construction industry. However, in today’sdynamic landscape, the incorporation of new technologies, sustainability considerations, andevolving managerial demands has increased the complexity of construction projects, bothtechnically and managerially. Consequently, the current construction industry places a premiumon the critical thinking and problem-solving abilities of recent graduates. Regrettably, asobserved in various professional fields, CEM programs have faced challenges in producinggraduates equipped with the necessary problem-solving and critical thinking skills. To addressthis issue, the authors propose the development of a novel senior capstone course using ascenario-based learning approach. The authors’ program is still in the process of
finding information in the sea of data can be fraught with challenges evenfor knowledgeable users. A search may yield interesting results, but what information isavailable concerning the quality and credibility of data? Is there a credible vettingprocess for pointing to what is important and relevant for students?Since the August 2003 Blackout in the Northeast, the Web has provided abundanttechnical information related to electric power systems and blackouts. But what is reallyneeded by the general public is a readily accessible explanation of how power isgenerated and distributed. Professionals outside of engineering need quick introductionsto technical problems and issues pertaining to policy matters related to power and energy.Although the
Research Support Group has been valuable in terms of generating additional research ideas, issues to be concerned about when structuring prelims, committee composition, dissertation, etc. Comrades at arms! That’s the part that has meant the most to me. I felt so completely alone after classes ended. I just could not seem to make myself work on my proposal, never mind the dissertation itself. I just didn’t want to think about it. Now, I’m interested. The group seems to like my topic. I’m moving again! “Cooperate and graduate” was what you kept telling us. I hung onto that advice more Page 7.343.5
transition for Black students in engineering and that they do not have continuity at thegraduate level with regards to identifying counterspaces. This leaves students to have to identifynew spaces in real time while adjusting to the new demands of graduate school. Additionally,there is a salient theme of mental health and wellness being an area of concern for Black studentsin engineering. While counterspaces provide avenues for Black students to express their wellnessconcerns there is an opportunity for institutions to rise to the call as well. These issues will befurther explored in future work of the larger study.References[1] B. L. Yoder, "Engineering by the Numbers," American Society for Engineering Education, pp. 11-47, 2018.[2] C.D.H. Ash
faculty academy of differential equations in the Math- ematics Department (ITESM Campus Monterrey). She is a thesis advisor and professor in the graduate programs of Education and Educational Technology and in the PhD program in Education at ITESM’s Virtual University School of Education. Her interests are the teaching and learning of mathematics for fu- ture engineers through modeling and technological applications and the construction of a bridge between the discipline of mathematics education and the community of engineering education. Page 21.33.1 c American Society for
conceptual model resulting from this research can be employed as a model for developingformal and informal pedagogical practices and experiences (i.e., curricular and extra-curricular)for priming engineering students to be global prepared. Findings from the Summit discussion oninternational learning experiences imply that to provide a student with a high quality, meaningfulinternational engineering experience, the following is suggested:First, by interacting with a new environment, students can increase their understanding ofdifferent cultures and practice communication in cross-cultural settings. Students can alsoimprove problem solving abilities in a non-US setting by being exposed to issues and challengesin new and diverse environments. Second
beenstructured as an engineering design report and uses engineering design terminology. Selectedheadings include both design-focused and education-focused terminology to assist the reader innavigating this structure.Institutional and ProgramThe University of Toronto is a large, publicly funded, research-intensive Canadian university.The Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering offers undergraduate and graduate engineeringprograms, and admits approximately 1300 undergraduate students per year into one of 10programs. All of these programs require that their students take a capstone engineering designcourse in their senior year, and a cornerstone engineering design and communication course intheir freshman year.Our program, the Division of Engineering
University. He earned a B.S. in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from Purdue University. His research interests include models and modeling, computational thinking, and computation in engineering education.Dr. Viranga Perera, Purdue University, West Lafayette Viranga Perera is a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University. He obtained his Ph.D. from Arizona State University in 2017. His research interests are in STEM education and planetary physics.Dr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alejandra Magana is the W.C. Furnas Professor in Enterprise Excellence in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and an affiliated faculty at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue
, Computer Information Systems, andEngineering Technology faculty is a result of the CSEMS colloquia. Students from allthree disciplines benefit from the CSEMS colloquia, which describe solutions to commonproblems involving all three disciplines. Since under-represented groups participate inthe CSEMS program, the opportunity exists within the CSEMS colloquia to offerprograms that will be significant to them. Financial aid is expected to permit students tofocus more on their education and less on financial concerns. The career counselingallows the students to achieve their potential both academically and professionally.Program outcomes include: o Improved education for CSEMS recipients from ET, CIS, and Mathematics - closer
feedback upon which toimprove learning2. Assessments that provide students and teachers insights into student thinkingcan help to guide feedback to refine and deepen understanding3.Affective attributes such as motivation, self-efficacy, and self-determination significantlyinfluence productivity4. The importance of affective development to productivity highlights thecritical need to assess affective development in engineering programs, which often do not focuson affect and motivations.Over the past few decades, employers have expressed concerns about the preparation ofgraduates for the workforce5,6,7,8. Concerns are not as much about technical capabilities, butabout less well-developed personal attributes in engineering graduates. The recent
each instructor every semester [18].Not all disabled students receive accommodations. Some may not be able to afford the necessarydocumentation, have their request denied, or encounter faculty who do not comply with DSO-recommended accommodations [13], [14], [18]. Students in high-stakes STEM situations likeexams or labs may see accommodations denied over concerns it will give them an “advantage”over their peers. Regardless of the reason, the denial or withholding of accommodations canhave a negative impact on disabled students’ success and cause them increased emotional,academic, and financial difficulties [50].Additionally, institutions are only required to offer “reasonable” accommodations, which is anambiguous standard. The Equal
Paper ID #35146Engineering Leadership: Transitioning from ”Soft Skill” to Hard DataDr. B. Michael Aucoin P.E., Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Dis- tribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc. His education includes a BS in Engineering from the University of New Orleans, an M.Engr. in Electrical Engineering and a D.Engr. from Texas A&M University, and an M.A. in Organizational Leadership from Gonzaga University. Dr
Engineering and Computing Systems, College of Engineering and Applied Science, at the University of Cincinnati and an affiliate faculty mem- ber in UC’s Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She received her Ph.D. in Math- ematics from the University of Illinois in 1975 and her PhD. in Computer Science from Texas A&M University in 1986. She is the head of UC’s B.S. in Computer Engineering Program and the coordina- tor of the Preparing Future Faculty in Engineering Program. Her research interests include embedded systems and VLSI, intelligent embedded systems, software and systems engineering, computational biol- ogy and synthetic biology, agent based modeling and simulation, mentoring, and diversity in
bridge structural engineer at Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. and Michael Baker International, Inc. in Denver, and she is a licensed professional engineer in Colorado and New York, USA. Dr. Amanda Bao won the 2021 Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching at RIT. Dr. Bao has been actively involved in engineering education research since 2011, including digital learning, active learning and intensive collaboration with industry. Dr. Bao develops a teaching website: http://baoteachingcet.com/ and opens a YouTube Structural Design Teaching channel to post screencasts to supplement traditional lecture-type classes, and she also created hands-on active learning modules to improve teaching and learning effectiveness. In
Paper ID #9586Defining Engineering EducationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in
theflooding.The CCRFR supports state and local governments by engaging faculty expertise and resources inconducting studies, technical and non-technical services, and policy guidance in recurrentflooding resilience. Old Dominion University faculty started engaging the Southside communityleaders in December 2022 to understand community concerns related to flooding, whichincluded a bus tour of flood concerns. Subsequently, an engagement strategy was developed,presented, and revised based on a follow-up meeting in February 2023 and presented to theSouthside Community Task Force, a coalition of civic league leaders. Old Dominion Universityfaculty engaged in the Southside CCRFR project also work in the CCDC and committed todeveloping flooding solutions for
use of banana fibers to create bags in Cameroon and address the plastic bag black market.“Economic Use of CMU Blocks” student group attempted to find a solution for Haiti's poorinfrastructure and waste management issues. They explored the possibility of using wasteproducts in building CMUs, a common construction material in Haiti. By working with ClemsonEngineers for Developing Countries (a student organization actively working in Haiti), theydefined a problem and connected students with Haitian stakeholders. Faculty members from theGlenn Department of Civil Engineering gave advice concerning materials andfeasibility. Students determined waste availability, obtained an understanding of potentialadditives to strengthen or serve as substitutes
Paper ID #33459Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineer-ing(RFE Design and Development - Year 2)Dr. Joni M. Lakin, University of Alabama Joni M. Lakin (Ph.D. , The University of Iowa) is Associate Professor of Educational Research at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include educational assessment, educational evaluation methods, and increasing diversity in STEM fields.Dr. Daniela Marghitu, Auburn University Dr. Daniela Marghitu is a faculty member in the Computer Science and Software Engineering Department at Auburn University, where she has worked since 1996. She has published
based at the Colorado School of Mines andwas led by Moskal; additional collaborating institutions included Ithaca College, SaintJoseph’s University and Georgia Tech.15 This project began with a thorough review ofthe computing literature concerning students’ attitudes and beliefs. Specific attention wasgiven to the research on attraction, retention and gender issues in CS. A primary sourcethat informed this work was the work of Margolis and Fisher, see [16-17]. A fifty-twostatement CS attitude survey was developed based on that literature review and wasdesigned to measure five constructs: 1) Confidence in learning CS, 2) Perceptions of CSas a male dominated field, 3) Beliefs in the usefulness of learning CS, 4) Interests in CSand 5) Beliefs
participation in the Yukon Territory, Canada,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 99, p. 107025, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107025.[32] R. Buchanan, “Design Research and the New Learning,” Design Issues, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 3–23, 2001.[33] G. Moore, V. Rao, K. Goucher-Lambert, and A. Agogino, “Journey Mapping the Virtual Design Thinking Experience: Engaging Students Across Disciplines in Human-Centered Design,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://codesign.berkeley.edu/papers/moore-journeymap-IDETC/[34] A. Coso and A. Pritchett, “The Development of a Rubric to Evaluate and Promote Students
focused on developing a concept-based teaching method for his students. Page 14.1000.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Quantifying Learning Through the use of Mind Maps and Concept MapsConcept Maps, Learning, Cognitive ScienceAbstractIn this work mind maps and concept maps will be used to facilitate the process of learning byquantifying the ability of students to connect existing memories to new concepts. Researchfrom cognitive and neural science indicates that learning occurs through the repeated process ofstoring, retrieving, and connecting information.Aligning instruction
areas. Returning to academia, he earned a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2011 at the University of Virginia. His current research interests include machine learning, embedded systems, electrical power systems, and engineering education.Prof. Ronald D. Williams P.E., University of Virginia Ronald Williams is a faculty member in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. His teaching responsibilities have typically been in the area of digital systems, embedded computing, and computer design. He has recently been actively involved in the redesign of the undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum. His research interests have focused on embedded computing for
Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, and educational psychology. His research interests span the formation of students’ professional identity, the role of reflection in engi- neering learning, and interpretive research methods in engineering education. He was the first international recipient of the ASEE Educational Research Methods Division’s ”Appren- tice Faculty Award”, was selected as a 2010 Frontiers in Education ”New Faculty Fellow”, and is currently a UGA ”Lilly Teaching Fellow”. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the en
academic course, personal interest, or professionalopportunity.The WPWP interfaces with more than 50 courses within our university’s curriculum in severaldifferent ways. The most relevant interface for this study is the Writing in the Major (WiM)program. The WiM program stresses the in-depth study and practice of discipline-specificwriting within one course in each academic major. For environmental engineering majors atour university, the course associated with the WiM program is Environmental Science forScientists and Engineers (EV301). Additional information concerning the WPWP, the WiM,and the Mounger Writing Center can be found at our university’s website.1.3. Environmental Engineering CurriculumWest Point’s environmental engineering
aim to empower, promote the works of, and highlight those frommarginalized communities. Including highlighting their research as part of spotlights that someuniversities implemented through the pandemic (Bhaduri, et. al. 2021).pg. 17Finally, universities must help faculty members do their jobs by investing in systems, resourcesand processes that take care of their well-being proactively. This includes, but is not restrictedto concerns such as those related to immigration or work-visa status, and simultaneously alsoeducating co-workers on challenges faced by international employees and how to be mosthelpful and supportive through critical phases.These reflections offer insight not only into personal growth strategies for educators, but
curriculum in first‐ and second‐year courses may help assuage some of the concerns expressed by some faculty of upper‐level courses. Fall 2019 was the first semester collecting data for Material and Energy Balances. We did get a high rate of participation for all sets of reflection questions, although we are only beginning to analyze the data. Spring 2020 is the first semester implementing these topics in Thermodynamic Process Analysis. As a result, the data has not been compiled yet and it is not possible to determine an analysis approach in advance.Weber and Atadero. 2020 Annual CoNECD Conference. 18
Paper ID #48719Work-In-Progress: Fluid Mechanics - One Size Fits All?Dr. Tamara Floyd Smith, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Tamara Floyd Smith is a Professor of Chemical Engineering. She became a full-time engineering faculty member in 2003 and currently serves as a faculty member and administrator. She has taught both undergraduate and graduate courses.Dr. Gifty Osei-Prempeh, West Virginia University Institute of TechnologyDr. Yogendra M. Panta P.E., West Virginia University Institute of Technology As a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at West Virginia University Tech Beckley Campus, he specializes in
Professor of Higher Education, and Director of Graduate Studies and secondary faculty in the Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Program at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. DeAngelo studies social stratification, investigating how social inequities are produced, maintained, and interrupted. Currently her scholarship focuses on access to and engagement in faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 “We just get stereotyped:” A Comparative Analysis of the Experiences of Undergraduate Women of Color and White Women in Engineering (Work in Progress) Women, and particularly women
not new to the study ofengineering design. Jansson and Smith1 were among the first who “clearly and repeatedlydemonstrated the existence of design fixation” through a series of experiments using senior-levelmechanical engineering students. Linsey, et.al.2, demonstrated that fixation on design featuresextends to design professionals, even those (in particular, engineering design faculty) who aretrained in and study engineering design. Chrysikou and Weisberg3 conclude that fixation due topictorial examples “is a general phenomenon that affects individuals irrespective of expertise.”On the other hand, Purcell and Gero4 contend the pictorial information has no effect if theinstance was unfamiliar, but if familiar, pictures were found to produce
counterparts without disabilities. This underscores theneed for the engineering community to encourage students with disabilities to be moreforthcoming in expressing their emotions, sentiments, and concerns. In addition, the research inthis field would amplify the voices of students with disabilities and benefit fromoverrepresenting this group in samples.Lastly, the insights collected from this mapping review on the experiences of students withphysical and sensory disabilities in engineering bring to light four essential themes. Thesethemes necessitate attention not only from the engineering education research community butalso from faculty, administrators, staff, policymakers, and society at large. The issues ofmarginalization, discrimination, the