of the LWD program is to use interdisciplinary collaboration across doctoralprograms at WSU in order to broaden the perspectives of students as they address learning withdisability with an emphasis on education and employability within the STEM fields. Doctoralstudents who complete the LWD program will have a distinctive set of knowledge, skills, anddispositions with regard to the needs and strengths of persons with disabilities. This uniquepreparation will make possible professional opportunities in a multitude of areas related to, butpotentially broader than their original disciplines (e.g. higher education, research and design ofassistive technology, curriculum development and implementation, or consultation with federaland state
for a postgraduate program preparingstudents for industry. There are currently no courses specifically listed as design courses, butthere is a course in regulatory requirements, which will compensate for the lack of materialspecific to the medical field in undergraduate engineering programs. The project course mayinvolve design, but its description indicates that enrolled students are to, “undertake a project thatwill utilize theories to solve problems related to biomedical engineering issues,” so it is notnecessarily directed toward design.At UNILAG the Postgraduate Diploma (PGD) program started in 2013-2014. As at Ibadan, thePGD is designed to take two semesters (26 units) and the MS about twice as long (an additional32 units). The mission
all participating studentsneed to fulfil. This requirement involves active association of the students with an engineeringorganization on campus or involvement in an undergraduate research project. For thisrequirement, students may or may not be working with their mentor. However, they need toreport to their mentor at the end of the semester with a brief report and a presentation thathighlights the main achievements of their work. Student projects may range from involvementwith organizations such as SAE Mini Baja or IEEE Robotics to specifically working in aresearch laboratory on campus or assisting a faculty member with research. This activity isspecifically aimed at stimulating student interest in out-of-class activities. Benefits of such
2006-2423: EVALUATING SELF-ASSESSMENT AND A PLACEMENTEXAMINATION FOR A FIRST COURSE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE: HOW DOWOMEN AND MINORITY STUDENTS FARE?Joseph Urban, Arizona State University DR. JOSEPH E. URBAN Joseph E. Urban is a professor of computer science and serves the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering as Inclusive Learning Communities Program Director at ASU. His research areas include software engineering, computer languages, data engineering, and distributed computing.Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND is an Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering. She was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from
to build consensusaround a vision change that led to design becoming a major feature of the curriculum.Building Shared MeaningOur first goal was to explore the interests and priorities of those in the department and identifyareas of shared focus and those without. The change process started in a Fall 2013 ABET retreatwhere faculty and staff participated in two thought exercises. For the first exercise, each personwas asked to “write down the traits or behaviors you would look for if you were asked to identifya successful ... graduate five years after graduation.” Some example cards are shown in Figure 1.The second exercise asked each person to “describe the best undergraduate degree program inelectrical or computer engineering in the country
level responsibility of corporate planning, technical program making and technology policy making.2. Engineering the Future ─Professional Graduate Engineering EducationTo Enhance U.S. Innovation in Industry for CompetitivenessToday, as never before, America’s future technological strength for economic competitiveness andnational security depends on continuous innovation by its engineers working in industry and governmentservice. Their ideas are the creative well-spring of U.S. technological development. The need forinnovation has been stressed by the Council on Competitiveness, which calls it “the single most importantfactor in determining America’s success though the 21st century.”1As such, the National Academies’report, Rising Above the
The Use of Undergraduate Minors to Meet National Needs in Nuclear Fission Power Engineering Michael L. Corradini, James J. Duderstadt, William R. Martin University of Wisconsin/University of MichiganAbstractWith the renewed interest in nuclear power as a key component of the nation’s energy portfolio,there is a growing concern about the availability of engineers trained in nuclear technology inview of the very significant erosion in university nuclear engineering programs and facilitiesover the past two decades. Even with a rapid infusion of new resources, the time required torebuild the necessary faculties and facilities and stimulate student interest makes it
add real value to any civilengineering program. This paper has shown how these activities at West Point directly supportthe civil engineering program outcomes. The benefits seem to be greatest in the areas ofbringing real world engineering into the CE program. Students gain a better understanding of thechallenges facing engineers in professional practice, knowledge of contemporary issues,awareness of the impact of engineering in a broader societal context, and motivation to continueintellectual and professional growth. Students will benefit when an engineering department hasan active student chapter. Students are more likely to join and participate in a professionalsociety after graduation when they are introduced to the benefits as a student
Principal Investigator and Project Manager of the NASA Undergraduate Student Research Program, one of NASA’s largest national higher education projects. In his role with USRP, he led the program to tremendous growth through a comprehensive strategic commu- nications plan, resulting in exponential increase to the applicant pool, as well as the participation of the program. USRP later received a NASA Group Achievement Award in 2010 for Management Excellence. Zippay graduated from Bowling Green State University with a B.A. in communications and marketing. His background involves working as a marketing research executive for Insight Advertising and a cor- porate account executive for the University of Texas, Pan-American
Session 3220 Expanding the Undergraduate Laboratory Experience Using Web Technology Sven K. Esche, Dennis J. Hromin Stevens Institute of TechnologyAbstractStevens Institute of Technology is currently implementing a new undergraduate engineeringcurriculum. This curriculum reflects the recent nationwide trend towards enhancement oftraditional lecture-based courses with a design spine and a laboratory experience that propagatesthrough the entire educational program. In the course of the curriculum development, it wasrecognized that the
, andsupport youth in strengthening their life skills. The MFYC was initially established as a sportfocused youth development center, but as it matured, the MFYC began to offer academicprograming in partnership with other units within and external to the university. Thesepartnerships resulted in much broader programming including the Everyday Engineering, KillerAsteroids, Discovery Dentistry, Creative Writing Unleased, Picture Perfect Health, Art as a Storyto name a few. These programs provided fun, challenging and creative explorations on a varietyof in-depth experiences in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics, and HealthSciences. Participants could choose a morning and afternoon class or one that met all day.Classes were taught by
Missouri-Colombia thatrevealed a freshman retention rate of 90% for FIG students compared to 78% for non-FIGstudents.18 The study further revealed a graduation rate of 56% for FIG students, compared to41% for non-FIG. At the University of Texas-Austin, participants in engineering FIGs had aone-year retention rate of 97%.19 After two years, the retention rate was 89%. While thisprogram specifically targeted retention improvements in minority and female populations, itcould be adaptable to other at-risk students. At the University of Hartford, initial results ofimplementing FIG's in an engineering technology program have also been positive. 20 Clusteringstudents within math and science courses at the freshman level has had a positive effect
(techne) needed to solve today’s real-world problems andthe theoretical knowledge (logos) necessary to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Ourgraduates are well prepared to lead the scientific and economic development of anincreasingly complex state, nation, and world.Our mission is to serve both traditional and non-traditional students at theundergraduate, graduate, and continuing education levels; in engineering andengineering technology, the sciences, applied liberal arts, business, andprofessional programs. We work to develop the broader community’sintellectual, cultural, economic, and human resources. Facilitated by ourinnovative faculty, dedicated staff, and supportive campus environment, ourlearning community empowers our students with the ability
ResearchUndergraduate research is a high impact educational practice that has numerous benefits forstudents [5]. It provides students with the opportunity to experience an education that isgrounded in discovery, enhances students intrinsic motivation to learn, and increases earlyengagement in engineering program [4], [5]. Students acknowledge that engaging inundergraduate research is intellectually stimulating, and believe it equips them with the skillsnecessary to tackle future challenges, particularly in solving engineering problems [3]. Manystudents have indicated that their most effective learning experiences occur when they areactively involved in undergraduate research [2], [5].Additionally, undergraduate research aids in the development of critical
theopportunities for undergraduate research projects, students can significantly advance theireducation by applying first-hand the curricula they are learning in class. This approach allowsfor a greater understanding of the advanced sciences and an early exposure to the laboratoryskills, both technical and practical, utilized by the professional engineering industry. One way of accomplishing this is through the pursuit of research inmicroelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and the technologies it encompasses. MEMS researchis an innovative research area for undergraduates because it incorporates a diverse range oftechnical skills in various engineering fields and represents many current and emergingapplications in society. With a history of over 30
in-place graduate engineers in industry, it is now evidentthat there are nine stages of growth, proficiency, and levels of responsible professional leadership in engineeringpractice beyond undergraduate pre-professional entry level education. These levels of growth range from beginning Page 4.75.7project engineer through executive engineer leadership levels of professional responsibility, value judgement,program making, and technology policy making.As Wickenden noted, “… virtually all engineering problems fall on some one of three fairly distinct levels: (1)the level of known laws and data; (2) the level of technical
with K-12 educators to design and deliver an extra-curricularmiddle school engineering education program.The program utilized the engineering design process as the fundamental construct forengagement with the novel teaching and learning experiences. The program providedexperiences where participants learned engineering and information technology skills throughactivities such as simulating desert tortoise behaviors, and researching and developing designs tomitigate the urban heat island. They also participated in leadership development activities overthe summer serving as docents for younger children at the local science center, a researchinternship with the university, and an industry internship with a local energy and water
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Enhancing Engineering Education through Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Case Study on Waste Plastic in Sustainable Infrastructure Kaylee Cunning1, Joseph Tighi1, Braden Olson2, Nitish Bastola3, Isabela Bueno3, Jamilla E. S. L. Teixeira4, Jessica Deters5 1. Undergraduate student, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Nebraska 2. Undergraduate student, Civil Engineering Department, Doane University 3. Graduate student, Civil and Environmental Graduate Program, University of Nebraska 4. Assistant Professor, Civil and
announced in June 2012. The federal and state agencies providedinfrastructure funding, which was augmented by funds from NYIT and the support ofnumerous industry partners.The ETIC is an illustration of the SoECS’ core beliefs and mission. The School’s high-quality undergraduate and graduate programs prepare students for advanced studies andchallenging positions in business, government, and industry. The SoECS is guided in thismission by the three tenets embraced by NYIT: 1) professional preparation of students; 2)applications-oriented research; 3) access to opportunity for all qualified students. Toaccomplish its mission, the SoECS offers a broad range of outstanding, accreditedacademic programs; supports faculty members who are effective teacher
. Data for the EFA analysis were collected over atwo weeks in summer 2019 with students enrolled in an online undergraduate engineeringprogram at a large, southwestern public university. Recruitment emails to participate in theonline survey were sent to students by the chair of the program. Participants were instructed toconsider one particular online course when responding to the items on the survey. (Notably, mostparticipants were only enrolled in one course.) The order in which items were shown on eachscale was randomized to reduce the participant bias that can result from the order in which itemsare presented. Students could choose to enter a drawing for one of 250 $10 Amazon gift cards asa thank you for participating in the survey upon
on effective practices for integrating computing into theircourses. Two of the FLC participants tested an APEX module in their biology course, and bothagreed that the module was appropriate for students with no prior programming experience. Theyalso solicited student opinions regarding the module, and across 31 students surveyed, a majorityrecommended that their instructors use the APEX module again (68%) and further indicatedinterest in learning more about bioinformatics (52%).Building upon these pilot efforts, we are actively expanding adoption of the APEX program inseveral ways. First, we continue to form new partnerships with community colleges and offertraining workshops for interested faculty. Second, we are refining and improving the
/tubepipefabrication/notching-tube-and-pipe., accessed January, 2012. Page 25.63.17 3. Heybruck, W. F., and Thurman, L., “Stimulating Broader Industrial Participation in Undergraduate Programs”, Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2011.4. Dieter, G. E. and Schmidt, L.C., Engineering Design, McGraw Hill, 2008.5. Lewis, C., & Rieman, J. (1994). Task-centered user interface design: a practical introduction. Boulder, CO, web link at http://hcibib.org/tcuid.6. Edmonson, C. P., and Summers, D. C. S., “Integrating Teamwork Across the Curriculum”, Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for
qualitativedata collection over time and across locations.SampleIn the Spring 2016 semester, 12 mechanical engineering seniors were recruited to participate in alongitudinal study of workplace learning. Mechanical engineering was selected for two keyreasons. First, the dominant industry focus of mechanical engineering makes it a useful site forexploring the school-to-work transition of new graduates. Second, ME is one of the largestengineering fields nationally and the largest department at the study university, providing anopportunity to obtain a larger and more diverse sample. Table 2 summarizes participantdemographics by race and gender. Given the potentially small number of potential participants incategories other than white male, race and gender
evident that there must exista combination of intrinsic value (stimulating curiosity and internal drive) and extrinsic value(making the learning experience instrumentally useful) to best engage a student in the coursecurriculum [18]. Intrinsic value can be activated through a personalized education, increasingmotivation in a student’s learning journey [19], and extrinsic value can be activated through self-guided inquiry, which leads to higher content retention and usefulness of the course [20]. With aself-guided education approach, wellness courses can be modified to accommodateundergraduate students’ desires to have more time to discuss their personal wellness journey[21]. At Bryn Mawr College, a health and wellness program for undergraduates
engineers grow as lifelonglearners, creators and leaders of new technology development to meet societal needs. Whereas manydistance graduate education programs have extended research-based graduate curricula to off-campusengineers in industry, graduate curricula often have not been designed specifically to match the growthneeds of engineers relevant to the practice of engineering and the leadership of technology developmentfor continuous innovation. A systemic deficiency in graduate engineering education exists across thenation. Because of this deficiency, the nation’s graduate engineers have been inadequately educated toassume engineering leadership roles and U.S. innovative capacity for competitiveness has declined. More than ever it is
State Uni- versity, Fargo, North Dakota. He is originally from Mandan, ND and is a member of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation. He has been involved with Native American outreach programs at NDSU such as PEEC (Pre-Engineering Education Collaboration) and NATURE (Nurturing American Tribal Undergraduate Research and Education). His involvement in these programs includes assisting in the instruction and teaching of students during summer camp activities.Mr. James Schanandore, North Dakota State University James Schanandore is a Ph.D. student in the Biological Sciences Department at North Dakota State Uni- versity. He is a member of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian
curriculum resources. Furthermore, higher ed faculty need to understand the constraints and assets of PreK-12teachers and the PreK-12 education system, especially if they desire to broaden the participation in STEM and include PreK-12 activitiesas their “broader impacts” in grants. This workshop will include small breakout groups to review and discuss PreK-12 STEM resourcesthey would like to explore in more depth, and provide strategies in how to engage with the PreK-12 education community as part ofengineering education research and service in higher Ed.W2. Inclusive Pedagogies for the Undergraduate STEM Classroom 3:15pmRachel Gabriel, Connie Syharat
Paper ID #40014Opportunities and Barriers to UDL-Based Course Designs for InclusiveLearning in Undergraduate Engineering and other STEM CoursesSujit Varadhan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sujit Varadhan is a Junior at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign majoring in Computer Sci- ence. He is an undergraduate research assistant as well as a frontend developer on ClassTranscribe.Xiuhao Ding, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Xiuhao Ding is a Math and CS senior student at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Delu Louis ZhaoAnanya Agarwal, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignDavid Dalpiaz
meeting and used discussion questions to stimulate students’ critical thinking,problem-solving, engineering design, teamwork, and communication. At the end of the program,all eight students participated in the Undergraduate Research Showcase hosted by the GraduateSchool of the University of Louisville with a poster presentation. Faculty and graduate studentsnot involved in the site events were invited as judges. Awards were given to the top three posterswho received the highest scores. Fig. 1 Project list for student selection TABLE 1. Engineering Fundamental Modules for Mentoring Theme Approach Wee
; and • addressing STEM workforce development by building effective, mutually beneficial academic-industry partnerships [2].Participants were asked to collect baseline data from prior S-STEM (if applicable) and/or otherinitiatives on campus to inform their proposals. As noted by Pearson, Crosby, et al, “... projectsshould seek to couch locally identified problems and needs in the larger context of educationalresearch to help the broader STEM education community determine what interventions workbest with scholars in their environments” [3]. Therefore, PIs were strongly encouraged to seekinformation on program and institutional challenges they could address and study as part of theirS-STEM projects and share what they learned