issuccessful”“Have heard industry asking for graduates to have these competencies”Each of the departments (this term will be used to include programs and schools) in the COE, aswell as the COE itself, have Industry Advisory Committees (IACs) that advise the departmentson what they are looking for from the students and provide advice on what they think should bepart of the curriculum. One of their major complaints has been the lack of interpersonalskills.Employers are concerned with the students’ inability to think critically, solve problems,effectively negotiate, and take initiative [38]. They further agree this presents a problem in tryingto develop a global workforce [39] with a competitive edge.Some students and faculty agree that many of the
Paper ID #36979Particle Sampling and Analyses Using Computer-BasedApproachesJean M. Andino (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Civil, Environmental,and Sustainable Engineering) Jean M. Andino is a faculty member in Chemical Engineering as well as Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She also serves as the Director of the Western Alliance to Expand Student Opportunities (a National Science Foundation Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation program). Dr. Andino earned a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Sciences from Harvard University and a PhD in Chemical
are required in the separation. This is a great concern forengineering laboratories involving kilogram and gallon quantities of chemicals in their modules.Our new experimental module consists on students designing and implementing a continuousprocess for the extraction of lysozyme from egg whites. Lysozyme, a protein present in eggwhite and in secretions such as saliva and tears, serves as an antibacterial agent by interactingwith the sugars in the bacterial wall.[25] In the new module, the isolation of the protein is used tointroduce the topics of biotechnology and its applications to drug formulations. From an educational perspective, the general idea of this module is to introduce importantconcepts of biotechnology and complex fluids
, • Prepare graduate students with a realistic viewpoint of faculty or industry experiences in their chosen field, and • Utilize mentors’ expertise for the professional and personal development of STEM graduate students.The breadth of the goals of the program speaks to the breadth of issues dealt with within thementoring relationships and in the programmatic information from the mentoring program staff.Through the mentoring program, students are matched with a faculty or industry mentor, asappropriate, who can help them with their stated professional and personal needs. The programuses an updated version of the Curriculum for Training Mentors and Mentees in Science andEngineering24 to help participants establish and facilitate
the current year of designetteswas increased by approximately 50% over previous years. Faculty and student feedback wasprimarily used to characterize and compare the designette’s effectiveness. Initial results suggesta continued benefit of the inclusion of the designette approach to capstone design courses, withvarying results from the depth of design process coverage.1. IntroductionThe use of the capstone design experience is common in Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) accredited engineering programs [1]. While there are several modelsfor the capstone experience, each tailored to the institutional and program goals of a specificprogram, most are project-based and introduce, or reinforce the engineering design process
allow students an opportunity to synthesize the complex concepts introducedthroughout the course. The content of the six required fundamental units (U 1 to U 6)correspond to the chapters of Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of InternationalRelations [13], and include: U 1) introduction to science diplomacy; U 2) what is sciencediplomacy?; U 3) science diplomacy as a national issue; U 4) science in diplomatic apparatus:the diversity of national approaches; U5 ) science in the vanguard of diplomacy; and U 6)multilateral science diplomacy. Additional required online media were selected as supplementallectures to five of the six required fundamental units, including: U 1) “Science Diplomacy: AnIntroduction,” created by the AAAS [33]; U 2) “A
computing arestill scarce. For example, new cryptosystems, new exploits at the application level, and new tech-niques that nourish students’ analytical mindset in digital forensics are missing in the prior litera-ture. Moreover, although most existing works engage students and examine their feedback, littleresearch continuously studies students’ feedback and uses it to improve the quality of their mate-rials in the long run. An adequate solution to these issues is required for the broader adoption ofcybersecurity curricula.In this paper, we present ReScuE, a cloud-based framework coupled with a suite of hands-on labsin various disciplines of pervasive computing, including new cryptosystems, new offensive tech-nology in mobile computing, and new
Paper ID #22490Piloting the Use of Technology to Provide Better Support to Students Through-out Their Life CycleRachel LeBlanc, International Council on Systems Engineering Rachel LeBlanc is the Assistant Vice President of Academic and Corporate Engagement at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She manages the portfolio of non-traditional academic programs for the University and engages in economic development activities tied to university strategy. Rachel has over 15 years of experience working with faculty and industry experts to create education solutions to meet business needs. She manages a variety of functional areas
librarian. Theyare not intended to cover every question that personnel in other library areas might ask. Rather,they are intended to be a starting point for a system wide process of database selection.II. What resource format meets the information need?This question assumes that an information need has been identified. Perhaps a faculty member orstudent has identified a new area of research that requires bibliographic information not currentlyprovided for in the collection. Perhaps an access change has occurred, as when INSPECmodified its pricing structure via FirstSearch, causing a loss of low cost availability to thedatabase. Or perhaps budget considerations have necessitated a review of the collection.After the information need has been
traditional instructional frameworks do not provide students with the skillsor experience that they will need to solve open-ended, real world engineering problems on thejob. In 2013, Seattle University was awarded a National Science Foundation grant to implementand study a new framework that addressed this issue.2 This study was done over a two-yearperiod in an undergraduate heat transfer course. In 2014, heat transfer was taught in a traditional classroom setting to establish a control for thenew instructional framework. Using a standard textbook,3 the heat transfer course providedstudents theoretical knowledge of conduction, convection, and radiation and practical skillsnecessary to design and analyze heat transfer systems. At Seattle University
a visit is considered extremely stressfulby headmasters and faculty, particularly because a rating of “needs improvement” usually resultsin the removal of the headmaster.4 There is serious concern about lack of training andconsistency of OFSTED evaluators as well as the fact that they serve only as judges handingdown assessments without recommendation for improvement and with no follow-up.4Nonetheless, this is the system under which assessment of secondary schools and secondaryschool students is made and which is used for admission decisions to UK universities.University DegreesWe will now move on, and examine the university system in the UK, particularly in engineering.Engineering degrees awarded in the UK are a bit different from those in
based on a combination of individual/team effort versus solely on the teamproduct. Faculty continually grapples with questions such as “can a team member be fired” and“if not, what are the realistic consequences?” School is a learning environment where studentlearning is fostered and students are given second chances. Academic culture, by its very nature,is opposed to unfairness, dire consequences, swift punishment and the harsh reality encounteredin the world and specifically, the workplace. Considering these types of issues leads one towonder how well the university education prepares a student to be successful in a real worldteam environment.This paper investigates this question through a comparison of university teams to business
advantage of office hours with faculty members the faculty tooktime to explain concepts to them they were struggling with, Most of the faculty are friendly, even if they try to come off as intimidating in class. Although, I think they just try to be intimidating so that we take the class seriously. Office hours with most professors are always really helpful.While participants lamented the intimidating classroom environment they sometimesexperienced, they did explain that their educational experience did make them feel prepared totackle new and different situations. Participants explained that when they had the opportunity toapply what they learned in class, for example in summer internships, their confidence grew.Even if students
course being taught to engineering students. Furthermore, he argued that new courses and research programs on wood should be initiated so that some of our engineering graduates might be inspired to pursue advanced work on wood in either engineering or wood technology departments. In the five years that have elapsed since Dr. Saeman presented hispaper, entitled, Wood as an Engineering Material--An Issue for 11Educators 11 , a substantial degree of progress has been made toward help-ing educators meet the obligatioQs)mentioned above. The most importantevent was the Heritage Workshop,t2 on 11 Wood-It s Structure and prop- 1erties11, held in Madison
. in Mathematics, and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics. Prior to joining the TAMU CSE faculty Dr.Hammond taught for five years at Columbia University and was a telecom analyst for four years at Gold-man Sachs. Dr Hammond is the 2011-2012 recipient of the Charles H. Barclay, Jr. ’45 Faculty FellowAward. The Barclay Award is given to professors and associate professors who have been nominated fortheir overall contributions to the Engineering Program through classroom instruction, scholarly activities,and professional service. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix PedagogyAbstractIntroductory engineering courses at large universities often number over a
maintains a self sustaining charge throughregeneration at times of low power train demands. A National Instruments' LabVIEW system isused to monitor and control the vehicle.The development of the vehicle is a multidisciplinary project with students from mechanicalengineering, electrical engineering and computer science involved. The majority of theundergraduate team members are enrolled in a two-semester senior design sequence. However,graduate students and volunteers also participated in the program. Faculty advisors from bothelectrical and mechanical engineering provide guidance for the team. Large, interdisciplinaryteam projects like this can give students a more complete understanding of interfacing, decisionmaking and cooperation.II. Hydrogen
particularinterest to engineering students and engineering faculty, and provides links to internet sitescontaining further detail. This paper available online at http://www.asee.org/conferences/paper-search-form.cfm using the keywords MIND Links. To recommend links for inclusion pleasecontact please email petrie@fau.edu with the subject MIND Links.IntroductionThe myriad of programs designed to promote participation of minorities in engineering andtechnology disciplines often are underutilized because minority faculty and minority studentsmay not be aware of these opportunities, nor of how and where to apply. Opportunities rangefrom programs designed to promote student interest in these fields, to summer enrichmentprograms, scholarships, fellowships
-line or real-times measures collect data duringlearning. The debate regarding which measures provide the best information about how wellpeople can self-direct their learning [13, 14] is understandable considering the complexities ofthe metacognition construct (i.e., consisting of declarative and procedural components) as well asa valid concern about whether the measures actually portray the psychological processesinvolved.Off-line measures of metacognition include interviews or questionnaires. On-line measures, onthe other hand, are obtained primarily through real-time think-aloud protocols or accuracyratings. A think-aloud protocol involves a person verbalizing while solving a problem. Theverbalizations are recorded, then they are transcribed
to meet 7 outcomes.Outcome 4 states “Design appropriate solutions in one or more application domains usingsoftware engineering approaches that integrate ethical, social, legal, and economic concerns”. Itis through this outcome we expect students to design solutions that address ethical, social, legal,security, and economic concerns. The importance of security in the curriculum guidelines can benoted from the change in SE education Knowledge Areas. In the 2004 Curriculum Guidelines forUndergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering [4] security was listed as an area ofstudy. However in the 2014 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs inSoftware Engineering [5] there is now an increase in the visibility of software
Paper ID #37062Board 313: Implementing Computational Thinking Strategies across theMiddle/High Science CurriculumDr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education, Director of the Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Teacher Development, and Director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Planetarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of engineering students and K-12 teacher connections with engineering.Dr. Olfa Nasraoui, University of Louisville Olfa Nasraoui is
and methods. Page 1.359.6 .--” 1BUT, THERE ARE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS . — - - ....As with any new concept or program, it is anticipated that there will be problems. Careful selection of studentsto pticipate. in this program, especially at the outset, will minimize these problems. First and foremost, thereare the problems associated with the language of the international country. Also, there is the adjustment tocultural differences. As with learning experiences of most types, overcoming the problem will be beneficial forall concerned. Also, after several students have returned
activities. As such, the traditional stumbling blocks of effecting credittransfer, differential tuition costs, and issues of foreign language have not only been mediated,but are essentially overcome by the Global E 3 program.AdministrationIn the United States the program is administered centrally by the Institute of InternationalEducation (IIE) based in New York City and in Europe by GE4, thereby minimizing the Page 7.455.2paperwork of individual member universities. IIE and GE4 oversee the student application and“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
each problem, the students were asked with a set of questions centeredon students' initial thought as they approach the CPBL system in earlier stage. The questionswere to investigate the student's expectations on CPBL after attending classes in the first fewweeks of the semester, what are the differences compared to their usual teaching and learningexperience, and what concerns they had. At the mid-semester stage, the focus of the interview Page 25.557.5shifted towards their emotional aspect as students were showing frustration in struggling to adaptto the CPBL cycles. The questions geared towards reflections of their learning issues and
class climates, financial concerns, and poor academic performance. For URM, thesechallenges are typically more pronounced and compounded by inadequate high schoolpreparation and issues navigating the school system [18].STEM intervention programs aim to fix barriers to student success by providing academic,financial, and social support through components such as summer bridge transition experiences,academic tutoring, peer or faculty mentoring, and skill building [11]; [14]. These componentsmay support students by building support systems that contribute to students’ sense of belongingat the university and within their major, support their ability to navigate existing institutional
associated strongly with peripheral cues, such as length of time workingtogether, feelings of liking or similarity, or general assessment of interpersonal cues like beingtalkative or “nice.” Participants struggled to articulate or justify these assessments, often relyingon statements such as “there was just something about him.” While this issue is not yet fullyunderstood, the low values for degree centrality and network density in the ethical networksuggest that team members are more selective about ethics, or perhaps are more uncomfortableidentifying it in their work teams. Conclusion This paper offers a new method for examining engineering design teams that may beparticularly useful to engineering
4th-12th Grade StudentsAbstractMany U.S. public school systems have experienced declining standardized test scores in mathand science. Of particular concern is an increasing disparity in the scores of underprivileged andunderserved students compared to other peer groups. This trend poses a distressing problem forthe engineering field, and has been identified as a major issue by the US Department ofTransportation, being viewed as a threat to the sustainability of the nation’s infrastructure andeconomic growth. This issue is compounded by a growing demand in the transportation industryfor skilled workers.Recognizing these concerns, a number of entities, including the University of Nebraska’s Mid-America and Nebraska Transportation Centers (MATC
reducing its greenhouse emissions. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationEnvironmental issues are a significant concern for both students and faculty of the University, aswell as the surrounding community. In 2001, the President of Rowan University, Dr. DonaldFarish, made a commitment with 45 other New Jersey College and University Presidents to theNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to support the Sustainability GreenhouseGas Action Plan for New Jersey. This commitment promised that Rowan University wouldreduce its greenhouse emissions to 3.5% below 1990 levels, by 20051. As the 2005
. Hisresearch is linked to hers, so if the results are not valid, it will negatively impact her project, and theentire lab. Everyone really likes John, including the PI, and everyone knows that she has been dealingwith a lot of setbacks in her research. She doesn’t want to look like a jealous co-worker by accusing Johnof fabricating data, but she truly suspects that he has. 1. What should Evelyn do? 2. Why is misconduct such an important issue in the scientific community? 3. What measures are in place to help prevent misconduct?Case Study: Credit Where Credit is Due(from Branchaw, Pfund and Rediske (2010) Entering Research: A Facilitator’s Manual. W.H. Freeman & Co, New York. pp.199. Their original source is “On Being a Scientist
vital role in many aspects of the US’s aerospace program. One of the main goals ofCCSU initiatives is to cater to the potential employers of our graduates. The project emphasizesmany attributes that employers look for in their new hires. It prepares students to address andtackle complex and interdisciplinary design problems, to work in diverse teams, to acquireproject management skills, and to present their findings to peers, faculty, industrial partners, andsponsors. Therefore, the implementation of this exciting NASA education-based program intothe senior capstone real-world design challenge helps in engaging students in solving aerospacerelated technical challenges, strengthening the future workforce of the local and nationwideaerospace
enhanced and expanded officially in 2001. However, thisprogram was designed to spark interests in science, engineering, and technology resulting inincreased enrollment in STEM related areas at colleges and universities. The UVUadministration, with the help of the English Department, realized a need to strengthen andimprove students’ reading and writing skills. In 2018 WE Committee was established at theuniversity level to handle this task. Some of the faculty representing the College of Engineeringand Technology, helped establish criteria for WE courses that were suitable for campus-wideimplementation.The UVU Academic Affairs Office approved the final version of the proposed WE requirementsin 2019. The new curriculum change was then announced and