, 87.5 percent of the engineering seniors strongly agreed oragreed that their math skills have improved over their career at NCA&T (Table 2). However, themost important information in this data is that the students had found both new ways to think Page 15.344.6about math and use math as illustrate in the selected quotes shown in Table 3. This particularfinding was the source of much faculty discussion and reflection.There was some concern by several senior faculty members over the fact that seniors perceivedmath and science skills to be less important than first year students did. Some of this perceptionmay be due to the fact that math
AC 2009-2105: LET'S GET DOWN TO BUSINESS: PREPARATION FOR ABETUNDER THE NEW CE PROGRAM CRITERIAFred Meyer, United States Military Academy Colonel Fred Meyer is the Civil Engineering Division Director in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree from USMA in 1984, a M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2002. COL Meyer has been a member of the USMA faculty for over six years and teaches courses in basic mechanics, structural steel design, reinforced concrete design, structural system design, and professional practices. He is an active
engineering curriculum. All expressed awillingness to continue to add required tools to the students’ mathematical toolbox if needed intheir specific curricula. If the proposed list of topics proved to be ambitious for the course,engineering faculty members were willing to cover some of the topics in subsequent requiredengineering classes. They felt strongly that the educational benefits provided by this course, asoutlined in the learning outcomes, discussed below, far outweighed the benefits of exposure to afew additional topics. This focus on deep understanding and application of concepts emphasizedthe important role pedagogy must play in the success of the new course. Therefore, theinstructional approach developed for the course was just as
whole. While there were several questionsfocused on a variety of issues, one question concerned the capstone design course. Following thefirst semester, the question was general and asked student’s opinion of the senior designexperience. Following the second semester, the same general question was asked in addition toasking student’s opinion of their broad experience in comparison to the earlier in-depthexperience. In each semester, various faculty members conducted exit interviews with groups ofthree or four students. All faculty members took notes on their interviews with the intent ofdisseminating the information among the faculty.The department faculty meets twice a year with the IAB. The IAB consists of senior engineersrepresenting public
of the new engineeringbuilding at WKU, which broke ground in May of 2002 and will be ready for students in the Fallof 2004. The paper will discuss how the new facility was designed and built around the studentin a project-based environment. The programs are currently scheduled for the first ABET visit inthe fall of 2004. The faculty involved in the program feel that the end of the beginning has beenreached and that the program is well on it’s way to developing an “engaging experience” whichis student focused and meshed very closely to ABET and the outcomes assessment process.2. History of Development of the Engineering Programs at WKUThe initiative to establish engineering programs at Western Kentucky University has developedover a
AC 2012-4388: A NEW ASSESSMENT METHOD TO EASILY IDENTIFYAREAS NEEDING IMPROVEMENT IN COURSE-LEVEL LEARNING OUT-COMESProf. Thomas Allen Knotts IV, Brigham Young University Thomas Knotts became a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University in 2006 after receiving his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He teaches a va- riety of courses, including thermodynamics, computer tools, unit operations lab, and molecular modeling. He enjoys teaching and discovering ways to improve student learning through problem-based and induc- tive learning strategies. With his research group, Knotts seeks to understand the physics of proteins and DNA at the molecular level with
support students have been enacted. Excerpts from semi-structured interviews were coded then synthesized into a narrative outlining the anticipated changes mentioned by participants. Findings. Participants noted three key areas of concerns: impacts on student recruitment, impacts to student support, and impacts to faculty and staff, including the frustration and confusion felt by faculty who want their students to succeed and are unsure how to help without appearing to violate laws. Reductions in students, staff, and faculty from historically marginalized backgrounds is also anticipated. Implications. While much more evidence on impacts of these new laws will grow over the next few years, faculty, staff
first year course sequence is a gatekeeper or barrier. Students arehighly aware of such courses and when they perceive they’re being “weeded out,” their behaviorchanges (Suresh, 2007). Administrative Concerns Administrative issues are handled by one centralized director, with autonomy to directteam members to tasks as needed. The lack of an assistant director is intentional and protectstenure-track faculty members from over commitment to administrative responsibilities beyondroutine committee work. The director positive answers to the assistant dean in the college ofengineering, as the courses themselves are housed under the dean’s office, and not any onecollege. Housing within departments Every team member has a home
research. However, research is still usuallyimportant for promotion, tenure, merit pay, and university image, thus often requiring the newprofessor to perform research with less-than-optimum resources and encouragement. Of course,a research record is critical to maintaining marketability and mobility.Successful research programs can be built at such institutions. Careful selection of research nichesis important to minimize cost and maximize relevance to institutional and regional concerns,particularly those of industries which can support applied research. Creative use of undergraduateresearch assistants is usually critical. Seed money programs aimed toward new faculty or facultyat undergraduate institutions, for example, the National Science
” atVirginia Tech is discussed. The implementation team consisted of seven faculty members and 21students (graduate and undergraduate). About 1200 students were enrolled. The format wassuccessfully piloted in spring 2005. Examples of new activities include introduction of a systemsapproach, hands-on engineering experiments for fitting empirical functions, students’presentations on contemporary issues, discussion of the attributes of “The Engineer of 2020,”learning from seniors’ study abroad experiences, and object oriented approaches for problemsolving. In addition, a 5-week sustainable development design project was introduced. With thedesire to increase student participation in the large classrooms and determine students’ priorawareness, faculty
with a competitive peer-review process. However, this‘two-track’ system is a cause of concern. The engineering institutions are faced with a similardilemma as its counterparts in the industrialized world. Should the institutions and the facultyfocus on research and relegate undergraduate engineering to a perfunctory activity? Furthermore,faculty compensation based on the two-track system complicates the issue even more. ThePakistan Engineering Council (PEC) is the statutory body with one of its functions being theaccreditation of engineering programs [6], while the Higher Education Commission is thenational institutional accreditation body. Typically the curriculum for engineering programsfollows a rigid format with little flexibility to
new power stations); § Manapouri hydro station (focusing on environmental concerns and design issues with original development of the underground station and technical issues with the second tailrace tunnel).In addition to demonstrating a familiarity with, and understanding of, the environmental,economic, and technological issues related to the specific technology or power scheme, thestudents are expected to present evidence, especially first-hand observations, of the impacts (pastand projected) of the technology. Impacts that must be considered include: § Magnitude and timing of net economic benefits (e.g., value of electric power generation); § Enhancement/loss of recreational uses; § Damage to the
radical change. An integrated learning experience will replacedemonstrate-then-emulate methods. The focus will be on problem-based, cooperative, andservice learning exercises; research; information technologies; and faculty teaming.The design methodology described begins with the creation of a knowledge base consisting ofprogram learning outcomes, content elements, and teaching resources. From the knowledgebase, a process is implemented leading to a new modularized integrated curriculum that will beteam-taught, will include innovations in teaching and assessment methods, and will use graduateteaching assistants in a novel way. The paper is organized in four sections: making the case forchange, a proposal for innovation, a paradigm-changing
AC 2009-454: AN INITIAL ANALYSIS OF FRESHMAN-TO-SOPHOMORERETENTION IN A NEW FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING PROGRAMRichard Cassady, University of Arkansas Dr. Cassady is Director of the Freshman Engineering Program and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas, where he has served on the faculty since August, 2000. Prior to joining the University of Arkansas faculty, he was an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at Mississippi State University (1996-2000). As Director of Freshman Engineering, he is responsible for overseeing the development and operation of both the academic and student services components of this first-year experience program for College of
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Epistemological Foundations of Global Competencies: A New Theory to Advance Research on Global CompetenciesIntroductionAround the world, many influential stakeholders are concerned with increasing globalcompetitiveness of engineering graduates by increasing their global competency. Recent booksfrom the US, Australia, and Europe attest to growing interest in global engineering.1 In sum, Whether working on multi-national project teams, navigating geographically dispersed supply chains or engaging customers and clients abroad, engineering graduates encounter worlds of professional practice that are increasingly global in character. This new reality
? The only national organization that took a serious look atthis issue was the AAUP due to its concern about faculty rights, the strategic planning processthat didn’t engage the faculty and the need for substantiating the existence of financial exigencywhen most of the losses may be covered by property insurance, FEMA and work interruptioninsurance. AAUP’s efforts, though laudable, have had little impact on the overall outcome.American Association of University Professors (AAUP) ReviewAAUP, as a watch dog for university faculty, sent a team of experts into the New Orleans area in2006 in order to evaluate the process used by each New Orleans university in eliminating tenuredfaculty. The report of this team is not yet finalized.Regarding faculty
discuss the enduring ideas and ideals ofworld civilization, the problems and opportunities of today and the issues to be faced in the yearsahead. The readings, covering such universal human concerns as justice, freedom, economicequity, community, leadership and democracy, function as case studies in leadership andleadership values. It is believed that this broad foundation is a requirement to develop judgmentskills needed for the wise management of technology.Industry ReviewTo test the model, presentations were made to over 20 executive groups in local industry. TheTwin Cities is home to many excellent companies such as Honeywell, 3M, Medtronic, Cargill,Seagate Technology, ADC Telecommunications, General Mills and scores more. It is from these
, a proposal was submitted to the TexasWorkforce Commission for the resources necessary to fund this and other related initiatives. This proposal has been funded and work on the new Power Engineering Technology programhas begun. As a starting point, a faculty member spent the Summer of 2007 onsite at the SouthTexas Project Nuclear Plant to learn about their workforce needs. Using this knowledge, a newcurriculum is being designed that includes a strong emphasis in three technical areas:• Electronic Engineering Technology, with a focus in the areas of power, instrumentation, and control.• Mechanical Engineering Technology, with a focus in the areas of materials, thermal systems, and mechanics.• Nuclear Engineering, with focus in
Australia and New Zealand to identify how capstone courses areimplemented outside the United States and what strategies can be shared across countries. As intheir United States counterpart, the 2015 Australia and New Zealand surveys includedquantitative, categorical, and open-ended questions on capstone course information, pedagogy,evaluation, faculty, students, projects and teams, expenses and funding, sponsors, and respondentexperience and opinion. This paper presents highlights of the resulting data by country, drawingcomparisons where possible across countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.Overall, the essence of capstone design courses in the three countries is quite similar; there arevariations in implementation details, but
Paper ID #28887Examination of faculty development in the Departments of Civil &Mechanical Engineering and Geography & Environmental Engineering attheUnited States Military AcademyCapt. Jes Barron, U.S. Military Academy Jes Barron is an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from West Point (2009), a Master of Business Administration from Oklahoma State University (2015), and a Master of Science degree in Underground Construction and Tunnel Engineering from Colorado School of
, as an Undergraduate Advisor in EES since 2000, as Faculty Advisor of Engineers Without Borders-UF, and in a variety of K-12 and undergraduate mentoring roles. In Jan. 2008, she assumed the role of Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the College of Engineering at the University of Florida and continues to serve the College’s approximately 5,600 undergraduate students in this capacity. Page 25.480.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Dual Model Summer Bridge Programs: A New Consideration for Increasing Retention RatesAbstractResearch on
AC 2008-1097: INFLUENCE OF THE NEW CIVIL ENGINEERING BODY OFKNOWLEDGE ON ACCREDITATION CRITERIAStephen Ressler, United States Military Academy Colonel Stephen Ressler is Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering degree from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. An active duty Army officer, he has served in a variety of military engineering assignments around the world. He has been a member of the USMA faculty for 16 years, teaching courses in engineering mechanics, structural engineering, construction, and
morespecifically the founding members, have provided an atmosphere to inform and inspire new civilengineering faculty to climb Lowman’s ladder. This paper seeks to extend the vision of theworkshop for ExCEEd graduates and entice those who wish to improve their pedagogicalpractices in the spirit of the ExCEEd Teaching Model. The authors gratefully acknowledge thesupport of the entire ASCE ExCEEd family.Bibliography1. Lowman, J., 1995. Mastering the techniques of teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.2. Estes, A.C., Welch, R.W., and Ressler, S.J., 2005. “The ExCEEd Teaching Model.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131(4), 218-222.3. Estes, A. and Welch, R., 2006. “Lowman’s model goes to the movies.” ASEE Annual
research universities offeringengineering programs. In the end, the bills put forward were passed by both houses and signedinto law in 2003 by Governor Locke.Next, the Higher Education Coordinating Board which must approve all new programs had to beapproached. A lengthy request was prepared that discussed all program aspects. Again, therewas much apprehension concerning non R-1 research universities teaching engineering, theimpact the new program would have on private universities throughout the state, and a newprogram first beginning offered on a branch campus site. We were able to convince the HECBon the first issue, somewhat convince them on the second issue but on the third we wereprovided some requirements that had to be met. EWU was required
called Mastering Teaching Online10 Page 26.256.2(Mastering Engineering11) was used. An online platform was developed by the Pearson 2publishing company. In order to get access to a particular course site to do assignments and otheractivities, student and/or faculty need to have course IDs assigned by Pearson for that particularcourse. This is a reasonably new approach to deal with same old circuit problems. The Masteringengineering has three interesting features, coaching problems, tutorials, and chapter problems.Mastering Engineering is offered by
working-through therelationships among societal considerations and the possible physical designs. For this studio, weworked on projects for which our culture’s habituated physical design responses are unsuited.This will call taken-for-granted assumptions into question.The design project acts as a vehicle to pull together a diverse number of philosophical issues,technical concerns, and basic theoretical knowledge. By using a number of modes of inquiry aswell as faculty from various disciplines, we can ask students to consider many thingssimultaneously and juggle many ways of investigation at the same time.The first studio had two main projects, as well as a series of continuing exercises in computing,drawing and technology. We began the semester
frameworks from the domains of engineering education and technical and professional communication to implement this research into a classroom intervention aimed at reducing the gendered disparity in these communication challenges. To help resolve these issues, this methodological paper presents a new research method called, "infrastructural rhetorical analysis" derived from the field of rhetoric and communication. The paper then applies this method to an educational intervention case study involving the experiences of women in the first-year engineering classroom to determine a concrete classroom intervention that aims to make the most difference with the least amount of resources needed to implement it. Keywords: Intersectional feminism
Access Control System HTTPS, MQTTS, Mosquitto 15 Final Projects System various As outlined above, the course is divided into two parts: constructing the IoT System (the“product”), and instrumenting, extending, and evolving the IoT System - Properties, Behaviors,and Concerns of Systems and the supporting courseware is divided into week-long modules,where each module tackles a new technology or concept. Details are provided in Table 1.Course SampleHere is an example of one week of the course, Week 10: Analytics and Dashboards. Prior tothis, students have incrementally constructed the LAMPI IoT System (including: the device witha touchscreen UI
Session 3592 A New Look at Gender Equity Professional Development for Secondary Science/Mathematics Teachers and Counselors Arlisa M. Labrie, Vivian L. Lemanowski, Bettie A. Smiley, Ellen J. Yezierski, Dale R. Baker, and Mary R. Anderson-Rowland Arizona State UniversityAbstractWISE Investments (WI) is a four-year National Science Foundation project HRD 98 72818designed for secondary science/mathematics teachers and counselors to enable them to helpinterest young women in engineering. A component of the WI program is gender equitytraining. Although the gender equity professional
, thatencompasses all the three key elements of the ABET 2000 criteria – 1) educationalobjectives, 2) metrics of quality and effectiveness, 3) formal process for outcomeassessments and continuous improvement. A powerful synergy exists between thecontent of information presented to prospective students and their families through therecruitment process on one hand, and the basic ABET accreditation criteria, on the otherhand. It spans over a broad range of issues, concerning the quality of students and faculty,the program objectives, the professional component and outcomes, supporting facilitiesand institutional resources. Such synergy provides the rationale for systematic, measuredtransition of appropriate concepts from the process of ABET evaluations to