Session 3630 An Inclusive Engineering Curriculum: How to persuade and assist your colleagues to develop one Julie Mills, Mary Ayre University of South Australia / University of GlamorganAbstractEngineering faculty are urged to be ‘inclusive’ when teaching classes of diverse students. Aninclusive approach, it is argued, will not only assist the progress of those students from socialand cultural groups, which have not traditionally entered engineering, but it will also broaden theperspectives of all students and thus improve the overall quality of an engineering
AC 2010-1903: A SPIRAL LEARNING CURRICULUM IN MECHANICALENGINEERINGRobert Roemer, University of Utah Robert B. Roemer is currently a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. He received his B.S. degree from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Stanford University. He teaches courses in engineering design, and is interested in integrating the use of design projects and active learning throughout the curriculum to improve engineering education.Stacy Bamberg, University of Utah Stacy J. Morris Bamberg is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She received her S.B. and S.M. in Mechanical Engineering
,security, health, and joy. The framework and development of the challenges is described inTable II [5]. Table II Organizing the NAE themes for the fourteen Grand Challenges Sustaining Life on Earth: Threatening the very existence of the human race and living organisms on our planet is a fundamental problem that needs to be addressed first. What would happen if we leave things unsolved, undermining our ability to occupy this planet indefinitely? Engineers addressing challenges that sustain life on Earth led to the identification of several of the Grand Challenges. Among these issues related to clean water and solving the energy crisis. Living Secure from Threats: Not only is sustainable
Paper ID #37097Board 370: Relationship between Mindset and Grit on UndergraduateEngineering Student Retentiontina Cartwright, Marshall UniversityJulie Lynn Snyder-Yuly, Marshall UniversityDr. Wook-sung Yoo, Marshall University Dr. Wook-Sung Yoo is Director of Research at Marshall University. He joined Marshall University in 2016 as a chair and professor of the Weisberg Department of Computer Science. He has diverse aca- demic background in Computer Science, Information Systems, Cybersecurity, Data Science, Software Engineering, Computer and Electrical Engineering, Health Informatics, Bioinformatics, Dentistry, Dental
Paper ID #33551A Rapid and Formative Response by the Engineering Education Faculty toSupport the Engineering Faculty and Students Throughout the ExtremeClassroom Changes Resulting from the COVID-19 PandemicMr. Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University Lance White is a Ph.D. student at Texas A&M University in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a thrust in Engineering Education. He is working as a graduate research assistant at the Institute of Engineering Education and Innovation at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station at Texas A&M University under director Dr. Tracy Hammond. Dr. Karan Watson and Dr. Pavel
opportunities for improvement. Recommendations regarding humanitiesand social sciences for BOK3 are presented based on the findings of this student. Therecommendations are grounded in previously established curriculum guidance including ABETprior to ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000, EAC/ABET 3(a) through 3(k), BOK and BOK2.Integration of Humanities and Social Sciences into BOK, ABET and other CriteriaThere is a large body of literature, going back in time, which provides support for humanities andsocial science (H/SS) in the education and the practice of engineering.1-6 There is a commonagreement that an engineering education must be supported with a fundamental education inmathematics, natural sciences, humanities and social sciences. The graphic
, Marshall, Castillo and Cardenas33 used scoringrubrics to generate numerical scores from qualitative writing for physical hydrology students.Within the current study, content experts produce concept inventory questions at theundergraduate level based on the levels of Bloom’s Revised Cognitive Taxonomy. Measurement of student motivation outcomes is assessed using Jones’ MUSIC Model ofAcademic Motivation14. This model consists of the following five primary components ofmotivation: 1) eMpowerment, 2) Usefulness, 3) Success, 4) Interest and 5) Caring. Page 26.238.5Empowerment relates to self-determination theory, which states that people are
stimulating curricular content for highschool agriculture teachers, emphasizing the modern, technology-infused components of theindustry and resulting in a series of Agriculture-based STEM lessons. The background andglobal objectives of the researchers were covered previously [1], but in summary, it was hopedthat some stimulating technology lessons provided during the career formative years of highschool might convince more students to select an agricultural vocation as being leading edge andworthy of consideration as a potential career option. The current employment plight withinagriculture is severe and contains a double-edged sword [2]. Jobs in the agricultural world areperceived as low class and menial, but the technological knowledge necessary
slide-number-70, etc. Note that it is necessary touse an incognito browser to access the “Try this example” option if there is a Matlab versionalready installed in the computer.The Undergraduate Research High Impact Practice in our Community College has a budget tosupport students ($5000 for two-semester and 1,000 for faculty per student participant). Therequirements include formulation of a research hypothesis with justification from previousresearch publications, doing the research process, doing the research writing, doing the researchpresentation, etc. In contrary, the learning assistant pedagogy described above would emphasizethe programming skills with a context of complexity simulation study with an application to MRIdata analysis to
Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Prof. Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the
education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He worked on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design. He has also co-developed a Page 15.1149.1 Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. He is currently working on NSF projects
the students couldn’t help but learn about themath in order to solve the design problem10.The popular Logo environment has involved the Turtle, originally a robotic creature that movedaround on the floor11. Logo can be a very powerful tool to help children – and college students –learn mathematics. It could help kindergarten children write simple programs to draw interestingshapes. It has also been used by college students to solve difficult problems in calculus.Despite its many potential benefits, Logo did not become part of the school math curriculum, andit is not referenced in the Core Curriculum Standards. It is, however, possible to createsomething that has many of the good points of Logo, and still connect it to classroom practice.Other
; Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Table 1. Course learning objectivesBy the end of the course, students must demonstrate ability to…1. In writing, explain the drug and medical device approval process in the United States.The explanation should include a description of the structure of the regulatory agency,important regulatory documents, the sequence of events, applications necessary, and theplayers involved.2. Define, obtain the regulatory codes, and describe the FDA’s guidance strategy forCurrent Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP).3. Draw a process flow diagram for a variety of biopharmaceutical manufacturingprocess and describe the operation and purpose of each unit, including water
British Chemical Manufacturers reported half ofthem as saying that the quality of chemical engineers was not very satisfactory because theywere not able to write reports, lacked cost consciousness, and did not fit harmoniously into theworking environment. This was typical of comments to be made about university education inlater years (see below) [9].Many questions arise, among them is one that does not seem to have been investigated, that is:why were these industrialists not able to influence the college advisory boards or boards ofgovernors on which they sat? Why were not the colleges organized such that industrialists mighthave more direct influence on their work? Part of the problem was that there was a tradition thatthe work of the colleges
domain is categorized from simpleto complex behaviors. Specifically, knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis,and evaluation are the behaviors that are typically mastered sequentially due to the nature of theirincreasing difficulty. Bloom’s method allows the development and accurate measurement ofstudents’ learning progression through each level of behavior. As behavior at each level islearned sequentially, with each new step in the chain building on its predecessor, this approachallows the development of a deeper level of understanding and higher-order thinking. Designingand conducting classroom activities that support the cognitive learning domains of Bloom’staxonomy can allow students to develop their fundamental and higher
Paper ID #21865Preparing Engineering College Students for a Culturally Diverse Global JobMarketDr. Maria Claudia Alves , Texas A&M University Maria Claudia Alves Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University Dr. Maria Claudia Alves is the Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University . She has been in this position since July 2012. In this position she is responsible for interna- tionalizing the research and education activities of the Dwight Look College of Engineering. Under her leadership the college has significantly increased the
Paper ID #37902From Silos to Systems: The Evolution of \University’s\ College ofEngineering PreCollege OutreachDr. Betsy Chesnutt, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Betsy Chesnutt is a lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville. She is interested in understanding how to prepare pre-service teachers to teach engineering, as well as how to support current K-12 teachers so that they can implement engineering into K-12 classrooms more effectively.Dr. Anne Skutnik, Tickle College of Engineering Anne Skutnik is the Director of Student Success for Tickle College of EngineeringProf. Laura
capabilities. If the consensus among industrypartners is not achieved, the Delphi process will be repeated. Then the final stage of theprocess involves reporting consensus results and discussing key discrete opinions. Recruit Participants: Focus on those who have expertise in the area under investigation. Design 1st Survey: Generate open-ended questions about the area of interest, asking respondents to write down their views about the topic. Content Analysis: Use “constant comparative method,” (grouping like responses) and tally like responses and themes to generate a comprehensive list. Design 2nd Survey: Report responses and ask respondents to rate these on 4 or 5 point
students towork in teams. A course outline is provided in Table 1.The computer lab exercises involve e-mail and web searching, designing an airplane wing,HTML scripting, MatLab, Excel, and statistics, and how things work as the writing intensiveassignment. The instrument labs cover 2-D and 3-D drawing using TurboCAD and SolidWorks,use of lab instruments, circuit measurements on resistive circuits, and building and testing amultivibrator, decade counter, and flip-flop using integrated circuits. In addition, basic solderingand basic wireless communication is taught using a temperature satellite. Apart from the labs,students also participate in three other teaming activities which are the focus of this paper. Thethree teaming events, three exams and
Paper ID #18387Training and Development for Faculty New to Teaching and AcademiaLt. Col. Clint Armani PhD, Unites States Air Force Academy Lt Col Clint Armani is an assistant professor of mathematical sciences at the United States Air Force Academy. In previous assignments, he served as the commander of a test and evaluation squadron, flight test engineer and mechanical engineer. Lt Col Armani received a BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Arkansas, a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University, and a PhD in Aeronautical Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology. He is also a graduate of
AC 2012-3982: INTRODUCING FACULTY RESEARCH TO UNDERGRAD-UATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS: ENHANCING ACTIVE COOPERA-TIVE LEARNINGDr. Nina Robson, Texas A&M University Nina Robson is currently an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department at Texas A&M University and an Assistant Researcher in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of California, Irvine.Dr. Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University Joseph A. Morgan has more than 20 years of military and industry experience in electronics and telecom- munications systems engineering. He joined the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution De- partment in 1989 and has served
% vs. 30%).Success in completing certificates and the professional licensure process represent a measure ofaccomplishment and life-long learning. As in the past, we asked the RIT alumni to identify thevarious licenses and certifications that they have acquired since graduation from RIT. Table 3provides the results of this question, by discipline and by year of survey. The Fundamentals ofEngineering (FE) and Professional Engineer (PE) examinations represent a multi-disciplinarycertification, but our results demonstrate - as they have in the past- that these certifications arethe most important to CET graduates. It is assumed that the reduction in percentage of CETgraduates attaining the PE license is attributed to the fact that most of the
industrialexperience before entering academia, and understands first hand the importance of beingable to interact effectively with professionals of other disciplines. In fact, Jim Rand’s keenenthusiasm for being the business professor participant was a direct result of his workexperience outside of academia, and without his support this venture most likely would nothave developed. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to transcend discipline-basedacademic barriers. Business and engineering were chosen because, in the real world,effective communication and understanding between these two professions are vital tocorporate success in the high-tech industry.A Wor k in Pr ogr essThis effort was initiated Spring Quarter of 2001 when Don Bowie and Dr. Jim Rand
engineering education, nuclearWengineering, science and technology studies (STS), social science, philosophy, rhetoric, and technical communication (as a non-exhaustive list). The design-build-test framework is an evidence-based approach to engaged learning in engineering education [3, 4, 5]. It allows students to learn engineering concepts and skills while learning the engineering design process. This approach is particularly effective when paired with technical communication instruction, in which students also write and speak about their design work across diverse audiences. Sometimes, students design for community organizations or local businesses to solve a particular design challenge. However, the opportunity
Paper ID #43492WIP: The Missing Link? Providing Honors Students a Self-Paced AssignmentThat Fits Their NeedsDr. Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas Dr. Aysa Galbraith is a Teaching Associate Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at University of Arkansas. She received her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Chemical and Biomolecular Department at North Carolina State University in 2006. She is responsible from coordinating the First-Year Honors Research Experience, teaching Introduction to Engineering, developing course material, and advising freshmen engineering students.Dr. Heath Aren Schluterman, University of
the analysis reveal that all the students that prepare study sheets with medium and high levels ofdetails obtained distinction grades, while at least one student who prepared a study sheet with low levels of details ordid not prepare any study sheet scored below the distinction grade. This study’s findings align with Erbe’s [4]perspective, suggesting that preparing study-sheets for exams positively impacts students’ performance.One of the limitations with this study includes the academic integrity of the students when writing the examinationsat home. There is no guarantee that the students did not use course materials beyond their study sheet and/orcollaborated with their classmates during the exam. However, all students were bound by the
separately, is significant for examining changea very organized functional administration procedure. endeavors in the Saudi instructive setting [22]. According to The capacity of the experts taking part in the change cycle Rogers (2003), an innovation's internal factors are itshas likewise been noted as imperative. Teachers and characteristics that can either encourage change or elicitadministrators in charge of making the changes have found it opposition. Outer variables envelop the circumstances whereinchallenging to adjust to new methods and procedures. Moreover, an advancement is presented, reflected as the information andpartner investment is missing fundamentally. The education
work, she developed and validated a new interdisci- plinary assessment in the context of carbon cycling for high school and college students using Item Re- sponse Theory. She is also interested in developing robotics-embedded curricula and teaching practices in a reform-oriented approach. Currently, a primary focus of her work at New York University is to guide the development of new lessons and instructional practices for a professional development program under a DR K-12 research project funded by NSF.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a
through the REU program on the post-survey: hard and soft skills. Hard skills thatstudents mentioned were fundamental knowledge acquisition, practice of techniques/skills, andhow to do research. Soft skills that students addressed were higher-order thinking skills,communication, teamwork, professionalism, and networking. Higher-order thinking skills thatstudents addressed include analytical, critical, problem solving skills and creativity.Communication includes communication skills with peers, research teams, and people fromdifferent disciplines of research, presentation of the research through posters, and writing skills.Professionalism includes persistence, patience, confidence, independence or autonomy, and timemanagement.Among hard skills
graduate students and professors,how to write reports, and working independently.Participant Perceptions of Engineering ResearchStudent perceptions of engineering research were measured by way of scaled agree/disagreequestionnaire items, open-ended questions, and focus group discussion opportunities, including acollage exercise. One major theme of their responses is that participation in an REU programchanged their pre-conceived notions of what working in engineering research is really like.Three-word descriptions of “research in engineering” were collected from participants on the Page 14.1227.6First Day and Final Day. These are included in