. Yale, UCONN,etc.) and is co-sponsored by the Connecticut Venture Group, Connecticut Innovations and the Departmentof Economic Development in the State of Connecticut.The New Dual Graduate Degree Programs Linking the Schools of Business and EngineeringAnother finding of our research was that companies were also interested in students who earned morethan one Master’s degree. This further supported the inter-disciplinary nature of and direction of ourprograms and led us to the development of the dual graduate degree program options.The Graduate Studies Division of the University of Bridgeport offers several dual graduate degreeprograms, offered jointly by the Schools of Business, Engineering and Education and Human Resources.Current dual degree
summativeassessments is described, which has led to a cycle of continuous improvement of the programand key lessons learned. These assessments have also been used to quantify the success of thesecond and third site objectives focused on student exposure and interest in graduate STEMresearch – the results of which are summarized in the subsequent section.Recruitment Approach and Cohort DemographicsRecruitment efforts for the REU site were led by the site organizers as well as the Office ofGraduate Studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The Office of Graduate Studiesoversees an umbrella summer research program, the Nebraska Summer Research Program, orSRP, encompassing most externally-funded summer research opportunities at the university.Recruitment
Session 1313 NSF-REU Site Program in Membrane Applied Science and Technology Gerri L. Burke, William B. Krantz, Joel R. Fried Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221-0012AbstractThe Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site program is one of the oldest and mostsuccessful NSF initiatives. Active research experience is an effective way to encourage qualifiedundergraduates to undertake graduate studies. This paper describes a
, research and development, supplier management, quality management, logistics management, and various leadership positions. He holds an associate’s degree in drafting technology from North Iowa Area Community College (1967), a B.S. in business administration (1990), and M.S. in management (1992) from Indiana Wesleyan University. Schuver is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and serves on the Executive Board of the Continuing Professional Development Division. He is also a member of College/Industry Partnerships, Engineering Technology, and Graduate Studies divisions of ASEE. Schuver is a member of the National Collaborative Task Force for Engineering Education Reform and is a Lifetime Certified
was selected into the Astronaut Hall of Fame and iscurrently the President of the international Association of Space Explorers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Longitudinal Effects of the Foundation Coalition Curriculum on Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Student Performance AbstractThis Complete Research explores the longitudinal effects of the Foundation Coalition (FC)curriculum on chemical and petroleum engineering student graduation outcomes: retention, time-to-graduation, and cumulative GPA. In 1993, a large southwest public university joined the FC, a10-year multi-university NSF initiative to improve first-year engineering (FYE
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student Satisfaction and Perceptions of Summer REU Experience in an Engineering/Communicative Disorders Focused Site at Program MidpointIntroductionParticipating in a research experience for undergraduates (REU) site provides opportunities forstudents to develop their research and technical skills, raise their awareness of graduate studies[1], and understand the social context of research [2]. In support of this mission, our REU site atThe University of Alabama (Sensors, Systems and Signal Processing Supporting SpeechPathology) is exploring research at the intersection of engineering and
Underrepresented Students in STEM”, 3 Year, $ 300 K award –July 2014 EDI Panel on Diversity and 03/31/16 4 Inclusion AIMS2 Program: Strength in Cohorts• Advising, cohort activities including tutoring, workshops, and student research are project strengths – Student application of knowledge relevant to their fields of study – Beneficial contact, meaningful relationships with faculty mentors – Mentoring: Academic and Career advising shapes student experiences – Preparation for careers in the field – Student contact with faculty in research, cohort group meetings, informal meetings = academic, social, and career
engineering management from FIU and is particularly interested in computer science for all. Her research interests include teaching and learning computer science in the Metaverse.Stephanie A Damas, Clemson University Stephanie Ashley Damas is currently a graduate student at Clemson University studying to get her Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her area of interest is Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering. She holds a bachelorˆaTM s degree in electrical engi American c Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploration of Servingness across Virginia's Top Ranking HSI, HBCU, and PWIIntroductionSocio-political History of
degrees [2]. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, thesmall percentage of U.S. workers employed in fields related to science and engineering areresponsible for more than 50% of our sustained economic expansion [1]. To benefit our economyand society, our national priority should be on encouraging more students to study STEM.Unfortunately, the U.S. is trending in the opposite direction. In the early 1980’s, about 40 percentof the world’s scientists and engineers resided in the U.S. Today that number has shrunk to about15 percent [1]. The STEM Scholars monthly seminars focused on promoting the pursuit ofgainful employment, or graduate school and research in STEM. Developing essential and softskills training over the five-year period, as well as
leadership studies at North Carolina A&T State University. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision making, intellectual sustainability in higher education, corporate social responsibility and ethics, and East Asian higher education systems. She has presented numerous workshops on issues related to minority affairs, graduate admissions and funding opportunities, intellectual capital management and investment, core professional development competencies, and graduate research and teaching assistant training and assessment.Dr. Shea Bigsby, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Shea Bigsby is the Coordinator of Graduate Writing Services in the Graduate College at North Car- olina A&T State
productionof Black engineers; however, this report emphatically states that these institutions are not utilizedat the level necessary for the U.S. to stay competitive within the STEM workforce. Therefore,this current study consists of a rigorous document analysis to summarize information from thereport that is directly and/or indirectly connected to engineering education at HBCUs including,but not limited to, background of authors, the institutional selection process, review of literaturecited, and recommendations. Results indicate that, first, there is a need for increased efforts toadvance and expand quantitative research related to the role of HBCUs in graduating Blackengineers including dual engineering programs with PWIs. Second, an analysis of
research design [15]. Based on ourinterest in examining how this department constructs engineering identity in its documentaryartifacts, we focused on two specific types of documents: internal documents and public-facingdocuments. Public-facing documents analyzed included outreach information on the universitywebsite about the department and the three majors, transfer plans from state community colleges,graduation/curricular requirements, and plans of study. Internal documents included ABET self-study reports for each of the three programs. Some documents we included blurred the linesbetween public and internal, such as the college and department strategic plans. Additionally, welimited our analysis to current documents produced within the last
• Employment by Navy Labs 18 ULIUniversity Laboratory Initiative•Graduate fellowship in STEM Fast Facts: • Graduate students are paired with a • 18 students (80 student from all cohorts) Navy Lab Mentor throughout studies • 15% Female / 85% Male • Students have a 10 week research • 15% Minority Participation experience in Navy Mentor’s Lab • $ 2,200,000 Annually•Fosters collaboration between Navy Labs and • 14 StatesUniversities in undersea weapon and vehicle • 100% alums interested in DoD
. 1759-1773, 2016.[3] V. Tinto, "Learning Communities: Building Gateways to Student Success," The National Teaching and Learning Forum, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1-11, 1998 1998.[4] Blinded.[5] Gallup Inc. "Clifton Strengths." https://www.gallup.com/cliftonstrengths/en/252137/home.aspx (accessed February 5, 2024.[6] K. J. Cunningham, "Graduate Engineering Peer Review Groups: Developing Communicators and Community," presented at the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, June, 2019, 2019.[7] G. A. Nichols and C. A. MacKenzie, "Identifying research priorities through decision analysis: A case study for cover crops," Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1040927.[8] T
, Dolson 2020), little is known about the uniquebarriers faced by student-parents in engineering programs, how these challenges affect their mental healthand academic performance, or what resources they find most beneficial. This study focuses on graduate-level student-parents at a large public research university in theUnited States, a context that offers both the diversity and scale needed to explore these issues. The studyunfolds in two phases. Phase I employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative andquantitative data collection through surveys distributed to undergraduate and graduate student-parents.These surveys seek to capture their most pressing challenges, evaluate how they engage with campus andexternal resources, and
Laura I. Spears, PhD, University of FloridaAbstractPrior to embarking on a major renovation of the University of Florida’s (UF) science andengineering library in 2022, the library asked their patrons, including engineering students, whatthey wanted in an academic library space. How do engineering students use their academiclibrary and what do they envision as an ideal space? The library teamed with the Department ofInterior Design in the UF College of Design, Construction and Planning to collaborate on a studyof the top two floors of the library that were slated for renovation. The goal was to develop floorplans that facilitate innovative research, creative thinking and problem-solving. The studymethodology included an observational study
spend most of their timein their departments as they take classes, attend seminars, conduct research, and interactinformally with department faculty, staff, and other graduate students, the climate theyexperience and the support they receive can have a major impact on their success. In addition,changes in a department can last well beyond the end of a grant. When interventions addressstudents directly, once they graduate there may be no lasting changes that result from theprogram. On the other hand, when faculty attitudes and mentoring practices change, the changescan last and continue to help students succeed long after the grant expires (robust design).In this paper, we describe the baseline surveys and the results from their administration
Engineers.Ms. Inez N. Moore, Howard University Inez Moore, M.Ed. is a Doctoral Student in the Educational Psychology Program at Howard University in Washington, DC. Currently, Inez is a Graduate Assistant for the Howard University Science, Engineer- ing, and Mathematics (HUSEM) program. There, she engages in research focusing on STEM education and issues surrounding retention. Her research interests include college access, STEM education and retention, ethnicity and culture, achievement, and human subjects protection.Dr. Dawn G. Williams, Howard University Dawn Williams is an Associate Professor and Chairperson of the Department of Educational Administra- tion and Policy at Howard University.Dr. Leonard Bernard BlissDr
joining the ADVANCE leadership team she served for 13 years as Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies in the College of Engineering. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Stanford University, her M.S. from the University of California, Berkeley and her Ph.D. from the University of Maryland, College Park. Professor McDonald’s research is at the interface of plant synthetic biology and bioprocess engineering, utilizing novel protein expression systems for production of human therapeutics, industrial enzymes and biopolymers in plant tissues and plant cell culture bioreactor systems. She is also the PI and Director of an NSF IGERT (Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship
, graduate, and undergraduate teaching assistants.PurposeThe purpose of the first phase of the pilot is to investigate the current practices of five of thethirty-five KEEN institutions that are currently incorporating EML elements into their first-yearengineering curricula. Through assessing these current practices, we will be able to develop acurriculum that integrates the best practices and examines the progress of student motivation,identity, engineering skillsets, and learning over the first year. The overarching research questionthat we are studying is: In what ways do entrepreneurial minded learning (EML) experiencesaffect first-year engineering students’ motivation and identity development? Additionally, we areseeking to answer the following
.” Page 22.307.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students’ Academic and Career DecisionsMotivation and NeedThe United States faces an urgent need to increase the number and diversity of engineeringstudents at the undergraduate level, and ultimately, in graduate studies and the workforce.Despite significant efforts over the last few decades to increase participation of under-represented groups in engineering, progress has been disturbingly slow. The time has come to re-conceptualize our theoretical approach to diversifying the field of engineering. This projectsignificantly advances fundamental knowledge of social
major research university in the southwestern UnitedStates. For this study, data was collected from participants by an external evaluator by using bothqualitative and quantitative methods. This paper presents and describes the cumulative data fromthree REU cohorts. The analysis and results of the data are disaggregated by the student academiclevel (sophomore, junior, senior), gender, ethnicity, the type of their home institutions (research orteaching institution), and desired career paths in the future (graduate school or industry). The paperalso provides a detailed discussion and implications of these findings.IntroductionAdvancements in manufacturing technologies and cyber-physical systems have enabledmanufacturing companies to offer their
% offreshmen with declared STEM majors were not ready for college-level mathematics. As aconsequence, many STEM majors at CSUB enter their programs at either the remedial or pre-calculus level. This increases their time to graduation and lowers their persistence in calculus-based STEM majors such as engineering.To investigate strategies to address this issue, CSUB received an NSF IUSE grant which hadmultiple activities to improve persistence and success in STEM. One of the activities was thissummer intervention program, which was intended to provide a connection between mathematicsand STEM disciplines to encourage persistence and success. The research question was if a* National Science Foundation Improving Undergraduate STEM Education grant number
resultsdisaggregated by gender identity, including consideration of genders other than male and female.We propose that ASEE GSW authors provide students who are the subjects of engineering educationresearch or evaluation studies with the opportunity to self-report their gender identity. IntroductionDecades of research has demonstrated the pervasive gender inequities in the field of engineering andby extension engineering education [1]. Transparent reporting of student gender identity inengineering education studies enables researchers to investigate these inequities through gender-based comparisons of educational experiences, outcomes, and interventions. The disaggregation ofresearch data by gender identity is a
accounting of how the experience generated by thecrossroads that the program creates, share how they are served by the program. The experiencesgenerated between the professional interdisciplinarity, the approach to infrastructure’ssustainability, and the concept of resiliency have impacted the experience of servingness forstudents in the program. This paper presents students’ reflections on the contribution of RISE-UP in students’ development of the following non-academic outcomes of servingness:leadership identity, critical consciousness, research and graduate school aspirations and civicengagement.2. Methods and Results.The methodology selected for this study is based on case studies. Case studies can be used togain insight on in-depth personal
interdisciplinary lab, REU fellows were exposed to a wide spectrum of learning and researchwork, beyond their disciplinary domain. The authors, in turn gained experience mentoring theREU fellows in their research work. The knowledge shared in this paper demonstrates how aninterdisciplinary engineering system/lab can be iteratively built as a result of undergraduateresearch work under graduate mentorship. This study also shows how an REU program cansupport the development of an engineering lab as well as the research of several masters and PhDstudents.Keywords: Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU), mentoring, interdisciplinary,environmental monitoring.Introduction The LEWAS lab is a unique real-time high-frequency environmental monitoring
Paper ID #16647SIMPLE Design Framework for Teaching Development Across STEMProf. Jill K Nelson, George Mason University Jill Nelson is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at George Mason University. She earned a BS in Electrical Engineering and a BA in Economics from Rice Uni- versity in 1998. She attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for graduate study, earning an MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Dr. Nelson’s research focus is in statistical signal processing, specifically detection and estimation for applications in
design optimiza- tion.Mrs. Megan Patberg Morin, North Carolina State University Megan Patberg Morin is a third year Ph.D. student at North Carolina State University. She is currently studying STEM education with a focus in Technology, Engineering, and Design. Her undergraduate de- gree is in Middle Childhood Education focusing on Math and Science from the University of Dayton, and her Master’s is also from NC State in Technology and Engineering Education. She currently works as Graduate Assistant in the Education and Workforce program at the FREEDM Systems Center and Pow- erAmerica at NC State. She focuses her research in electrical engineering education specifically research experiences, underrepresented
Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 2800 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Dr. Lydia Ross is a clinical assistant professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College
and the projectionsfor a scaled porting of the model to a campus-wide level.I. IntroductionEducational research has widely documented the achievement gap between students fromdifferent socioeconomic statuses (SES). The seminal work by Coleman et al. in 1966 sparked amyriad of studies and initiatives addressing this phenomenon with different views regardingrelation, incident factors, or effects [1][2][3][4]. Despite more than fifty years of documentedefforts, the prevalence of the gap, studied at national and global levels, continues to highlight theneed for renovated approaches [5][6]. At the college level, this gap manifests among studentsfrom lower SES with a higher attrition level, longer times to graduate, and significantly