than the SEI (i.e., fewer experts per department over shorter durations), and amplifiesthe impact of the experts by building intellectual communities around course transformation atmultiple levels. The University of Kansas launched its adaptation of the embedded expert model in the2013-2014 academic year, beginning in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS) andexpanding in 2014-2015 into the School of Engineering. The embedded experts are postdoctoralscholars with Ph.D.’s in the discipline that are hired by a unit (department or school) for threeyears to collaborate with faculty members on the incorporation of student-centered, active andcollaborative teaching practices into four-to-five undergraduate courses. To date we have
Engineering Education, 2013 The Impact of Clickers on Your Classroom and Your CareerAbstractStudent response units or clickers enhance student learning by providing immediate feedback toboth students and the instructor. This feedback can be an extremely valuable resource forteaching. In addition clickers increase student engagement with all the material within a class.Not surprisingly, every year there is more quantitative evidence of the value of clickers andricher descriptions of how clickers can be used.This presentation adds to that evidence and those descriptions, but the paper’s focus is a broaderperspective. First, the paper discusses how and why clickers can qualitatively change theclassroom. Second, how the change can positively
function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team h. an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development i. an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity j. a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementThrough community service programs, engineering students will play a more effective part in thedevelopment and improvement of the American way of life.community service in construction
Paper ID #13654Valuing and engaging stakeholders: The effects of engineering students’ in-teractions during capstone designIbrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan Ibrahim Mohedas is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2011. His research focuses on the design of medical devices for resource limited settings, particularly related to the use of design ethnography in developing these technologies. He works in the Laboratory for Innovation in Global Health Technology (LIGHT
others.Another significant discovery was that the writing group enhanced productivity and fostered asense of responsibility in writing tasks. The cross-tabulation revealed a positive correlationbetween the frequency of student participation and the likelihood of them being authors ofpublications. This implies that motivation and accountability factors in a group setting helpsstudents overcome common obstacles such as procrastination and writer's block. Establishingwriting objectives, monitoring advancement, and regularly engaging with colleagues can offerexternal incentives to persevere through difficulties. The literature has documented similarbeneficial impacts of writing groups on productivity, as reported by [38].In addition, the graduate students
partner institutions, as well as scholarly publications. In conclusion the paperdiscusses the broader impacts of the NSF funded project on software verification and validationcurriculum in undergraduate software engineering education.1. IntroductionThe body of knowledge appropriate for undergraduate software engineering programencompasses both theoretical and practical aspects. The knowledge areas (KA) listed in the 2014IEEE/ACM Software Engineering Curriculum Guidelines [1] are imperative for undergraduateeducation and the subsequent professional career. However, due to the lack of active learningtools and the dearth of engaged student learning, software engineering education may not beeffectively delivered, resulting in non-coverage by the
Paper ID #41889Board 427: Work in Progress: ADVANCE Strategic Partnership for Alignmentof Community Engagement in STEM (SPACES)Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program offers a BS degree accredited under the general criteria of the ABET EAC and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Bielefeldt’s research focuses on sustainability, ethics, social responsibility, and community
materials processing, and smart materials modeling and design. His teaching interests include the use of technology for education, especially in the area of engineering mechanics and in effective teaching methodologies and their impact on student progress in mechanical engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Classroom Demonstrations and Surveys on Higher-level LearningAbstractAn educational technique was developed to increase student learning of fundamental concepts instatics and particle dynamics. This technique consisted of online surveys on conceptualproblems and a physical demonstration during class, and was implemented on four
their time-intensive nature and sometimes lowdegree of objectivity in evaluation. As a result, despite a few reports on oral exams beingused in classes4, written tests are still the mainstream of assessment.In this study, the author introduced a voluntary oral exam in a junior level mechanicalengineering course--"ME 301: Thermodynamics I". The impact on the grade performanceand students’ attitudes was evaluated. Since the process involved subjectivity inperformance evaluation, the author’s feedback was also examined. It is hoped that thisstudy could serve as a blueprint for other instructors who would be interested inimplementing oral exams in a thermodynamics course.2.1 Description of courseME 301 (Thermodynamics I) is a 10-week course for
Impact of Assessment on a BME Undergraduate Program Thomas R. Harris, David Cordray Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235IntroductionLearning theory suggests that effective instruction should be “student centered, knowledgecentered, assessment centered, and community centered”1. We have been engaged in a largestudy aimed at exploring and testing these concepts for biomedical engineering education—theNSF Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT (VaNTH) Engineering Research Center onBioengineering Educational Technologies. The set of concepts that have been applied toimprove learning have been labeled the “How People Learn (HPL) Framework”2. This paper isan
mathematics classes. She developed teaching modules to improve students’ learning in mathematics using technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE National Conference Impact of Programming Robots and Drones on STEM AttitudesAbstractHands-on activities can effectively engage students and promote learning. This paper presents theresults of a one-week long summer camp for middle school students. The objective was to impactthe attitudes of the participants towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)fields. The participants of the camp were from underrepresented groups from two rural schooldistricts. The camp provided opportunities
practiced professionally in some of Boston’s larger design firms. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Pilot study: Impact of Social Consciousness on Engineering Design Decision MakingAbstractOne of the tasks of engineering design education is to ensure that students have a strongunderstanding of their customers and environments. They must understand the context of theirdecision-making and how it affects people in diverse communities. This requires students to seehow a design may be biased toward or against a particular population and to develop sensitivityabout issues of race, gender, religion, nationality, age, physical ability, and
under-represented students studying STEM at Ca˜nada College, including the Health Career Pathways Program, the Student On-Ramp Leading to Engineering and Sciences Project, the Veter- ans Employment Assistance Program for Engineering, and the National Science Foundation Scholarship Program. As Project Director for a $5.9 million Hispanic-Serving Institution-STEM Grant (CalSTEP), Danni collaboratively spearheaded the creation of The STEM Center, which promotes STEM education through programs, activities, academic/support services, and opportunities for students, faculty, staff, and the greater community. Danni earned a BA in Music from UC Irvine and an MA in Ethnomusicology from the University of Hawai’i at Manoa
. One ofthe Council’s recommendations to address this issue is to engage students with researchexperiences in the first two years. Recently there has also been an increasing awareness of theimportant role that community colleges play in educating STEM professionals, especially inbroadening participation among students from underrepresented groups. This paper presents theresults of a collaborative project between a small Hispanic-serving community college and a largeurban university to address the retention and completion problems among community collegestudents through a summer research internship program that provides opportunities for freshmenand sophomore community college students to participate in engineering research under thesupervision
hold an undergraduate degree in a STEM field and may not even befamiliar with the acronym. This preliminary study evaluates the impact of an After SchoolSTEM service learning course on undergraduate preservice teachers (PSTs). This course wasdesigned with the broad goal to engage undergraduates who are thinking about becomingteachers (going on to a credential program after graduation) in a service learning course in whichthey engage in a pre-credential field experience. As part of this experience, undergraduates learnabout STEM integration in teaching and STEM based activities, and then teach those activities toelementary students in local after school programs. The main research questions for this studyinclude: A) How did the service learning
AC 2011-904: THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERING-BASED SCIENCE IN-STRUCTION ON SCIENCE CONTENT UNDERSTANDINGMs. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts UniversityMerredith D Portsmore, Tufts University Merredith Portsmore is a Research Assistant Professor in Education at Tufts University as well as the Director of Outreach Programs for Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Merredith has the unique honor of being a ”Quadruple Jumbo” having received all her four of her degrees from Tufts (B.A. English, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, M.A. Education, PhD in Engineering Education). Her research interests focus on how children engage in constructing solutions to engineering design problems. Her outreach work focuses on creating
in higher education: is there a need fortraining in pedagogy in graduate degree programs? Research in Higher Education Journal, 21.Tapilouw, M. C., Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Chandra, D. T. (2017). The importance of trainingneeds’ questionnaire in order to arrange science teacher training program. Jurnal Pendidikan IPAIndonesia, 6(1).Teach Tomorrow (2018) A complete guide to continuing education for teachers. American.Available at https://www.teachtomorrow.org/continuing-education-for-teachers/ [accessed Jan10, 2018].Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professionallearning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teachereducation, 24(1), 80-91.
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The impact of flipped Math course on Peer LearnersWhy we wanted to changePassive learning was not working anymore in class; students were missing lectures at a higherrate, their attention level in class was decreasing proportionally to the availability of externalresources, such as Youtube videos, on line lectures etc.Our feeling, as instructors, was that the deluge of material outside class was diminishing thevalue of lecture-time as the unique time to get an understanding of the material, and many of ourstudents were falling to the temptation of procrastinating their study: “I’ll google it, and studylater this afternoon”.The diffusion of new tools such as laptops and cell phones
thatallowed student interaction between the courses, it was necessary to define the activity. The firstiteration of the activity was an assignment that asked students to have on-line discussions aboutcommon reading assignments. The discussions that students had amongst themselves did nothave great depth, and it was clear that they were not completely engaged in the activity.Afterwards, it was determined that the assignment was viewed as only a small homeworkassignment in a much larger course, and it had little impact. The second version of the assignment required students to present to local organizations(including a museum and an after-school program for high school students). Logisticallimitations required that each class present at
toevaluate an engineering report submitted by students completing the design activity (AppendixA).Since our intention was directed at comparisons of design abilities, and not the absolutemeasurement these abilities, we chose not to engage in a search for other assessment instruments.A cursory search reveals many instruments such as the CEDA, PCT, PSVT-R mentioned in arecent JEE article4.A constraint on this approach was that the activity primarily used teams. We targeted seniors, sothey had formal instruction in design. We chose to implement the activity with teams because itreflected typical work scenarios and because it was logistically prudent. So even if a singleengineering report reflected two to more students, the report itself could be
the Fluid Mechanicscourse. The data not only confirms the findings of our previous study but also suggests that themodel’s effectiveness may be independent of the developer and implementer of the model, if theinstructional protocols are followed. Additionally, this study shed some light on the relativecontribution of each of the strategies implemented towards the measured positive impact.According to student opinions, it was found that the greatest positive impact can be attributed,by far, to carefully designed in-class activities, followed by the quality of the lecture content.Introduction and BackgroundA great deal of research has shown that engineering students who are more engaged in their classactivities are more likely to succeed
Paper ID #29250Career Development Impacts of a Research Program on Graduate Studentand Postdoc MentorsNicole McIntyre, University of California, Berkeley Nicole McIntyre serves as the Education Director of the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF funded Science and Technology Center. She is also the Director of the Transfer-to-Excellence program, a summer research program for community college students. Nicole holds degrees in Psychol- ogy and Social Welfare from the University of California, Berkeley, and a graduate degree in Educational Leadership from the University of San Francisco. She is committed
, 2024 WIP: Exploring the Impact of Partner Assignment on Students’ Decision Making in Collaborative Design ProjectsIntroductionTeam formation strategies are an important element of engineering task design for authentic,collaborative projects. Many engineering educators employ software such as CATME [1] toregulate team formation. These programs, which typically focus on demographics and skill levelswith the goal of creating productive teams, tend to work at the individual project level and maynot necessarily account for students’ participation in a series of multiple projects. Indeed,engaging a classroom community in a series of projects presents the opportunity to strategicallypair students such that their connections with
assistants(TAs), increasing the amount of shared content between different course sections (that could beeasily facilitated on Zoom), and allowing final projects to be either physically-built or virtual(e.g. software, websites, or phone applications). These modifications were designed to fulfill thelearning objectives of the course and encourage students to develop teamwork skills andestablish relationships with their peers. An end-of-semester survey was administered to assessthe gains that the students made in their understanding of the course objectives, the impact of theTAs in the classroom, and how well the students communicated and formed friendships.BackgroundEID101 is a project-based course that was designed to introduce students to hands-on
transformations through anembedded expert model. The program pairs faculty and doctoral students from the College ofEducation and Human Development (COEHD) with faculty in the COE to transform coursedesigns and teaching practices to increase student engagement and success. This paper examinesthe impact of three specific course transformations within the program in terms of student andinstructor outcomes.Course transformation programThe goal of the course transformation program is to improve student learning by innovatingcourse designs and teacher practices. This program is based on the Carl Wieman ScienceEducation Initiative (CWSEI), which provides a framework for transforming courses by usingresearch-based educational strategies and data-driven
reinforcing elements from the university’s critical thinkingframework and improving student engagement in departmental presentations. Student survey responsesindicated that students found the assignment effective in meeting some of the course goals, such asimproving their critical thinking skills. An analysis of selected students’ work on these assignmentsindicate that most students had some success in identifying salient purposes, concepts, and questions atissue for each engineering discipline for which there was a department presentation. It was also clearthat point of view was an element with which students consistently struggled.IntroductionThe J.B. Speed School of Engineering is a medium-sized, urban, ABET-accredited institution in thesoutheast
technology and teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by
Paper ID #37437Work in Progress: Impacts of Engineering-Adjacent Participation OnIdentity and Motivation in EngineeringDr. Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, Rowan University Cassandra (Cassie) Jamison is an Assistant Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Depart- ment at Rowan University (Glassboro, NJ). Her research interests focus on understanding and improving the learning that occurs in experiential, out-of-class activities for engineering students. Cassie previously received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and her M.S. and Ph.D. de- grees in BME from the University of
engineering, and applied statistics. Dr. Mart´ınez is a member of the Institute of Industrial Engineering and the Systems and Engineering Management Society.Dr. Michelle Crimi, Clarkson University Dr. Michelle Crimi is the David Spatz ’68 Endowed Chair for the Director of Engineering & Management Program at Clarkson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing the Impact of Lean Six Sigma Capstone Projects on Engineering Management StudentsAbstractCapstone design projects are meant to provide an invaluable learning experience to seniorstudents. However, the project experience can be disappointing if students are not provided
engineering profession. In addition to this challenge, they must critically thinkabout how the failure occurred and what could and/or should have happened to prevent thedisaster. The trial gives students a chance to demonstrate their understanding in a different waythan typical written communication. This different format seems to be engaging for moststudents.3.1 2010 Revisions to the Hyatt Regency Case StudyFollowing the 2009 Introduction to Engineering course, there were some items that could beimproved. Students’ papers showed some confusion based on project roles and responsibilitiesstill existed. The project role discussion was made more explicit in how each role connected tothe Hyatt Regency case study. A discussion of how “change of