Conference Session

Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sergio Guillen Grillo, University of Virginia; Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

]. This model is integrated in varying formats through the instruction ofthe engineering design process, but there is a theoretical and practical model that puts theseprinciples into actionable skills and steps: Giving Voice to Values (GVV) as introduced byGentile [6]. A search of the American Society for Engineering Education document repositoryreveals that there are only five papers that have directly cited GVV. The oldest was published in2014, and the newest in 2023.The following sections of this work in progress paper set the stage for the introduction by theDepartment of Engineering & Society faculty at the University of Virginia of an innovativeframework for developing engineering students’ competencies for acting on their values

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder; JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Stanford University), and Civil Engineering (BS, University of California, Davis), and MS and PhD degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Davis. She has been a member of the faculty at the University of Colorado, Boulder since 1982.Dr. Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder Beverly Louie is the Faculty Advancement Research Associate in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. Formerly she was the Director for teaching and learning initiatives in the Broadening Opportunities through the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center, Director for the Women in Engineering Program and senior instructor in en- gineering

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IND)

visit, she discussed Lean Green at a highlevel and introduced the pertinent facts of one of her previous projects. The project involvedsustainability initiatives of the Canadian operations of a large multinational automobilemanufacturer headquartered in Europe. During her second visit, she went through the details ofthe case, discussing the analysis and recommendations. Student teams had an assignment duringthe two weeks in between her visits. In addition to Lean-specific concepts, the assignment hadcultural and global elements as well. It asked for research into the European Union’s 2050 long-term strategy compared to environmental policies of the United States, Canada, and Australia.The assignment prompt is presented in Appendix A-1.Mr

Conference Session

Promoting Communication Skills

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bruce Kovanen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Ryan Ware, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Megan Mericle, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Turnipseed, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; J. Patrick Coleman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Celia Mathews Elliott, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; John S. Popovics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; S. Lance Cooper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; John R. Gallagher, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Paul Prior, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Julie L. Zilles, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools: A Survey of Top-Ranked U.S. and Canadian Programs,” J. Bus. Tech. Commun., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 452– 490, 2004.[3] N. T. Buswell, B. K. Jesiek, C. D. Troy, R. R. Essig, and J. Boyd, “Engineering instructors on writing: Perceptions, practices, and needs,” IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 55–74, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPC.2019.2893392.[4] Yoritomo, J. et al., “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large research university through the lens of writing studies,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30467.[5] A. Pincas, Teaching English writing, Repr. London

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronaldo Luna, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Richard Hall, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Michael Hilgers, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Ghulam Bham, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Richard Elgin, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Charles Morris, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Glenn Morrison, Missouri University of Science & Technology

respond instantaneously to learners’data inputs with numerical and graphical responses, and can provide a vehicle for structuring andpromoting communication[6]. At another level, web-based presentation of content can free theclassroom instructor from the limited and passive task of traditional lecture, leaving class timefor more active learning scenarios such as collaboration and one-on-one instruction. Finally, allof these methods have an advantage over traditional software tools since they are available toanyone with a web browser and internet connection, and they allow for networking beyond a setgroup of computers to connections around the globe.Research indicates that much of the promise of these learning systems has not been fullyrealized[6

Conference Session

Track Special Topic: Intelligence Technical Session 14

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Turhan Kendall Carroll, Ohio State University; Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State University; Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Intelligence

class, but in a specific way. It aims to instruct the student onwhat smartness is, how they should view themselves, and how they should view others in relationto themselves. This instruction is given to students implicitly through artifacts such as grades, testscores, establishment of accepted behaviors, etc. These artifacts are not established solely by theinstructor; they are established by all members of the class. In other words, the nature of smartnesslends itself to co-construction of all members of the classroom, even those who are marginalizedby this definition. Further, since smartness is implicit and done to others, the behaviors andartifacts that constitute smartness are immeasurable, and as both Hatt [5] and Carrillo [22] argue,they

Conference Session

Design for Community

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Timothy Prestero; Neil Cantor

Proceedings 2nd Development by Design Conference, Bangalore, India, Dec 2002.3. Figueredo, S.L., The Kinkajou Project: Product Design of a Low Cost Microfilm Projector, MIT Mechanical Engineering Senior Thesis, June 2003.4. Garcia, K., Evolution of the Kinkajou Projector: Motivating Team Members Beyond Classroom Learning, MIT Mechanical Engineering Senior Thesis, June 2003.5. Jaimes, J., The Study and Development of a Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Microfilm Optics Unit, MIT Mechanical Engineering Senior Thesis, June 2003.6. Tolliver, M., The Kinkajou Project: Power System Optimization for a Low Cost Microfilm Projector, MIT Mechanical Engineering Senior Thesis, June 2003.7. Vargas, P., Human Powered Portable Projector for

Collection

2015 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Gordon W. Romney; Baird W. Brueseke

deployment of theinternet present challenges to vetting of educational content that extend far beyond peer reviewsof academic journal papers. Vetting, in this context, implies the process of examination, review, Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 471validation and authentication of instructional content relative to a standard of excellence and fact.Five identified aspects of the vetting process are: 1) the creator of the content; 2) the content; 3)the qualifications of the assessor: “vettor”, reviewer

Conference Session

Machine Design Related

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Xiaobin Le P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology; Anthony William Duva P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology; Richard L. Roberts, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

&T fundamentals was regarding dimension tolerances. TheY14.5 standard specifies a default tolerance zone for features of size through what is referred toas Rule 1, also known as the envelope principle [13] when there are only dimension toleranceswithout geometric tolerancing. This rule states that when only a tolerance of size is specified fora feature of size, the limits of size prescribe the extent of allowed variation in its geometric form.Specifically, the envelope principle (Rule 1) states that the surface of a feature of size may notextend beyond an envelope of perfect form at MMC (Maximum Material Condition)[13]. In thisway, Rule 1 of GD&T shows the relationship between dimension tolerance and geometrictolerancing. We used some

Conference Session

Critical Reflections on Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Claire Lynne McCullough P.E., High Point University; Svetlana Chesser, Auburn University; Brian J. O'Leary, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga; Bart L. Weathington, WECO Solutions

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

threat; [8]), and lowering their aspirations for careers in STEM fields [9], [10].Even more troubling is that academically qualified high school girls rarely choose STEM-relatedmajors in college. Further, women who choose STEM majors are almost twice as likely as mento leave that major due to an unwelcoming culture or lack of engaging introductory courses [11].While it appears that some sex- and racially-based barriers have been removed as students movefrom secondary school through the university, the shortage of women and minorities in STEMcareers remains relatively intractable.There is a growing body of evidence that hidden biases in the workplace contribute to theleakage of women and minorities from STEM-related industries [2]. A report by

Conference Session

Project Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University; Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University

scholarship interests lie in the areas of geometric modeling, design, CAD, DFM, CAM and CNC machining.Sura Alqudah (Assistant Professor) Sura Al-Qudah Holds a Ph.D. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Binghamton University. She is a co-program director of the Manufacturing Engineering Program at Western Washington University. Dr. Al-Qudah is a Co-PI on a $1M S-STEM award number 1834139. In her role with the S-STEM grant, Dr. Al-Qudah assists in various tasks and activities such as recruitment and selection, program webpage development, and application material development. Co-PI Al- Qudah has a primary role assisting with the delivery of the Viking Launch bridge program through the Spatial Visualization workshop

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 5: Online Teaching and Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenneth Reid, Virginia Tech; Max Mikel-Stites, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

insufficient to be certainthat there had been academic misconduct, and were consequently rejected for submission to the honorcourt. However, many cases had at least three or more characteristics, and passed the ‘window test’;imagine if printouts of the code were aligned and held up in front of a window - looking through one tothe other shows that the characters were identical. In other words, codes suspected of violation were oftenso similar that they could have been overlain on one another flawlessly, and had perfect alignment,despite variable changes, or the addition of comments. Once we had established beyond any reasonabledoubt that the codes were too similar to have been created by legitimate collaboration (i.e. two or morestudents discussing the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5B: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manaz Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University; Chandan Dasgupta, Purdue University; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia MSSEC, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

disciplinary engagement with engineering design activities using sub- optimal models. His research interests include the use of counterexamples as primary generators for supporting productive disciplinary engagement, integration of design thinking and scientific inquiry into K-12 education, and designing learning environments that help students generate and use design heuristics and make effective tradeoff decisions.John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia MSSEC, Purdue University, West Lafayette John Mendoza-Garcia is a Colombian Systems Engineer, and currently a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His advisors are Dr. Monica E. Cardella and Dr. William C. Oakes. In his dissertation, he is interested in

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 11: Shaping Engineers - Competency, Creativity, and Iteration in the First Year

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Portia Elise Lenczowski, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Aaron Lalley P.E., Southeast Technical College

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

-based model for developing adaptiveexpertise in first-year engineering students. By emphasizing iterative learning, reflection, andstructured support, this approach equips students with the skills and mindset to excel in thedynamic and evolving landscape of modern engineering. Through further refinement anddissemination of these practices, engineering education can continue to prepare students not onlyfor the challenges of today but for the uncertainties of the future.References1. G. Hatan and K. Inagaki, Two Courses of Expertise. New York, NY: Freeman, 1986.2. D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.3. J. Larson, S. S. Jordan, M. Lande, and S. Weiner, “Supporting self-directed learning in a project-based

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bushra Tawfiq Chowdhury, Virginia Tech; Stephanie Marie Kusano, Virginia Tech; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Akshay Sharma, Virginia Tech, Industrial Design

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 153-174.Author. (In press). Beyond Help: Using Scaffolding to Teach Programming in an Online Java Forum.Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2011). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-20.Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329-348.Bucciarelli, L. L. (2001). Design knowing and learning

Conference Session

Increasing Engagement in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Wolf, University of British Columbia; Gayatri Gopalan, University of British Columbia; Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

: Exploring Three Methods in an Engineering Ethics and Professionalism CourseAbstractThis paper explores the role of three pedagogical interventions in engineering students’ learningabout ethical and professional conduct, with a particular focus on affective engagement. Manytransformative efforts involving equity, diversity, inclusion, and decolonization are centered onethics as a justifying principle, which further stresses the need to cultivate an ethical orientationin engineering practice, beyond specific knowledge. A new course on professionalism and ethicswas introduced as a platform to explore scalable pedagogical approaches to enhance engagementand achieve affective learning outcomes in engineering ethics. The learning

Conference Session

Maker Communities and Authentic Problem Solving

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Rennick, University of Waterloo; Carol Hulls P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Derek Wright P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Andrew J. B. Milne, University of Waterloo, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering; Eugene Li, University of Waterloo; Sanjeev Bedi P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

also seen as attractive as it met many of the principles underlying High-ImpactPractices [13]. For our first implementation in Mechatronics, while software is an importantcomponent of the program, it is only one of four main program threads, with hardware,mechanical design, and control systems being the other three. Consequently, the problem spacewas expanded beyond a typical hackathon.Hackathons are typically extra-curricular and held over a weekend. This was seen as overlyinvasive of the student time given their very heavy first semester. Accordingly, it was essentialthat this activity be part of the regularly scheduled class time for the students, although thisproduces scheduling issues as discussed in Section 4. Management Engineering, a

Conference Session

Issues in Computer Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Ahmet Eskicioglu

: • a focus primarily on research on human learning (though the study of animal learning provides important collateral information), including new developments from neuroscience. Page 8.1144.3 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” • a focus especially on learning research that has implications for the design of formal instructional environments, primarily preschools, kindergarten through high schools (K- 12), and colleges. • a focus on research that helps explore the

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura D. Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Cinda Heeren

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

communities, divides the professoriate into more and less privileged groups” (p. 7).While issues related to teaching faculty are thorny, many who study them are quick to point outthat these individuals provide value to their departments beyond “covering” instructionalresponsibilities—often bringing distinctive knowledge, skills, and attitudes to bear in their work.These assets include expertise in critical fields, teaching proficiency, real-world experience andperspectives, and a passion for their subject matter.13Support for teaching faculty is central to their success. Lyons and Burnstad indicate that teachingfaculty thrive in their positions when they have access to:“1. A thorough orientation to the institution, its culture and practices;2

Conference Session

Instrumentation and Laboratory Systems

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Pierre; Frank Tuffner; Robert Kubichek

Innovative Communications Experiments Using an Integrated Design Laboratory Frank K. Tuffner, John W. Pierre, Robert F. Kubichek University of WyomingAbstractIn traditional undergraduate teaching laboratory environments, many communication topics aredifficult to convey because of their complexity in implementation. This paper describeslaboratory experiments that explore challenging communication topics using the University ofWyoming’s new integrated design undergraduate teaching laboratory. Each lab stationcomprises a PC using LabVIEW and GPIB to control oscilloscopes, arbitrary functiongenerators, power supplies and a data acquisition card. In

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

tina Cartwright, Marshall University; Julie Lynn Snyder-Yuly, Marshall University; Wook-sung Yoo, Marshall University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

technology byfocusing on recruiting, retaining, and graduating low-income female students.The PWS model is based on a Project-Based Learning approach to help students developtechnical and professional skills through real-world project experiences under faculty mentorshipbuilding a successful pipeline to the workforce from the college. The PWS program supports 2-cohorts of incoming students (2021 N=10 and 2022 N=9) through scholarships, coursework, andprojects mentored by faculty from computer sciences and engineering. Students have participatedin a 1-credit hour course each semester focusing on building and supporting students’ growthmindsets and recognition of the importance of grit through the examination of two books, CarolDweck’s Growth Mindset

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 3 Slot 7 Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Alberto Esquinca, San Diego State University; Erika Mein, University of Texas at El Paso; Helena Mucino, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

literature reviewed previously that points out thatstudents with low grades struggle to feel a sense of belonging to their fields [26].Students became aware of each other’s GPAs through practices such as announcing theirgrades publicly to their peers or discussing grades with each other. They also typically askedeach other what they got on the test, a practice that may be related to grade curving. In thecontext of the competitive culture, this could also be an opportunity for students to positionthemselves in relation to others. For instance, Genesis told a story of how she asked her (mostlymale) peers about their grades on a test. “Or like, "Oh, well how did you guys end up doing onthe exam?" I'm like, "Oh, well, I ended up getting an A on the exam

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Leadership Development and Team Building Efforts, Dual Career AssistanceProgram, and Faculty Evaluation Policy/Practice. This paper describes a subset of theAdvanceRIT career navigation activities, outcomes and evaluation, and progress towardssustaining these efforts beyond the length of the current AdvanceRIT funded project.IntroductionA group of women faculty at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) have been on a nearly10 year journey to increase the representation, retention and career advancement of womenfaculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) and Social & BehavioralSciences (SBS) fields at their university. The road led them through an NSF ADVANCEInstitutional Transformation Catalyst project titled Establishing

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monique S. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Susan McGrade, Indiana Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Paper ID #14744An Exploration into the Impacts of the National Society of Black Engineers(NSBE) on Student PersistenceMrs. Monique S. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monique Ross is a doctoral candidate in the Engineering Education department at Purdue University. Her research focuses are race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace, specifically the experiences of Black women in engineering industry. She also has interest in preparing women and minorities for career advancement through engagement in strategies for navigating the workplace. She has a Bachelors degree in Computer Engineering from

Conference Session

Technology and Design in Engaging and Analyzing Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University; Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; William M. Jordan, Baylor University; John Edward Miller, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Accrediting Engineering Programs (CAEP), for example, guides programs onprogram educational objectives, student outcomes, assessment of these outcomes, and thenprocess improvement/evaluation determining how well the program addresses these criteria.2 TheStudent Outcomes a-k have almost universally been adopted by engineering departments tocharacterize their programs without modification, usually to simplify the accreditation process.Outcome f, an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, is typically satisfied by acourse on ethics, often taught outside the department and from a non-engineering perspective.Outcome h, the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental and

Conference Session

Project-based and Experiential Learning in Civil Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University; Kyle Kershaw P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alec C. Derks, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

ofreinforced concrete behavior, the design of simple beams and one-way slabs to resist shear andflexure, and the design of short columns. Because of the scale of typical civil engineeringstructures, students commonly do not get to experience large or full-scale structural behavior as apart of an undergraduate reinforced concrete course. Rather, students typically learnfundamental concepts through theoretical discussions, small demonstrations, or pictures andimages. Without the interaction with full-scale structural members, students can struggle todevelop a clear understanding of the fundamental behavior of these systems such as thedifferences in behavior of an over or under-reinforced beam. Additionally, students do not buildan appreciation for the

Conference Session

Committee on Professional Practice Presents: Topics in the Academic-Industry Zone

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bradley Aldrich P.E., F.NSPE, F.ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers; Kleio Avrithi, P.E., Mercer University; Jennifer Hofmann, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

standards forcivil engineering licensure, consequently, many perceive the CEBOK only as an “academicexercise” that does not pertain to civil engineering practice outside formal education. With thethird edition – the CEBOK3 – this could not be further from the truth.The third edition of The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK3) [1], published in2019, goes beyond formal education to define the complete set of knowledge, skills, andattitudes (KSAs) that all civil engineers should first attain and then maintain to serve inresponsible charge of civil engineering services.The CEBOK3 should be a powerful tool to guide students, academics, early-career engineers,managers, principals, and owners as the roadmap to prepare themselves and their

Collection

2023 PSW

Authors

Tara Esfahani; David Copp

quiet place to study. In theseresponses, students clearly describe both benefits and drawbacks to both transitioning to onlinecourses and transitioning back to in person. These results provide important implications forstudent wellness in multiple learning formats and through disruptive transitions in learning.IntroductionThe prevalence of online classes has steadily increased since their introduction more than threedecades ago. However, the COVID-19 pandemic uniquely impacted the way students andinstitutions approached education with a sudden and disruptive shift to virtual/remote and onlinelearning. These sudden changes had dramatic and widely varying impacts on university studentsrelated to not only learning and study habits, but also to

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yupeng Luo, California State University - Fresno; Wei Wu, California State University - Fresno; Zhanna Bagdasarov, California State University - Fresno

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

-centered approaches promoting active learning [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].Several sets of generic measures along with associated rubrics for the targeted SLOs weredeveloped and tested. Table 1 below lists the direct and indirect measures used in the threecourses. Comparative analysis was also conducted through a pair of surveys to inform futureTablet PC usage and assessment efforts in both STEM and social science fields. A full discussionof all measures is beyond the scope of this paper. The results section will focus on the surveyanalysis only and thus provide students’ perceptions.Table 1: Direct and indirect measures to assess selected SLOs SLOs and Associated Assessment Measures

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Shinelle Hutchinson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Yung Han Yoon, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Neesha Shantaram; Umit Karabiyik, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

, Purdue University Dr. Umit Karabiyik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. Prior to his appointment at Purdue, Dr. Karabiyik was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at Sam Houston State University from 2015 to 2018. Dr. K received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Florida State University in 2010 and 2015 respectively. His research interests broadly lie in Digital and Cyber Forensics, User and Data Privacy, Artificial Intelligence, Computer and Network Security. He is a recipient of federal grants from National Institute of Justice. He is an Associate Editor-in-Chief for Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, and