manipulation of information isgoal-directed. The ease of this process is dependent on the engineer’s level of expertise incontent knowledge (declarative knowledge) and procedural knowledge (i.e., she knows when touse a particular algorithm, formula or process) (d and e). Evaluation of the process andjudgments of alternative outcomes (i) may be influenced by the engineer’s personal skills andbias on whether the project is a success or not (i.e., maybe the bridge met the functionalspecifications but failed from an aesthetic perspective).Self-Perception of Problem-Solving Skills Bandura's self-efficacy theory postulates that an individual’s confidence rises when hehas mastered a skill through experiencexx. Self-efficacy studies in STEM fields
Paper ID #30970Lessons Learned Using Slack in Engineering Education: AnInnovation-Based Learning ApproachMr. Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University Experienced Systems Engineer with a demonstrated history of working in the electrical and electronic manufacturing field. Highly skilled in Embedded Devices, Software Engineering, and Electronics. Ex- tremely motivated and self-reliant with a great believe in autonomy, new ways to solve problems and ROWE approaches. Team player and devoted to create superb working environments through dedication and team culture. Strong information technology professional with
systems, navigation, rapid prototyping methods, and integrating project-based learning experiences beyond the regular syllabus.Dr. H.H. Cheung, University of Hong Kong Dr. H.H. Cheung is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Hong Kong. He obtained his B.Eng., M.Phil., and Ph.D. degrees at the University of Hong Kong. Prior to joining the University of Hong Kong, he has worked in manufacturing and IT industries as a consultant for a number of years. He has gained substantial experiences in developing and managing RFID-based solutions, and the provision of consultancy services to implement RFID applications to various industries/enterprises. Dr
promising findings of this research and the encouraging feedback of the student community motivated him to pursue this line of research in his NSF CAREER award in 2017. Since then, he has built a coalition within the university to expand this work through multiple NSF-funded research grants including IUSE/PFE: RED titled ”Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Because of the importance of neurodiversity at all levels of education, he expanded his work to graduate STEM education through an NSF IGE grant. In addition, he recently received his Mid-CAREER award through which, in a radically novel approach, he will take on ambitious, transdisciplinary research integrating
, including the one now in use, and relevant observations and conclusions we havedrawn through the years.IntroductionDuring the fall semester of 1990, BYU initiated a two-semester design course entitled, IntegratedProduct and Process Design.1 The main objective of the course was to strengthen perceivedweaknesses in new graduating engineers. The course includes classroom instruction, individualassignments, an examination, and project work by student teams performed on industriallysponsored design and build projects. Essentially the course involves students learning how tointegrate design skills in four major areas: technical analysis, design creativity, projectmanagement and teamwork.Each year approximately 180 students take the course from a variety
’ prior knowledge through their experience with the technology. Given theoverwhelming degree to which technology surrounds and mediates modern life, students arepossibly more likely to have prior experience with a particular technological device than acomparable example of the scientific principle from the natural world.While technology created by people adheres to all of the physical principles governing thenatural world, an understanding of the physical science principles at work in some aspect oftechnology is a critical component of overall understanding. Explanations of technology that arelimited to the scientific principles at work remain an incomplete understanding of technology. Insome cases there is one scientific principle or
create a baseline by which to judge the morecomplex formats against a known, yet fairly basic, quiz-show type platform as is Kahoot! Sincemany of the students have experienced Kahoot!, the learning curve will be very small, and wewill be able to establish assessment norms by which we can evaluate further development. Whilethis paper explores the use of Kahoot!, ultimately, the aim is to develop a game based on studentoutcomes and through the use of feedback develop early intervention indicators, via the game,which may lead to higher retention rates.KeywordsComputer-based Instruction, Games, eLearning, Assessment, Electrical Circuits. Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Annual Conference Copyright
datafrom the perspective of the instructor (through pre- and post-semester interviews), the researcher(through observations of three class meetings with our observation protocol), and the students(through conducting a student survey at the end of the semester). This poster presents qualitativeand qualitative analyses of these data to answer our research questions, along with evidence-based best practices for effectively using a flexible classroom.IntroductionFlexible classroom spaces are non-traditional classrooms containing movable furniture that canbe arranged into different layouts. This furniture, along with other technology such as movablewhiteboards and wall-mounted monitors, makes it easier for instructors to effectively implementactive
law of thermodynamics to answer thequestion posed by the interview prompt. Transcribed interview data was organized and processedusing a NVivo 12 software package. A subset of interviews (n = 8) were coded by the first andsecond authors to assess the reliability of the findings through the calculation of a pooledCohen’s kappa statistic [30]. Interrater reliability calculations resulted in a 0.82 pooled Cohen’skappa value indicating sufficient agreement in the coding scheme [31].Results Analysis of students’ interpretations of the first law resulted in the emergence of threedistinguishable reasoning approaches: direction-oriented, magnitude-oriented, and process-oriented reasoning (Table 2). These distinct types of reasoning represent
-traditional students. This new learning environment utilizesand encompasses a variety of modern technologies that include World Wide Weband I.V.D.L. (Interactive Video Distance Learning). In addition, certaininstructors utilize a variety of well structured independent internet activitiesknown as “Research Reports” and “Tech. Topic Term Papers.” Basically, theprinciple has been to encourage faculty utilize modern technological innovationsin their educational methodologies to supplement, enhance and expand studentlearning beyond the boundaries of the traditional classroom. In this paper, theauthor tries to describe his accomplishments at the School of Engineering andApplied Science at Miami University of Ohio.IntroductionResearchers have shown that
Year Course - Engineer, Design, Explore, Build. She comes to this position from an indirect journey. She earned both her BS and PhD in Biology from UNM and then began as staff through grant funded programs focused on increasing success in STEM Students. Over the years she’s taught within both the K-12 and University settings, and has been involved with various mentoring and research programs, as well as stand-alone events and presentations focused on student academic success and sense of belong or Querencia. One of the main goals she has kept with her along this journey is knowing she is having a positive impact on the world around her. More specifically to her current position, it’s to help each student in the
knowledge about how the prototypes worked. His reflections onteaching emphasized classroom management and how to model design process steps.Our findings have implications for incorporating engineering experiences into work with noviceteachers. Teacher educators should consider supporting the framing of design as a knowledgebuilding enterprise through explicit conversations about epistemology, apprenticeship in sense-making strategies, and tasks intentionally designed to encourage “figuring things out.”IntroductionThe inclusion of engineering design at all grade levels in the Next Generation Science Standardsnecessitates efforts to create learning opportunities for teachers to learn to teach engineering 1.The NGSS call for the “integration of
engineers. On asounding rocket program3 one could quickly gain a realistic experienceflying hardware into space. These rockets only provide a short observingtime (5 minutes) above the atmosphere, but the value comes from replicatingevery phase of a space project -- most importantly the propulsion eventinherent in the launch environment. Scientists and engineers whosuccessfully fly these rockets gain the necessary management and designexperience to move on to larger missions. Not surprisingly, through, the costof launch vehicles has increased, creating fewer sounding rocketopportunities. The space shuttle and space station programs were oncethought to replace sounding rockets as a way to gain flight experience, butfew opportunities are available
take an introductory course in thefundamentals of engineering. In this course, students learn the fundamentals of engineering thatthey will use for years to come. Beyond helpful tools such as CAD and other computer software,the course offers students a chance to explore other topics relevant to engineering. This includes,disciplinary boundaries of engineering, engineering ethics, and the design process. While thesetopics can be given a cursory lecture, there exists opportunities to expand on these themes andtopics. Given practices of inclusive classrooms, a faculty member can create engaging ways tohave students explore these topics and encourage the development of good research skills andcritical thinking. Inclusive practices can include
width modulated signals to blink the LEDs on the breadboard.Laboratory 2: In this experiment, the students become familiar with the sensors that will be usedthroughout the semester. The deadzone of the motor and H-bridge is also measured in thisexperiment. The students are provided with a Simulink model that runs the motor and collects thedata. The sensor measurements are displayed to the students in real time via a Scope block.Laboratory 3: In this experiment, students build a system model of the motor through firstprinciples. The time constant of the voltage decay was too fast to accurately capture withSimulink and the Raspberry Pi, so an inductance, capacitance and resistance (LCR) meter wasused to measure the armature inductance. If this
Merrienboer, J. (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 645-660.21. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., and Janssens, S. (2008). Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: Consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 295-317.22. usatoday, “Recycling of gadgets grows,” USATODAY.COM, n.d., http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2011-12-27/recycling-gadgets/52240824/1.23. Pratt, C. C., McGuigan, W. M., & Katzev, A. R. (2000) Measuring program outcomes
beach.Ms. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and In- novations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the Professional Workforce”. In her time at the University of Connecticut she has also has served as Program Assistant for an summer pro- gram in engineering for middle school students with ADHD. Previously, she spent
have internalized the subject matter at a cognitive level and have gained masteryover it[6].OBE goes beyond ‘structured tasks’ (e.g. memorization) by demanding that a studentdemonstrate his/her skills through more challenging tasks like designing and projectbuilding. They should engage in analysis and synthesis and apply it to problem solving.Many times they should utilize other partner’s resources in the equation of problemsolving. The students learn the value of cooperation in place of mindless competition thatis detrimental to team spirit and resources development, which are critical to complexproblem situation and solution[7, 8]. Thus, OBE involves students in a complete course oflearning—from developing their skills in designing to
Teaching Assistants in Active Learning EnvironmentsIntroductionEngineering schools must strive to evolve a new paradigm for undergraduate education thatrecognizes the evolution of the skills and learning styles of its incoming students and preparesthem to tackle society’s grand challenges of the future, while at the same time increases theprobability of their success in their chosen engineering program. Most researchers and experts inthe field agree on some basic tenants of retention1,2,3, which include developing communityamongst freshmen, creating connections for freshmen through meaningful interactions withreturning students and faculty, engaging freshmen in active learning environments, helpingfreshmen understand and
Assessment of General Education Competencies,” International Journal of ePortfolio, vol. 2, pp. 87-97, 2012.[6] J. Milne, E. Heinrich, and I. Lys, “Integrating e-Portfolios: Guiding Questions and Experiences,” Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, vol. 14, pp. 47-61, 2010.[7] J.D. Jenson, “Promoting Self-regulation and Critical Reflection Through Writing Students’ Use of Electronic Portfolio,” International Journal of ePortfolio, vol. 1, pp. 49-60, 2011.[8] T. Penny Light, H. Chen, J. Ittelson, Documenting Learning with ePortfolios: A Guide for College Instructors, Jossey-Bass, 2012[9] D. Cambridge, B. Cambridge, and K. Yancey, Electronic Portfolios 2.0: Emergent Research on Implementation and
engineers and other professionals who are awarded conditional certificates toteach subjects such as physics, chemistry, and advanced mathematics due to the lack of educatorswith these skills.Due to the requirement of advanced degrees in higher education, researchers are recruited toteach despite their relatively little experience teaching. This frequently results in discouraged anddisjoined students at a time that is critical to future studies and careers. This leads us to questionhow much pedagogical training is received by STEM educators, especially in relation to varioustechniques and in developing a course.Formal Training in Education. In general, K-12 educators are expected to be trained in bothteaching pedagogy and their subject area. However
nature of the problem preclude simple answers. Students must go beyond the textbooks tocollect information and knowledge from a variety of resources. The primary role of the instructor is toact as a facilitator for the overall group process and stimulate and direct learning. The basic features ofPBL are: • Learning is initiated by a problem, which are based on real-life, open-ended situations. • Students work in small permanent groups with access to an instructor. • Students identify and locate the resources required to solve the problem. • Learning is active, integrated, cumulative, and connected.Typically, a class is divided into groups of approximately four or five students. These are usuallypermanent groups
issues such as dissemination of project information and activities, and c) sustainability of project components beyond the life of the grant. (4) A web page for the re-developed courses carrying the course modules and lectures in a PDF format and Lecture PowerPoint presentations for students and other users to browse and download from any location using remote desktop and virtual lab server. The interactive components, simulations and laboratory experiments are available for other universities and Drexel-affiliated colleges. Online learning will be a channel for use of the developed materials and also their dissemination.Course Improvement and Re-development: TutorialsA derived, but nonetheless
stakeholders in adeliberative, representative, and evidence-based approach to determining present activities andcomparing them to best practices on-campus and elsewhere will be discussed. Finally, issues toconsider in replicating GREAT Environments in other engineering and technology contexts willbe shared.IntroductionIn the GREAT Environments structure, five important components are considered with theultimate goal of creating a meaningful and effective college experience for all students. Eachelement of the framework is meant to evaluate important moments in the college progression and Page 15.632.2build off one another to move students through
programming. Figure 5: Third Section (Ratings) of the Tutorial EvaluationA preliminary implementation of the tutorials was done at the Dent-Phelps R3 Public School, arural K-8 school district in Missouri. The gifted class for fifth grade through seventh grade wasgiven the tutorials in the school computer laboratory during a single two-hour period. Sixstudents participated with ages from 10 years to 13 years old including four boys and two girls.All had received prior computer instruction, e.g. E-mail and word processing, through the schooland most had computers available at home for E-mail and gaming. Only one had done limitedprogramming before and none had used Squeak Smalltalk before. All completed Tutorial 1 andsome started
, entrepreneurial ecosystems, and fostering graduate student professional development. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Examining Women STEM Faculty’s Participation in Entrepreneurship ProgrammingIntroductionThe past decade has seen a rise in academic interest in innovation and entrepreneurship inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Given its economic impact,fostering STEM innovation through entrepreneurship programming is increasingly becomingnecessary for higher education. Academic entrepreneurship education programs (EEPs) continueto increase in adoption and scale, signaling the
objective is to create a culturally diversevirtual environment where students can explore and enhance their interpersonal skills, and also,improve their intercultural competency skills. In this Work-in-Progress (WIP) paper, we presentearly findings of a COIL project from students’ perspectives.Social constructivism postulates that humans develop and construct knowledge through socialinteractions with others [2]. Thus, participating in collaborative social activity helps to acquireknowledge [2]. Hence, having students from two culturally distinct regions to collaborate iscrucial for the development of intercultural skills. Thus, the objective of COIL is not necessarilyto expose students to the experience of virtual collaboration, rather, to enhance
strongly that their workwas worth doing and were committed to sharing the student voice with the administration inhopes of meaningful change. We came together with a common goal and desire to curate a better culture for the department and not let this conversation fall through the cracks like it has in the past, and we got that ball rolling. -DH We all committed a lot of time and effort beyond what we are expected to do and I'm proud of the quality of work we presented to the faculty and department. - ARAll four of the SELs expressed their commitment to ADEI work throughout the reflection. Theyshared their desire to continue their work to improve culture in the department. A couple of theSELs mentioned their
ability to think critically allows the designer to move through the designprocess step by step, while checking the intermediate results for validity and applicability. It isessential in all the preceding design steps.Students enrolling in engineering technology (ET) quickly acquire a toolbox of ideas,knowledge, and thinking skills. The thinking skills they acquire should be among the sharpest,most versatile, and most oft-used tools in their toolbox. The degree to which students aresuccessful in building and applying these tools is dependent on the degree to which wespecifically teach them and apply them in our curriculum. Because the manner in which theyintegrate all these tools into their ET experience has a significant effect on the success of
. H. Penn, M. Withers, “Results of a practicum offering teaching- focused graduate student professional development,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1867-1873, 2014.[23] C. J. Finelli and J. E. Froyd, “Improving student learning in undergraduate engineering education by improving teaching and assessment,” Advances in Engineering Education, pp. 1-30, 2019.[24] Stellenbosch University, "Enhancing graduate student teaching competencies through professional development," Stellenbosch University Press, 2015.[25] A. Guerin, A. Dufresne, and K. Smith, "Time management strategies for graduate students in STEM: A case study," Journal of Graduate Education, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 105- 120, 2020.[26] R. A