-cost toaster oven that studentsencounter throughout the mechanical engineering curriculum. The toaster oven project is part ofa larger effort by several mechanical engineering faculty to enhance the entire laboratorycurriculum. The laboratory curriculum enhancement includes two facets: 1. Modernize and improve the technical skills acquired by students in the laboratory courses. 2. Thoughtfully incorporate developmental skills (soft skills like teamwork
one of the core courseelements: Agile Methodology, Effective Communication, Digital Design, MechanicalAutomation, or Electrical Automation. The students prepared the content for their sessions aweek prior to their demonstration, with materials provided by the instructors in addition to otherstudent-sourced resources. The content was delivered with active exercises as constructed by thestudents and included games, quizzes, tutorials on software and standard lecture. It was hopedthis generational learning could direct a suitable platform for approach to the concepts withrespect to the varied background of the student cohort. Sticky-note clustering was performed inmainly the ideation and project planning lectures to help explore ideas in both
the assessment, design, development, delivery and evaluation of large nationwide curricula. Page 12.554.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Distance learning in the graduate-level ocean engineering curriculumAbstractVirginia Tech is an established leader in distance learning with 85% of departments offeringsome form of electronic courses 1 . The graduate level Ocean Engineering curriculum is fullyavailable to off-campus students, thus allowing professionals anywhere in the world to earn anMS degree. The MS in Ocean Engineering was the first program in engineering at
33Handbook of Industrial Engineering .In conclusion, industrial engineering curriculum needs industrial ecology integration so thatindustrial engineering students learn to consider the broader impacts and implications of theirproduct, process, and system designs. Teaching industrial engineering students to consider lifecycle environmental impacts will enable them to design and manage more environmentally friendlysystems.Bibliography1. Norberg-Bohm, V., et al. International Comparisons of Environmental Hazards: Development andEvaluation of a Method for Linking Environmental Data with the Strategic Debate Management Priorities forRisk Management. CSIA Discussion Paper 92-09. (Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University,Cambridge, MA, 1992).2
) study of the literature on engineering education, including reviewingresults from the engineering education coalitions, (3) seeking advice from a wide range ofexperts, and (4) comparing and contrasting alternatives for designing the curriculum. In Page 6.153.11 Degrees will be offered in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Engineering andEngineering. The latter category will contain general topics, probably including Biomedical Engineering Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exhibition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationgeneral
Page 13.951.42, a project relates to other objects, including people, organizations, products and events. Inaddition to the examples of Table 1, there are several relevant ontology efforts. Ontologies wereused for handling complicated construction management applications24, for improvingcommunication between educational repositories8 and for describing IT education goals14.However to our knowledge, ontologies have not yet been applied to describe, analyze andimprove curricula and practices in engineering education.Bardet et al.6 proposed an ontology for describing the experimental processes in earthquakeengineering in response to the needs of the George E. Brown Jr. Network for EarthquakeEngineering Simulation (NEES) of the National Science
AC 2008-1999: INDUSTRY EXPECTATIONS FROM NEW CONSTRUCTIONENGINEERS AND MANAGERS: CURRICULUM IMPROVEMENTGouranga Banik, Southern Polytechnic State University Page 13.741.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Industry Expectations from New Construction Engineers and Managers: Curriculum Improvement Gouranga C. Banik, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor School of Architecture, Civil Engineering Technology & Construction Southern Polytechnic State University Marietta, GA
division courses. Several changes were made tospecific courses to improve students’ integrative understanding of calculus and the physicalsciences, and to emphasize applications to engineering. Various data have been collected toinvestigate the impact the reforms had on student learning, as well as to gain insight intostudents’ experiences during their undergraduate engineering career. Interviews were conductedwith engineering students and faculty to garner feedback about integration efforts and studentsperceptions of the curriculum. This paper describes the interview project and outlines theinterpretive framework we established for the analysis of the interview data. Initial analysissuggests that students have difficulty understanding lower
the innovation-decision process?,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 020104, 2012.[10] R. A. Mansbach, G. L. Herman, M. West, D. R. Trinkle, A. Ferguson, and A. Schleife, “Work in progress: Computational modules for the matse undergrad-uate curriculum,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[11] K. Thornton et al., “Summer school for integrated computational materials education.” https://icmed. engin.umich.edu/, 2017.[12] P. Giannozzi et al., “QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simu- lations of materials,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 21, no. 39, p. 395502 (19pp), 2009.[13] S. Plimpton, “Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics,” J
. Page 25.409.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Designing and Implementing an Online Offering of a Nuclear Engineering CurriculumAbstractVirginia Tech restarted its nuclear engineering program in the Fall of 2007. The program hasgrown from a class enrollment of 60 students to about 200 students in 2009. When we restartedour program, we took the opportunity to be innovative and find ways to differentiate our programfrom other programs nationwide. In addition, we targeted the nuclear industry within our state byoffering the majority of our graduate nuclear engineering curriculum via distance learning. Weinitially started with live video teleconferencing to remote
accreditation by havinga final year capstone design course as documented by Thigpen et al [3] that tasks students toexecute a project in which most of the principles that were taught and learnt in the curriculum areapplied in the realization of a product that is designed, built, and tested. The overall goal of thecurriculum in mechanical engineering should be to prepare students to pursue differentprofessional endeavors from working with an engineering company, working on their own, orpursuing advanced studies to innovate new products or improve on existing products. In allcases, students must be taught at a level that ensures their understanding and application of thefundamental principles of science and engineering. The formula approach to teaching
Programming course taught at The University of Texas at Austin.Mitch Pryor, University of Texas, Austin Mitch Pryor graduated with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Methodist University in 1993. After teaching high school for two years, he completed his PhD in 2002 at the University of Texas (UT) at Austin where he now works as a Research Scientist in the Robotics Research Group and teaches in the Mechanical Engineering Department. As a researcher, his efforts have focused on software development for robotic systems. Recent research efforts include human/robot interactions, mobile manipulation, and robotic workcell integration including projects funded by NSF, DARPA, DOE/NNSA
Session 2793 Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated Curriculum Management R. Bruce Floersheim, Margaret Bailey and Stephen J. Ressler United States Military Academy at West PointAbstractAs we enter the 21st Century in engineering education, a common desire exists toimprove curriculum structure, integration and assessment. Much has been written anddiscussed in workshops and professional journals concerning the top-down process forassessing and/or revising a program curriculum. Institutions are finally realizing theycannot afford to rely solely upon the senior capstone design experience to be theintegrator of all
experience thedifficulties of dealing with changing requirements, project creep, variability of input, choosingappropriate analytical methods and tools, etc. and putting it all into practice. They also are exposed tothe mathematical nature of problems in the classroom in courses dealing with statistics, modeling andsimulation, operations management, big data and informatics.Finally, in discussions with the ISE Advisory Board and the ISE senior classes since implementation,it was clear that the above curriculum was well received. Feedback was overwhelmingly positivefrom the Advisory Board, employers, and Senior Exit Surveys. Stevens is not allowing publicationof specific ISE data at this time since the number of graduates within the ISE program is
AC 2011-2247: INCREASING STEM ACCESSIBILITY FOR STUDENTSWITH COGNITIVE DISABILITIES VIA INTERACTIVE CURRICULUMEthan E Danahy, Tufts University Ethan Danahy received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science in 2000 and 2002, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering in 2007, all at Tufts University, Medford, MA. Within the School of Engineering at Tufts University, he is currently a Research Assistant Professor in the Depart- ment of Computer Science. Additionally, he acts as the Engineering Research Program Director at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO), where he manages educational technology de- velopment projects while researching innovative and interactive techniques
, are made available to the department curriculum committees aftereach work period for evaluation. The Agricultural Engineering Curriculum Committee at ISU hasused this feedback to develop curriculum plans and changes. Feedback from co-op/intern studentfocus groups has been used to clarify the competency data received from the Engineering CareerServices office. This feedback, along with other sources of feedback, has been very helpful to thecurriculum committee in assessing our current program.Mentkowski et al. (2000)4 addresses this type of initiative for a curriculum group. “ Forcurriculum designers – any faculty or staff group who designs learning for students – theessential question is, “What elements of a curriculum could make a difference
, Optimizing Student Learning, and Leadership Skills. Dr. Ater Kranov is also adjunct associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University. Page 24.933.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 NEW MECHATRONICS CURRICULUM ON MULTI-AXIS INDUSTRIAL MOTION CONTROLAbstractOver the past couple decades, mechanical engineering programs have made significant advancesin developing educational materials and laboratory exercises in controls and mechatronics1-4.However, there is an important gap remaining between the
thirty years later, the then President of the Institution of Electrical Engineers E.J. Midwinter said of his approach to the curriculum that it was based on generalizedsystems and “It suggests common ground between engineering and most otherdisciplines. That engineering, science and law share common ground comes as nosurprise but what about engineering and the liberal arts or the social sciences? Yet manyof engineering’s greatest failures have come from the failure to take into account thehuman dimension.” 11While there may be common ground between engineering and law the two subjectsapproach “evidence” in different ways as American engineering educator Woodson madeclear in his treatise on engineering design.12 (See exhibit 1). To all intent and
Educations,” in Handbook of STEM Faculty Development, 2022.[9] I. Villanueva et al., “What does hidden curriculum in engineering look like and how can it be explored?,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[10] R. J. Downey and I. Villanueva Alarcón, “Reading the world of engineering education: An exploration of active and passive hidden curriculum awareness,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[11] I. Villanueva, L. Gelles, K. Youmans, and M. di Stefano, “Exploring how engineering faculty, graduates, and undergraduates evaluate hidden curriculum via emotions and self-efficacy,” in Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association, 2018. doi: 10.1109
Session 3650 Why Should Cases be Integrated into the Engineering Technology Curriculum? James L. Barrott Chattanooga State Technical Community CollegeI. IntroductionThe case method of instruction was first introduced in 1870 at the Harvard Law School. In 1908,the Harvard Graduate School of Administration was formed and its curriculum was based onpractical case studies. Today, medicine, human behavioral sciences, education, law, business,applied physical sciences, and engineering faculty successfully use the case method ofinstruction. The
allocations among the knowledge and skill areas can be illustratedgraphically.A second hierarchical structure called the Augmented Syllabus Method divides thecurriculum into four parts: Foundation Materials, Defining Elements, ComplementaryElements, and Integrating Experiences. This approach to curriculum analysis and renewal isdescribed in considerable detail in Beasley, et al.3 Augmented syllabus analysis documents thedegree to which course-level goals are currently being accomplished. It provides detailedtopical coverage, and identifies the fundamental principles included in each topic presentation.It also shows the level of accomplishment expected by the student, the prerequisite knowledgefor each topic, the anticipated subsequent use of topics
. “Modernizing the Curriculum for the Department of Electrical Engineering of Kabul University.” SAEConference, Kabul University, 17-18 December, 2005.6. Brewer, Eric. “A Scalable Enabling IT Infrastructure for Developing Regions,”7. Conference Transcription. “Conference on Strategic Planning of Higher Education for Afghanistan.” IndianaUniversity, Bloomington, IA, 2002.8. E. Ghashghai, R. Lewis. “Issues Affecting Internet Use in Afghanistan and Developing Countries in the MiddleEast.” RAND Issue Paper 2002.9. Jones, Russel. “Engineering Capacity Building in Developing Countries.” American Society for EngineeringEducation, 2007.10. Ministry of Higher Education, Afghanistan and International Institute for Educational Planning UNESCO,“Strategic Action
. Green’s research interests include entrepreneurship education and the psychology of entrepreneurship. Prior to Mtech, he provided business development and product management to WaveCrest Laboratories (acquired by Magna Interna- tional, NYSE: MGA), an innovative start-up in next-generation electric and hybrid-electric propulsion and drive systems. At Cyveillance (acquired by QinetiQ, LSE: QQ.L), he served in operations, client service, and product development roles for this software start-up and world leader in cyber intelligence and intelligence-led security. While at Booz Allen Hamilton, he provided technical and programmatic direction to the DARPA Special Projects Office (SPO), Army Research Lab (ARL), Defense