Paper ID #43904Work in Progress: Transforming the Freshman Engineering Experience throughPeer-Mentorship and Professional Competency WorkshopsTristan Hernandez, University of Texas at El Paso Tristan Hernandez is an Undergraduate Researcher for the Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Education at the University of Texas at El Paso. Tristan is pursuing a Multidisciplinary degree with concentrations in Engineering Education and Leadership, Mathematics, and Communication at the University of Texas at El Paso, with an expected graduation date of May 2024. He is a former school board member for a local school
research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Prof. Thomas Dick, Oregon State University Thomas Dick is a professor of mathematics at
received a Fulbright award in 2015.Theresa FS Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc. Theresa Bruckerhoff is the Principal Research Associate and Operations Manager at CRE., with nearly twenty-five years of evaluation experience, ten years as the principal evaluator. She studies and evaluates training, professional development and other education change programs funded by state, federal and private sources and is a member of the American Evaluation Association, ASEE, and other content and education focused professional organizations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
DelawareLaura Alison Weinstein, University of DelawareChelsea Davis, University of DelawareDr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Dr. Sarah I. Rooney is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Delaware. Dr. Rooney’s efforts center around developing and teaching courses in the undergraduate BME curriculum and facilitating continuous improvement of the program.Amy Posch, Pacific Research LabsAmelia Lanier Knarr, The Perry InitiativeElise Corbin, University of Delaware ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Development of a Unique Bioengineering Laboratory Curriculum Focused on Material
. Bauer holds a doctoral degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Dr. Bauer is the recipient of numerous awards and scholarships as a graduate student and young professional. Her primary research interests are: water and wastewater treatment, renewable energy technologies, pollution prevention, and engineering education. Dr. Bauer is an active member of ASEE and the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and currently serves as the Faculty Advisor for Rowan’s Student Chapter of SWE.Theresa FS Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc. Theresa Bruckerhoff is the Principal Research Associate and Operations Manager at CRE., with nearly twenty-five years of
University of Wisconsin - Madison, and a faculty fel- low at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in STEM reasoning, learn- ing and teaching, especially in mathematics and engineering classrooms and in laboratory settings, using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Dr. Nathan has secured over $20M in external re- search funds and has over 80 peer-reviewed publications in education and Learning Sciences research, as well as over 100 scholarly presentations to US and international audiences. He is Principal Investiga- tor or co-Principal Investigator of 5 active grants from NSF and the
Paper ID #21680Changing of the Guard: Tips for Enabling Smooth Officer TransitionsMonika IngallsDr. Elizabeth Hill, University of Minnesota Duluth Dr. Hill is focused on active learning teaching methods and materials research. After receiving her Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Dr. Hill spent several years working industrially.Ms. Helene Finger P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Helene Finger has been a faculty member in the Civil/Environmental Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 1997, with a break from 2007-2010 to pursue her PhD in Mechanical Engineering
graduation. However, students in early stages of theirundergraduate studies will remain in good standing even with lower GPA. Extreme variations inStudents’ GPAs during their time at a university may result in suspension or even expulsion.While policies of forgiveness also exist, they are not very clear. In addition, another study hasshown that the policies related to the courses that students are required to take in their first yearcan impact students’ success [3]. The unclarity of the policies may result in students’ failure.Given how important these policies can be, many researchers have started analyzing andcomparing academic polices from the past. Ohland and Long [4] discuss that examiningmatriculation models, sharing the record data and
%* 2.9% Faculty-Led Research 27.7% 26.1% 31.3% 25.9% Co-op, Internship, Work Abroad, or 93.1%* 79.5% 73.0% 81.0% Faculty-Led Research With how many employers did you 4.03* 3.45 2.40 3.56* interview? How many full-time job offers did 1.75* 1.26 0.79 1.33* you receive?Students who studied abroad participate at a higher rate in internship, work abroad, and theaggregate of work experiences than students who do not study abroad. Students who studiedabroad interviewed with more employers and received more full-time job offers than studentswho did not study abroad. There were no differences in attendance of graduate school
graduate education, particularly related to underrepresented minorities and women.Margaret Hobson, Texas A&M University Margaret Hobson, Ph.D. serves as an Assistant Director of Strategic Research Development for the Texas Engineering Experiment Station, a state-wide research agency of the Texas A&M University System. Dr. Hobson has a B.S. from Texas Woman’s University and an M.S. and a Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in Educational Psychology (Dissertation: Teacher Perceptions of Change in Leadership Roles and Activ- ities as a Result of Participation in a Science Education Leadership Program). Her dissertation study was supported by the National Science Foundation project Center for Applications of
High Research (R2) 68 77 Minority Serving Institution MSI 23 26 Non-MSI 131 150 Average Fall Student Enrollment (per 1,000) 23.86 22.89Statistical analysisThis study uses hierarchical regression analysis to determine if the Percent of Female Facultyimpacts the Percent of Female Graduates when controlling for confounding variables.Hierarchical regression is a multiple regression method that involves adding predictor or controlvariables in stages, to determine if the model improves the prediction of the
Professional Science Master’s Programs: An Opportunity for Engineering Schools and Students Beverly Karplus Hartline, Ph.D. Acting Dean of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Associate Provost for Research,Dean of Graduate Studies, University of the District of Columbia 487 Professional Science Master’s Programs: An Opportunity for Engineering Schools and Students Beverly Karplus Hartline, Ph.D. Acting Dean of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Associate Provost for Research, Dean of Graduate Studies, University of the District of ColumbiaThe Professional Science Master’s (PSM
than those without mentors or with informalmentors. They conclude that qualitative approaches would be useful to understand theirobservation that formally mentored faculty had higher numbers of publications.The current study uses self-efficacy for research, teaching, and mentoring graduate students as aproxy for faculty development. Self-efficacy has been shown to be a predictor of actual behavior,although as the above studies show, “self-efficacy” can be highly contextual, specific, and nuanced(Bandura, 1997). Research has repeatedly shown links between self-efficacy and researchproductivity. Wester et al (2019) found significant and moderate correlations between facultyproductivity and self-efficacy for general and quantitative research
linkage between engineering writing and disciplinary discourse with other mechanisms ofengineering graduate socialization, such as identity formation, socialization, persistence, anddesire to pursue academic careers. This study is designed as an embedded exploratory mixedmethods study of current graduate engineering students and recent non-completers that seek toanswer the following research questions: 1. How do graduate students at various stages in their PhD programs in engineering perceive the role of academic writing as it relates to academic socialization and success in future academic careers? 2. How are these perceptions different or similar for graduate students who are considering leaving or have left their
Paper ID #33612Student to Scholar: A Professional Skills Focused Library CollaborationDr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Dr. Azure Janee Stewart Azure is an interactional ethnographer whose research
, study, discovery prototype Valley of death Conclusion• There are numerous challenges that universities face• Crisis everywhere, but opportunities abound• Resources are available in Asia, but how long?• Internationalization is very important, but how much?• Pursuing excellence requires a fundamental culture change• Many opportunities for collaborationPOSTECH’s Vision with Internationalization 14 and Excellence•Become a great place for learning - where inspired students can learn from inspiring professors•Be recognized as an outstanding research institution - where faculty, students and graduates pioneer and lead
graduate engineering technology programs toproduce research-competent graduates8.The increase in the number of graduate engineering technology programs in the United States isplacing pressure on faculty to engage in applied research in order to be a responsive instructor4.These applied research projects focus on the solution of problems in the workplace6.III. Engineering TechnologyThe modern master’s degree, based on completion of a prescribed course of study, was firstoffered at Harvard in 1869. There are approximately 270 types of MS degrees. The firstuniversity to confer a Master’s degree in engineering technology was the University of Houstonat Clear Lake in 19669.During the 1950s, accreditation requirements of the Engineering Council for
positiverelationships [11]. In the LDP, use of the social interdependence approach to develop acurriculum of self-leadership, teamship and organizational leadership, has demonstratedsignificant improvement in undergraduate’s graduation rate and time to graduate [3]. Ourresearch on LDP outcomes recently expanded to study the impact of our program on graduatestudents’ success.Research MethodThe researchers sought to determine if LDP graduates who decided to continue their education ingraduate and professional schools benefited from the leadership development training andexperiences. A qualitative research design consisting of a semi-structured interview protocolwith open-ended questions and discussion [12], [13] was used to gather data from a diverse focusgroup
Engineering & The Military Tony AmblerDean of the College of Engineering & Computing2002 – to date…1999 – to date… Technical Advances In High Power Systems• ESRDC has defined the field of reconfigurable power systems and architectures, protection, and controls at the 100MW microgrid level. – Not historically part of power system research. – ESRDC performed the core research in this area – Now is becoming important far beyond ship systems (DoD bases, DoE, microgrid, renewable energy (wind, solar), ultra-high- reliability industrial power) Where the Graduates Work• ABB - US • GE Aviation • Pacific Northwest Nat Lab• ABB
, professional and social resources that support success in graduate study. Specifically,the five-year research project is addressing the following research questions:1. How do graduate students’ funding mechanisms vary across their incoming characteristics (i.e., demographics and bachelor’s or master’s institutional type, location, or affiliation) and STEM discipline?2. What is the relationship between graduate students’ funding mechanisms and their post- doctoral outcomes, including time to degree, field of first job, job placement, and salary of first job?3. How does the relationship between graduate students’ funding mechanisms and their post- doctoral outcomes vary across their incoming characteristics (i.e., demographics and bachelor’s
will be designed based upon socialconstructionist theories using communicative prospective 11, which will reveal how femalestudents create, negotiate and shift their identities while selecting, studying and practicing inSTEM field. Research questions include: a) what do they think about graduate education; b)what does pursuing career in STEM field mean to female?; c) what messages are enunciate aboutSTEM discipline, and how does these messages differ at different points in a female’s life?; d)what were the initial factor(s) compelling females to choose STEM as field of study?; e) whatfeatures of STEM discipline seems enticing or dispiriting to females from pursuing educationand practice in these area?; f) what kind of guidance, mentoring, and
dual mechanisms we undergraduate curricula, complimented by researchseek to promote nanotechnology literacy within our general experiences for those students who are interested in furtherundergraduate engineering student body while simultaneously exploring nanotechnology concepts and perhapssetting the foundation for a nanotechnology-based research track contemplating further studies at the graduate level. In thisthat will facilitate a pipeline of students pursuing nanotechnology manner we have significantly increased exposure of ouras a career including through graduate-level education. undergraduates to core nanotechnology concepts, while
Institute of Technology Ella L. Ingram is the Associate Dean for Professional Development and a Professor of Biology at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology. Her educational research interests include promoting successful change practice of STEM faculty, effective evolution and ecology instruction, and facilitating undergraduate re- search experiences. Her teaching portfolio includes courses on: nutrition, introductory biology, ecology and environmental studies, evolution, evolutionary medicine, and research practices in science.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities and Pro- fessor of English at Rose-Hulman
seminars, and industry visits • Participants agreed that the SURE experience was beneficial to their careers – 93.3% of graduate school attendees, and 88.2 % of non-attendees FOCUS 2-day graduate recruitment program to attract qualified URM students to pursue graduate studies at Georgia Tech • Supports attendance of 10/200 URM undergraduate students • Awards two $10,000 fellowships for currently enrolled PhD URM students5 Georgia Tech and Intel: Making a Difference • RISE Scholar • Summer Engineering Institute RA • Peer-2-Peer Mentee and Mentor • Summer Undergraduate Research Experience
funded, and the time todegree completion is shorter when compared to other disciplines. Third, engineering students are typicallyorganized into research groups with peers conducting similar research under a single faculty advisor [4].Despite some apparent advantages, engineering graduate attrition rates remain relatively high, suggestingan incomplete understanding of attrition and how the relationship between students and the academychanges during their course of study [7].Recently, researchers have increased their efforts in understanding and identifying elements of graduateeducation that contribute to attrition. These efforts are critical as departed students are losing time,money, resources, and talent to advisors, departments, universities
Paper ID #12734Academic Outcomes of Cooperative Education ParticipationNichole Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in aerospace engineering from The University of Alabama and her M.S. in aviation and aerospace management from Purdue University. She is a former recipient of the Purdue Doctoral Fellowship. In addition to cooperative education research, she is also interested in studying student choice and migration engineering and technology.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main
Tutorial Services.Shamik Bhattacharya, Ph.D.Dr. Shamik Bhattacharya graduated with his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Texas TechUniversity in 2011. His primary research interest is in biofluid mechanics, tissue mechanics ofheart valves and medical devices. Currently he is an Associate Professor in the Department ofEngineering and Technology. He does research with undergraduate students. He involves studentsin hands-on research and tries to give them exposure in cutting edge research by sending them topremium conferences and submitting manuscripts in premium journals.
variable will be milestone success and theindependent variable will be one of the four core element(s) of socialization. These coefficientsin the regression analyses will help determine which core element(s) matter most, which coreelement(s) can be ignored, and how these core element(s) influence each other.Quality Measures Three quality measures will be considered as part of this research design: replicability,validity, and generalizability. In terms of validity, the phenomenon and data collection that is thefocus of this study is designed around an established theory of graduate student socialization anda corresponding validated survey. This research design study is replicable because it uses anadapted graduate socialization survey. The
summers. This paper provides a view ofthe design and components of the WIMS LSAMP REU, and successes of the REUstudents to contribute to the WIMS research programs, as well as to pursue graduatestudy and earn graduate degrees. Alliances with LSAMP chapters at minority servinginstitutions (African-American, Hispanic, and others) have been important to therecruiting effort. WIMS REU’ers have gone on to graduate study and professionalschools in significant numbers (about 80%). An independent third-party processevaluation has been done each year, leading to continuous program improvements.Introduction and OverviewWIMS ERC Structure: WIMS is a National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering ResearchCenter (ERC) with initial core partner universities of
assist graduate students with the academic hiring process; and (6) to develop the skills needed to establish and lead a research program.INTRODUCTIONAs the mean age of ASEE engineering professors is over 50 years, there is the potential for ASEE to fulfillseveral points of its mission statement, “to encourage youth to pursue studies and careers in engineeringand engineering technology; and influence the recruitment and retention of young faculty andunderrepresented groups.” (3) by working with ASEE Student Chapters to prepare future faculty. ASEEcan sponsor events for graduate students, facilitate contact between graduate students and professors, andtake an active role in preparing teaching assistants.To these ends, the University of