. These projects help expose students to practical design issues in thefreshman year, foster creative problem solving skills and may aid student retention onengineering programs. These projects have also been successfully piloted in pre-collegeprograms, aimed at generating interest in engineering careers among high school students.We describe ongoing work to extend these projects to include computer control and sensoryfeedback, allowing students to develop autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Further, weoutline ongoing work to assess the effectiveness of these modules.1 IntroductionThis paper describes an ongoing effort, at Stevens Institute of Technology, to develop a set ofeducational modules, which will teach fundamental engineering
, and Circuit Analysis.Prof. Todd D. Morton, Western Washington University Todd Morton has been teaching the upper level embedded systems and senior project courses for Western Washington University’s Electronics Engineering Technology(EET) program for 25 years. He has been the EET program coordinator since 2005 and also served as department chair from 2008-2012. He is the author of the text ’Embedded Microcontrollers’, which covers assembly and C programming in small real-time embedded systems and has worked as a design engineer at Physio Control Corporation and at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory as an ASEE-NASA Summer Faculty Fellow. He has a BSEE and MSEE from the University of Washington
strategies of self-reflection, and teamcitizenship, we believe that it is pertinent to study and explore these two aspects together. Thus,in this study, we aim to explore the relationship between these two strategies.Research MethodSite The data is collected from a large mid-western university from the first-year engineeringstudents of a required course. In this class, students learn to develop the solutions for engineeringdesigns by attempting modeling challenges and practice evidence-based engineering decisions ondiverse teams. “Students cover topics such as data visualization and analysis, ethics, engineeringdesign, application of basic programming to the solution of engineering problems, developmentof mathematical models to solve
AC 2011-2404: A DROP-IN TUTORING PROGRAM TO SUPPORT FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERINGDr. Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder BEVERLY LOUIE is the director for teaching and learning initiatives in the Broadening Opportunities through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from CU, and a D.Phil. in mechanical engineer- ing from the University of Oxford, England. Dr. Louie’s research interests are in the areas of engineering student retention and performance, teaching effectiveness and collaborative learning.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder DANIEL W. KNIGHT is the engineering assessment
, West Virginia University Lizzie Y. Santiago, Ph.D., is a Teaching Associate Professor for the Freshman Engineering Program in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources. She holds a Ph.D. in chemical engineering and has postdoctoral training in neural tissue engineering and molecular neurosciences. She teaches freshman engineering courses and supports the outreach and recruiting activities of the college. Her research interests include neural tissue engineering, stem cell research, absorption of air pollutants in human upper airways, attrition and university retention, increasing student awareness and interest in research and engineering, STEM education, and recruitment and retention of
interested in sustainability education and transdisciplinary learning.Mr. Gerald Tembrevilla, University of British Columbia c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing Metacognition in First-Year Students through Interactive Online VideosAbstractThis complete research paper examines the use and impact of a series of optional interactiveonline videos (“screencasts”) to develop metacognition and learning perspectives in first-yearengineering students. In 2018, eight screencasts were distributed once per week at the start of anintroduction to engineering course; this was expanded to nine screencasts in 2019. Theeffectiveness of the screencasts was assessed using a
pedagogies by exploring the effectivenessof small interventions that can be embedded into busy course curriculums without significantlydetracting from classroom time available for content directly connected to course outcomes. Thethree interventions used in this study include a first-day collaborative activity to establishclassroom norms; a mid-quarter activity centered around growth mindset and metacognition; anda one-to-one instructor/student meeting.The effectiveness of the interventions on increasing sense of belonging is assessed using a seriesof five Likert scale questions drawn from other belongingness surveys found in the literature [2].The pre-course survey was administered during the first week of the term with nine questionsembedded in a
University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work in Progress: Self-Guided Professional Development as an Enabler for Multidisciplinary ProgramsAbstractThe capstone design program at Colorado School of Mines serves three departments and fourdegree programs, each having their own demands, distinctive industry-specific languages, anddepartmental expectations. Each discipline is looking to the capstone design program to provideABET required capstone projects and assessment, professional practice training, and instructionin multiple discipline specific design tools and techniques to their students. This paper describesthe use of student-specific professional development plans, in
five outcome areas. The specific learning objectives are given in Table1 in the Assessment section.Acculturate Students to the College and UniversityBoth the literature and focus groups with SJSU freshmen indicate the importance of engagementon campus to student success. A primary goal of EXCEED was to get the students familiar withthe resources on campus, including current students, staff and faculty. Roughly nine hours ofdirect programming was dedicated to this outcome including the activities detailed below.Peer Mentors: A core part of the program was peer mentors. Five peer mentors each workedwith a small team of the EXCEED students (six to seven students per team) throughout theprogram. The peer mentors had served as peer mentors for the
compared.6,7 The existing literature about TFIDF describes it as atechnique used to classify documents based on keywords and modifiers. Specifically, TFIDF isused to describe documents using hierarchical subclasses, or other creative methods where thealgorithm is used repeatedly per subclass. For example, a keyword for a computer hardware partmight be described as “comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware”, and this is an example of where thealgorithm is used repeatedly in a loop within each subclass. From a computational perspectivethis puts a large load on the processor(s), and as such is quite intensive, but the results aregenerally accurate. Although we are not using a repeated looping method within subclasses forthis study, we can still use the TFIDF to
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 3D Printing in a First-Year Engineering Design ProjectAbstractThe current study is a work in progress. First-Year Engineering Students from a medium-sized,urban, public university took part in a semester long design project. The Honors Students (1section or approximately 20% of the class) had an additional design project that utilized 3D printtechnologies. During the 2015-2016 school year the honors students worked in small groups todevelop a concept that was then 3D printed for a design competition and then students had theopportunity to revise their design for a final design competition. Course instructors assessed theexperience to better understand how the use of 3D printing
students in developing certain design qualities. Sheppard andJenison [2] outlined these qualities as communication skills, effective teamwork, reflection,problem-solving skills, being resourceful, and considering various aspects of a problemincluding socioeconomics and environment. Depending on the institution, different approacheshave been taken to achieve these qualities such as weekly labs, class demonstrations, smallprojects, and multi-week large-scale projects. Examples of these projects include a mousetrapvehicle project, a balsa bridge project, building airplane out of a soda can, an egg dropcompetition, a cantilever beam competition, a tennis ball launcher, and building catapults andtrebuchets [3].In fall 2013, the Engineering Practice and
of the program, with upheld focus on increasing interest, knowledge, andconfidence in STEAM, were as follows: 1. Increase young women students’ interest levels in STEAM fields 2. Provide an opportunity for young women to engage in coding and use coding as a platform for future STEAM inquiry in college and beyond 3. Increase student self-confidence and critical thinking skills in STEAM/coding 4. Incorporate coding into a topic in which students are interested in and experience daily such as music 5. Help students draw connections between their interests, passions, and STEAM disciplinesRationale for the Program and Literature ReviewWhen assessing the global proportion of STEM professional positions between
model or script dominating that situation, and envisioning possible moral conflicts or dilemmas that might arise in that context or as outcomes of the dominating scheme. 2. The ability to imagine new possibilities. These possibilities include those that are not context-dependent and that might involve another mental model. 3. Evaluating from a moral point of view both the original context and its dominating mental models, and the new possibilities one has envisioned.Students, as with many people, have a tendency to see ethical issues as black and white. That is,they quickly assess the problem and come up with a “right” course of action. In this process,they use habitual patterns and frameworks for their moral assessment
the first-yearengineering may be a good setting in which to introduce the inverted classroom approach. Thepositive attitude percentage is similar to, or even higher than, the figures given in many reports inthe literature.1,6,7,8Conclusion and Future WorkIn summary, the first-year engineering honors program at Ohio State implemented the invertedclassroom approach as part of switching from the quarter system to semesters. Students wererequired to engage in lightly-assessed preparation activities before each class and to participatein application activities during class time. In-class lecturing was minimal. First-semesterstudents learning computer programming in the first implementation of this approach performedno differently from those who
Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Jamie R. Gomez, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez, Ph.D., is a Lecturer Title III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- Principal Investigator for the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Professional Formation of Engineers: Research Initiation in Engineering
programming skills [24, 25].In this study, we investigated the following research questions: (1) In a computer programmingcourse, how does the assessment of students’ written and coded solutions to a complex open-ended problem change over the course of multiple submissions? and (2) How do students’solutions compare across sections that have an emphasis on modeling and others that do not?MethodsSetting and ParticipantsIn Fall 2018, 302 students enrolled in an introductory computer programming course forengineers across 16 sections at a medium-sized, private, STEM+Business only university. Theprogramming language for the course is MATLAB. All mechanical, civil, and aerospaceengineering students are required to take this course. The electrical and
Page 26.1221.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Peer-Led-Team-Learning in Early General Engineering CurriculumAbstractThe Partnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science (PRIMES)is an NSF STEP program being implemented across nine different departments in three differentschools (Engineering, Education, and Arts and Sciences) at the University of Louisville. Thecornerstone of this program is the development of Peer-Led-Team-Learning (PLTL) communitiesin several of the foundation courses for each of the participating departments. The underlyingconcept of this approach is students will feel more comfortable and are more
engage young engineers. Data on the course outcomes and studentevaluations for all projects will be presented.IntroductionVillanova University is an independent coeducational institution of higher learning founded bythe Augustinian Order of the Roman Catholic Church. A medium-sized Catholic institution andcomprehensive university, Villanova emphasizes undergraduate instruction and is committed to astrong liberal arts component in each of its undergraduate programs, including engineering.The College of Engineering at Villanova University (CoEVU) is comprised of four departments,Civil and Environmental (CEE), Chemical (ChemE), Electrical and Computer (ECE), andMechanical (ME) and three Centers, the Center for Advanced Communications (CAC
AC 2008-1571: DESIGN, THE NEXT GENERATION: A FIRST-YEAR COURSE INPRODUCT DESIGNSusan Montgomery, University of Michigan Susan Montgomery is a lecturer and program advisor in the Chemical Engineering Dept. at the University of Michigan. She earned a BSEChE from the University of Michigan, and PhD ChE from Princeton University. She is the ASEE Campus representative and faculty advisor to the ASEE graduate student group. She leads a team of students developing educational software for chemical engineering.Rodney Johnson, University of Michigan Rod Johnson is a lecturer in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan College of Engineering. He has a Ph.D in Linguistics from the
participation in engineering education. He is a Research Scientist and Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder and Managing
/disasters/kansas_city_walkway.html (n.d.).2. Baker Institute, “Poverty, Energy, and Society,” retrieved on 10 October 2011 from http://www.rice.edu/energy/research/poverty&energy/index.html (n.d.).3. Bailey, R. and Szabo, Z., “Validation of Approaches to Assess Design Process Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 112th ASEE Conference and Exposition (2005).4. Bailey, R.; Szabo, Z.; and Sabers, D., “Assessing Student Learning about Engineering Design in Project- Based Courses,” Proceedings of the 111th ASEE Conference and Exposition (2004).5. Brannan, K.P. and Wankat, P.C., “Survey of First-Year Programs,” Proceedings of the 112th ASEE Conference and Exposition (2005).6. Cardella, M.; Oakes, W.C., Zoltowski, C.B
safety, manufacturability, and sustainability 2. Participate effectively in small teams, 3. Communicate effectively using written and graphical forms and oral presentations, 4. Demonstrate professional and ethical responsibility 5. Use software tools relevant to engineering practice.The course has continued to evolve from one that mainly taught students engineering graphics toone that focuses on the engineering design process, with graphics being one of thecommunication skills supporting the design process. As it is now constructed, the course usestwo significant projects as the context for teaching design. The first project ranges from productdissection and redesign to system design, with different faculty choosing and
Department of Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Silva is known for her teaching innovations and educational studies in large-scale assessments and collaborative learning. She has participated in two major overhauls of large courses in the College of Engineering: she played a key role in the re-structure of the three Me- chanics courses in the Mechanical Science and Engineering Department, and the creation of the new computational-based linear algebra course, which was fully launched in Summer 2021. Silva research fo- cuses on the use of web-tools for class collaborative activities, and on the development of online learning and assessment tools. Silva is passionate about teaching and
Paper ID #19571Implementing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Design Project in an IntroductoryEngineering CourseDr. Matthew James Jensen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Matthew J. Jensen received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2006. Matthew received his doctorate from Clemson University in 2011 in Me- chanical Engineering, focused primarily on automotive control systems and dynamics. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, the ProTrack Co-Op Coordinator and Chair of the Gen- eral Engineering Program at Florida Institute of Technology
-defined problem at the outset, the students are required to work in small teams to carry outresearch and define the problem as they see it. For example, the instructor may state that a certainnumber of people die each year as a result of freezing (hypothermia) in downtown Chicago. Thecauses for these deaths must be researched and, through analysis and discussion, the team must cometo a consensus as to what the ‘real problem’ is. After about the first three weeks, teams present theirview of the problem to their peers as persuasively as they can, and provide an initial solutionconcept. The class then comes to a consensus as to the best problem identification and solutionconcept.During the subsequent phase, in which teams collaborate (see Fig. 1
-centered learning, and gender and technol- ogy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Investigating task choice in first-year engineeringteam projectsAbstractThis research paper investigates the relationship between the tasks that students take on in teamprojects and changes in their engineering confidence and self-efficacy during project-basedlearning experiences. Project-based learning has become a widely used pedagogy in engineeringprograms at many universities. Courses that involve a hands-on project give engineering studentsa “real world” experience and allow them to work in a setting that mimics a professionalengineering environment: students typically work in small groups to design, build, and
Paper ID #33016Exploring Engineering: Peer-sharing Presentations in First-yearEngineering CurriculumDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. She is the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition.Ms. Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University Abigail Stephan is a doctoral candidate in the Learning
providing powerful new studentresources. However, these studies have largely been conducted in small subsets of engineeringdisciplines [13, 19, 9]. There is limited prior work that systematically evaluates how the adoptionof GenAI has evolved over time across the population of an entire engineering university, leadingto (RQ1) How have engineering students adopted GenAI, and what motivational anddemographic factors contribute to its usage?Student and Educator Perceptions of Generative AI Research indicates that students tend tohave positive perceptions of GenAI tools like ChatGPT. Students tend to view GenAI asinevitable [17], and also feel that these tools can substantially improve their quality of work andoverall learning [19]. Yet research on
analogue phenomenon, sound, signal processing, analogue/digital conversionand bit resolution.These projects have added an interesting variation into the course. The students have foundthese projects challenging, and it has been important to develop aids to help them understandworking with sound. Particularly important is providing materials to help students who havelittle or no musical training. This paper includes a discussion of the various problems andprojects used and the lessons learned in implementing them.IntroductionIn a recent assessment of their first-year engineering program, Notre Dame found that theirgreatest student attrition coincided with a first semester programming module.1 This result isnot unusual. First-year students often