activitiesstudents participate in during their pre-college years have an impact on their choices of majorand their views of a subject area [7, 8]. In particular, [8] shows us that male and femaleparticipants, at times, take away differing views about their experience in the activities.Phase 1 ProcessPhase 1 began with a focus group of six computing education researchers and evaluators whotook part in multiple online sessions over several weeks to answer the following two researchquestions: 1. What type of data might be useable and useful for educational researchers and evaluators when measuring the impact of pre-college computing activities? and 2. What type of data might be useable and useful for practitioners who are designing and/or
Paper ID #15703Integrating Sustainability Grand Challenges and Experiential Learning intoEngineering Curricula: Years 1 through 3Dr. Claire L. A. Dancz, Clemson University Claire L. A. Dancz is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Civil Engineering and online active experiential learning and assessment with Clemson Online at Clemson University. Dr. Dancz received her B.S. in Environmental Microbiology and Biology from Michigan State University, her M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of Pittsburgh, and Ph.D. in Sustainable Engineering from Arizona State University. Her areas of research include modular, course, and
design and construction process,ranging from excavation to material choice to various building systems. CEE 507 focuses oninfrastructure systems from the technical and environmental perspectives and examines theinterdependences between these infrastructures.III. Motivation and Vision:Introductory courses tend to be required for lower-division students and these courses act asprerequisites for upper-division courses that tend to be more discipline-specific and thus, may bemore engaging for students. Introductory courses provide fundamental information andknowledge needed for upper-division courses. This framework continues throughout anacademic course map, forming a linear advancement. Figure 1 shows this progression
consider global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors in student outcomes [1], as do licensing agencies such as the National Society ofProfessional Engineers (NSPE) [2] and profession societies such as IEEE [3].Most engineering instructors have been educated with a deep technical focus, and though manysee the value of addressing sociotechnical issues, they have little experience outside ofengineering and feel ill-equipped to integrate these topics in the curriculum. In this project, weaim to make it easier for engineering instructors to include sociotechnical issues in their coursesby developing modules (with detailed teaching guides and instructional resources) for theintroduction to circuits course, each emphasizing a different
Paper ID #11292Integrating Sustainability Grand Challenges and Experiential Learning intoEngineering Curricula: Years 1 and 2Claire Louise Antaya Dancz, Arizona State University Ph.D. Candidate in Sustainable Engineering at Arizona State UniversityKevin J. Ketchman, University of PittsburghRebekah Burke, Arizona State UniversityDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of PittsburghDr. Elizabeth A Adams, Chandler-Gilbert Community College Residential Engineering Faculty at Chandler-Gilbert Community College.Prof. brad allenby, Arizona State UniversityProf. Mikhail Chester, Arizona State UniversityProf. Vikas Khanna
groups who communicated themost during the exercise and proceeded with the game only when everyone understood the concepts,scored the highest. This paper will discuss pedagogical issues with learning in virtual worlds, discuss theeffectiveness of the game, and suggest methods to improve learning. Future research will focus on theuse of Second Life for expanded statistics sessions and for human factors and ergonomics labs.1. IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to enhance Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) 306 with technologywith the intended goal of improving student learning during homework sessions. ISE 306 is the firstcourse in a two-course sequence in engineering probability and statistics. It is a required course for allISE
groups who communicated themost during the exercise and proceeded with the game only when everyone understood the concepts,scored the highest. This paper will discuss pedagogical issues with learning in virtual worlds, discuss theeffectiveness of the game, and suggest methods to improve learning. Future research will focus on theuse of Second Life for expanded statistics sessions and for human factors and ergonomics labs.1. IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to enhance Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) 306 with technologywith the intended goal of improving student learning during homework sessions. ISE 306 is the firstcourse in a two-course sequence in engineering probability and statistics. It is a required course for allISE
sufficient to onlybe technically correct and proficient. You must also show that you are informed on a range ofissues that might have some bearing on topic under consideration. My point is that, to write thistype of paper and to do it well, is hard work.Your first draft should be at least 3 pages long, not including the title page, with 1 ½ line spacingand 11-point font. Your final paper should be a minimum of 2 pages in length, not including thetitle page. It should have 1½ line spacing and 11-point font. References should be as endnotesas per the examples shown in class. References and visual aids should not be included whendetermining the length of your paper.AudienceTo be specific, consider that your audience is comprised of generally well
thesystems engineering framework (Cynefin) that will guide the application of collaborative inquiryin the special session. As part of the discussion, we will also provide some groundinginformation regarding the course the session participants will be exploring.Collaborative InquiryCollaborative Inquiry is a process through which individuals work together to investigate,analyze, and test solutions to complex situations and/or problems. It has been used in manydisciplines, though K12 education stands out for using this technique across teacher professionaldevelopment [e.g., 1], in the classroom as a pedagogical tool in the K12 classroom [e.g., 2, 3],and as a research [4] or evaluation [5] method. Computer-mediated versions accelerated its usein the
evaluation comments directed at confusion incomponents of the syllabus. Further, technical contract review in this assignment guided studentsin detail-oriented practices including compliance benefiting further academic progress and futureengineering roles. Students acquired knowledge through assessment allowing them to associateterms of the syllabus to terms of a conventional contract; these included observables, conditions,precise description, and formal representation (Farmer & Hu, 2018). The data from this studycannot be generalized in predicting success in an engineering course; however, previous studiesshow that students who have an increased understanding of course objectives and expectationshave increased learning outcome success (Ulmer
for the circuit’s laboratory (from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) islive online.The Circuits Lab learning outcomes are described below. 1- Learn how to use the oscilloscope, function generator, power supply, and multimeter. 2- Improve the technical writing and computer-aided circuit analysis and design. 3- Study electrical networks such as pure resistive networks, RC (resistor and capacitor combination), RL (resistor and inductor combination), RLC (Resistor, inductor, and capacitor combination), Operational amplifier networks and their behavior. 4- Create a troubleshooting procedure to improve the circuit implementation time.One of the most critical challenges in this laboratory is getting the
skills.IntroductionPrior to the design and implementation of the technical writing and communication course at TheCitadel, engineering curricula were supported by writing-intensive courses taught in thehumanities, which also contribute to a student’s general education requirements. The writingcourses were developed over 40 years ago as a “one size fits all” answer to a large generaleducation requirement at a small school that produced fewer than 60 engineers annually. Withthe growth of engineering students in the past decade, The Citadel developed the technicalwriting and communication course to meet the demand of engineering faculty and industrypartners. While humanities-based writing courses continue to be included in engineering studentdevelopment, these
I use she and her pronouns.” Many universities still include birth/given names in the student information system. Using this name could accidentally “out” a student who uses a different name. 2. As a getting-to-know-you activity, pass around 3x5 cards and ask students to provide a photo, write down their names and pronouns, and tell you 1 or 2 things that are important to them (e.g., a hobby). Collecting the cards during the next class meeting. 3. Use a syllabus statement (see example above). 4. When in doubt, ask! Generally, it is best to use pronouns that are consistent with the way an individual present themselves. If you are not sure, it is OK to ask politely and with discretion.Safe
) graduates’ attributes and current employers’ expectations.Therefore, with the growing demands from industry, it has become vital for engineeringprograms to focus on equipping students with non-technical or professional knowledge and skills[1]. Brunhaver et al. explain that with technical knowledge and skills becoming “less central orless sufficient” for performing engineering work, professional knowledge and skills have becomemore significant [2]. As such, programs are now tasked with widening their focus towards notonly ensuring that their graduates obtain adequate in-depth discipline specific knowledge,decision making and problem-solving skills but also towards ensuring that graduates areacquainted with ample informal pedagogies to support the
thesame term.Requirements diagrams are not used; they are inefficient in representing requirements linkages(low density of information). Requirements are instead represented in tables/matrices withappropriate relationships displayed.Tables and MatricesOne of MagicDraw’s strengths is its ability to generate tables and matrices on demand of directand multi-order relationships between elements. Students are shown how to use tables andmatrices to investigate model consistency, completeness, and as a basis for rich self-explorationof a system model.Figure 5: Table of OperationsThis table lists operations from the PRZ-1 model; it also shows the owning block, the definitionof the function, what call operation nodes reference it, and what activity
Paper ID #26549Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Coursesin a Research 1 UniversityMr. Johnny Crayd Woods Jr., Virginia Tech Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Higher Education PhD Student at Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. He obtained his master’s in Educational Foundations from Makerere University (Uganda), and a bachelor’s in Sociology from A.M.E. Zion University College (Liberia). Prior to joining Virginia Tech, he served at Tubman University (Liberia) for 10 years in several capacities, including his last position as Chief of Staff to the University President and Liaison to the
as well, as a focal pointof our design was availability and convenience. Thus, we arrived at a prototype that is 1) cheapand easy to build, 2) relatively small and easy to install, 3) interchangeable with most plumbingsystems in bathrooms and kitchens, resizability would also account for this, 4) environmentallyconscious materials. Our device is a water wheel that can be fitted onto many different types ofpipes, and produces a small amount of energy. We believe that with many of these within a buildingwe would be able to generate a reasonable amount of energy for utilization for any purpose.IntroductionToday, people are using electricity more than ever, and as climate change is increasingly creepingup on us, finding new sustainable sources
Engineering Analysis course at the Engineering Technology (ET)department in the University of Houston – Downtown (UHD). Furthermore, to the best of theauthors’ knowledge, this is the first reported work where bayou water is used for powerproduction which is an inexpensive way to produce power.Keywords: Power, Bayou, Houston, Turbine, No head.1. Introduction: For most of the modern age, people have been getting most of the energy from coal, gas, andother types of fossil fuels. While people have used other forms of power generation, there hasbeen a substantial movement to find and use other forms of power generation where windturbines being the most well-known example. This work looks for alternate power generationthat has led to look at what
Paper ID #37328Enabling Generic Sensing Devices to use LoRaCommunicationCiprian Popoviciu (Assistant Professor) Dr. Ciprian Popoviciu, East Carolina University – Assistant Professor Dr. Ciprian Popoviciu has over 20 years of experience working in technical and leadership roles in the IT industry. He is an industry-recognized domain expert in IPv6 who has worked with large service providers, enterprises, and governments. Popoviciu founded Nephos6, which did groundbreaking work OpenStack for IPv6, authored two books on IPv6, and has worked on IPv6-related internet standards and patents. He is an IPv6 Forum Fellow
33 4 31 4 31 9 30 24 30 Ethnicity Native Am. & 0 0 1 8 0 0 1 8 1 3 3 4 Pacific Islander Black 2 15 5 42 2 15 7 54 16 53 32 40 Asian 4 31 0 0 3 23 0 0 2 7 9 11 Hispanic 3 23 1 8 2 15 5 39 10 33 21 26 White 4 31 5 42 6 46 0 0 1 3 16 20 First Generation College Student Yes 5 39 3 25 6 46 5 39 5 17
drying and straightening are examples of energy that are not typically examined in anengineering classroom. Research led by Mechanical Engineering professor Dr. Tahira Reid atPurdue University examines the heat transfer of hair care products [4]. The thermalcharacterization of hair dryers and straighteners is an area that may have more personal relevanceto female engineering students. This topic can connect to students’ everyday lives anddemonstrate technical aspects of energy, establishing the legitimacy of stereotypically non-maleproducts can have in engineering.Energy Distribution: Mini-grids in Developing ContextsRoughly 1 billion people across the globe are still without access to electricity [5]. TheInternational Energy Agency (IAE
Paper ID #14439Revamping Robotics Education via University, Community College and In-dustry Partnership - Year 1 Project ProgressProf. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev earned his bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering at Moscow University of Electronics and Automation in 1995. He obtained the Master degree in Physics from Michigan Technological University in 2004 and the PhD degree in Electrical Engineering
to learn from each other in courses taught byengineering faculty with technical topics.Table 1 shows the correlation of the General Education Outcomes to the ABET StudentOutcomes. The mapping provided a way to explain to engineering students that the seminarswere groundwork for future engineering work. At the same time, it offered an explanation tonon-engineers that these skills could be transferred between different disciplines, regardless ofseminar topic. ABET Outcome 5 (Teamwork) has no apparent analog to the General EducationOutcomes and is included for completeness. In many of the Freshman Seminars, students dowork together in teams, but this dynamic is not assessed explicitly. Table 1: General Education and ABET
classroom setting.Introduction The effectiveness of using simulation-based learning strategy for procedural knowledgeor skills has been reported by many researchers [1]–[3]. Such an approach can “replace andamplify real experiences” through proper guidance to “evoke or replicate substantial aspects ofthe real world” [4]. Simulated environments that can provide the high fidelity immersiveexperience, such as CAVE [5]–[7] or other forms of visualization representation can help thelearners create the necessary cognitive connection [3], [10] between the physical world and thecomputer-generated instance. With the technological advancement in visual computing, simulation-based learningthrough technology such as virtual reality (VR) that
), wedid not find any empirical studies regarding effects of ASK systems on educationaloutcomes in our literature review. Nonetheless, the ASK system design provides an idealframework for practical implementation of the learning theories that guided the designand development of the RPT curriculum. ASK systems are well-suited for accessingcourse scenarios in the form of stories (cases) and for embedding authentic activities(anchoring tasks) within those scenarios.ASK systems share three common characteristics: 1) categorization of links betweentexts; 2) implicit domain theories distributed between content and reader; and 3)automatic generation of links between texts for large ASK systems (Fitzgerald; Wisdo1994). Categorization of links between
brief paper depicts a current snapshot of an ongoing investigation that probes how studentsreconcile social and technical forms of identity in engineering education. While the detailedresults are represented in other publications, this paper highlights the study in its current form inorder to describe what will be presented at the poster session that corresponds to this paper. Theoutcomes of this ongoing investigation will be relevant for engineering educators who arefocused on sharpening the social and technical competencies of their students. As we inengineering education seek to develop engineers that competently navigate a sociotechnicalpractice, this study provides a detailed snapshot of how social and technical perspectives ofengineering
). This steptook 10 minutes at each of the 3 institutions.Ideation Session 1: Students generated and recorded their ideas for 20 minutes without using aformal ideation method; this was repeated at the 3 institutions.TRIZ Training Intervention: A common TRIZ PowerPoint presentation lecture was given to theTRIZ intervention groups (not to the control groups). Students received a list of TRIZ principlesand the Contradiction Matrix handouts; this was repeated at the 3 institutions.Ideation Session 2: Students were asked to generate and record ideas for 50 minutes (UTEP) or20 minutes (UMD and Penn State) following the TRIZ method while the control group wasasked to generate ideas without following a formal ideation method.Ideation Homework: Students
students. After the session, the researchercollected their worksheets and documented the whiteboard collaborative ideas, and a summary ispresented in Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Ideas generated by negative brainstorming workshop.The next step was for the students to develop and use the four-field matrix evaluation tool tounderstand and practice an evaluation process. The students were asked to determine what metricparameters and assessment levels they would like to use. The students determined that theywanted to use impact as one parameter, with the assessment levels of high-impact and low-impact. The second parameter the students selected was approval, and the two assessment levelswere if something needed official university approval or not
. James C. O’Brien, Villanova University Professor Jim Oˆa C™Brien is a tenured Faculty member in the College of Engineering of Villanova University. At Villanova he has won numerous awards for teaching including the Lindback Award, the Farrell Award, and the Engineering Teacher of the Year Award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Engineering Design in Laboratory Sessions for Second Year Mechanical Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering design fosters students' capacity to apply technical knowledge towards innovativesolutions. While design has gained visibility in engineering education through programs likeentrepreneurship, freshman design, and
Sessions on Confidence in Teaching STEM-Related SkillsAbstractProfessional development programs for teachers involving hands-on research have been shownto improve student performance. However, the mechanisms by which this occurs are unclear.After preliminary investigation, teacher confidence appeared to be one metric that may beaffected by participation in our research program. Quantitative survey data fail to confirm thishypothesis, though. Qualitative essay data suggest external factors that impact confidence andthus our interpretation of survey data.1. IntroductionNational Science Education Standards established by the National Research Council in 1996suggest that science teachers “encourage and model the skills of scientific inquiry, as well