standards, the ABET SLOs (particularly the new 1-7) needsignificant parsing to make them relatable to student learning experiences. While this has beendone by the faculty as illustrated by the mapping in Table 1, its value is often lost to the students.The skill set presented in Table 2, offer a bridge to connect these two levels. Their simplicity andapplicability to workplace practice makes them more relatable than the ABET SLOs. And as willbe demonstrated in the next section, they can also be integrated into learning experiences withinthe courses to compliment the stated learning outcomes. This we argue helps to further motivateand engage students in those activities where at times the immediate and complete skills benefitmight not be apparent
3160 Two International Engineering Programs in France Ian R. Simpson ENST BretagneIntroductionUntil very recently, France had been notoriously poor at offering high-level engineeringprograms to international students whose mother tongue was not French. In the author’sopinion two of the reasons for this situation were:• A relatively stultified and non-proactive education system at university level, unable (and perhaps, unwilling) to adapt to the new phenomena of the Europeanisation of educational programs and globalisation, in general
should benoted that the last problem on the common final consisted of several concept questions, whichmay have favored the Bingo classes somewhat.ConclusionsThe techniques utilized in the dynamics course are not new, but in general are not applied inundergraduate statics and dynamics classes. Many other instructors resist using more activelearning or project based assignments in their class for fear of not getting through all of thematerial. The similarities in the final exam scores suggest that this should not be a concern. Themore important aspect to consider, which is extremely difficult to actually measure, is the longterm retention and understanding of the students. Problems based in engineering context (e.g., acatapult) should provide much
operating in 1994, and Penn Stateofficials began to hear almost immediately from industrial users of the Facility about theneed for associate-degree level technicians skilled in micro- and nanofabrication.Pennsylvania companies expressing these concerns represented the information storage,microelectronics, biotechnology, and opto-electronics industries, as well asnanofabrication equipment and supply vendors. In 1997, these companies proposed toGovernor Tom Ridge that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania provide funding for aneducational initiative that would leverage the Penn State Nanofabrication Facility to helpmeet the need for nanofabrication technicians. Industry has guided every phase of thedevelopment of the NMT Partnership since its inception
represent any real facility.In the original implementation, students were given a written description of the facility( including process chemistry and MSDS sheets ), and asked to explore the virtual plant toidentify both safety concerns and examples of safety systems in use. They were then asked towrite an analysis of the overall safety of the plant, with recommendations for improvement. Acomparative study of students using virtual reality versus students who based their analysissolely on the written process description did not show the desired benefits, and therefore thesimulation has recently been revised.The new version provides more directed student activity, through the use of specific questions tobe addressed during the simulation, as well as
teaching focus on integrated STEM Education.Dr. Karl A Smith, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emeritus Professor of Civil Engineering, Morse-Alumni Distinguished Teaching Professor, Executive Co- Director STEM Education Center, and Faculty Member, Technological Leadership Institute at the Univer- sity of Minnesota; and Cooperative Learning Professor of Engineering Education, School of Engineering Education, at Purdue University. E-mail: ksmith@umn.edu, web: www.personal.cege.umn.edu/˜smith/ Page 26.857.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How Fifth Grade Students Apply
patternat a “use first” level. One person is assigned to be an observer who takes notes in response toseveral questions about the actions of the group members. Each group received a set of simplesupplies and a set of vague and ambiguous instructions to follow. The activity must becompleted within a restricted timeframe, usually 10-15 minutes, and students are not allowed toask questions of the faculty or the observer. In this case, the activity used was the constructionof a “water clock” to measure a specified time interval via a pendulum movement, using a bowl,4 inches of water, a piece of aluminum foil, and 3 washers. The questions that the observer isresponding to highlight actions characteristic of each learning pattern, including concerns
forglobal virtual teams to form. This international experience enlightened and exposed the students todifferent cultures, an essential capability to have as an engineer. Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright ã 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 8The pilot project was assessed by comparing the performance of this particular group of WTAMUstudents in Senior Design with other project groups who worked on other senior design projects thatdid not have an international focus. The project was assessed by a group of engineering faculty atWTAMU
issues andother barriers (such as social issues, legal hurdles etc.) that must be overcome.• Speculative Case Study: Boeing Vs Airbus: In the early part of the 21st century, there was aheated competition between Airbus and Boeing about the future of commercial air travel. Eachcompany held a very different vision for the future of air travel (broadly speaking: hub-and-spoke vs.point-to-point), and each company designed an all-new aircraft to secure that vision. In thisSpeculative case study, students learn about the original design decisions leading to the A380 and the787, and then perform their own research to assess the relative merits of each business approach (andtechnical implementation). Objective: Investigate the market
lack of connection causing difficulties incompetencies attainment.Meso and micro curricular levelFor the assessment courses identified at the macro curricular level, the development of theassessment plan, course card, course syllabus and rubrics was undertaken. The assessment planis a new element in the process. The assessment was guided by the student outcome leaders, whoare faculty members in charge of a particular student outcome. Detailed assessment plans foreach student outcome (a-k) were developed. The listed forms (see Figure 1) were defined andimplemented on a given course; in this paper just assessment courses are referenced. Once thecourse is offered, the course evaluation survey and the course reflexive memo are outputs thatfeed the
reviewed over a two-year period (4 test cycles) are more relevant than using one setof data since the number of students taking the exam during any 6-month period can be small foran institution. Subject Matter Reports also track student performance over multi-yeartimeframes, facilitating a robust tool for assessing trends and the efficacy of curriculum changes.Plotting the FE Subject Matter Reports over several test cycles will provide a better picture ofstudent performance [10]. Negative trends in any subject areas should be of concern to themechanical engineering faculty and initiate a curriculum assessment to determine the cause andpotential corrective action (e.g., new course textbook). Positive trends, on the other hand,indicate successful
reflect positively on their university. The conference would allow graduate students topractice presenting their research as well as gain exposure to other research conducted at theuniversity. The conference would also provide an atmosphere for socializing or networking withother students as well as faculty outside the confinement of the classroom or lab walls. Creatingan atmosphere of a social nature has been shown to increase collaboration and quality of work 3.Additionally, having a college wide conference could provide an opportunity to show newgraduate students the wide range of research being conducted. Typically new graduate studentsdo not have the knowledge of what research they are interested in1, by having a conference thestudents could
somestudents were intimidated by multimedia examples while other students expressed the ever-present concern that such examples were not beneficial in preparing for the next exam [1]. Otherstudies have concluded that multimedia modules can improve student learning, such as the studyperformed in a Stanford mechanical systems course, where it was found that test scores weresignificantly improved after including a multimedia motorized systems module [3]. These mixedresults serve to emphasize the fact that effective multimedia modules for the classroom requireperiodic revision based on student feedback and learning, as well as updating based on newenabling technologies.The faculty of the Basic Engineering Department at the University of Missouri-Rolla
AC 2011-1285: SERVICE-LEARNING VS. LEARNING SERVICE IN FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING: IF WE CANNOT CONDUCT FIRST-HAND SER-VICE PROJECTS, IS IT STILL OF VALUE?Susan F Freeman, Northeastern University Susan Freeman, Stanley Forman, Beverly Jaeger, and Richard Whalen are members of Northeastern Uni- versity’s Gateway Team, a group of teaching faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Pro- gram at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered and professionally-oriented mission of Northeastern University.Richard Whalen, Northeastern UniversityBeverly K Jaeger, Northeastern UniversityStanley M
strong grounding in these principles can make graduates more attractive to employers and better prepared for the demands of the modern workforce.Method 1. Participation in formal enrichment programs, seminars, and training. Faculty were instructed to participate in seminars and professional development activities related to sustainability to become resourceful in teaching the topics. Monthly brainstorming meetings have been conducted to share the knowledge gained and revisit the curriculum to identify the courses for including these topics or to evaluate the necessity of creating a new course to address above-mentioned key areas. 2. Systematic review of course outlines and materials
focusDr. Mark Vincent Huerta, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Huerta is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education Systems & Design at Arizona State University and has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. His research group explores approaches to building positive and inclusive learning environments that support the professional growth of students and faculty within engineering education contexts. His research interests include graduate student mentorship, faculty development, mental health and well-being, teamwork and group dynamics, and the design of project-based learning classes.Atlas Vernier, Virginia
students to get engaged in problem identification and solution. • Guidance to the instructor on how to use the case study to teach a course topic or conceptIn previous work, the authors introduced the idea of a comprehensive case study (theDigitalHome case study) [7, 8] that can be used throughout a computing curriculum. In that workwe motivated the use of case studies in teaching and shared some of the artifacts developed at thetime. We also discussed how the DigitalHome case study addresses the aforementionedshortcomings with a goal of providing a complete set of artifacts associated with softwaredevelopment as well as providing case modules that can be used by faculty in teaching differentsubjects in a computing curriculum.The main
faculty to faculty collaborativenetworks (Borrego & Newsander, 2008), publications networks for research and teaching (Madhavan, etal., 2011), institution to institution networks (Berggren et al., 2003) for initiating and examining cultural,institutional, and faculty change, and innovative methods for assessing research collaboratives (Marchand& Hilpert, 2017). In each of these examples, key features of complex systems such as emergentrelationships between multiple levels of analysis, underlying network structures of information sharingand collaboration, and dynamic mutually causal change have provided new research insights. What these studies have to offer is unique conclusions about the adaptivity and functioning of abounded
the engineering education community andpresents case studies of the use of specifications grading in engineering classrooms. Our threecase studies include insights into transitioning a senior design course co-taught by technicalcommunication faculty from rubric-based grading, transitioning a lower-level statistics classfrom bell-curve grading, and developing a new first-year engineering course. With these cases,we aspire to create a diverse set of advice and templates for other faculty to adopt in their classesto implement specification grading as well as common pitfalls to avoid when first adopting it.IntroductionPractices for determining mastery or proficiency via a grade in a given academic subject are asmuch a part of the educational
with a vision course.VI. Summary and Future PlansThis paper described the background that was the basis for the development of a computer basicscourse that incorporates autonomous robots and wireless Internet devices. The course was builtupon an initial offering of a one unit course on computer basics that was successful in retainingstudents. In comparing the initial offering with the current version of the computer basicscourse, these new and novel technologies had a positive impact on the students.The students in each offering of the course have provided recommendations on software featuresto improve the functionality of the Pocket PCs. One application under development is anInternet based mentoring capability whereby a faculty member
Work in Progress: Sustainability in First-Year Engineering Design: A Collaborative ApproachOverview: A team of faculty members at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) received agrant from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Engineering for One Planet(EOP) program to enhance the integration of sustainability topics into the first-year engineeringdesign course. This course serves students from across the college. The team developed materialswhich they made available to the larger group (11 instructors across 12 sections in Fall 2023).This paper briefly presents the materials that were developed, mapping the concepts to the EOPframework. Simple survey data from students provide insights into
the integrationof new pedagogical approaches.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0835981. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography 1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (1999). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: The Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 2. Bjorklund, S., & Fortenberry, N. L. (2005). Final report: Measuring student and faculty engagement in engineering education. Center for the
Report mirrors a typical daily construction report, covering key details (who, what,where, when; progress; disputes, change orders, delays; quality assurance/control concerns). Italso incorporates ABET- specific elements like risk and uncertainty with recommendations,sustainability practices, and economic issues. Over the semester, the 12-13 weekly reports arecompiled into a final, comprehensive Field Report (.i.e., mirroring the monthly Field Report).Quick feedback on submissions allows students to refine their critical thinking and improve theirweekly reporting practices, ensuring continuous development.Each week, students engage in a unique construction experience, culminating in a section of a“How-To Guide” documenting materials, methods
makers (homo faber), (2) the utilitarian and humanistic aims of engineeringeducation, (3) student- vs. instructor-centered learning, and, most significantly for our purposes 8here, (4) engineers as problem solvers vs. engineers as problem seekers. They contend that,instead of viewing these tensions as problematic, we should view them as both necessary and generative [because] they are a natural part of human affairs and generative in that tensions highlight dialectics from which new truths or perspectives emerge. From this viewpoint, a key element of faculty development is formulating a defensible personal philosophy that both
interest, retention, and achievement of girls and womenin science, math, and engineering.16 An ASU faculty member from the College of Education(COE), whose primary research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching,conducted this session. The engineering faculty also included information on gender equity ineach of their workshops.The professor from the COE focused primarily on appropriate pedagogy and curriculummaterials for the gender-inclusive classroom. Participants explored and critiqued websites forequity resources. Middle school educators were given additional information on the differentialtreatment of girls and boys in mathematics. Discussions offered more on the current literature onthe causes and correlation of girls
issues affect problem formulation,decision alternatives, and success of solution implementation; and effectively communicatequestions, concerns and solutions to people in different cultural communities.While standard lectures explain and illustrate the appropriate use of decision-making tools aswell as the correct interpretation of their results, pedagogical approaches that make content morerelevant to students’ lives and the needs of society better motivates student learning andimproves critical thinking [17]. Case-based instruction is one form of active learning thatengages students and allows them to better relate course content to real-world problems. Studieshave shown that the use of case-based instruction in engineering exposes students to
technol- ogy. In that regard he was an IDEA Studio fellow at Autodesk LLC in San Francisco and is one of the Autodesk faculty Fellows. He was a member of the National Association of Schools of Art and Design working group on the future of design education and served recently as Midwest District Vice President of the Industrial design Society of America. He is currently a member of the Core Planning committee for the new Seibel Center for Design at UIUCMs. Baigalmaa Batmunkh, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Baigalmaa Batmunkh received a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Engineering and Technology from Mongolian State University of Agriculture and a Master of Science degree in Industrial Engineering
/as/xs,researchers have drawn upon studies conducted by and for Latinos/as/xs to challenge theprevailing White narrative of American exceptionalism in engineering education [11, 12].Borderlands scholarship, exemplified by the works of Gloria Anzaldúa [13-16], encouragesresearchers to explore how sociopolitical forces serve as the backdrop to current issues whereoppression is still present. Employing a Borderlands theoretical lens, engineering educationresearch has the potential to expose the origins of sociopolitical forces and analyze theirimpact on students' lived realities, revealing the interconnectedness of the political, personal,and educational spheres they inhabit.In this paper, the concept of Nepantla, a stage within Anzaldúa's
transfer, wind load calculations, heating load calculations, cooling loadcalculations, piping/pump considerations and terminal air diffuser distribution andselection. The second course MEG419/619 describes the air distribution/fan selection andduct design, direct contact heat exchangers, indirect heat exchanger selection methods,refrigerant side thermodynamic considerations and finally an introduction to solar heatgain calculations including the different ASHRAE Clear Sky models etc…A partial survey of the literature concerning previously reported published effort on theteaching of HVAC has been made using the COMPENDEX online database for the lastten years. In his paper Alexander, R.C. (1990), has suggested that faculty teaching HVACcourses
validation tool. Assessment procedures toverify the success of the project were developed and data has been analyzed. The resulting classstructure, which was tailored to meet the needs of nontraditional students, has improved thequality of learning for all students. The study found a modest increase in average studentlearning with a significant reduction in the class standard deviation. Successful portions of thisproject have been incorporated into the day section of this course over the past 3 semesters,which consists of three 50-minute lectures taught by faculty and one 2-hour discussion sectionled by a teaching assistant per week. The use of these techniques in additional courses is beingevaluated within the department and college.I. Overview of