, American Society for Engineering Education References1. Applewhite, A., 2002, “Why so Few Women?”, IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 39, Issue 5, pp. 65-66.2. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, special tabulations of U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, Completions Survey, 2001. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/wmpd/underdeg.htm.3. Youngman, J.A., Egelhoff, C.J., 2003, “Best Practices in Recruiting and Persistence of Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A 2002 Snapshot”, Frontiers in Education, 2003, Vol. 2, pp. F2D-11-16.4. Furse, C., Price, J., 1999, “Making a World of Difference
, American Society for Engineering Education References1. Applewhite, A., 2002, “Why so Few Women?”, IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 39, Issue 5, pp. 65-66.2. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, special tabulations of U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, Completions Survey, 2001. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/wmpd/underdeg.htm.3. Youngman, J.A., Egelhoff, C.J., 2003, “Best Practices in Recruiting and Persistence of Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A 2002 Snapshot”, Frontiers in Education, 2003, Vol. 2, pp. F2D-11-16.4. Furse, C., Price, J., 1999, “Making a World of Difference
professor and di- rector of engineering technology at the University of Texas, Brownsville (UTB). Prior to joining the UTB faculty he was a visiting professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology and an associate professor of production engineering technology at PSG College of Technology, Bharathiar University, India, where he served as the director of the Computer Vision Laboratory and National Cadet Corps – Engineering Division Director. With over 29 years of teaching and research experience in manufacturing/mechanical engineering and engineering technology, he currently teaches in the areas of CAD/CAM/CIM, robotics and automation, product and process design, materials and manufacturing processes, machine design
traditional course has continued to evolve, and it has beenadapted to different audiences and contexts. There are now three versions of Creativityand New Product Development, but they all share common goals and objectives.Class objectivesWe have three general goals for this course: (1) to provide an overview of the basicprocesses in new product development in a competitive marketplace by simulating themin class, (2) to acquire the skills for successfully creating and developing a new productthrough hands-on, team-based projects, and (3) to become more creative individuals andmore effective team members.The topics covered in this class fall into four categories: technical skills, creativethinking, business strategies, and people skills. Technical
Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures. He teaches manufacturing processes and tribology related courses. A registered Professional Engineer in North Carolina, he serves on the Mechanical PE Exam Committee of the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors and is active in several divisions of ASEE and in ASME.Alice Stewart, NCA&T State University ALICE C. STEWART is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management in the School of Business and Economics at the North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. She received her Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She teaches strategic management and general management to
a wide variety of careers in related fields. 2. The program will provide training at the individual topic, individual course, and certificate level for individuals interested in learning mechanical engineering technology topics regardless of a traditional degree goal. 3. The program will provide technical assistance in mechanical engineering technology related areas to local businesses.Note that this mission supports METS Department goals 1 and 2 listed previously.Moving further down the support structure, one of the MET program educationalobjectives with a specific linked outcome that supports the MET mission items 1 and 2above is shown in Table 1 below
DiscoveryClassroom”, 2001 ASME Curriculum Innovation Award Honorable Mention,http://www.asme.org/educate/aawards, accessed Nov. 22, 2002.10. Shih, C., Lourenco, L. and Alvi, F. “Integration of Optical Diagnostic Techniques into the Teaching of theThermal and Fluid Sciences Laboratory Course”, Session 2526, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1999.11. Ting, F. C. K., “Using Inexpensive Modern Equipment in Teaching Turbulence to Undergraduate EngineeringStudents”, Session 1526, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1999.12. Steele, W. G., R. A. Ferguson, R. P. Taylor, and H. W. Coleman, “Computer-Assisted Uncertainty Analysis”,Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 5, issue 3, 1997, pp. 169-179.13 Stern, F., Muste, M., Beninati, M.L., and
. Keska, J.K. and Wang G., “Mathematical Model for Pressure Gradient Calculation for Air-Water Heterogeneous Mixture Flow in a Small Square Horizontal Channel Based on the In-Situ Parameters and Flow Pattern Coefficient”, International Journal of Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, ETF 6736, 2005.3. Keska, J. K. and A Chuck Miller, “Experimental Results for Application of Two-Phase Flow in Micro-Heat Exchangers,” Proceedings of FEDSM99 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluid Engineering Conference & 1999 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, pp1-8.4. Keska, J. K. and B. E. Williams, "Experimental Comparison of Flow Pattern Detection Techniques for Air- Water Mixture Flow," International
, ≠ include “uncertainty” and its implications in engineering analysis courses, Page 15.999.5 ≠ consider offering technical electives, in this domain, and let “uncertainty” be a central theme, ≠ make use of modern computational tools to support probabilistic thinking.Such curriculum changes may fall short of meeting set goals without adequate research aimed atcontinued improvements in probabilistic and statistical thinking for civil engineering in generaland the design component in particular.3) Estimation: A main challenge of a project design is the number of variables and theirinteractions during the design process. Often, the
Paper ID #6029A Framework for Liberal Learning in an Engineering College.Dr. Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, College of Engineering Pune Pradeep Waychal has close to 30 years of experience in renowned academic and business organizations. He has been the founder and head of Innovation Center of College of Engineering Pune. Prior to that, for over 20 years, he has worked with a multinational corporation, Patni Computer Systems where he has played varied roles in delivery, corporate and sales organizations. He has led large international business relationships and incubated Centre of Excellences for business intelligence, process
(AJUR). He has been serving as a reviewer on the IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing since 2001. Pecen has served on ASEE Engineering Technology Division (ETD) in Annual ASEE Conferences as a paper reviewer, session moderator, and co-moderator since 2002. He is currently serving as a Chair-elect on American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Energy Conversion and Conservation Division. He served as a Pro- gram Chair on ASEE ECCD in 2010. He is also serving on advisory boards of International Sustainable World Project Olympiad (http://www.isweep.org/) and International Hydrogen Energy Congress. Pecen received a certificate of appreciation from IEEE Power Electronics Society President Dr
Session 1442 Informal Graphics for Conceptual Design Richard Devon, Sven Bilén, Andras Gordon, and Hien Nguyen Engineering Design Program School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs Penn State UniversityAbstractEngineers who work in innovative design spaces have very different CAD and graphics needsthan those who work in more conventional design spaces. We propose to develop ideas aboutthe graphical communication needs for conceptual design. This paper will illustrate what wemean by describing a few new methods such as
to exert control over non-dominant groups by limiting their rights, freedom, and access to basic resources such as health care, education, employment, and housing. There are four types of oppression: ideological, interpersonal, institutional, and internalized. These systems overlap and interact. Systems of oppression are designed by people, and upheld by people.MethodologyThe executive team of the Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) of ASEErecognizes the need for teaching about DEI and integrating it into the classroom for educatingthe engineers of tomorrow. This prompted LEAD to propose and organize a discussion panelsession at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference to address this important issue and to contribute tothe advancement
candidate discussed reasons and advantages to becoming an engineer. She also shared withthe students her own personal experiences in studying engineering and entering the Ph.Dprogram. Being an international student, it was of great interest to hear her account of obtainingher Bachelor’s degree in Portugal prior to moving to the United States to continue herengineering studies. The speaker provided brief descriptions of the research she has beenconducting in the area of Alzheimer’s disease. She concluded by sharing her experienceworking with a major pharmaceutical company, Wyeth.Hands-On Activity #3: Separate This!!! In this challenge, students were given twenty minutes to design and construct a device, or series of devices, to separate
-sented by an IT profession and family educational backgrounds in technical areas are importantoutcome predictors, while gender and age are less important.Introduction The availability of an increasing supply of highly skilled information technology (IT)professionals is essential if the United States is to maintain international economic competitive-ness in the near term and in the future. Given today’s level of unemployment it may seem thatthere is a surplus of IT workers, however when we look at the long term “big picture” recentstudies indicate that there will be an overall shortage of qualified technical professionals and thatthe trends predicted are discouraging. For example, the state of Massachusetts has an on goingforecasting
date: _____ Your email: ____________ Other participating team members:___________________________________________________________________Instructions: The following self-assessment is to be completed via email; you have seven days.Identify all response entries by the item number shown below.Notes: A. Grade yourself using 1 as “BEST performance”, on a five scale. B. Ensure that you include this page with your email response.Basic precepts: Participating RA students are graded on their…1. Active lab/ class-room participation [You must attend regularly.] —2. Team leadership [planning, peer review teams, needs assessment & futures forecasting] —3. Demonstrated technical competence and growth—4. Quality of completed assignments —5
. and A. T. Young, editors, Technically Speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, National Academies Press, (2002). 2. Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering, National Academy of Engineering, National Academies Press, (2008). 3. C. Alexander, Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard University Press, (1964). 4. K. Akiyama, Function Analysis: Systematic Improvement of Quality and Performance, Andrew P. Dillon, Translator, Productivity Press, Cambridge, (1991). 5. P. E. Vermaas, “Focusing philosophy of engineering: analyses of technical functions and beyond
Session 2609 The Biomedical Engineering Partnership Program An Integrated Educational Approach to Biomedical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ofer Amit, Richard Schoephoerster, Alan Carsrud, Vish Prasad Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199AbstractSince its inception – four years ago as the Biomedical Engineering Institute – the FloridaInternational University (FIU) Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) has adopted abroad definition of its role as part of South Florida’s largest academic institution. In addition tothe mission of excellence in
recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 62 journal articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 118 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,000 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
+ 5sinφEmploying differential calculus, we write δ xC = 10(cos θ ) δθ + 5(cos φ ) δφ = 10(3/5) δθ + 5(3/5) (2 δθ ) = 12 δθ δ xC = 12 δθTherefore, differential calculus yields the same value for δ xC as that indicated in Fig. 19.ING-CHANG JONGIng-Chang Jong serves as Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. He received a BSCEin 1961 from the National Taiwan University, an MSCE in 1963 from South Dakota School of Mines and Technol- Page 10.1231.14ogy, and a Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics in 1965 from Northwestern University. He was Chair of theMechanics Division, ASEE, in 1996-97. His
, Dr. Tsai was a Member of the Technical Staff in the Fluid Mechanics Group at The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Tsai earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. at the University of California, Berkeley in Mechanical Engineering.Ms. Amber Janssen, California State University Maritime Academy Amber Janssen is a senior assistant librarian at California State University, Maritime Academy (CSUM). Her research background is in the instruction and assessment of information literacy in undergraduate education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Information Literacy Instruction as a Continuous Improvement
partial rebates to the library for their subscription to the IEEEinformation product (contingent on predetermined IEEE Student Branch membership goals).The IEEE IEEE (The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) was formed in 1963. TheIEEE has more than 365,000 members in over 150 countries. Of that total, approximately68,000 are students. The IEEE is recognized as the preeminent international body for electricalengineering and organizes over 350 conferences each year worldwide. The IEEE is also veryactive in telecommunications, information technology, nanotechnology, robotics andbiomedical engineering and has 39 technical societies and publishes over 100 periodical titles. The IEEE has long encouraged and supported
Page 15.658.4 Computer, 2 credits. (10) - Florida State has a 1 credit computer programming and technical skills for all disciplines; details about how students learn about ChE were not available, class size about 400/year with section size ranging from 30 to 60. (15) - McMaster University offers 4 credits computing; 3 credits design, 3 credits profession with class size 900 sectioned into 10 sections (27). - Northwestern has a 2 credit course on Engineering Design and Communication, with class size 350 with 20 per section. It features an integrated introduction to the engineering design process and technical communication; approaches to unstructured and poorly defined problems; conceptual
larger function. When studentsare presenting their work, whether it is simply to update their advisor on their research progressor when practicing for a conference, other students (undergraduate and graduate) should be in theroom listening to this presentation. Of course, emphasizing to the students that this is aprofessional development opportunity for them should be done in order to prime the students tobe ready to critically consider the contents of what they are to about to hear.A few days prior to a technical conference where students are presenting their work, it isbeneficial to have the students practice their presentation in front of the research group. Duringthis practice session, the audience is asked to analyze each slide individually
course at a considerabledistance from a physical laboratory.VPLab has been reviewed by a number of engineering educators. They have consistentlycommented on the uniqueness of the approach. We believe that it is applicable to a wide range ofengineering laboratories.VII. References[1] Chapman, S. J., 1998, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill.[2] El-Hawary, M. E., 1986, Principles of Electric Machines with Power Electronics Applications, Prentice Hall.[3] Fitzgerald, Kingsley and Umans, Electric Machinery, McGraw-Hill.[4] Gonan, Turin, 1998, Electrical Machines, Power International Press.[5] Sarma, M. S., 1994, Electric Machines: Steady-State Theory and Dynamic Performance, 2nd Edition
AC 2010-2378: ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIONMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior member of
Paper Award by the Manufacturing Division of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), three review papers and three book chapters. He has participated in numerous national and inter- national conferences. He is a member of ASM International, TMS, ACerS, AIST, ASEE, and a registered Chartered Professional Engineer. Dr. Manohar’s research interests include mathematical and computer modeling of materials behavior, thermo-mechanical processing of steels and other metallic materials, microstructural characterization, and structure – property relationships. He has conducted a number of technical failure investigations, consulted on various materials-related problems, and acted as an expert witness in the Court of
102,000Motion sensors in underutilized 114,000 1 125,000areasInstall LED Exit Signs 50,000 3 55,000Student Development: Design, Communication and EnvironmentalismFrom a technical standpoint, the project requires students to function at all levels ofBloom’s Taxonomy, and to transition between convergent and divergent thought severaltimes throughout the project. The open-endedness of this project serves well as the finalproject of three progressively more complex design projects for Sophomore Clinic.Indeed, in a survey of 2005 students, 16 out of 43 students specifically mentioned theopen-endedness of the project in their comments about the class (although not all
Diversity Paper at the ASEE Annual Conference in 2015. She also conducts technical research with civil engineering and construction management graduate students. She and her students study ways to extend the safe and useful life of existing structures, particularly concrete bridges, through enhanced inspection, management and repair techniques. This research has been funded by the Mountain Plains Consortium, a USDOT University Transportation Center, and the Colorado Department of Transportation. She teaches courses in structural engineering such as reinforced and prestressed concrete design and civil engineering materials to upper division undergraduates and graduate students. She is a registered Professional Engineer in the
and Sustaining Superior Performance, Simon & Shuster, 1998.Rackham, Neil, SPIN Selling, McGraw-Hill, 1988.Robb, Walter L., “Selling Technology to Your CEO”, Research Technology Management, 37(3), 1994.Wilson, Larry, Stop Selling, Start Partnering, Oliver Wight, 1994.Wilson, Larry, Changing the Game: The New Way to Sell, Fireside, 1987.Biographical InformationRONALD J. BENNETT is Director and Chair of the Engineering Programs at the University of St. Thomas. Heholds a Ph.D. in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA. With a background of 20 years in industry, Bennettteaches and publishes on diverse topics including materials engineering, technical innovation, technology transferand engineering education. He is an EAC of ABET program evaluator