’ 21st century skills such as collaboration and problem solving.Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student profes- sional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and engineering makerspaces.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State
examines logical consequences’ structured and rule-based query capabilitiesalongside word embeddings’ natural language processing abilities as paths toward creatingcomprehensive educational tools. Our implementation demonstrates how these complementaryapproaches enhance educational outcomes: students benefit from personalized learning pathwaysand clear prerequisite relationships, while instructors gain tools for curriculum optimization andadaptation to emerging technologies. Through representative use cases, we show how thesedistinct approaches provide robust frameworks that balance precise, logical reasoning withflexible natural language understanding, ultimately advancing aerospace engineering educationby serving both student and instructor
research paper explores how undergraduate engineering students utilize socialcapital through the resources of a cohort program. Presented are the emerging themes generatedfrom the data featuring descriptions of which parts of the cohort program were meaningful toundergraduate engineering students. This paper draws on social capital theory as an anti-deficitapproach to guide the development of educational systems that support historically excludedstudents leveraging, developing, and utilizing relationships. The 16 participants in this studywere in a four-year-long cohort and took part in focus groups at the end of each semester. Thiswork focuses on the first two focus groups, representing the participants' first year in theirengineering programs
Resourcefulness scored highest in Analytic and Reflectionscored lowest. Since Open-Mindedness refers to receptivity to new ideas and differentpossibilities, it makes sense that it correlates with Clout as it pertains to social status, confidence,and leadership. Open-Mindedness is vital to engineering because it signifies the drive totranscend one’s own assumptions, challenge the status quo with scientific inquiry, and generateinnovations that will expand disciplinary boundaries. Furthermore, Open-Mindedness isincreasingly important for a globalized world that relies on information technology and co-creation on various STEM initiatives [32]. Both Open-Mindedness and Clout require an abilityto manage diverse interests in a social setting. Visualizing might
study will look at how individual perceptions of STEM (with anemphasis on Physics) as a career option may influence academic and professionalpursuits. To that end, formal interviews with practicing professionals and college studentsfrom a range of disciplines will be used as a primary data collection tool. This paper willprovide a synthesis of the empirical data collected through these formal interviews.Factors that emerge from this synthesis as having a significant influence on one’sperception of STEM as a career choice will be further examined and discussed. Byfocusing on individual perceptions, this study aims to contribute to the existing empiricaldatabase of factors that influence career choice and perpetuate the gender gap in STEM-related
mentorship for womendoctoral students in engineering. Positive mentoring experiences are crucial for retaining andadvancing those who hold marginalized identities in STEM as it contributes to their persistence intheir field in a variety of ways. Researchers have emphasized the mutual benefits when graduatestudents can connect with mentors who share their values and lived experiences; however, thesevere underrepresentation of women contributes to the often-disproportionate burden ofmentorship placed on women faculty and faculty with other marginalized identities. Therefore, the intended aim of this work is to inform more inclusive mentoring strategies,expanding access to mentorship in engineering that is responsive to women’s needs. This
Rose-Hulman Ventures Outcomes from an Experiential Learning Program William A. Kline, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Engineering Management Thomas Mason, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Terre Haute, IndianaAbstractRose-Hulman Ventures (RHV) began in 1999 at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology as aunique program providing outstanding experiential learning opportunities for math, science, andengineering students. Funded by the Lilly Endowment
learning, the instructional team can “surf”the classroom to listen in on discussions, ask guided questions, and address questions and anymisconceptions. The second advantage of this design is that it allows switching between the“corporate space” and the “team space” organically. This switch takes place often throughout theclass time, especially when the teams report out information and feedback is provided in return.The goal was to examine how technology could be used to replicate this in-person TBLenvironment in the online classroom. Figure 1 shows the recreation of the active learningclassroom in the online space using Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Active Learning Classroom Virtual Active Learning Classroom Figure 1
engineering experience, especially within and across cultural boundaries. Through this research, she aims to inform the development and evaluation of these initiatives in a variety of contexts.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and
benefits: creative design for engineering students As Department Chair of Industrial Design, Prof. Laffitte meets with severalstudents each semester who come to his office wanting to transfer out of an engineeringprogram and into industrial design. They typically indicate that the engineeringcurriculum is not offering them enough opportunity for hands-on, creative application ofthe information they are learning. Some of these students possess the visual and spatialability, and sketching skills to succeed in industrial design. Those who gain admissionoften become some of our most outstanding design students, able to creatively apply arange of complex technologies. It is not unusual for them to mix the engineer’s strengthsin areas like CNC
exploring students’feedback on the lab. The results demonstrated significant improvements in students’ quantumcomputing knowledge (p < .001), medium-to-high engagement and perceived usability scores(M = 3.90, SD = 1.06), and no significant changes in attitude. This study introduces aninnovative learning tool for undergraduate quantum computing education and provides empiricalevidence supporting the effectiveness of the tool in enhancing QC learning.1 IntroductionQuantum computing (QC), or Quantum Information Science and Technology (QIST), is anemerging field grounded in the principles of quantum mechanics, offering the potential torevolutionize industries by addressing complex problems far more efficiently than classicalcomputers [1]. Over the
2006-1930: INTRODUCING PROJECT MANAGEMENT TO SENIOR CIVILENGINEERING STUDENTSPhilip Dunn, University of Maine Philip Dunn PE is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management Technology at the University of Maine in Orono. He holds master's degrees in business, public administration, and civil engineering. He is very involved with the Maine Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Maine Association of Engineers along with several civic groups in his community.Bryan Pearce, University of Maine-Orono Dr. Bryan Pearce has taught at the University of Maine since 1978. He is a graduate of MIT with graduate work at the University of Florida. In addition to his research
he joined the faculty at the Citadel. Dr. Greenburg’s research interests include modeling project networks, technical decision making and leadership. Dr. Greenburg earned is BA in History at The Citadel (1981), Masters in Management from the Naval Postgraduate School (1994), and his PhD in Business Administration (Man- agement of Engineering and Technology) from Northcentral University (2010). He is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP) by The Project Management Institute (PMI). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Meeting Industry Needs for Professional and Technical Skills With New Graduate DegreesThe role and latitude of the
engineering graduates will be expected to contribute towards both traditional and emerging technologies, and hence it is imperative that our undergraduate students, the future engineers, have design skills that transcend a basic understanding of fundamental concepts. Dym 9 states that “effective inquiry in design thinking includes both a convergent component of building up to asking deep reasoning questions by systematically asking lower-level, convergent questions, and a divergent component in which generative design questions are asked to create the concepts on which the convergent component can act”. The authors have introduced simple design-based learning activities in their Circuits I and II courses using the Analog
AC 2007-1158: TEACHING VISUAL DESIGN THINKINGJames Wronecki, East Tennessee State University James A. Wronecki is a designer/educator with diverse experience product and digital design medias. Mr. Wronecki currently serves an Assistant Professor of Digital Product Design within the Digital Media Program and Technology Department at East Tennessee State University. He received his Masters of Industrial Design from The University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pa. He has also taught as an Adjunct Professor at The University of the Arts, Philadelphia University, and The Art Institute of Atlanta
power systems, and completed his Ph. D. studies at Princeton.ROSE M. MARRARose M. Marra is an Assistant Professor in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies. Herprimary teaching areas include the assessment and evaluation of instructional innovations, instructional design anddevelopment, project management of instructional design experiences, and effective uses of technology for K-12teachers. Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Missouri in 2000, she worked as the Director ofEngineering Instructional Services in Penn State University’s College of Engineering. In this capacity, Dr. Marraworked with the college faculty to develop curricula, introduce effective uses of technology into engineeringclassrooms and
evaluation of the "ethics" outcome from EC 2000. The evaluationquestion probes the handling of proprietary information, licensed software, confidentiality,conflicts of interest, citation of sources, quotations, and copyrights. It also evaluates the extent towhich discussion of the impact of technology on society reflected recognition of the socialresponsibilities of scientists and engineers. The rubric is shown below, but data is not availableas of this writing. Our international experience is not necessarily designed to address ethicsissues but we will use this year’s analysis to assess the degree to which this ability may be anindirect outcome of the student experience
. This is particularly notable in transdisciplinary startups such as smartenergy and nanomedical technologies, where cross-disciplinary expertise is increasingly vital. Asa result, emerging entrepreneurs in these sectors often encounter challenges in accessingadequate support. These challenges persist in the 21st century, when U.S. innovation facesunprecedented competition for leadership. In 1960, U.S. research and development (R&D)spending for defense and private industries constituted approximately 69% of the global total(CRS, 2018). However, by 2016, the U.S. share of global R&D spending had dwindled to just28%, largely due to China's remarkable technological advancements. If this trajectory continues,China's R&D spending as a
to their career goals.On the other hand, the US system's broader education, with its focus on flexibility andexploration, might foster greater adaptability, innovation, and a wider range of career options.US graduates may be better equipped to navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing jobmarket and adapt to emerging technologies and industries. While both approaches have theirstrengths, the optimal choice may depend on individual learning styles, career aspirations, andthe specific demands of the engineering profession in different contexts.ConclusionThe UK and US engineering education systems, shaped by their unique historical, cultural, andsocietal contexts, offer valuable lessons for engineering educators worldwide. By
CLIVE L. DYM is Fletcher Jones Professor of Engineering Design and Director of the Center for DesignEducation at Harvey Mudd College. His primary interests are in engineering design and structuralmechanics. After receiving the PhD from Stanford University, Dr. Dym held appointments at the Universityat Buffalo; the Institute for Defense Analyses; Carnegie Mellon University; Bolt, Beranek and Newman; andthe University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He was also head of his department at UMass (1977–85) andchair of his department at Harvey Mudd (1999–2002). Dr. Dym has held visiting appointments at theTECHNION-Israel Institute of Technology, the Institute for Sound and Vibration Research at Southampton,Stanford, Xerox PARC, Carnegie Mellon
, he has worked in various sectors and private and public companies. He also has belonged to Colombian educational formal and informal settings as a pedagogy consultant at the Planetarium of Bogotá: Innovation, Science, and Technology instructor and consultant at the science and technology museum Maloka, and secondary school teacher in Chemistry. As part of his research in Spanish, he has explored Colombian chemical engineers’ social representations about science and technology, their conceptions and attitudes about chemical engineering, and their identity as chemical engineers. Cristián is a Master in Education from the University of Los Andes in Colombia, a Master in Science, Technology, and Society from the
12 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conferenceoperations specialist and analyst in one of the biggest 3PL companies in Istanbul, Turkey. He gota MSc. in Information Technology from Southern New Hampshire University (2010). He is nowpursuing his Ph.D. in Technology Management in University of Bridgeport. His recent workexperience in industry for the past six years includes analyzing and designing logistics and supplychain operations and consulting, testing and implementing logistics management and assetmanagement systems. His current fields of interest are emerging technologies in supply chain andlogistics management and decision support
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering PLUS Alliance stEm PEER Academy for Faculty and Administrators: Transforming the National Engineering Education Landscape for Women and BIPOC StudentsIntroductionThe Engineering PLUS Alliance is one of 17 National Science Foundation (NSF) INCLUDESAlliances of higher education institutions and the only INCLUDES Alliance focused onengineering. The NSF INCLUDES Alliance is a nationwide initiative designed to build UnitedStates leadership in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) by increasingthe participation of individuals from groups that have been historically underrepresented inSTEM. The Engineering PLUS Alliance seeks to strengthen and expand
activity, dubbed the “Meme Game,” features anexchange of doodles which results in the viral propagation of certain doodles across the playerpopulation. The activity makes explicit connections to epidemiology and sociology via designchoices which offer direct analogies between the game and real-world scenarios of infectiousdisease spread and social mimetics/information spread. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemicand with the proliferation of disinformation on social media, the domains associated with ouractivity have become especially relevant and motivating to students.We used the Meme Game as a first-day activity for an introductory course on modeling andsimulation at a small engineering-focused college. Our results suggest that the
students have through this and use qualitativedata to show how these experiences prepared students to envision their role as graduatestudents. As a result of these findings, the engineering education research and practicecommunities can better understand how students conceptualize graduate school, their careergoals, and research-intensive careers to inform how these experiences are conducted. Ourfindings also hold implications for scholars studying the formation of the future professoriate,as the academic “pipeline” begins with students like the ones from which we collected data inthis study.Introduction and Literature ReviewIn recent years, there has been a slight uptick in the focus on engineering graduate studenteducation, particularly
-funded Women of Color in Engineering Collaborative, whose mission is to work cooperatively with other organizations to provide resources to create a supportive, encouraging, and inclusive environment in the engineering workplace. Her SWE research centers on equity issues in STEM education and the workplace, with studies on gender bias, the development of an engineering identity, and the community college transfer pathway. Prior to joining SWE, she worked in higher education policy research and on programs focused on faculty productivity and student success. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, MBA and M.S. in Information Management from Arizona State University, and Ph.D
Accreditation and Quality Assurance VI Academic Support Services I.4 Policy Management VI.1 Admission I.5 Entity and Activity Review Systems VI.2 Registrar I.6 Fundraising VI.3 Information Technology Services II Student Learning by Coursework Program VI.4 Student Learning Support II.1 Program Educational Objectives VI.5 Teaching Resources II.2 Student Outcomes VI.6 Library II.3 Curriculum VII Student
markets (or at least for modeling purposes), one may make severalassumptions about a market’s operations and the conditions necessary for achieving efficientallocation. Those assumptions revolve around the substitutability of products, many buyers andsellers, no barriers to entry or exit into the market, and perfect information among transactingparties. In theory, these markets enable efficient allocation of resources among buyers andsellers. At the abstract level, efficiency can entail efficiently producing goods with a given set ofresources or alternatively it can correspond to efficient allocation/distribution of those goods [19,p. 31]. The reader should note that there is a more elaborate set of frameworks for thinkingabout equitable
portion of the event, students had theopportunity to ask the recruiters and engineers questions one-on-one.2.8 Career Center Initiatives with the Technical Interview Process - Category 4Cornell University [6], Dartmouth University [7], Massachusetts Institute of Technology [17],Northeastern University [18], and Yale University [27] demonstrate a more indirect approach totechnical interview preparation by providing online content and direct links to external sourcesthat can aid in students’ preparation. Similarly, the University of Massachusetts Amherst embedsthese materials directly on their College of Information & Computer Sciences careers webpage[24]. On the other hand, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s (RPI) Center for Career
often focused on hiring students in those strongresearch-based R1 programs.The future of any educational institution depends on the quality of its educational programs andclear pathways to future professional careers for its students. In the past decade, the engineeringdisciplines in general, and ECE in particular, have been experiencing huge transformations withfast-emerging new disciplinary areas. New technology areas range from quantum computing tomachine learning, cyber-physical systems, internet of things (IOT), industrial internet of things(IIOT), etc. It is becoming a challenge for small educational institutions such as some IECmembers to reflect new technology areas in their educational offerings, as well as take advantageof new trends