Imperative in Higher Education,” Cent. Stud. High. Educ. Res. Occas. Pap. Ser., no. CSHE.11.10, p. 7, Sep. 2010.[2] R. Rousseau, L. Zhang, and X. Hu, “Knowledge Integration: Its Meaning and Measurement,” in Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram, Eds., in Springer Handbooks. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 69–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_3.[3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Integrating Serious Illness Care into Primary Care Delivery: Proceedings of a Workshop. 2022. doi: 10.17226/26411.[4] N. Fields et al., “How Can Interdisciplinary Teams Leverage Emerging Technologies to Respond to Transportation Infrastructure Needs
students' motivation,problem-solving skills, and creative thinking [1], [2]. PBL provides students the opportunity to apply theirknowledge to solve a real-world challenging problem [3]. PBL is usually achieved when students work inteams. The capacity to work effectively in teams is one of the highly demanded skills in the workforce[4]. This need has been recognized by both the academics and program accreditation entities like ABETwhich listed the ability to function in multidisciplinary team as an outcome that engineering graduatesmust have practiced and a skill that they have acquired by the time they graduate [4]. While academics tryto educate students on the essentials of team dynamics and promote a collaborative environment,challenges and
] M. Andersson and M. Weurlander, “Peer review of laboratory reports for engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 417–428, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1538322.[26] A. Saterbak and T. Volz, “ Implementing Calibrated Peer Review To Enhance Technical Critiquing Skills In A Bioengineering Laboratory,” in American Society of Engineering Education, Philadelphia, 2008.[27] Canvas LMS, “How do I use peer review assignments in a course?” Accessed: Mar. 31, 2024. [Online]. Available: How do I use peer review assignments in a course?[28] A. Nichols, “Using Calibrated Peer Review As A Teaching Tool For Structural Technology In Architecture,” in American
]. Art history, symbolism and legends. Accessed Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available:http://artelisaart.blogspot.com/2012_03_25_archive.html[3] S. H. Lekson, “The idea of the kiva in Anasazi archaeology.” Kiva, 53(3), 213-234, 1988,doi: 10.1080/00231940.1988.11758095[4] “Estufa.” Oxford English Dictionary. Accessed Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.oed.com/dictionary/estufa_n?tab=meaning_and_use#5279689[5] A.F. Aveni, ed. “Archaeoastronomy in the New World. American Primitive Astronomy.”Proceedings of an International Conference. Held at Oxford University, September 1981.Cambridge University Press, 1982.[6] A.F. Aveni, ed. “Archaeoastronomy in the Pre-Columbian America.” University of TexasPress, 1975[7] G. Sprinkle and M. Zeilik
approach to teaching software engineering,” in ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE TS), Mar. 2024.[26] G. Kulczycki and S. Atkinson, “Why educators need to team with industry professionals in software development education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. ASEE Conferences, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31243[27] G. V. Wilson, “What should computer scientists teach to physical scientists and engineers?” IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 46–65, 1996.[28] G. Wilson, D. A. Aruliah, C. T. Brown, N. P. C. Hong, M. Davis, R. T. Guy, S. H. D. Haddock, K. D. Huff, I. M. Mitchell, M. D. Plumbley, B. Waugh, E. P. White, and P. Wilson, “Best practices for
is linked to worksheet 3.Figure 4. Worksheet 4 – Cost per gross square foot by use group and construction type [14]. The Building Valuation Data is created by the International Code Council to assist building departments to calculate the cost of permit fee from permit sets submitted for review. The introduction notes [14] “The
of the National Science Foundation.References[1] F. Zhou, H.-L. Duh and M. Billinghurst, "Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR," in 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2008.[2] R. Palmarini, J. A. Erkoyuncu, R. Roy and H. Torabmostaedi, "A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance," Robotiucs and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, vol. 49, pp. 215-228, 2018.[3] J. Jetter, J. Eimecke and A. Rese, "Augmented reality tools for industrial applications: What are potential key performance indicators and who benefits?," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 87, pp. 18-33, 2018.[4] A. Blaga, C. Militaru, A.-D
of the program was on the completion of a technological project, a second focalpoint was the dynamics of working in a small group that involves diverse members. Eachstudent was awarded four credits for the technical portion of the course and another threecredits for the multicultural aspects of the course. To receive credit for the multiculturalportion of the course each student was required to maintain a journal of all theirexperiences during the program and submit that along with a formal report on Malaysianculture. This paper provides the preliminary investigation of challenges and achievementsin introducing such a technology study abroad program.IntroductionThe expansion of university programs to include international experience has been
$88 billion dollars’ worth of damages in the tumultuous period [1]. The United NationsHuman Refugee Agency estimates that over 1 million Iraqis are living in protracted situations andover 2 million remain internally displaced [2]. Yet, the nation has been on a steady path towardreclamation, reformation, and rebuilding of its historical, cultural, and social infrastructure [3].Education has an important role to play in supporting a country’s economic recovery after yearsof conflict and instability[4], a fact that is not lost to citizens of the republic [5]. Particularly, highereducation has a critical role in providing career development opportunities that translate intosuccessful integration in community development in both stable and
learning.References:[1] P.D. Rogers and C.C. Martin, C.D. (2019). “Using an inverted classroom approach to promote active learning in construction management and engineering courses,” 55th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. 2019, Associated Schools of Construction 2019.[2] M.J. Lage, G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia, M., “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. 2000.[3] S. McCallum, J. Schultz, K. Sellke, and J. Spartz, “An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college academic involvement
computer games: a capstone course for undergraduate computer science education. In Proceedings of 31st SIGCSE Technical Symposium (Austin, TX, March 2000), ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000, 260-264.[3] G. Pleva, “Game programming and the myth of child’s play,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 20 2 (December 2004), 125-136.[4] L. Samavedham, and K. Ragupathi, “Facilitating 21st century skills in engineering students,” The Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. XXVI No. 1, 2012, pp.38-49.[5] B.R. Maxim, S. Acharya, S. Brunvand, and M. Kessentini, “WIP: Introducing active learning in a software engineering course,” Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, OH, June
practice. The details of the methodology are shown in Figure 1. Stage I - Planning the review Phase 0 Identification of the need for a review Phase 1 Preparation of a proposal for a review Phase 2 Development of a review protocol Stage II - Conducting a review Phase 3 Identification of research Phase 4 Selection of studies Phase 5 Study quality assessment Phase 6 Data extraction and monitoring progress Phase 7 Data synthesis Stage III - Reporting and dissemination Phase 8 The report and recommendations
2multidisciplinary outcomes appropriate to a specific program [9]. A second major challengeconcerns the time and resources required of departments to design and implement curricularenhancements without burdening students or faculty with unsustainable course or workloads [1].Project-based learning (PBL) is a teaching approach that addresses many of the noteddeficiencies in the current engineering education model while enhancing, rather than competingwith, technical content [3]. Literature on PBL articulates a variety of educational benefitsapplicable to the desired professional formation of engineering students [1], [2], [3], [5].Notably, project-based learning: Requires students to connect knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines to address
advertising was focused on three regions of the U.S. – East, Mid-West, andWest for 2-year and 4-year institution faculty. Some participants were also recruited from thehigh school technical teaching population. It was planned to teach 20 faculty in each regionthrough 3-days of training. One hundred eighty applications were received to participate in thetraining. Follow-up with these faculty found 60 to be committed to the time restraints of theproject faculty. Three, 3-day, workshops were planned. These occurred in June and July. Therewere some faulty who were outside their own specific region, e.g., Mid-West, who participatedin the professional development session in another region, since distance was not a factor forparticipation. The only
Consortium of Engineering Institution (LACCEI) as a regional Vice-President, and in the International and Minority Divisions of ASEE.Maria M. Larrondo Petrie, Florida Atlantic University María M. Larrondo Petrie has over 20 years of experience in higher education. Presently she is Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, and Associate Dean for Academic and International Affairs for the College of Engineering at Florida Atlantic University. In the past, she has served as: President and Executive Council member of the Upsilon Pi Epsilon Honor Society for the Computing and Information Disciplines, and on the Education Board of ACM SIGGRAPH. Currently she serves as Executive Vice President and as
AC 2010-433: COLLABORATIVE TOOLS FOR GLOBAL DESIGN PROJECTMANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY OF AN ACADEMIC EXPERIENCEIvan Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State. His interests are in engineering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International Division of the American Society for
professional skills related courses in their curricula. These include 3% of EM and 10%of ME programs. Another remarkable finding is that although, on average, one course is offered per eachcategory for EM programs, ME programs offer either more options for courses in each categoryfor professional skills or require more than one course per category. The analysis shows that there is still a low percentage of engineering programs that offerformal courses on professional skills, or which include these skills in other technical-orientedcourses. Similarly, a low variety of options/courses is available to target specific categories ofprofessional skills. Because all analyzed programs are ABET accredited, they are required toassess and report
Lab [DEL] at Stanford University. The participant group had a diverse set of educational and professional backgrounds and included undergraduates (N=3), graduate students and postdoctoral scholars (N=4), visiting student researchers (N=5), academic staff (N=1), and experienced faculty members (N=3). As a part of the session, the participants were asked to reflect and respond to two questions: 1) As an instructor, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you use to create a more inclusive and equitable classroom (i.e., to help students feel like they belong and are supported)? 2) As a student, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you wish your instructors used to create a better
selected the international collaborative project, the main theme of whichwas “Bus Transportation Systems in the 21st Century”. The divisions of the studentswere Mechanical Engineering, Architecture, and Information & Computer Science. Theteams independently worked on different bus transportation/urban transportationsystems, focusing on their themes of interests.A poster session was held at the end of the winter term. Award-winning posters wereselected by judging the design solutions for distinctiveness and creativity. Postersproduced by design teams of SP and RHIT were also exhibited together with thoseproduced by KIT teams at the poster session.(2) Students of Singapore PolytechnicStudents of Singapore Polytechnic are generally between 17 to
participants to reflect on their leadership experiences over the pandemic years andintroduced the concepts of positive emotions and gratitude. Sessions two and three occurred infall of 2022, focusing on generalized reciprocity, positive energizers, and high-qualityconnections. Sessions four and five, which occurred in the winter and spring of 2023, unpackedthe fundamental state of leadership–a psychological state in which leaders are other-focused,results-centered, internally directed, and externally open. Related concepts were empathy,purpose-finding, core values, and growth mindset. Following the news of the dean’s transition toa provost role at another institution, the season finale addressed strategies for leading throughtransitions and leveraging
developed systems using automatic assessment (computer based assessments) using questions generated by algorithms and integrated with LMS systems.Dr. Maria M. Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Maria Larrondo Petrie has a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering and is a Professor and Associate Dean of International Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computer Science of Florida Atlantic University. She is the Executive Director of LACCEI (Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions) and serves as an officer of the International Division of ASEE (American Society of Engi- neering Institutions), a member of the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society and a member of the IEEE
TeachingTo implement the hands-on, inexpensive experimentation in STEM online learning suggested by[16], the instructors chose the 3E model for best practices. Expectations, Experimentation, andEngagement make up the 3E model. The three areas of knowledge—cognitive, psychomotor, andeffective—must be considered in the laboratory learning objectives and expectancies. Throughlab tasks that actively engage students in scientific investigations, experimentation aims tosupport the development of the necessary technical and critical thinking abilities. For the ECPimplementation at Morgan State University, the inexpensive portable device used is the M1Kshown in Figure 3. Synchronous technologies must be employed in the online environment tohelp students
workshop. Before the convening, teams completed apreliminary version of their DEI Strategies Plan, identifying plans to address the proposedchanges to ABET Criteria 5 and 6. In addition, the teams conducted an internal audit of theresources that were available at their institutions to promote DEI efforts. Throughout theworkshop, teams had the opportunity to develop their plans. During two sessions, teams werepaired with other teams to review and discuss one another’s DEI Strategy Plan. The detailedSummit agenda is available at: https://www.engr.psu.edu/equity-inclusion/dei-summit-22.aspx.MethodsThe DEI Summit was a milestone event, not only for participating institutions but for all U.S.engineering institutions accredited by ABET. As the external
concrete bridges and in the development of damage detection techniques in structural systems based on Non Destructive Evaluation. He actively collaborated in the creation and development of the Monitoring Center for Intelligent Bridges and Structures, leading the analysis and structural evaluation of the systems. In the academic field, he has worked as a professor in the Civil Engi- neering career, in the area of structural engineering at the Instituto Tecnol´ogico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM) Campus Quer´etaro. He has directed research projects for undergraduate and master’s degree students. He has authored several technical publications of the Mexican Institute of Transporta- tion, extensive
argued that technical competence and leadership alone are not keys to project successoutcomes; team dynamics and personality composition are other indicators that synergisticallyaffect project outcomes. This paper explores the effective management of a large educationalSTEM program that includes multi-departmental projects by harmonizing team dynamics andpersonality strengths. In this study, the team members’ personalities were assessed using animpartial personality evaluation tool that employs the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).This study further examines the team’s dynamics under the spectrum of the members’perspectives, exploring how the team utilizes personality traits and team dynamics to effectivelyadminister a sizable STEM program
in studying or working abroad? ____2. After having heard the presentation, using the above scale, identify how interested are you in the following types of international programs and their duration: Type of program abroad: Duration of program abroad: ___study ___intersession (3 weeks in May) ___intern ___summer session ___service learning ___semester ___year3. Based on the above scale, what is your interest in each of the following regions: ___ Mexico, Central and South America ___ United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) ___ Western Europe
aforementioned IDI, based on Bennett’s Developmental Model ofIntercultural Sensitivity (DMIS) [11], can be used to evaluate where an individual falls on adevelopmental continuum [3]. The IDI has been used widely for research, training, andevaluation purposes in the international education field, including in large-scale national studieslike the Georgetown Consortium Project [12] and multiple engineering education studies [8-9].Another class of “hybrid” instruments purport to combine the compositional and developmentalapproaches. For instance, the Global Perspectives Inventory (GPI) is comprised of six scales thatcover three dimensions: cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal, i.e., “thinking, being, andrelating” [13-14]. These scales and dimensions
participatedexpressed appreciation. One of the challenges reported by author was technology transfer.Students were found reluctant in documenting their work until it is too late.Sulzbach [3] illustrated the importance of concrete canoe competition in enhancing engineeringeducation. The success of concrete canoe team was directly dependent on technical as well asoral and written communication skills. It was found that those students who participated inconcrete canoe competition enhanced technical knowledge and built a project managementstructure and leadership skills.Abramowitz [4] described an experiment in which students constructed and tested bridges out ofthe readily accessible material basswood. The study's objectives were to assess the viability ofusing
Wright School of Architecture (Taliesin West). Outside of the classroom, he is engaged with the Associated General Con- tractors of America (AGC), Massachusetts Chapter’s, Virtual Design and Construction Group. Dr. Cribbs has presented on both the national and international stages discussing topics related to modular and offsite construction techniques, BIM and other data-centric design/construction workflows, pedagogical models for training the future of the construction industry and research specific findings that are scalable to the industry at large. He is a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Accredited Profes- sional (AP) in the Building Design and Construction (BD+C), Interior Design and
be exposed to the following topics and concepts before theygraduate: 1. Structural failures during construction and why they occur. 2. The basic concepts of mechanics, including equilibrium, internal forces, and stresses. 3. Design codes and codes of standard practice. 4. Types and sources of loads. 5. Structural materials (concrete, masonry, steel, and wood) and their properties and behavior. 6. Concepts of structural stability with an emphasis on the susceptibility of structural components and systems to loss of stability and buckling during construction. 7. Load path (also referred to as load tracing). 8. Gravity load resisting systems and their components, including prefabricated, cast or built