uninteresting. The central concept which I seek to convey tostudents is the realization that All science was new at some point.With the vast attention to detail in many engineering classrooms, this truism is easily forgotten.This is reflected in the often omission of historical context of topics in both engineering textsand lecture halls. Some texts1 make attempts to provide brief sketches of famous scientists whomade fundamental contributions to the discipline, yet these descriptions are often superficial incontent and rarely enter discussion in the classroom. The proposed course will use excerpts fromthe original publications written by the magnates of science and mathematics who have madefundamental contributions to modern science. Since this course
to create credible undergraduateengineering programs that maximizes access while also expanding the national STEM workforcehave struggled to balance professional skill sets with fundamental training in engineering in amanner that gives a distinct profile to each program. Our initial data indicate that U.S.universities continue to struggle to define themselves at this nexus.It is also evident that the various “structural” features that we reference in our study designfunction in complex, interdependent, and generally non-deterministic ways that approach thecomplexities of an ecosystem. For example, while much of the focus on professional skill sets—especially teamwork, communication (writing and presentation), and design—have occurredwithin
ofwhom were already aware of the recent regional events that inspired the design challenge.IntroductionCommonly, first-year undergraduate curricula in design fields like engineering and communityand regional planning involve fundamental science and humanities courses; rarely are studentsprovided with real-world problem solving experiences. However, it is through such practice thattheoretical knowledge can be learned and understood in a professional context. This is especiallyimportant for diverse students who do not have much prior exposure to their fields of study. As aresult of traditional introductory curricula, such students are more likely to drop out of theprogram when they encounter decontextualized and difficult theoretical knowledge
Paper ID #5946Impact of Attending a Research Experience for Teachers Program with In-ternational and Societally Relevant ComponentsZornitsa Georgieva, West Virginia UniversityProf. Reagan Curtis, West Virginia University Reagan Curtis, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Educational Psychology and director of the Program Eval- uation and Research Center at West Virginia University. He pursues a diverse research agenda including areas of interest in (a) the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge across the lifespan, (b) online delivery methods and pedagogical approaches to university instruction, and (c) research
2006-95: DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTIFICIAL ORGAN DESIGN COURSEConrad Zapanta, Pennsylvania State University Conrad M. Zapanta is an Assistant Professor of Surgery and Bioengineering at The Pennsylvania State University in Hershey, PA. Dr. Zapanta received his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the Pennsylvania State University in University Park, PA, and his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (with an option in Biomedical Engineering) from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA. Dr. Zapanta has served as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Engineering at Hope College in Holland, MI, and an Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Austin Community College in Austin, TX. He also worked for CarboMedics Inc. in
schoolsuccess. Lastly, on the TCE survey associated with the multidisciplinary introductory course,students conveyed appreciation for the opportunity to learn about different disciplines from anarray of professors and identified the literature review writing process, homework assignments,and dedicated class time to meet with their groups as helpful aspects of the course.It is worth noting that while the COVID-19 pandemic certainly affected all three interventions –most of which had to be offered online as opposed to in person – this also presented someopportunities. For instance, broadcasting and recording the events and lectures allowed for theremote synchronous participation of both presenters and students, as well as for theasynchronous viewing of a
possibilities.One student writes: I think the financial help would be the most important because without it, it would put a lot of students in the position of keeping track of their college life with having to worry about how they’re going to pay to keep doing what they’re doing. With financial help, there would be a huge burden lifted and most of what a student would have to worry about is either studying for a test or how to apply for internships or jobs, instead of working external jobs or taking extra loans that will probably bite them in the ass in the future. Honestly, the financial help is a godsend.Similarly, another student offers: Another big part of Endeavour is the financial support that it gave
. Page 23.563.62. Introduced information systematically and concisely (but with enough details) at the level of knowledge for undergraduates to comprehend with the goal of showing students what had been done and what needed to be done.3. Explained and discussed background knowledge multiple times to help students understand the complex issues and disciplinary fundamentals necessary to solve problems.4. Played devil’s advocate, that is, pretended to be against student’s ideas or plans in order to make the student discuss it in more details.5. Created and gave appropriate levels of assignments (or tasks) to be solely completed by undergraduates to help them understand certain theory behind the research. Some tasks included operating
Paper ID #8971Assessment of Product Archaeology as a Framework for Contextualizing En-gineering DesignDr. Kemper Lewis, University at Buffalo, SUNY Kemper Lewis is a Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University at Buffalo - SUNY. He is the project PI for the collaborative NSF TUES grant, ”Assessment of Product Archaeology as a Framework for Contextualizing Engineering Design”. The project is a collaborative effort between the University at Buffalo - SUNY, Arizona State University, Penn State University, Northwestern University, Bucknell University, and Virginia Tech.Dr. Deborah A. Moore-Russo
Paper ID #38718Imperfect Interventions for Speaking Up and Supporting Women in STEMDr. Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Kristen R. Moore is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. Her research focuses primarily on technical communication and issues of equity, inclusion, and social justice.Dr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University Meg Handley is an Associate Teaching professor and Director Undergraduate Programs for Engineering Leadership. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on inter
Pennsylvania State University in 2004, his MSECE from Purdue University in 2006, and his PhD in Engineering Education in 2010, also from Purdue University. His research interests lie in first-year pedagogy and program assessment as well as conceptual understanding of fundamental computing concepts.Teri J Murphy (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com State of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Teaching Development Programs for Students in EngineeringAbstractThere is a significant dearth of literature on the teaching training available to engineeringgraduate students, both as student instructors
is the development of students' professional identity. To bettersupport students' professional identity development, we must understand what motives, values,and experiences across the curriculum contribute to its construction.This study reports on our recent interactions with instructors, alumni, and students of anEngineering Science program. The data was collected through interviews and focus groups thatallowed us to understand how each group of participants understood the role of engineeringdesign education. The data analysis showed us that to have a nuanced understanding of thepurpose of design courses, we need to ask students to reflect on how they connect their designexperiences to their professional identity through reflective writing
] areintroduced. We then go into the history of fossil fuel technology (both for electricity andfuel/transportation), how it has evolved over time, and how it has affected Earth's climate.The next section of the course is on alternative/renewable electricity generation technologiessuch as nuclear, geothermal, wind, solar, hydroelectric, biomass, etc. [37], comparing them tohow electricity has traditionally been generated at scale. Students are asked to discuss potentialsocial and environmental consequences of implementing these technologies and how they relateto the culture, politics, and design of the built environment in their country/region of operation.This material builds into the first group project, where students write a report and give
expectations on the part of the instructor, course orprogram; differences between communicated expectations and lived experiences.Year-over-year, we see the same lead themes presented in student writing. However, from thenumber of qualitative repsonses received, the ranking of these representative categories hasshifted (Table 3). Ranking is determined by the number of times that the theme presented instudent feedback as a unit of meaning. The most notable of these shifts is the movement of the“Transition” theme from a 4th ranked position to a 3rd ranked position: this represents that overtwice as many students as the previous year mentioned transition issues in the workloadcomments (5 incidences in Year 1 to 12 in Year 2). Another shift is present in
for problem-based learning,which is a fundamental component of the program. The results are presented in a form ofvaluable results and broadly transferable methodologies that will inform a variety of K12 STEMoutreach activities.The ProgramMany studies have confirmed that America’s educational system is lacking. Listed under thetitle “Some Worrisome Indicators” in the Executive Summary of the National Academy ofEngineering’s Rising Above the Gathering Storm (2005)1, three particularly compellingstatements can be found: 1) “Fewer than one-third of US 4th grade and 8th grade studentsperformed at or above a level called “proficient” in mathematics, 2) “US 12th graders recentlyperformed below the international average for 21 countries on a test of
Technology in Education. As a lead researcher for the HP grant, Jaurez is exploring the application of gaming to learning while leveraging the recreational elements of digital entertainment to enhance the rewards of learning. Now, in conjunction with grant Principal Investigator Professor Ronald Uhlig in the School of Engineering and Technology, he is taking wireless communications students and creating game designers out of them. These students are creating new games as part of their engineering courses. They are integrating information architecture and mapping technology into learning management systems, and creating entire games, then writing scholarly papers about their work. As board member for
transformation initiatives and enhancing theoverall understanding of systems engineering in diverse industrial contexts.Keywords: Digital Transformation, Systems Engineering, INCOSE Vee Model, PBL1.0 Introduction1.1 Background Digital transformation represents the integration of digital technology into all areas of abusiness, fundamentally altering how businesses operate and deliver value to customers. Thistransformation is not limited to the digitization of paper records but extends to comprehensiveshifts in business models and processes. Examples of digital transformation include the adoptionof cloud computing, implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning, utilization ofbig data and analytics, and the integration of
on anoverview of Natural Language Processing in Section 3.3.3.1 Overview of Data ScienceData science, as defined by Provost and Fawcett, is “a set of fundamental principles that supportand guide the principled extraction of information and knowledge from data” [1, p. 2]. Datascience involves the use of statistical and computational methods to gather, analyze, and interpretlarge volumes of structured and unstructured data to inform decision-making, identify patterns,and make predictions. Data science involves several stages, including data collection, datapreprocessing, data exploration, model building, model evaluation, and deployment. Varioustools and techniques may be involved in these stages. In industries such as finance, healthcare
their undergraduate degree sets the stage for a power differentialas well as othering source.Feminism PoststructuralismBoth the analysis of the literature and the data will be through the lens of FeministPoststructuralism. This frame allows for a fluid interpretation of the data and preserves the voicesof the participants and validates their lived experiences. It also shines light on the pre-existingstructure that women negotiate and exist in during their undergraduate program. Theunderpinnings of Feminist Poststructuralism ensure a fundamental assumption that knowledge orunderstanding is formed socially by language, meaning, and subjectivity [21 p. 20].Feminist Post-Structuralism. A critical frame that helps “address the questions of how
from Kent State University. Contact: sstefl@g.clemson.eduProf. Amy Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Amy E. Slaton is a Professor of History at Drexel University. She writes on issues of identity in STEM education and labor, and is the author of Race, Rigor and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line . c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Developing a National Research Agenda: A Data Collection and Community Engagement ModelIntroductionThis paper summarizes a recent effort to create a research agenda for an underdeveloped area ofstudy in the scholarship of STEM higher education: The underrepresentation in
landscape that our graduates face strongly suggests a need to change the preparationour students receive.The University of Wisconsin-Madison has been facilitating change in the undergraduate programto promote a different kind of engineering education. To provide leadership and strategy forchange, the College of Engineering (CoE) formed the Engineering Beyond Boundaries EB2 TaskForce (TF) consisting of a core group of faculty.. Through a series of focus groups, facultymeetings and the formation of a larger working group, faculty and staff articulated and pursuedthe following goal:The College of Engineering will provide a contemporary engineering education that is strong inthe fundamentals of the discipline and also fosters an understanding of the
, a research and design project is to becompleted to promote independent work and creativity. The project topics may be centered onthe Institutes research area and can be carried out in association with industry. Within the IGTP a Page 7.715.2limited number of students performed their design project, following the formal lectures, exercises “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”and laboratory sessions in parallel. The coordination of the IGTP and supervision of theindividual
Opportunity Identification and Problem Definition Work Time (Students continue with opportunity identification and also work on problem definition, i.e., write problem statement and POVs, define design requirements and criteria.)5 1 Hands-on Skills Session: Electrical Fundamental and Circuits (Students acquire and practice the skills of building circuits.) 2 Hands-on Skills Session: Arduino, Sensors, and Actuators (Students learn to work with Arduino and a few commonly used sensors and actuators.)6 1 Hands-on Skills Session: Engineering Models, Visual Models, Technical Drawing, 3D
course would be titled EngineeringFundamentals (EGR 105). It would be a 3-credit course where 1/3 of the course would bedevoted to an introduction to computer science and computer applications, specificallyspreadsheets. The course description is as follows: This course is designed to equip engineering students with the necessary tools and background information to prepare them to be successful engineering students as well as a successful practicing engineer. Topics covered in this course include project management, team work, technical writing, working with data and using spreadsheets, creating presentations, engineering design, and a thorough understanding of the engineering profession.The EGR 105 course was
10* Some students were completing double majors II. Cour se DesignA. Learning ObjectivesThe fundamental purpose of this course is to educate undergraduate students to besuccessful in their endeavors upon graduation and enhance their overall collegeexperience. This course is structured to ensure that upon completion of this course thestudent should be able to1: Page 13.31.5 1. Work effectively as a member of an interdisciplinary project design team, bringing unique skills, perspectives, and background not shared by all team members, and using information provided outsidg"vjg"uvwfgpvÓu"qyp
overall course grade; about 2% earned for each lab experience.The project-based assignment was worth 3 labs—the brainstorming activity was worth ½ lab, theproject idea write up was worth 1 lab, and the final storyboard presentation was worth 1.5 labs—for a total of 6.5% of the overall course grade.What was the final student-team product we asked them to create? Student teams were asked toproduce a storyboard poster presentation that conveyed an engaging way to teach a specificconcept of their choice from the fluid dynamics class. A storyboard is a graphical representationof concepts, narratives, or products and is usually presented in sequential, linear, story-tellingformat. Comic strips are probably the most pedestrian, but widely recognized
content, ordeveloping a new approach. Upon review, faculty determined that, like a SCUBA diver-in-training is able to develop a fundamental skill set by practicing with equipment in a classroomsimulation or even in a swimming pool, there is no substitute for subsequent non-simulated real-world “sub-sea” experiences. Problem based undergraduate experiences were developed thatwere specific (i.e. possessed a stakeholder), measurable (i.e. students could demonstrate progresseven if incremental), and realistic (i.e. expectations of results that could realistically be achievedin the allocated time). Projects were extremely well defined by instructors on the front end, whileremaining open-ended on the back, thus allowing students the freedom to
the K-12 classrooms, would have a significant impact on theengineering profession1, especially because it encourages secondary students to considertechnical careers. Although some may argue that it would be better to emphasize thefundamentals of math and science as college preparation for engineering rather than teachingengineering. There are counter arguments about career awareness and that both objectives can beaddressed by making sure that fundamental math and science is connected to the engineeringcourse. Engineering courses show how the subjects of mathematics and science arefundamentally helpful for students because they show the connection between the real worldsituations and science and mathematics. Unfortunately, few schools offer
Paper ID #40034Renewable Energy Projects Enhance Pedagogy in Foundational ECE CourseMr. Devin Connor Whalen, Bucknell University Devin Whalen is a graduate student at Bucknell University, pursuing a master’s degree in electrical en- gineering. His research focuses on microgrids and energy harvesting, and aligns with his passion for renewable energy and sustainable solutions. In 2022, Devin graduated summa cum laude with a B.S.E.E. from Bucknell, where he developed a strong foundation in electrical engineering. He demonstrates his dedication to his field through his involvement in curriculum development, academic and research
pedagogy, that is supported on three fundamental pillars: academicachievement, cultural competence, and socio-political consciousness [40]. The first tenet asksinstructors to foster an environment that is inclusive of the instructional practices intended tohelp students master the content. According to Ladson-Billings, the teachers who were able toeffectively teach students of color, upheld a sense of responsibility towards preparing students tobe academically successful [41]. She further explained that the embodiment of CRP “requiresthat teachers attend to students’ academic needs, not merely make them feel good.” [41, pp. 160].In her later work, Ladson-Billings [44] explained that academic achievement does not equate tostudent achievement on