you? b. How do you see yourself involved in these? c. Do you see engineering playing a role in addressing these issues? 8. Does your sense of social responsibility move you towards or away from an engineering career? 9. Is there one issue that you feel particularly passionate about trying to address? Why? a. Can your engineering abilities help with this goal? b. Can other majors in engineering better help you to reach this goal? 10. How confident are you that you will get an engineering degree and practice engineering after graduation? What are your main concerns? 11. Is there
nuggets of wisdom like, “Spec sheets always lie,” and “There is no suchthing as a problem, only challenges.”A well planned and executed student project should be finished, tested, and working at the end ofthe semester, by the expected date of completion. But, as any faculty member will tell you,things do not always go according to plan. The shortfalls are often attributed to unforeseencircumstances, personal failures, or simply running out of time.Risks and the management of risks are part of the capstone experience. But traditionalapproaches to risk management do not address the most common kind of risk found in studentcapstone projects, namely, risk to the schedule.In this paper, we propose an approach to schedule risk management, based on
perfectionism includes sociallyprescribed perfectionism and excessive concerns over mistakes. Maladaptive perfectionism canbe associated with procrastination while adaptive perfectionism contributes to the timelycompletion of tasks.Normal vs. NeuroticPerfectionism can be classified as normal or neurotic. Normal perfectionism refers to striving forreasonable and realistic standards which leads to a sense of self-satisfaction and enhanced self-esteem. Neurotic perfectionism refers to an inclination to assess excessively high standardswhich are motivated by fear of failure and concerns over others’ disappointments.Looking at these characteristics of perfectionism, we can see overlapping features such asavoiding negative outcomes, concerns over mistakes
produce scientists, engineers, and secondary scienceand mathematics educators who are experienced in developing and implementing authenticeducational practices into current secondary science and mathematics curricula and 2) to design,develop, and implement hands-on activities and technology-driven inquiry-based projects, whichrelate to the students’ community issues, as vehicles to authentically teach science, technology,engineering and math (STEM skills). The partnerships with the schools created the context andsetting for accomplishing these goals. Fellows were initially trained in lesson planning andteaching techniques, and then were paired with cooperating teachers in the participating schoolsto develop and implement the hands-on
-scientific issues and concerns for the activity of science is embedded in amuch deeper realm of human experience” [32]. It seems that this is precisely the same thing that Page 25.1039.7Bucciarelli is saying about engineering and engineering design. “[…] in the big world […]attributing value or quality to a technical product is always a social process […] to think thattechnology „has a life of its own‟ may be in order in the object-world of replicating automaton,but it is romantic nonsense to think and talk this way out here in the big world. […]” The visionof technology that sets itself apart and aloof, distant and seemingly out of reach of
Month of the YearIII. Our ProgramThe WPI Global Business Perspective Program (GBPP) strives to enhance the knowledge ofglobal issues particularly in Latin America through an approach directed toward students,faculty, and the business sector in New England. 1. Faculty-focus – Under the umbrella of this program, three professors from WPI have been able to study in Latin America. Prior to their trips, each professor did research on specific sectors and established contacts overseas. The information that has been gathered and attained through the meetings in Latin America have been incorporated into undergraduate and graduate course modules and student projects. Thus, the transfer of the
of Civil Engineering and Coastal Engineering. He has published and presented more than 300 refereed publications. He has received numerous awards including a Senior Fulbright scholarship award, teaching awards, best paper awards, community service awards, and admis- sion as an Eminent Engineer into Tau Beta Pi. His research on passive radon-resistant new residential building construction adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of nu- merous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses
through Dasein – a construct meant to engage the philosophicalcommunity with the notion that humanity is at a nexus of object and subject. When the engineerin our American institutions has been treated only as a byproduct for a specific purpose – onethat cannot even construct new physical laws but only manipulate them – the engineer existencecomes into question. While previously I concerned myself with the notion of expanding the construct of theengineer’s place in society, I am more focused on expanding upon a few of Heidegger’sphilosophies here. Although I still feel that the question of how we prepare engineers to thinkphilosophically is a high priority for our field, the current state of affairs indicates that perhapspapers on highly
). Therefore, equity work at themacrolevel of contesting ideologies and dominant ways of knowing and being acknowledgesbarriers that foster inequities in engineering participation at the microlevel, making way for allstudents to rightfully participate (Calabrese Barton & Tan, 2018, 2019).The second application of this contestation concerns conceptualizing epistemologies ofengineering for learning. For this orientation towards engineering and practice, engineering ineducation can be leveraged to engage in social justice work. Morales-Doyle (2019) argues thatcurricula constitute spaces that can invite students to interrogate and critique macro-levelsystems, increase their knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues and enact change.Bazzul
issues will take time to change, understandably.In general, the overall goal of the project is on target. S-L integrated into core requiredcourses seems to be achieving the hoped-for results, so far. The numbers of courses,students, community partners, and faculty involved is encouraging; now the challenge isto improve the quality overall of S-L projects and therefore their impact on the students,faculty, and community.AcknowledgementThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, Grants EEC-0431925 and EEC-0530632. HP and National Instruments donated equipment to theproject. Thanks to Dwight Giles, Professor of Education, U Mass Boston, consultant;Cathy Burack and Alan Melchior of Brandeis, consultants; Tooch Van, former S
processing plant is nolonger operational, or that e-waste recyclers are burning cables to extract copper. According toMayo, this is “to help people view the familiar from a different vantage point” [11]. Our HESstudents learn to analyze and codify field research data and then share it with faculty andcommunities throughout the research process and later during research translation strategies(e.g., workshops) so all make sense of the data in new ways. From STS, our students learnconcepts related to the subjectivity and politics of data gathering, interpretation anddissemination [32-33] and how traditional practices of development attempt to cloud thissubjectivity and politics under the veil of objectivity in ways that benefit the status quo [23].For
. The sevenstudents and two high school teachers involved in the REU Site gained valuable experience indefense-oriented R&D, while the faculty supervisors started moving their research activities inthe direction of new federal funding opportunities.After spending the first week studying UAV platforms and their applications, the participantsdecided on buying a large model airplane kit rather than designing their own. In essence, aquarter-scale, single-engine, radio-controlled airplane kit was purchased and built by theparticipants. This large plane has a wingspan of approximately three meters, and the studentsdetermined empirically that it can lift scientific instrument payloads up to four kilograms inmass. All of the REU Site participants
[is] sensitive to cultural differences” (Chan andFishbein 2009: 6). Furthermore, it has been suggested that engineering students who plan toengage in sustainable development initiatives develop a set of global competencies (Lucena et al.2008) and move from being mere “technology advocates” to “Honest Brokers,” who researchand present a range of technical possibilities within the “broad contextual constraints of theproblem-setting” (Mitchell et al. 2004: 40).Engineering programs globally have responded to these calls for a shifting paradigm inengineering education by introducing innovative curricula that combines social andenvironmental concerns with economic and technological development (Ahrens and Zascerinska2012; Lucena and Schneider 2008
engineering pedagogy, technological literacy, and human- artifact interactions.Prof. P. Suresh C. Rao, Purdue University, West Lafayette Suresh Rao is the Rieth Distinguished Professor of ecological engineering in the School of Civil En- gineering at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue 13 years ago, Rao was on the faculty for 25 years at the University of Florida. His research and educational interest span a broad spectrum of trans-disciplinary themes at the intersection of how human societies alter natural landscapes, and how multitude of ecological adverse impacts cascade through complex coupled systems. He teaches multiple courses with emphasis on application of sustainability and resilience concepts to better
liked the enhanced security measures Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2025, American Society for Engineering Educationintroduced by the potential integration of an enclosed system and dual functionality as a doorto prevent gear from falling out of the vehicle. It was noted that the system includes a manualoperation to avoid power failures. Soldiers disliked the impractical ramp length needed to avoidsteep inclines and the fact that soldiers needed to exit the vehicle for operation, leaving themexposed to outside threats. They expressed concerns about resolution/maintenance time for ramp-related problems and compatibility issues with current EOD equipment setups.Survey
participants have an opportunity to interact and ask questionsof the African-American faculty at Georgia Tech. • FOCUS Professionals – This initiative is intended to expose young AfricanAmerican professionals to the advantages and benefits of formally furthering theireducation. The Professionals will experience a track similar to that of the Scholars wherethe emphasis will be placed on matriculation and retention issues for graduate program.The main difference is that the professionals will also interact extensively with the Officeof Continuing Education and Distance Learning, as that may be the vehicle that someProfessionals use to attend Georgia Tech as graduate students. This initiative is scheduledto be added to FOCUS 2004. FOCUS
with demanding coursework, making it challenging for students to findsuitable study abroad opportunities without falling behind in their academic progress. Concerns about delayed graduationdue to postponing engineering courses, credit transfer issues, or a mismatch in curriculum may dissuade engineeringstudents from participating in study abroad programs. Study abroad programs also may not offer the specific engineeringcourses required for students to stay on track with their degree requirements. Some study abroad programs may also havelanguage requirements, and engineering students may have limited language proficiency due to their focus on engineeringcurriculum. Second, engineering students may prioritize gaining practical experience through
, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Alyssa Miranda Boll, Colorado
have been exposed tothe significantly reformed Engage integrated first year curriculum3, fully implemented in1999, that a meaningful comparison study can be performed.In this study, a comparison of graduation success and MBTI distribution is made betweenthe approximately 1500 students who began engineering study just before theimplementation of our new first year curriculum, and the first 1500 students who enteredthe new curriculum. The most significant effect of this curriculum change was a 6%increase in graduation rate for entering students. The on-time completion of first yearrequirements for engineering students increased 15% when this curriculum wasintroduced, this early advantage tapering down to 6% as students progressed through
asconsultants in the eastern expansion. These appeared in the report as preliminary design optionsthey explored for expansion into the eastern region† and as mitigation strategies they suggestedto address potential concerns over constructing new power transmission infrastructure (see theStakeholder Awareness section above).Paternalism (Team Lilac)As suggested in a footnote of the Stakeholder Awareness section for Team Lilac above, some oftheir suggestions for mitigation strategies appeared lacking in care-ethical responsibility due to alack of cultural sensitivity. This can easily lead to paternalism, through which the engineerassumes too much responsibility and usurps the freedom of those they are attempting to help.While many of Team Lilac’s
and objective measures for teacher performance and the development of an environment oftrust, faculty teaching portfolio and emphasizing the teacher as a quality manager in the classroom. Thispaper describes in detail several issues involved in the development of a TQM approach in classrooms.Specifically, it elaborates on the ground work needed to implement such an approach, development of acommon shared vision for the course, the delivery methods to effectively carry out instructions and exercisesto enhance student involvement. The courses included are mechanism design and automotive chassis design.They are required courses in Mechanical Engineering at GMI for the machine design and automotivespecialties respectively.Introduction
versus Constructivism: Do We Need A New Philosophical Paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 1991. 39(3): p. 5-14.23. Richey, R., The pursuit of useable knowledge in instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1998. 46(4): p. 43-55.24. Spector, M.J. Teachers as Designers of Collaborative Distance Learning. in SITE99: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (10th). 1999. San Antonio, Texas.25. Spiro, R.J., et al., Knowledge Representation, Content Specification, and the Development of Skill in Situation-Specific Knowledge Assembly: Some Constructivist Issues as They Relate to Cognitive Flexibility Theory and Hypertext
DesignConsultant in RIT’s Teaching and Learning Services department, for her assistance in thedevelopment of the TEAK-TA Teaching Workshop.Bibliography1. ASME, "Vision 2030―Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education," American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York 2010.2. Felder, R., Brent, R. [2004], “The intellectual development of science and engineering students part 1. Models and challenges”, J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 269-277.3. Felder, R., Brent, R. [2004], “The intellectual development of science and engineering students part 2. Teaching to promote growth”, J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 279-291.4. DeBartolo, E., Zaczek, M., Hoffman, C. [2006], “Student-faculty partnerships”, Proc. Amer. Soc. for
fromexperts in a classroom setting. This belief is fostered by courses taught in this fashion at theuniversity level and by how most students have been taught using passive methods throughouttheir K-12 education.ConclusionsThis study was conducted to validate a new instrument and to provide an assessment of theengineering epistemological beliefs held by first-year engineering students. Four factors wereincluded and evaluated concerning students’ beliefs regarding the nature of engineeringknowledge – certainty of knowledge and the simplicity of knowledge – and the nature ofengineering knowing – source of knowing and the justification for knowing. Factor analysis wasused to confirm the four factors through 13 items. The four factors were then used to
design project has allowed them to be successful(or even gain) their current position. Page 23.269.8ConclusionsWhile alumni found benefit to working on an international design project as seniors, theyrecognized a number of drawbacks from their inability to conduct a site visit. Alumni thought asite visit would not only benefit the ultimate design of their project, but would enhance theireducation and understanding of non-technical issues concerning engineering on internationalprojects. Finally, while they admitted the cost factor as a barrier to the site visit, they did notfind that prohibitive and offered a number of suggestions to overcome
package!1 Some common CAD topicsinclude: (1) 2D sketching, including use of splines, (2) geometric constraints, (3) extrusions andrevolved 3D features (bosses & cuts), (4) patterning, (5) filleting, (6) shelling, (7) ribs, (8) partconfigurations, (9) sweeping & lofting, (10) basic assembly modeling, (11) assemblyconfigurations, (12) traditional drawings, (13) viewing, and (14) use of color. Aside from thedemonstration of specific CAD concepts, perhaps the most important issue concerns the range ofprojects considered, which is consistent with the ubiquitous nature of CAD in industry today.From a pedagogy point of view this is one the most important concepts learned in the course; theentire class benefits from seeing other projects
Session 2457 Using Project Management Skills to Improve the Outcome of Student Projects Charlie P. Edmonson Donna C.S. Summers University of DaytonAbstractDoes your course require the completion of a project? Do your students put off theirproject assignments until the end of the term? Do they cram all their efforts into a veryshort period of time only to finish with an inferior project? Do you have to deal withteamwork and cooperation issues? If you can answer yes to any of these questions, thenyou may
his bachelor’s degree at the University of San Diego (USD) in Integrated Engineering. Assimilating to the culture of this predominantly white institution left Peters questioning if he could be an engineer and multiracial. Fortunately, the liberal arts emphasis of the school combined with research work in Engineering Education helped him to see his worth as a multiracial engineer. Peters’ current goal is to obtain a doctorate in Engineering Education at Purdue University to challenge the embedded settler colonialism of engineering and engineering education.Dr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University Alice Pawley (she/hers) is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in
issues with me. Same with my managers at my workplaces... They did not understand the processes themselves, but never let that be a deterrent to helping me navigate those successfully.Programs that are not tailored to support international students generally, and internationalwomen of color specifically, can impact students’ experience significantly. Literacy education isnot a discipline that intakes the majority of international students, unlike STEM disciplines.Hence, author 2 had to navigate a very different environment related to immigration. I was the first international student in my department, hence, my department had no idea on how to support me through the academic program. International women and faculty
” Session 1408these issues, we created a new learning experience in a technical writing course that sought tocreate a more meaningful and interactive learning experience through the implementation of casestudy pedagogy with an online database.ABET-aligned CompetenciesAs ABET standards become a primary concern for Engineering departments nationwide, it isimportant to understand how these standards will be enacted within the classroom. The Collegeof Engineering at Iowa State University (ISU) has undertaken a new initiative to help address theABET 2000 Outcomes. ABET Criterion 3, Program Outcomes and Assessment, states,“Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have…” and presents a list ofeleven specific outcomes, now well known as