learning in middle school students and to support entrepreneurship at primarily undergraduate institutions. Her background is in civil engineering with a focus on structural materials; she holds a B.S.E. degree from Princeton, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees from Cornell.Elena Rose Yasinski, Carnegie Mellon University Page 23.836.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Job Shadowing: Improving Interest and Persistence for Women in EngineeringAbstractWith funding from the Engineering Information Foundation, the Picker Engineering Program atSmith
Paper ID #34661WIP: Assessing Engineering State of Mind of First-Year UndergraduateAfrican American/Black Students in Scholar ProgramsJameka Wiggins, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Jameka Wiggins is an undergraduate senior Chemical Engineering major and Entrepreneurship minor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). She is a member of the Center for Women in Technology and Ronald E. McNair Scholar Programs, as well as a Senator for UMBC’s Chapter of The National Society of Black Engineers. Her research fields include the use additive manufacturing to create biomass containment devices and the
), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system tech- nology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science
include all types of girls createda misrepresentation of IT.In contrast to these prior studies, the CSRL at BYU has attempted to cultivate a gender-balancedenvironment rather than an all-female program. By adapting proven approaches that have shownsuccess to a mixed-gender environment, the CSRL has shown an increase in student researchpublications, class performance, and cybersecurity competitions. Though the researchenvironment contains a large male population, it does not cause any discouragement for womenas the environment is equal and unbiased. Students are encouraged to socially interact, askquestions, and seek mentorship in research projects and class work. Likewise, students are
AC 2011-1319: THE EFFECT OF SKEWED GENDER COMPOSITIONON STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERINGPROJECT TEAMSLorelle A Meadows, University of Michigan Dr. Lorelle Meadows is Director of Academic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. In this role, she holds primary responsibility for the design, management and delivery of the first year program to undergraduate students. She also serves as a catalyst for coordination among the engineering programs encompassed by the Office of Undergraduate Education, including the Center for Entrepreneurship, the International Programs Office and the Multidisciplinary Design program. In this role within the college, she also has
for judging.Judges for music and coding were recruited through both Amazon and Georgia Tech. Codingjudges were asked to have basic knowledge of coding or taken a coding class, while musicjudges were asked to have a background in music or play an instrument. All judges watched ashort training video and were asked to commit an hour of their time during a two-week judgingperiod. We recruited approximately 200 judges, split equally for coding and music.Each judge graded approximately ten student submissions, assuring that every entry wasreviewed by three separate judges in coding and music. Judges used the RocketJudge onlinecompetition platform to score their entries. Each submission was judged using a rubric on a 1-5scale.Coding criteria
technology administration, computer science, computerengineering, and mathematics. Demographic information about undergraduate students at thissite are given in Table 2. Table 2: Demographic information about undergraduate students in the IPS class. Semester 1 Semester 2Student Student Gender Major Gender Major ID ID Business Technology UG1 Female Computer Engineering UG7 Female
middle school in Phoenix, Arizona.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American
Engineering, and Dean of the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, a position he has held since 2005. Prior to Dartmouth, Dr. Helble was the AAAS Revelle Fellow, spending a year on staff in the U.S. Senate with a focus on science policy. Previously, he was Professor and Chair of Chemical Engineering at the University of Connecticut, and from 1987 to 1995, a researcher at Physical Sciences Inc. Dr. Helble is the author of over 100 publications and 3 U.S. patents, the recipient of several awards for his scholarly work, and a 2014 co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering Gordon Prize for the development of Dartmouth’s Engineering Entrepreneurship Program. He presently serves as Chair of the ASEE
process that engages local needs experts, who are people with disabilities and organizations that support people with disabilities. 2. Through this course, we provide an example of an inclusive culture in engineering. 3. The HuskyADAPT course is an example of integrating accessibility into a design course, which aligns with the recent addition of accessibility in the ABET definition of engineering design [7]. 4. The service learning component of our course may be especially attractive to underrepresented students in engineering, as engineering courses that include service learning commonly enroll a higher number of underrepresented students [8-12], and engineering classes or projects with clear service
. These includefamily, peers and group work, mentorship, relevant coursework, career goals, internships andresearch, pre-college engineering, and professors and other university staff. The candidates whowere interviewed had family members in engineering, or relied on their families for support.Three of the candidates had older siblings in engineering, which helped them decide on theirspecific major, and acted as someone to talk to when classes and life got tough. A few of theinterviewees did not have family members in engineering, but their families were their mainsupport system. And some of the candidates had family members who are in engineering orSTEM, who pushed them towards it.Most, if not all of the interviewees had something to say about
freshmen ENG^2 scholars were required toenroll in the class. The course provides in-depth information on the types of engineering, careeropportunities, degree programs, assistance in the career decision processes, the basics of theengineering design process, and reinforcement of the importance of communication, studyhabits, teamwork and continued professional development within the engineering profession.Students are required to maintain a design and professional development journal, attend a careerfair and work on a team based design project. Total enrollment in the fall 2008 class was 76students at day 14, and the fall 2009 class enrollment was 64 at day 14.“Discipline Chats” were held to provide in-depth information about the specific
ofcreative ideas within the EERB. A makerspace provides a location for students to explore ideas,complete class projects, or pursue an entrepreneurial innovation. As a general concept,university makerspaces present both formal and informal learning opportunities to students.From an educational perspective, makerspaces espouse constructivism and constructionism aslearning philosophies, incorporating collaborative and problem-based activities. Essentially, theexpertise and tools provided in makerspace facilities foster a hands-on approach to learningbased upon individual interests, building upon intrinsic motivation (Kurti, Kurti, & Fleming,2014) [1]. Whether a student wants to learn a new skill to improve classroom performance orparticipate just
identification of academic and socialfactors contributing to persistence,i but none, as far as can be determined, addresses the questionusing the strategy upon which the research presented in this paper is based: a review ofconsistently high-performing programs. We therefore decided to perform a qualitative analysisof engineering programs which have conferred at least 30%, on average, of their baccalaureatedegrees to females from Academic Year (AY) 2001 (Class of 2002) to 2005 (Class of 2006) toidentify core, common factors which support persistence of female undergraduates inengineering studies. The floor of 30% represents a level of achievement above the nationalaverage of approximately 20% of undergraduate engineering degrees conferred to females (as
[7]. Our model leverages the nine broad "Core Competency" areas for professional developmentestablished by the Graduate College at N.C. A&T. The nine Core Competencies are as follows:1) Career Development, 2) Communication, 3) Disciplinary Expertise & InterdisciplinaryConnections, 4) Entrepreneurship, 5) Global Awareness & Cultural Sensitivity, 6) Leadership &Management, 7) Personal Development, 8) Research, and 9) Teaching. For each of these CoreCompetency areas, students develop skills that build cumulatively in the course of their graduateeducation and their subsequent faculty career.For participants in the Preparing Future Minority Faculty for the Professoriate Program, the corecompetencies model discussed above forms a
, 2015 Attracting Women to Engineering through Service Based LearningIntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) points to enhancing student interest in engineering, scienceand technology entrepreneurship; and increased professional skills in design, communication andteamwork as some of the ‘Grand Challenges of Engineering’ (NAE, 2009). In response, the Departmentof Civil Engineering & Construction Management (CECM) at Georgia Southern University aims tosystematically integrate experiential and community service learning opportunities throughout thedepartmental curriculum in order to further the NAE vision of access to enhanced visibility andprofessional skills of its students. The objective of this revolutionary department
-centered with ground-breaking teaching/learning techniques, includes competency-based and other innovative learning approaches giving students greater flexibility and autonomy in pursuing their personal interests, and fosters academic success across a broader and more diverse population (Purdue Polytechnic Institute, 2015). Expanding the college’s state and global engagement and its research that are not only inspired by and more closely tied to the needs of industry and communities, but that also infuses innovation and entrepreneurship and integrates those skills into the college’s learning environment (Purdue Polytechnic Institute, 2015).Purdue Polytechnic has already begun efforts to prepare for
Research Fellowship to fund her PhD upon returning to the United States.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc
learning in formal and informal learning environments. She has designed and piloted a mobile application course for undergraduate non-CS majors through her participation last summer in the national pilot of the new AP CS Principles course. She is currently designing mobile appli- cation curriculum with MIT AP Inventor for 8th grade mathematics classes and middle and high school social studies classes. Dr. Gardner-McCune recently completed a year and a half long postdoctoral re- search position in computer science education at Georgia Institute of Technology’s College of Computing where she led the design of the I-3 Experience programs. She holds a B.S. in Computer Engineering from Syracuse University, and earned both
degree possibilities.Diversify educational opportunities for engineers. Women, as well as men, are attracted toprograms with visible positive impacts on society, such as bioengineering or environmentalengineering, as well as interdisciplinary programs. Attractive breadth for engineering programsinclude gaining more business or entrepreneurship knowledge, integration of engineering withliberal arts programs, or expanding international study experiences. We need to makeEngineering the degree of choice to engage the important issues of the present and the future.Consider a 5-year path to a professional degree. The possibility shifting the professionaldegree to the masters level was discussed both in the context of allowing the undergraduatedegree
AC 2012-3600: MIND LINKS 2012: RESOURCES TO MOTIVATE MI-NORITIES TO STUDY AND STAY IN ENGINEERINGDr. Maria M. Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic UniversityDr. Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of engineering at Penn State, Brandywine. His interests are in engineering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International
University Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She is a qualitative researcher who primarily uses narrative research methods and is interested more broadly in interpretive research methods. In her research, Dr. Kellam is broadly interested in developing critical understandings of the culture of engineering education and, espe- cially, the experiences of underrepresented undergraduate engineering students and engineering educators. In addition to teaching undergraduate engineering courses and a graduate course on entrepreneurship, she also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the
Paper ID #22321Reflections on a new community partnership: How does an engineering sum-mer camp evolve to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse student popula-tion? (WIP)Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in Cleveland OH where she manages a cowork- ing space and promotes community and diversity in the city’s entrepreneurship ecosystem. She served as an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo where she was involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of
, Technology, and Engineering and Math (STEM) programs relies heavilyon authentic partnerships. True partnerships are not just a transfer of monetary resources, but acombination of time, effort, access to cutting-edge technology and world-class laboratories, etc.Partnerships require commitment from all individuals and groups involved, in the case ofunderrepresented minorities, an evolving level of social and institutional cultural competence isalso required.Why are partnerships so important to the continuation of these vital programs? One of the largestnational deficits is the lack of STEM professionals, educators, and students currently studying inthe science and technology fields. It is imperative that we combine our resources to provide amulti
accompanying related Grand ChallengesScholars Program website: http://www.grandchallengescholars.org/. There are a series of eventsscheduled posted at http://summit-grand-challenges.pratt.duke.edu/ with the goals to:1. Enhance student interest in engineering and science.2. Increase the visibility and importance of engineering and science to society.3. Underscore the importance of recognizing that engineering education must be coupled to policy/business/law and must be student-focused.4. Enhance student interest in engineering, science, and technology entrepreneurship.5. Foment future collaborations of interested scientists, engineers, policy makers and researchers in business, law, social sciences and humanities needed to successfully address
actively encourage their faculty members to participate in research,educational and leadership activities beyond the engineering college”.[2, p. 7] The theme ofchanging the education system by encouraging cross-department integration of course materialwas suggested in the education literature as a way of retaining women and minorities in STEMprograms. Because of the complexities of world issues, globalization and meeting society needs,students need to understand and make connections among disparate areas (e.g., environments,issues, topics). Cross-department integration affords the opportunity to prepare students forfuture careers by linking technical classes with course work in business management, liberal arts,entrepreneurship and systems
in campus activities has been demonstrated to be important to cognitivedevelopment and persistence, as well as the accumulation of important social and culturalcapital.27-29 However, the benefits of involvement may be differently distributed among studentsfrom dissimilar social-class backgrounds. Specific differences, such as low SES students’ need towork, affects the amount of time they can commit to extracurricular activities such as ECT.30Faculty must recognize that subjective thresholds of time commitment may exclude somestudents from participation.We acknowledge that many different dimensions of diversity impact students’ experiences inengineering education and that these interlocking “inequality regimes” create different barriersfor
Page 23.546.6committee, an assessment committee, a program coordinator, and fifteen (15) femaleupperclassmen who served as peer mentors. In Fall 2010, the project committee met bi-weeklyfollowed by the assessment committee meeting. By Spring 2011, only the project committee metbi-weekly, since the work of the assessment committee was completed by the end of Fall 2010.Informal interaction between the project PI and other project members was frequent. The ProjectPI met with the Program Manager bi-weekly to discuss the progress of the project.Peer mentors were recruited from EXCEL then hired and trained over Summer 2010. Menteesconsisted of the entire EXCEL freshman female class and were assigned to mentors based ontwo factors: major and living
size in prior research. High schools in the region vary from agraduating class of 20to a class of over 400. The MIDFIELD study found there are differencesin retention in engineering that correlate to high school size (Chen & Ohland, 2012; Orr,Ramirez, & Ohland, 2011). In addition, high school STEM course offerings vary by school size;the smallest schools offer only the state requirements in mathematics and science, while thelarger schools offer advanced math and science electives. Huang (2000) found a statisticallysignificant difference in the availability of Advanced Placement (AP) or college level courses inPhysics and Chemistry for Hispanic high school students in comparison to white and Asianstudents. There are also teacher
, science, and technology entrepreneurship. Page 15.874.95. Foment future collaborations of interested scientists, engineers, policy makers and researchers in business, law, social sciences and humanities needed to successfully address these complex societal issues.A critical factor in determining whether a student will be successful in engineering is theirexposure to Mathematics. Teachers and counselors profile students into college bound and notcollege bound during their K-12 years, and have been criticized for not motivating or counselingminority and female students to take rigorous math courses. A poster is available throughNACME