Statespopulation is African American22.In addition to providing a significant number of potential engineers, the diversity introduced byengineers hired from underrepresented population is itself a positive asset. The Difference,argues that diverse groups are typically smarter and stronger than homogeneous groups wheninnovation is a critical goal, as it is now in our globally competitive environment17. Daryl Smithconcluded that diversity initiatives positively affect both minority and majority students oncampus in terms of student attitudes toward racial issues, institutional satisfaction and academicgrowth19.Increasing the number of engineers from underrepresented populations has been a concern forseveral decades. For this reason, much research has been
. Reed (pseudonym) was in her third year of teaching at the institution.She had no experience with the instructional system but had experience teaching the dynamicscourse (without using the system). Prof. Morris (pseudonym) was a new instructor at theuniversity and taught the course for the first time as an official instructor/instructor of record.Before accepting her faculty role, she had experience with the instructional system as a student inthe dynamics course, worked as a teaching assistant for a dynamics course, and then co-taughtthe course with a senior instructor at the large research institution she attended for her degrees.These two instructors are in the first stages of their instructing career, making their experiencesas early career
(IBBME), University of Toronto. In addition to instruction, she has acted as the Associate Director, Undergraduate Programs at IBBME as well as the Associate Chair, Foundation Years in the Division of Engineering Science. Currently an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream, she serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery program and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Discovery
are of interest in both academia and the business world. Thecurrent state-of-the-art practice includes the multinational engineering teams for productdesign and the global business coordination, such as supply chain management. Weforesee, however, that with the advance of automation and sensing technology,integration of physical manufacturing processes into the global business and engineeringfunctions will be the next stage of the foregoing manufacturing evolution.Development of e-Manufacturing Lab for Network Based Manufacturing EducationUTEP has recognized the strategic importance of the new program to the manufacturingindustries, which has materialized through a strong support in resources. This lab is thesynergistic combination of
differencesin how individuals, cultures and disciplines define what is inappropriate as far as textualborrowing and attribution are concerned. 2,3,27,28,29,30In addition, there is some tenuous evidence that verbatim textual appropriation that involvesmainly words rather than complete ideas or research results may be tacitly accepted in scienceand technology disciplines. According to two engineering professors at Ohio University,interviewed in response to the 2006 graduate plagiarism scandal,5,27 copying of sources mayoften be condoned or overlooked in the literature reviews of engineering theses since thesesections are not always expected to be very original. Likewise, Crocker and Shaw2 and Shi30found that many STEM faculty placed a higher priority on
circumstances. Essentially, in crafting interventions for rural students, we need to engage with their commu- nities to ensure that we understand and address rural concerns. This is not a new problem in education, and there are many existing frameworks that can be utilized in this effort, like culturally-relevant pedagogy [39], community-based learning [40], and possibly even critical pedagogy [41]. These approaches are participative in nature, mandating a collaborative process between the curriculum developers, the teachers, and the students – grounding learning activities in the concerns and interests of the students while providing the rigor needed to prepare students to effectively use CS [42]. Embracing such approaches helps avoid the sense of
this is very straightforward; they are broken into teams and each team determines what new feature they mightinvestigate and try to incorporate into the design. For example, the frame team needs to build aframe for the car. However, they may want to look into a better suspension system than theprevious year’s team. With the drone capstone we (students and faculty) had no knowledge ofhow drones for agriculture were designed and built. This was in part why we structured ourgoals so that it would take multiple years to have a complete program from designing andbuilding to actually help farmers. In the first year we knew we needed a multispectral camera.That alone took up ½ the total budget for that particular year. They also knew that they
researchers wrote about students who had accommodations for notetakers in theircourses. Some students said their campus Disability Resource Center (DRC) offices (orequivalents) would say they could offer note takers, but then the DRC would take weeks to findone [29]. Three articles specifically said that confidentiality of the disabled students’ identitieswas a problem when asking for note takers [28], [29], [37]. Other issues include poor qualitynotes, difficult-to-read handwriting, and note taker absenteeism [31], [34].Additionally, some authors worry that accommodations are giving people an unfair advantage.Multiple researchers thought that students doing too well with accommodations was a concern[38], [39]. Ketterlin-Geller & Johnstone [38
provides biomedical engineering students with a useful arena in whichto wrestle with questions regarding how their academic discipline integrates with their largerworldview.Under the direction of faculty members from engineering, biology and philosophy, a multi-disciplinary team of undergraduate honors students is developing a curricular module on thehistory and philosophy of reverse-engineering. In keeping with the mission of the institution,learning objectives and educational outcomes are carefully defined to assist with assessment ofstudent learning. This module is currently being implemented among a group of engineeringstudents in a course on the history of quantitative thought. Assessment activities are beingconducted in an effort to
basicmotivations and goals that are to govern an educational program, and refer to the why of aninterdisciplinary program [22]. At the macro level, the establishment of this program isguided and driven by national policy. In recent years, the Chinese government has attachedgreat importance to the cultivation of AI talents. In 2017, the Chinese State Council releasedthe New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan of China, which made anoverall plan for the development of AI in China, with AI talents as the top priority. In 2018,the Chinese Ministry of Education issued the Action Plan for Artificial IntelligenceInnovation in Higher Education Institutions, proposing that universities should improve theirAI talent cultivation system. In 2020, the
; Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”V. Key issues influencing MEMS manufacturing education curriculum1) Experimental facilities and infrastructure requirementsTechnological education would not be complete without laboratory based practicalexperience. So, as far as MEMS based manufacturing education is concerned there shouldbe a continuous exposure to the state-of-the-art fabrication and characterization facilities.The higher capital cost of acquiring this equipment within each university presents aconsiderable financial challenge. Shared infrastructure facilities acting as geographicallydistributed centers among universities, profit and non-profit organizations andgovernmental research
diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement. The soft skills, including ethics, are generally learned by the students in their non-engineeringtechnology courses; however, it is the responsibility of the engineering technology faculty toassess and evaluate the student learning in those areas. At many schools, there are a vast numberof courses that students may take to fill their humanities and social science electives. Onealternative would be to require certain courses that cover the desired materials, but that defeatssome of the advantages of attending a large school, specifically the ability to tailor a program toone’s interests. In
sheet] whilehe was working with a competitor, but I didn’t personally see any issue with it.” He also notedthat though “these [calculations] came from a different place … this is not anything we wouldn’thave had access to [otherwise]” because the formulas were readily available in a textbook. Givenhis comment that the “biggest thing” in work is to not steal from competitors, he had given this“potential dilemma” some consideration before deciding the choice he and his co-workers madewas justified. Nonetheless, it is notable that Corvin seemed very attuned to this particular issue.The second idea he addressed regarding engineers and ethics concerns the use and misuse oftechnologies. Here, he equivocated between two views - that engineers have a
first infrared temperature sensor or circuit design. The second infraredtemperature sensor that was implemented was MLX90615 Infra-Red Thermometer [12]. Thetemperature measurements were compared again. With the new temperature sensor, thedifference were minimum. Another request from the animal science students and faculty was toimplement a laser pointer to make sure the temperature reading is taken from specific points. Alaser pointer was implemented and installed with temperature sensor at a specific angle.The schematic of NCTD is shown in Appendix A. This schematic was prepared for use by theanimal science student during the testing process. Initially, a complaint was made by the animalscience students who conducted the testing using the
of Environmental Quality as a Hydrologic Engineer, as independent consulting in forestry, Sum- mer Youth Programs Instructor at Michigan Technological University, and as an Adjunct Faculty member for the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University, Gogebic Com- munity College, and Keweenaw Bay Ojibwa Community College. She currently works as a Hydrologist for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Page 25.129.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Adaptation of Design Modules to First-Year Engineering Courses and K-12 Outreach
ofsociotechnical systems theory: a classic concept for new command and controlparadigms,” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 479–499, Nov. 2008,doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220701635470.[14] J. R. Turner, M. Morris, and I. Atamenwan, “A Theoretical Literature Review onAdaptive Structuration Theory as Its Relevance to Human ResourceDevelopment,” Advances in Developing Human Resources, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 289–302, Jun.2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319851275.[15] “Best Project Management Software and Tools of 2023,” www.top10.com, Dec. 26,2022. https://www.top10.com/project-management/comparison? (accessed Mar. 01, 2023).[16] T. Sharif,. R. Nahas.. “Team Effectiveness: A Case Study of a Fast-Growing
“hybrid” learning, whichinvolves a mixed delivery of face-to-face interactions and online learning (offering a number ofthe advantages associated with flipped classrooms). A study on faculty perspectives on hybridlearning indicated the benefits included flexibility, self-paced learning, and free time for complexproblem solving, whereas the challenges included time for course development, reduced studentinteraction and technical issues [13]. The U.S. Department of Education reported that students inonline learning conditions performed better than those in face-to-face conditions and that hybridlearning conditions performed better than both completely online and face-to-face conditions[14]. Hybrid learning is particularly attractive because of the
Paper ID #46487Love and Its Attributes as a Foundation for Student Learning in EngineeringEducationDr. Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli was the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Leadership at Syracuse University, where he also serves as an adjunct professor in the Ren´ee Crown University Honors Program. He has taught at the secondary level in the New Vision Engineering College Preparatory Program and at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth. With a professional background spanning research, design, development, and management roles in advanced
Faculty H.S. Students (from across the U.S.) Figure 1: Team OrganizationEmbedded in the process of designing the communications platform and procedures fordistributed design and decision making, all members of the team were immersed in learningabout a new medium that will become an increasingly important component of their professionallives.Learning CommunityThree distinct learning communities participated in this project: the high school students fromacross the U.S., the Academy Cadets, and “external agents” who have joined the project. Thefinal composition of CGA Team USA was 47 members from 9 locations across the
alaboratory of learning and reinforcement through iteration and application. This approachdirectly develops the engineering attributes set forth in ABET 2000 Criterion 3. Severalexamples of the technology-based virtual laboratory are provided. Positive and negative factorsfrom teacher and student viewpoints are discussed with an emphasis on how students withdifferent learning styles behave with respect to the new methodology introduced in these classes.Experience accumulated from several iterations of aerospace courses at all levels from freshmanto graduate, and subjects ranging from abstract theory to practical applications, are discussed.The diversity of student reactions indicates the critical need to understand learner attributes indetail, and
Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring the Relationships between Artistic Creativity and Innovation Attitudes in Engineering StudentsAbstractThis research explored potential relationships between the innovation self-efficacy (ISE) ofengineering students and their artistic creativity and life experiences revealed on an ice-breakerassignment. In a community-building assignment, students were directed to introduce themselvesthrough cartoon monster drawings that communicated various personal attributes (such as thenumber of languages they speak, and the number of states visited). Previous research has foundthat multicultural experiences can shape feelings of self-efficacy concerning innovation andcreativity. This pilot study was
-paced technological advances, environmental concerns, and globalization1, 3. Two major Page 23.215.2sources have spurred on this interest and sense of need, namely the Accreditation Board forEngineering Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000)4 and the two-phasepublication by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofEngineering in the New Century1 and Educating the Engineer of 20202. ABET EC2000‘sCriterion 3, sections ―a‖ through ―k‖4 address some hard skills as well as some so-called ―softskills‖ or preferably termed ―professional skills‖3.A number of noted engineering education leaders have
engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is
their ability to meet project requirements with thechallenges of being at home instead of having an in-person learning environment.IntroductionIn-person classroom teachings have been the education norm for K-20 education [1]. Over time,a new form of pedagogy known as distance education or remote learning was created thatphysically separated educators and students in transferring knowledge. This was mainly due tothe advancement of technologies and the internet that created an important sector within theeducation system [2]. Remote learning has garnered a strong interest for a variety of reasons; byallowing a larger inclusive student population, providing asynchronous teachings for moreaccessibility, and reducing tuition and institution cost [3
large scope. A second limit is the focus on degree programs.While pedagogies, content, and faculty development impact upon degree programs, they are notthe program itself. Here we take a more systemic view, looking at how a program can reassessits purpose or rationale in ways that better support preparing students to address the commongood.Another self-imposed constraint is that of pragmatism. By choosing to address the issue ofmoral and ethical responsibility at the program level, there needs to be substantive evidence thatchange is both possible and effective. As Machiavelli noted [4], changing the existing order isdifficult and doubters need evidence that changes will result in improvements. This is easier Ifchange is built on existing and
to pursue an engineering degree. For allitems, some Veterans endorsed the statement positively, some negatively, and some neutrally,suggesting there is not a general consensus among these Veterans concerning these issues. Table 5: Descriptive statistics of Veteran-specific questions. Standard Question Mean Min Max dev. I cannot see the connection between my service in the 3.32 1.32 1 5 military and the profession of engineering.* The
yet to learn that with limitedresources they cannot realistically address every concern, and that they need to prioritize. Mostof the students failed to think outside of the box – in a scenario in which protesters weregathering outside of a police station to protest the lack of action to help local residents, insteadof, say, issuing a public statement to outline major known risks, most groups automatically sendpolice to detain peaceful protesters.2015 Crisis Simulation Exercise: Memorial Hospital in New Orleans during HurricaneKatrinaParticipants in this simulation assumed roles of various staff members and medical personnel ofthe Memorial Hospital in New Orleans, Louisiana over a period of five days, beginning withAugust 29th, 2005, when
master students is 27, andthat of PhD students is 40. Accordingly, individuals of Generation X were born between 1965and 1977; individuals of Generation Y, also called Millennials, were born between 1977 and1993; and individuals pertaining to Generation Z were born between 1993 and 2005 [15]. As aresult, undergraduate students belong to Generation Z while master and Ph.D. students belong toGeneration Y.Indeed, some studies have analyzed the relation between age and sustainable behavior [16,17].Consequently, they have indicated that Generation Z, also known as Zoomers or Gen Zers, ismore concerned with sustainability and environmental issues than Generation Y [16]. Inaddition, Zoomers are more environmentally and socially conscious when they
rise ofmultinational corporations, and technological and educational exchanges [1],[2],[3]. The successof engineering projects depends as much on social and cultural competencies as technicalknowledge, since disagreements concerning (in) appropriate courses of action can cause conflictbetween individuals and organizations, and endanger public safety. Instances of academicdishonesty, research fraud, and international trade disputes can be traced back to conflictingcultural values. Ethical issues arising from global and cross-cultural engineering practice are farfrom being sufficiently discussed in curricula. The diverse cultural and educational experiencesof students have been extensively overlooked in research ethics education. More
spent in the laboratory was expended trying to make the circuits functionand not on exploring the concepts. The latter is a common observation of both students andfaculty and suggests that there should be a better way of implementing the laboratory.Motivation for a single experimental platform that could be used throughout the four-coursesequence came from the desire to improve student retention of theoretical concepts from courseto course. Faculty in the Department of Electrical Engineering observed that students enteringadvanced senior level courses did not retain fundamental knowledge from prerequisite courses.On the other hand, students taking these courses commented that ELEC 304 and ELEC 305seemed to be math courses with no engineering