the most traditional elements of thecourse, following what Chi and Wylie [24] would consider passive to active in the ICAP framework. It is also noteworthy that students largely reported that the elements designed to supportsuccessful navigation through the course – knowing how they would be assessed by the instructor, thecourse design to learn or study the materials even if remote, navigation of the course site, and knowingwhy the class focused on the topics presented – provided much help or great help to their learning.Designing a course to be easily navigated is particularly important for remote learners.[25] Multiplestudents pointed out in midterm feedback that choice was not prohibitively stressful because of twofactors: the
Lab/Program appropriate for SCU with the knowledge that many othermodels/choices exist and that many of these alternatives would be more appropriate for otherinstitutions.Equipping The Lab. With only a few exceptions, the Lab is equipped with a standard array ofmaker equipment. This includes: Computer controlled machines typically featured in maker labs, to include six 3D printers, two laser cutters, four routers ranging in capability from large format woodwork to circuit board fabrication; Standard hand tools (hammers, screwdrivers, wrenches, foam cutting tools, etc.); Standard manually operated power tools (drill, sander, etc.); Several manually operated powered benchtop tools (mitre saw, small milling machine
strong emphasis on both the program’s organiza-tion and curriculum. Due to its longevity, the work also details, where appropriate, the significantevolution of the program (previously described to the ASEE in 20001 ) over its eight session his-tory. The work begins in the following section with an overview of each of the ten instructionalunits that comprise the program. In particular, lesson objectives, presentation summaries, projectdescriptions, methods of learning assessment (homework assignments, project debriefings, etc.),and unit assessments, completed by the instructors in retrospect, are presented. In Section 3 asummary of student assessment data, which was obtained during the 2005 and 2006 sessions, ispresented and the work concludes in
with appropriate uses of technology in the classroom. The MaterialBalances and Stoichiometry course is a large interdisciplinary course that is required ofchemical, biological and environmental engineers in our program. In this course, I utilize aWeb-based Interactive Science and Engineering (WISE) learning tool developed here at OSU.The WISE learning tool allows the instructor to pose questions to the class that probe forconceptual understanding and supports a variety of student response types including: multiplechoice answers, multiple choice with short answer follow-up, numerical answers, short answers,and Likert-scale surveys. The tool provides formative assessment of student learning, allows forimmediate feedback by the instructor
Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationDevelopment ContextPerhaps the single most important motivation behind our work with the Mind-Matrix isthe desire to build a tool that will bring learning and instruction closer together byproviding a bridge between the two. The framework of this bridge between a person whohas in-depth knowledge of some subject area and a person who is actively seeking anunderstanding of that area is our Mind-Matrix knowledge map program. The mechanicsof the bridge are automated assessment of the state of the student’s understanding. TheMind-Matrix knowledge map program is fundamentally an
bias in the measures of these latent variables 6 . MIMICmodeling is especially useful for current research for the following reasons: (1) it worksbetter for small samples 7,8,9 , as opposed to other CFA methods, such as multisample CFA,because there is no need to divide the sample into different groups (e.g., gender orethnicity groups) which requires the sample size be large enough in each group foraccurate parameter estimates, (2) the regular factor analysis analyzes the covariancematrix involving only the response variables, which might not capture the differenceacross background groups 9,10 . The inclusion of background variables provides MIMICmodeling with important extra information, which enables the researchers to investigate
needingmore of a personal touch. As indicated previously, most experienced college teachers areprobably “Competent.”Although achieving the “Complete Exemplar” ought to be a teaching aspiration, Lowman furthernotes that exemplary instructors are also identified as teachers who excel at one of the twodimensions and are at least adequate in the other. The emphasis for “Exemplary Lecturers” is onmotivating students through their passion for the subject matter, and these teachers are especiallyskilled within large introductory classes. On the other hand, the focus for “ExemplaryFacilitators” is on relationships and inspiring high quality independent work. These teachers areespecially skilled within small more advanced classes. Some students will naturally
(IUCRC). The hands-on experience affordsparticipants the opportunity to evaluate career choices in the technical fields. The studentinterest in pursuing science and engineering careers is increased through exposure to state-of-the-art technical topics.Energy engineering, largely centered around electrical and mechanical engineering, has a naturalappeal to persons from all age and ethnic groups because it concerns our environment, ourquality of life, and well being as a society. The REU program strategy is to use topics, not onlyof research relevance from the center, but also of relevance to indigenous peoples. Nativepeoples desire to be both self-reliant and self-determined. From an energy perspective suchindependence would then include the
cyclical improvements, and summative assessment to measure success ofthe project. Once completed, the project is expected to have direct impact on more than 500community college students, in addition to being used for K-12 outreach to increase interest inSTEM and build the pipeline into wind energy careers.Goals and ObjectivesGoals • To transform teaching practices in community college wind energy programs through the use of an interactive, web-based, 3D simulator for troubleshooting and safety. • To improve the quality of the wind energy workforce to meet the critical needs of the industry.Objectives • To develop teaching modules for troubleshooting strategies and safety in community colleges through a web-based, interactive 3D
Education an educational software company focused on teaching sketching and spatial visualization skills.Dr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr.Huihui Qi is a Teaching Assistant Professor at the University of California, San Diego.Dr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego and the President of eGrove Education, Inc. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project- based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, and is committed to fos- tering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large
Programs. Dr. Huang- Saad has received numerous awards for her teaching and student advising, includ- ing the 1938E College of Engineering Award, the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the U-M ASEE Outstanding Professor Award, the International Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award, and the College of Engineering Outstanding Student Advisor Award. Aileen has worked in the private sector gaining ex- perience in biotech, defense, and medical device testing at large companies and start-ups. Aileen’s current research areas include entrepreneurship engineering education, impact and engaged learning. Aileen has a Bachelor’s of Science in Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, a Doctorate of Philosophy from The
universityhas a large, top-ranking engineering college with over 9,000 undergraduate students enrolled andapproximately 50 tenured or tenure-track faculty in the electrical and computer engineeringdepartment. The department offers Bachelor of Science degrees in electrical engineering orcomputer engineering and maintains a joint degree program in software engineering with thecomputer science department. More than 2,000 students are majoring in electrical, computer, orsoftware engineering. This department is also the recipient of two recent National ScienceFoundation grants (RED/SSTEM) that focus on departmental change, including supporting itsattempts to develop undergraduate electrical, computer, and software engineering identities.These grants are but
American 11.0% 12.5% White 14.8% 3.7% Hispanic Hispanic Hispanic 81.0% 82.5% 74.1% Figure 1: Demographics of DREAM mentees from spring 2009 The demographics of the participants are never pre-determined by the program, and as such theDREAM mentee demographics largely reflect the school demographics. At Austin High School(AHS), African Americans and Hispanics make up, on average, 96% of the participants in
engineering management curriculum offers innovative courses in technicalmarketing, high tech product strategy, fast cycle time product development & launch, andengineering entrepreneurship. In these case study courses, students develop real world marketingand business plans for commercializing innovative new products and technologies. Some of theinnovative product development and technology commercialization ideas have won accolades atregional business idea pitching competitions.All students in the Florida Tech College of Engineering must participate in a senior designprogram. The intensive undergraduate engineering programs at the university have resulted in anumber of outstanding crossfunctional Senior Design Projects. The Senior Design program
system. A six-level system would be A through F withoutplusses or minuses. Grading levels may be easier to design using a numerical scale, for example,four-level grading system is 1-4 and a ten-level grading system is 1-10. For simple questions,having two levels (all right/all wrong or pass/fail) is sufficient. For more complex questions,there are more opportunities for students to make errors and more levels are needed to accuratelygauge assessment. In general, the grading process is faster with fewer grading levels.In large classes, dealing with grading complaints after the exam can be time-consuming andfrustrating. Giving a small amount of points for trying to solve a larger problem, instead of zero,can reduce the complaints. It has little
diverse students at UCSD by serving on the faculty advisory board for the IDEA Student Center. Her research is focused on engagement strategies for large classrooms and the development of K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering. Page 26.1595.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Tracking Student Engagement with a Touchscreen App for Spatial Visualization Training and Freehand SketchingAbstractThe Spatial Visualization Trainer (SVT) App was developed for an iPad to enable students tofreehand sketch isometrics and orthographic projections. The App consists of
essential for crafting practical microlearning elements. Relying solely on the video lecture transcript would be inadequate for producing comprehensive microlearning materials such as programming quizzes or explanations of formulas.It is imperative to conduct manual checks on the generated microlearning content to ensure itsquality and accuracy before making it available to students. The generated content can beutilized in subsequent semesters or as training data to refine the AI tool’s capabilities ingenerating different educational materials in future iterations.PromptA prompt is an instruction given to a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, enablingthe tool to perform a specific task. The efficacy and relevance of an
students’ability to identify issues and present well-reasoned positions in response to open-ended questionsand scenarios. Semi-qualitative measures of learning included tracking of the proportion ofissues spotted, occurrence and proportion of properly used terminology, and length of response.In addition to evaluation of student performance, an external evaluator assessed the effectivenessof the program at the end of each semester. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were usedto determine the project’s success at meeting its intended outcomes. Qualitative data wascollected through focus groups led by the evaluator and feedback sessions convened after eachproblem solution. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-program content
peak your interest in working to identify potential engineering leaders during the recruiting process? How should these experiences or programs be described through the recruiting process? 6. How would you classify your company: public/private, large/medium/small? 7. May we contact you if we have any further questions? Please list email: __________________________
self-assessments assist in fullyunderstanding the realized benefits of ETW.II. ETW OrganizationHow is ETW organized? ETW is a one-week short course (Figure 1) providing seminars on thebasics of excellent teaching (using Lowman5 and Wankat and Oreovicz6), demonstrations ofeffective teaching, laboratory exercises requiring the participants to teach lessons followed bygroup assessment, and discussions on how to apply the presented techniques in differentuniversity settings (laboratory, large classrooms, auditoriums, or seminar groups, etc.).The most critical and transformational part of ETW is the opportunity to learn new techniques,then practice them in the three classes presented by each participant. Team members assume therole of students
experience wherestudents from each of the participating institutions worked collaboratively in support of theoverall research project. To enhance the students’ education, they spent several weeks in afocused experience at two of the universities with visits to the others. The intent was to broadentheir perspectives on the operations at different schools and promote interest in graduate schoolwhile learning about product platform planning. We describe the structure of the program alongwith the activities undertaken by the students. We also include an assessment of the program bythe students and plans for improving our future offering of this program.NomenclatureBOM Bill of MaterialsDSM Design Structure MatrixEBOM Enhanced Bill of
.[16] Jensen, M. J. and J. L. Schlegel, “Implementing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Design Project in an Introductory Engineering Course,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2017, Columbus, OH.[17] Wilczynski, V., Zinter III, J., & L. Wilen, “Teaching Engineering Design in an Academic Makerspace: Blending Theory and Practice to Solve Client-based Problems,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2016, New Orleans, LA.[18] A. Gerhart & D. Carpenter, “Creativity, Innovation, and Ingenuity Summer Enrichment Program: Collaborating with a Cultural Institution and Assessment Results
encouraged to explore a range of possibleinternships. With the approval of the program director, each student makes a commitment for asummer role which will contribute to advancing technical innovation in a real organization.Because each internship is also anticipated to have educational value, the program provides asupporting structure to help each internship experience become a student’s “ultimate elective”.Since the launch of the program, formal and informal assessments of each student’s learningfrom their own internship have been integrated into the program curriculum as part of theprogram design. Initially, learning assessment was primarily from written journal entries and afinal paper of accomplishments and reflections. In recent years
Motors Fort Wayne AssemblyPlant, Zimmer Biomet, Fort Wayne Metals, PHD, Inc., Franklin Electric, WarerFurnaceInternational, Inc., and a large number of small engineering and manufacturing companies.Because of this, our mechanical engineering program began seeking the involvement of theselocal industries.. This was accomplished by writing to these industries in the area and by makingplant visits to discuss the possibility of having the company supply and sponsor a project for aproblem that needs solving. A good percentage of our own mechanical engineering studentswork at these companies, either as a full-time, part-time orco-op. Therefore, it was a great benefitto have students who could reach out to their employers and encourage them to supply
activities underway. Web site: http://www.spacecoastedc.org/. · Wyle Laboratories (Wyle): This large and diverse organization is committed to developing a skilled technician workforce and provides executive leadership to chair the ATAC. Wyle Labs has provided significant financial and staff support to the BCC aerospace technician program, including videotape training programs for use in the areas of security and safety – two elements that may broaden the Page 7.151.11 “Aerospace Encounter” seminar to KSC and CCAFS-wide use as a refresher training program for all employees. Web site: http://www.wylelabs.com/.Proceedings
these courses are administered by our own STS Department. Fortrue engineering design courses, the barriers to entry for H&SS faculty members are likely to bevery high in most educational settings. (We suspect the main exceptions here are where H&SSfaculty members are literally assigned those roles, including by being hired directly byengineering programs.) Using Making as Critical Inquiry to facilitate interdisciplinarycollaboration is likely to attract participation by H&SS faculty, perhaps especially those from thehumanities, by providing them a non-trivial role in the assessment and steering of student work.In terms of facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration around design among engineering andH&SS faculty members, or
first is a web application thatsupports an NSF funded curriculum development project. The second is a channelsupported by the uPortal portal system that automates the department’s graduateadmissions process and is deployed on the university’s IT portal system. The third is anapplication that integrates a Course Management System, Blackboard, with an outcomesbased assessment tool, True Outcomes, to automate the importing of student information tobetter measure outcomes for ABET accreditation. The fourth project is a linguisticsanalysis tool that finds word usage patterns in media articles.1 IntroductionOne of the program characteristics that ABET expects in engineering and technologyprograms that it accredits is the inclusion of some type of
, leaving the majority of their time available for learning duringout-of-school time4. Over the past twenty years, a growing number of informal programs havebeen created to take advantage of this opportunity while addressing the need to increaseparticipation in science and engineering. In addition to large blocks of time, these informalprograms have other unique benefits over formal schooling. Informal learning experiences offerlow-stakes assessments and a greater variety of topics to explore (school curricula tends to focusnarrowly on math and literacy due to testing policies). They have also been shown to moredeeply engage participants, better encourage direct interaction with real-world phenomena, andbuild on prior knowledge and interests5
in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with XRoads Research Group, the Global Engineering Program and the Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Effectiveness. He received a Bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Florida State University and a Master’s degree in environmental engineering from Purdue University.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the
qualitativedirected content analysis of two interviews and four focus groups, as 13 student participantsdiscuss their learning experiences within their engineering programs in the Faculty ofEngineering at the University of Manitoba, a large research university in Central Canada.Students’ lifelong learning aptitudes, which are defined in this study by Deakin Crick Et al.’sseven Dimensions of Learning Power, are evidenced in the data, demonstrating both the capacityof, and the means by which to assess this attribute while students are in our programs.Additionally, we can use students’ developing competencies in lifelong learning to improve ourown understanding of how students transform into becoming engineers. This paper makes a casefor keeping lifelong