qualities.4. Setting up the tutorialsImplementing a peer tutoring scheme involved the usual needs and strategy ofimplementation required for any innovation in teaching1 :i.Dept./Faculty commitmentx Good teachers who understand the need for the new programmex Communication between staffx Enthusiastic, excited coordinatorx Support from the HOD - ability to start afresh and integratex Commitment/support from colleaguesii.Strategy for implementationx Find out what other Universities are doingx Incorporate assessment and evaluation schemes which are reliable and validx Develop a plan for raising support/budgetx Include students in the developmentx Hold a pilot of the scheme and evaluate itx Show how the pilot scheme can be scaled
., 2022). Students now have the ability to rely on AI-generated work tocomplete assignments and exams, raising concerns about academic integrity, the authenticity ofsubmissions, and the validity of traditional methods in accurately measuring student learning outcomes.It is clear that, if traditional methods of assessments are not adjusted to match with this new reality, itcan seriously affect the quality of student learning and ultimately undermine the whole enterprise ofhigher education (Cotton et al., 2024).In response to these challenges, educators and institutions must rethink how assessments are designedand implemented to ensure they remain relevant and effective. However, the early response of highereducation institutions has been either a
throughout the semester.Overall, the modules had a positive impact and were gratifying to the students.Resistance to Change and Risk of FailureChange is inevitable in all organizations, including education systems. Even though it is excitingto implement new technology and techniques, modifications to the status quo can be met withresistance. Resistance often forms when the alteration is not perceived as necessary. Thesefeelings can be initiated by either students experiencing the new style of learning or from facultyopposing changes to the curriculum. Students and faculty alike have become comfortable withhow the standard lecture style teaching is carried out. For the benefits of new techniques to takeroot, the transition phase would require extra
. Page 22.351.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Comparison of Instructor Perceptions and Student Reflections on Model Eliciting ActivitiesIntroductionInstructors can impact student learning through their expectations of student achievement1-6. Weexamine how faculty perceptions of concepts learned and skills gained compare to that ofstudents to better understand this premise. Specifically, to investigate this issue, an educationalintervention, model eliciting activity (MEA), was implemented in four engineering courses.MEAs present complex, realistic, open-ended problems to students to reinforce targetedconcepts. Assessment of student understanding was measured through
definitely a new approach resulting in a different method of recruiting faculty for mentoringthe teams.In order to “quick start” the integration of innovation into the engineering curriculum, we createdan overall strategy of starting with piloting a Freshman class, then piloting a SeniorDesign/Capstone class, then providing pathways from the Freshman class (two semester class) tothe Senior Design/Capstone class. The concept was to introduce the key elements of innovationin the first year, including results and recommendations from [6] and [8] and the experiencesfrom an existing Freshman research class, expand on key aspects from the Freshman innovationclass in existing sophomore- and junior-level major-specific classes (again using the results
assignments, that arenot mentioned through Wiley plus which is difficult when you have large sections to be able toactually do that.” She then expressed her concerns, stating that, “But the main issue or concernwith taking the service courses online is the ability to cheat… it's difficult to implement thoserules without some sort of proctor…” This highlighted the challenges of enforcing academicintegrity in a virtual environment, where traditional monitoring methods are inherently limited.Her attention to detail was further emphasized when she remarked, “I knew that they worktogether ahead of time because I knew they sat near each other for previous tests when you'reactually in person...” This demonstrated ID7’s proactive approach to deterring
, innovation, risk management and other skillsessential for creating and exploiting market opportunities, whether as an individual or as anemployee of a larger organization (“intrapreneur”).The PBL module was co-developed by mechanical engineering faculty at four universities: OhioNorthern University, Lawrence Technological University, Gonzaga University, and St. LouisUniversity. Project sponsorship was provided by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network(KEEN).1 This module was delivered in two semester courses at each of the four schools,impacting a total of 219 students.Pre- and post-project surveys, using a common instrument at all schools, were given to allstudents to measure students’ confidence in their own abilities concerning fourteen
issues. Their mainobjective was the design and construction of suitable parts for the roller coaster track andsupporting structure.Several interim client review sessions were conducted before a final student presentation at theend of the quarter. The curriculum team repeated this process with another group of upperdivision students in Winter 2003. The outputs of both efforts were a set of working drawingsthat will be converted into molds for mass production of parts. These parts will go into reusablekits for use by students in the First-Year Engineering Program. This curriculum project isintended to serve as a model of intra-university collaboration that can be replicated elsewhere byprograms concerned with creating sustainable and cost
. from Purdue in 1971, his doctorate in industrial engineering from Stanford University in 1975, and his masters in civil engineering from UAA in 1999.Dr. Neal Lewis, University of Bridgeport Dr. Neal Lewis received his Ph.D. in engineering management in 2004 and B.S. in chemical engineering in 1974 from the University of Missouri – Rolla (now the Missouri University of Science and Technology), and his MBA in 2000 from the University of New Haven. He is an associate professor in the School of Engineering at the University of Bridgeport. He has over 25 years of industrial experience, having worked at Procter & Gamble and Bayer. Prior to UB, he has taught at UMR, UNH, and Marshall University.Dr. Gillian M. Nicholls
described in previous work, most recently in [12]. The work presented heregoes further than [12] in describing the details of a broad collection of projects.Ethical and professional responsibilities are often raised as a concern. Ethical engineering andprofessional behavior are discussed across engineering education and are often subject to entirecourse curricula [10, 11]. The work described in this paper does not add to the description ofethics and hacking but does require a basic understanding of security ethics between instructorand students before the project can begin.Project-based learning is widely considered an effective tactic for reinforcing concepts andintroducing new skills to students of all levels [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. This paper
, students are given the opportunity to design a windturbine to optimize power output under a list of given parameter specifications. The main projectgoal is to optimize a wind turbine that would produce the highest coefficient of power whileaddressing environmental and economic concerns. Students are given a limited supply ofmaterials to encourage the efficient allocation of resources, reinforcing the economicalconsiderations of sustainability. Figure 4 shows Rowan undergraduate students assembling theirgroup wind turbine. Figures 5 and 6 show a final wind turbine designed by a team of Rowanundergraduate students being tested for power output. Figure 4: Rowan Undergraduate Students Figure 5: Rowan Engineering Faculty Constructing
expressed concern about the level of preparedness of graduates.These two positions reflect opposite poles of the breadth versus depth spectrum, neither ofwhich, when pushed to the extreme, represents a satisfactory position. The team developing theCorBoK determined an intermediate position reflecting that all systems engineers work in aparticular specialization of systems engineering, but that for different graduates thatspecialization will be different, and that all graduates are first assigned work in which theycontribute to a project but are under the authority of more senior systems engineers who areresponsible for the project as a whole. That is, it is unrealistic to expect a new graduate, even of amaster’s program, to be suitably
nanotechnology and synthetic biology to autonomous vehicles, neurotechnologies and artificial intelligence. A professor in the ASU College of Global Futures (where he is Associate Dean of Curricula and Student Success) he brings a transdisciplinary approach to problem solving that combines the natural and social sciences with the arts and humanities, to explore new ways of collectively building a better future. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Design the Future Activities (DFA): A Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework in Engineering Design EducationAbstractWe propose an effective, innovative framework for
. Her research interests include organizational behavior and change as it pertains to engineering education and broadening participation, faculty change agents, and complex system dynamics. Her re- search investigates narrative inquiry of faculty who use their agency to engage in broadening participation in engineering activities. Cynthia received her B.S. in Biological Systems Engineering from Kansas State University and will receive her M.S. in Management Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2019.Mr. David Reeping, Virginia Tech David Reeping is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics
, theadministration of this college has been rigorously assessing the quality of instruction throughstudent surveys, faculty surveys, and in-class course evaluations by students. In this paper, the authors present an overview of the online Bachelor of ElectronicEngineering Technology (BEET), and Bachelor of Nuclear Engineering Technology (BNET)degree programs at EC, with the primary focus on the process for assessing the quality of thecourses, quality of instruction, and user (student) satisfaction with the online courses in BEETand BNET programs. A summary of the methodology used for data collection surveys, and theresults of the quality assessment of a selected set of courses are presented. Finally, conclusionsconcerning the results are provided
challenge; to share ideas with fellow students; and to appreciate which ideas are “new” and to revise their list. Learner and community centered. Multiple perspectives: The student is asked to elicit ideas and approaches concerning this challenge from “experts.” Community and knowledge centered. Research and revise: Reference materials to help the student reach the goals of exploring the challenge and to revise their original ideas are introduced here. Knowledge and learner centered. Test your mettle: Summative instructional events are now presented. Knowledge and Page 22.471.4 learner centered
organizations to train and developtheir employees to support necessary continuous learning and to develop and maintain agility.Communities of Practice (CoPs) is not a new concept, although the accepted definitions arerelatively recent [1]. Two definitions posited by Etienne Wenger and his collaborators are: • “Communities of Practice are groups of people informally bound together by shared expertise and passion for a joint enterprise” [2]. • “Communities of Practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly” [1].CoPs have a few defining characteristics: groups, shared expertise, and learning throughinteractions. More
existing hardware and software platforms available (see Summary for more information), the CS students can proceed with their development and testing while the EE team designs and fabricates their hardware. The EE students can test their hardware using existing SDR software to ensure it works before final testing with the CS students’ software. This “division of concerns” makes the projects more management for both teams. More importantly, the ultimate success of each group is not necessarily tied to the other group. This helps to prevent internecine conflicts among the students (and faculty!). ≠ The SDR applications are very broad, from amateur radio to public service (e.g., police, fire, and other
bedaunting to engineering educators. Unable to predict so volatile a future, we nonetheless have to decide about whatto teach engineers and how to prepare them for an increasingly international workplace without compromising thehard-won quality of education programs. The main purpose of engineering education is to provide engineering graduates with knowledge, skills andattitudes, which will enable them to practice their profession with competence and confidence. There are various Page 10.1300.1reports and survey concerning the generic attributes of an engineering graduates1, 2 in the new millennium. Althoughthe research
conclude that stakeholder concerns, in this case the needs of our diverseuser population, force us toward creative designs that are better in terms of economics,flexibility, and functionality, than what we might have developed otherwise. And it is thisconcept, which was developed first in architecture and then migrated to product design, that isnow being articulated for instructional design. When we open up a system to a more diverse usergroup: The system at first has barriers to accessibility; then evolves retrofitted elements toaccommodate the new group; and eventually new designs are developed with the expanded usergroup already accounted for in the core user population. The resulting system is improved for allusers by these additional
Section 142 Using Internet Resources to Enhance Communication Skills Fazil T. Najafi Ph.D., Professor, University of Florida, Daniel C. Dobson, B.S. Art/ Publication Specialist, University of FloridaAbstractOur objective is to address issues of improving students effectiveness in information gathering and sharing. Thepurpose is to develop a model for use in class. The program is applied to both graduate and undergraduate publicworks courses. Our intent is to improve the student’s
2006-1455: DESIGN, BUILD AND TEST IN SUPPORT OF COMPUTER AIDEDDESIGNJohn Burkhardt, U.S. Naval Academy John Burkhardt received a Bachelors Degree in Civil Engineering from The Cooper Union in New York City. At the University of Illinois Prof. Burkhardt received his Masters of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degree in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Prof. Burkhardt is currently on the faculty at the United States Naval Academy in the Mechanical Engineering Department. Page 11.414.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Design, Build and Test in Support of Computer Aided
strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures LLC Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas is the CEO of Quality Measures, LLC, a Virginia-based consulting firm special- izing in program and project evaluation, team-building, and capacity
feeling pressure to improve performance tomaintain/regain eligibility and other students being forced to delay graduation or leave theirstudies due to financial difficulties and ineligibility for financial aid [24], [26].No publications examined the issue of financial aid eligibility specifically in relation to first-yearengineering math, such as calculus or pre-calculus. Given the paucity of research in this area, wethink this is a very promising area for further development. When both sets of studies arejuxtaposed, it seems plausible that many C-in-Calculus I students may be leaving due toconcerns with maintaining financial aid rather than direct concerns about their mathperformance. We hope to utilize the results of this review to guide future
-defined radios.Mr. Qi Cao, Chinese University of Hong Kong Qi Cao is a postgraduate student and teaching assistant at Department of Information Engineering, CUHK. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship: A Course-Level Implementation Case in Hong KongIntroductionAdvancements in technology have transformed modern society. However, new global challengesand emerging issues have arisen alongside technological advancement. These include (but arenot limited to) climate change mitigation and adaptation, cyber attacks, and inequalities in health,education, and infrastructure [1].On 30 December 2015, The United Nations (UN
services, residential life/housing, and undergraduate research. He has presented at academic and professional conferences in Canada, China, the U.K., and the U.S. Robert consults regularly with government agencies, policy centers, and postsecondary institutions in the U.S. and Canada. Robert holds a B.A. in Canadian Studies from the University of Vermont, a, M.A. in History from the University of Maine, and an M.P.A. (Public Administration) from the University of New Hampshire.Dr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A
, excellenteducation and the integration of education and research within the context of the mission of theirorganizations” 14 (p.2). Faculty in this study were asked how they felt about NSF’s Broader Impactcriterion, of which 80% viewed the criterion favorably. However, despite favorable feelings aboutthe Broader Impact criterion, only half of these faculty members “would continue with the samelevel of involvement in socially relevant activities if it was not required by NSF”15 (p. 69).Hallienn15 also found there was a lack of feedback through NSF regarding the Broader Impactactivities, suggesting through her findings that faculty required guidance, presumably from theagency, to help facilitate their Broader Impact strategies. Other concerns about the
biophysics from Johns Hopkins University and has taught in the Biology Department at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She focuses on equity issues in education and K-12 educational reform. Marion is co-PI of the STEP NSF grant.Monica Gaughan, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Monica Gaughan is an Assistant Professor of Public Policy. Her research currently focuses on higher education policy and administration, and scientific careers and labor force. She was awarded an NSF CAREER award to investigate the effects of university-level personnel policies and practices on the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women faculty in science fields
, Issue 4, pp. 92-100, July/August 2003.3. Major, C., Implementing Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Education, The Journal of General Education, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 235-334, 2002.4. Navaz, H., A New Approach to Teaching Undergraduate Thermal/Fluid Sciences-Courses in Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics and Compressible Flow, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 35-49, January 2002.5. Williamson, K., Resources in Technology, Technology Teachers, Vol. 64, Issue 3, pp. 15-19, November 2004.6. American Society of Engineering Education, , Washington, D. C., USA.7. Sutterer, K., and Descoteaux, T., Before Senior Design-Integration of Project-Based Learning in Multi
real objectives for the community and deeper understanding and skills for themselves. Inthe process, students link personal and social development with academic and cognitivedevelopment. . . experience enhances understanding; understanding leads to more effectiveaction.” [6] The instructors have worked with all of the students that are participating in the S-Lon following the steps in this cycle to achieve many facets of development for the students andthe community partners. One aspect is discussed in this paper, concerning the student perceptionof the community.Literature ReviewThere is a considerable amount of literature addressing the positive impact of S-L on studentswith some on the effects on faculty and the community. Included here are